scholarly journals Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-153
Author(s):  
Ni Kadek Sofia Arianti ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Electronic Media ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Electronic Signatures ◽  
Procedural Law

This research is motivated by the development of technology playing an important role in the establishment of companies in various regions in the territory of the archipelago, namely the Republic of Indonesia, one of which is a Limited Liability Company. This study aims to determine the arrangement of electronic signatures in the General Meeting of Shareholders of Limited Liability Companies and to find out the legal consequences of the signatures conducted electronically in the deed of decree of the General Meeting of Shareholders of Limited Liability Companies. The method used in this research is the normative research approach is legislation. Then, the data that has been analyzed are presented in an informal form, through the words described in paragraphs. The results of this study address that the regulation of electronic signatures in the deed of the decision of the decision of the general meeting of shareholders of the Limited Liability Company through tracing and transformation according to structured translation by reasoning based on logic that electronic information or electronic documents and / or printouts can be used as evidence legal law, which is also an expansion of legal legal evidence based on the provisions of article 11 jo. Article 5 of the Law. Therefore, the evidence according to the procedural law above made in the form of electronic information or electronic documents, is valid evidence under the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, so that all electronic transactions that utilize electronic media produce electronic signatures that are loaded on the deed of determination of the results of the GMS decision, the Limited Liability Company can be considered as a deed. Then, due to the legal signature that was carried out through electronic media the outcome of the determination of the GMS had a legal impact on the legalization status of the deed which according to the relevant Act was declared valid insofar as the deed was seen as a deed under the hand.

scholarly journals TO OVERCOME THE CONSTRAINTS OF PROOF IN THE APPLICATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-110
Author(s):  
Dewi Asimah
Keyword(s):  
Proof System ◽  
Electronic Systems ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Electronic Signatures ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Valid Evidence

The existence of electronic information and / or electronic documents has been recognized as valid evidence which is an extension of the evidence in the Procedure Law that applies in Indonesia provided that the electronic information and / or electronic documents use electronic systems in accordance with the provisions stipulated in Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. However, despite the ITE Law as well as several other regulations, it cannot be said that the Indonesian Procedural Law has stipulated electronic evidence in evidence, because the regulation of electronic evidence is in the realm of material law. Proof using electronic evidence at the trial has debates such as the examination of witnesses using the teleconference in the case of BULOG and marriage /consent qobul conducted different countries. Besides there are several other obstacles such as 1. Authentication of electronic evidence 2. Procedures for showing the instrument electronic evidence and 3. Electronic signatures. Responding to these constraints, the renewal of the procedural law must be carried out immediately by including the electronic evidence and changing the evidence system from a closed proof system to an open proof system, in order to accommodate the development of evidence, especially electronic evidence.

scholarly journals Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik Berkaitan Dengan Kontrak Kerjasama

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Maslikan Maslikan ◽  
Sukarmi Sukarmi
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Business Entities

AbstrakDalam pasal 1 ayat (1) UU No 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, Notaris  adalah pejabat umum yang berwenang untuk membuat akta otentik dan kewenangan lainnya sebagaimana dimaksud dalam undang-undang ini. Salah satu kewenangan notaris adalah membuat akta otentik, dimana hal tersebut sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam pasal 15 UU No 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.Hal ini penulis mencoba menelaah kewenangan notaris dalam pembuatan akta otentik berkaitan dengan kontrak kerjasama.Peneitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normative, dimana pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual.Akta-akta yang dibuat oleh Notaris misalnya pedirian Perseroan Terbatas (PT), perubahan dan risalah umum pemegang saham, pendirian yayasan, pendirian bahan usaha-badan usaha lainnya, kuasa untuk menjual, perjanjian sewa menyewa, perjanjian jual beli, keterangan hak waris, wasiat, pendirian CV termasuk perubahannya, pengakuan utang, perjanjian kredit dan dan pemberian hak tanggungan, perjanjian kerjasama, kontrak kerja, segala bentuk perjanjian yang tidak dikecualikan kepada pejabat lain, oleh sebab itu akta yang berkaitan dengan kontrak kerjasama mutlak merupakan wewenang oleh sorang Notaris untuk membuat akta otentik tersebutKata Kunci : kewenangan notaris, akta otentik, kontrak kerjasama AbstractIn article 1 paragraph (1) of Law No 30 Year 2004 concerning Notary Public, Notary is a public official authorized to make authentic deed and other authority as referred to in this law. One of the authority of a notary is to make an authentic deed, which is in accordance with the provisions of Article 15 of Law No 30 Year 2004 regarding Notary Position.This author tries to examine the authority of notary in making authentic deed related to cooperation contract. This research uses normative law research method, where the research approach used is the approach of legislation and conceptual approach.Notarial deeds made by a Notary, such as the establishment of a Limited Liability Company (PT), general shareholder changes and minutes, establishment of foundations, establishment of materials of other business entities, authorization to sell, lease agreements, sale and purchase agreements, inheritance rights, , the establishment of the CV including amendments, recognition of debts, credit agreements and the granting of mortgages, cooperation agreements, contracts of employment, all forms of agreements not excluded to other officials, therefore deeds relating to the contract of cooperation are absolutely authorized by a Notary to make the authentic deedKeywords: notary authority, authentic deed, cooperation contract

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Saham Minoritas Perseroan Terbatas Tertutup dan Keadilan Berdasar Pancasila

SASI ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
Mustaqim Mustaqim ◽  
Agus Satory
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Voting Rights ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Minority Shareholders ◽  
Full Control

Legal protection for the majority shareholders is sufficiently guaranteed, especially through the mechanism of the RUPS, but this is not the case for minority shareholders, thus creating an injustice problem for minority shareholders. The purpose of this study is to uncover and find out legal protection for minority shareholders in a limited liability company based on Pancasila justice. This research is normative juridical so it uses secondary data with the law approach and qualitative data analysis. The results showed that the General Meeting of Shareholders did not reflect legal protection for minority shareholders, because in every decision making through the General Meeting of Shareholders and various other decisions based on the attendance quorum about the majority of votes present at the General Meeting of Shareholders. Such matter is detrimental to the interests of minority shareholders because without the presence of minority shareholders, a General Meeting of Shareholders can be held, while minority shareholders also have the same rights and obligations and responsibilities. The majority of shareholders hold a large and full control over the company, resulting in minority shareholders, there is no guarantee to get justice based on Pancasila justice. Therefore, the General Meeting of Shareholders must be held if attended by all shareholders with voting rights present or represented. If this is not the case, the results of the General Meeting of Shareholders may be canceled.

scholarly journals KEBERADAAN PEMEGANG SAHAM DALAM RUPS DENGAN SISTEM TELECONFERENCE TERKAIT JARINGAN BERMASALAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF CYBER LAW

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Company Law ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
Network Problem ◽  
Network Problems ◽  
Cyber Law ◽  
Internet Network ◽  
Legal Right

In Indonesia, the General meeting of Shareholder through teleconference mechanism can be conducted under the provision of Article 77 of Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company. This teleconferencing mechanism allows all participants to see and to hear each other as well as  to participate in the teleconference meeting. There is legal vacuum with regard to position of shareholders in the General Meeting by teleconference mechanism, especially in the case of network problems. However, by analogy with the legal construct of the provisions of Article 90 of the Company Law can be stated that the position of shareholders continues to be recognized as a legal subject who has legal right and has valid votes counted even if the minutes of the meeting have not been signed electronically because internet network problem as long as treatise or the minute of General Meeting of shareholders is made by notarial deed and shall be signed by the Notary who made the deed.

scholarly journals Dynamic stereotype and its role in written language diagnostics

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 113-119
Author(s):  
Valery Shepitko
Keyword(s):  
Written Language ◽  
Forensic Linguistics ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Important Place ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Electronic Signatures ◽  
Electronic Information Resources ◽  
New Directions ◽  
E Mail

The article is devoted to the role of a dynamic stereotype in the diagnosis of writ­ten speech. Author paid attention to: 1 global processes in the exchange of information between people; 2 changes in the tool base for the texts writing; 3 the usage of electronic documents and electronic signatures; 4 the exchange of e-mail messages. The study of the written language in criminalistics is carried out within the framework of forensic handwriting examination judicial handwriting and forensic linguistics. The dynamic stereo­type took the important place in these branches of criminalistic techniques – the neuro­physiological basis of skills, a definite integral system of conditioned reflex reactions.­The dynamic stereotype is also typical for various modern ways of performing texts including using of electronic information resources. Reader attention is focused on new directions in the diagnostic examination of written texts, the formation of forensic crim­inalistic linguistics and psycholinguistics, as well as the development of psycholinguistic study of texts for identification purposes.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Kredit Macet dengan Benda Jaminan Fidusia yang Dipalsukan (Studi Kasus: PT. BPR. Ulatidana Rahayu)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 222-227
Author(s):  
Ni Made Sintia Tarisa ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Motor Vehicles ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Credit Guarantees ◽  
Legal Subjects ◽  
Statutory Regulation ◽  
Legal Consequences

An agreement is a legal action carried out by two or more people who have legal consequences for the rights and obligations of the makers. The agreement involves at least 2 or more people. In addition to individuals, the parties to the agreement may also consist of legal entities. Limited Liability Company (PT) is a legal entity that is one of the parties or both of them in the agreement. Both are legal subjects who can carry out legal actions and carry out their rights and obligations. Referring to the above problems, this study was conducted with the aim of describing how the legal protection of bank creditors in granting credit with fiduciary collateral objects falsified and how the legal consequences if the debtor commits the fraud of the BPKB (certificate of ownership of motor vehicles) credit guarantee. This research was designed using an empirical research approach. The results of this study indicated that the legal protection of bank creditors in falsifying collateral loans with fiduciary collateral objects is regulated in articles 1131 and 1132 of the Civil Code. Other legal protection given to creditors is preventive legal protection which is legal protection to prevent disputes and in this case concerning the rights and obligations of creditors. Another result of this research is the debtor who falsified the collateral object or the BPKB of the vehicle that was used for credit guarantees was used in article 263 of the Criminal Code with the threat of a maximum prison sentence of six years. So, legal protection and sanctions to creditors and debtors, if a problem occurs is regulated in statutory regulation.

scholarly journals View at the Partner’s Transfer of the Stake and its Restrictions

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-140
Author(s):  
Adriána Palajová
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Commercial Code ◽  
Commercial Company ◽  
Material Conditions ◽  
Business Share

Abstract This article deals with the transfer of stake in a general commercial company and the transfer of business share in a limited liability company especially according to Slovak legislation and also according to older and current Czech legislation. The attention is focused on the regulation of these transfers and the relations that are generated on the basis of author´s point of view and case law. The question of the admissibility and prohibition of the transfer of stake is presented in general commercial company. Analysis of the issue focuses mainly on the formal and material conditions of transfer of business share in limited liability company with differentiation on another member and on third party. Special attention is paid to the consent to that transfer granted by the general meeting or by other body of limited liability company and also is paid to the legal consequences that arise in the case of withholding of consent. The authoress seeks to point at the shortcomings of assessed legal arrangement and provides possible legislative solutions of transfer of stake or business share within the dispositive provisions of the Slovak Commercial Code.

scholarly journals PEMBAJAKAN KARYA LAGU MELALUI APLIKASI DI PLAYSTORE MENURUT PERSPEKTIF HAK CIPTA (TAXATION OF SONG WORKS THROUGH THE APPLICATION ON PLAYSTORE BY COPYRIGHT PERSPECTIVE)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-32
Author(s):  
Aditya Suud ◽  
Suherman Suherman
Keyword(s):  
Computer Program ◽  
Digital Computer ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Electronic Media ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Research Type ◽  
Secondary Materials

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami bagaimana bentukperlindungan hokum terhadap tersangka pada pembajakan hak cipta melaluiaplikasi di Indonesia. Khususnya terhadap karya cipta digital programcomputer dalam bentuk bentuk aplikasi yang berisi dokumen elektronikberupa karya cipta lagu atau musik milik orang lain yang kemudian dipublikasikan di salah satu aplikasi bernama Playstore. Penelitian inimenggunakan jenis penelitian Yuridis-Normatif dengan melakukanpendekatan peraturan perundang- undangan (statute approach) danpendekatan konseptual (konseptual approach). Pengumpulan data daribahan sekunder dilakukan dengan metode kepustakaan dan dianalisamenggunakan metode kualitatif dan melakukan analisis yuridis. Hasilpenelitian ini adalah di Indonesia belum ada aturan khusus mengenaipembajakan lagu melalui media daring atau Internet digital maka UU No. 28Tahun 2014 mengenai Hak Cipta dapat menjangkau hal tersebut denganmenggunakan dasar seperti yang telah dijelaskan diatas yaitu dapat dikaitkandengan pasal 32 Jo.pasal 48 UU No. 19 Tahun 2016 mengenai Informasi DanTransaksi Elektronik walaupun kejahatan yang dilakukan adalah mengenaipelanggaran hak orang lain yaitu Hak Cipta. Hal tersebut juga disebabkan olehkonsep yang belum tepat mengenai pengaturan pembajakan dalam mediainternet atau elektronik. Konsep yang diperlukan ini adalah denganmendirikan badan baru yang menjembatani dua aturan yang berbeda makahal ini akan menjadikan penanganan mengenai pelanggaran pembajakanmelalui aplikasi Playstore akan lebih jelas kewenangan mengadili daripermasalahan tersebut.Kata kunci: Hak cipta; Dokumen elektronik; Analisis yuridis; Mediadaring; Media elektronikBorneo Law Review : Vol.5 No.1 Juni 2021 17ABSTRACTThis study aims to find out and understand how the form of legal protection against suspects in copyright piracy through applications in Indonesia. Especially for digital computer program copyrights in the form of applications containing electronic documents in the form of songwriting or music belonging to other people which are then published in an application called Playstore. This study uses a juridical-normative research type by applying a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Collecting data from secondary materials was carried out using literature methods and analyzed using qualitative methods. The result of this research is that in Indonesia there are no specific rules regarding pirating songs through online media or digital Internet. 28 of 2014 regarding Copyright can reach this by using the basis as described above, which can be linked to article 32 Jo. Article 48 of Law no. 19 of 2016 regarding Electronic Information and Transactions even though the crime committed was regarding the violation of the rights of others, namely Copyright. This is also due to the inaccurate concept of regulating piracy in internet or electronic media. The concept needed is to establish a new agency that bridges two different rules, so this will make handling of piracy violations through the Playstore application clearer in the authority to judge these problems.Keywords : Copyright; Electro

scholarly journals Analysis of Validity Decisions General Meeting of Shareholders Limited Liability Company in Circulation

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 356
Author(s):  
Nanang Nurcahyo ◽  
Yudho Taruno M
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Validity ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Share Ownership ◽  
Limited Company ◽  
Made In

The General Meeting of Shareholders (AGM) held by the company is an important organ in taking various policies in the company. The GMS in practice is set forth in an authentic deed made before a notary and or made in minutes of meetings in the form of a deed under the hand, and then the deed is set forth in the form of an authentic deed and this practice is known as the deed of the decision of the meeting. In this context, the responsibility of a notary in making the deed of declaration of decision of general meeting of shareholders of circular limited company should be studied further, since a Notary is a public official who has authority to make authentic deed of all acts, agreements and stipulations ordered by general regulations or requested by the parties making the deed. Notary as a public official in every execution of his duties should not be out of the "signs" that have been regulated by the applicable law. Based on the results of research can be concluded that the making of Deed of Shareholders General Meeting of Shareholders which made in circulation has been regulated in Law Number 40 Year 2007 and has been allowed, so have legal validity and strength. However, in the verdict the judge has overturned the ruling of the general meeting which was made in circulation regarding the transfer of ownership of the shares, because the judge considered that in making the decision there is one element that has not been completed, namely the signature of several parties. With the cancellation of the decision, it will affect the return of share ownership from the defendant to be returned to the party, and this also affects the notary who participated in making the deed of decision of the general meeting that the notary is required to obey and comply with the stipulated decision.

Akibat Hukum Surat Pertanggungjawaban Laporan Tahunan Yang Tidak Ditandatangani Oleh Seluruh Dewan Komisaris

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-143
Author(s):  
Atika Wulan Dari ◽  
Busyra Azheri ◽  
Yussy Adelina Mannas
Keyword(s):  
Annual Report ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Company Law ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Consequence ◽  
A Company ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The purpose of this study is to analyze how the legal consequences of the annual report accountability letter were not signed by the entire Board of Commissioners of a limited liability company by looking at the case of PT. Garuda Indonesia Tbk which occurred in 2019. Where in that case there was a rejection by 2 (two) Commissioners from PT. Garuda Indonesia Tbk to sign the annual report at the General Meeting of Shareholders. The nature of this research uses normative research, namely by reviewing laws and regulations, as well as company case reports. Based on this case, the function of company organs in charge of supervising a company is not going well. The case shows that this organ does not carry out its supervisory function in accordance with Article 108 of the Limited Liability Company Law. The legal consequence in this case is the imposition of fines on the organ of the company that signs the annual report. This is a consequence of the collegiality of the responsibility of the Board of Commissioners in a limited liability company.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document