scholarly journals TO OVERCOME THE CONSTRAINTS OF PROOF IN THE APPLICATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-110
Author(s):  
Dewi Asimah
Keyword(s):  
Proof System ◽  
Electronic Systems ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Electronic Signatures ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Valid Evidence

The existence of electronic information and / or electronic documents has been recognized as valid evidence which is an extension of the evidence in the Procedure Law that applies in Indonesia provided that the electronic information and / or electronic documents use electronic systems in accordance with the provisions stipulated in Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. However, despite the ITE Law as well as several other regulations, it cannot be said that the Indonesian Procedural Law has stipulated electronic evidence in evidence, because the regulation of electronic evidence is in the realm of material law. Proof using electronic evidence at the trial has debates such as the examination of witnesses using the teleconference in the case of BULOG and marriage /consent qobul conducted different countries. Besides there are several other obstacles such as 1. Authentication of electronic evidence 2. Procedures for showing the instrument electronic evidence and 3. Electronic signatures. Responding to these constraints, the renewal of the procedural law must be carried out immediately by including the electronic evidence and changing the evidence system from a closed proof system to an open proof system, in order to accommodate the development of evidence, especially electronic evidence.

scholarly journals Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-153
Author(s):  
Ni Kadek Sofia Arianti ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Electronic Media ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Electronic Signatures ◽  
Procedural Law

This research is motivated by the development of technology playing an important role in the establishment of companies in various regions in the territory of the archipelago, namely the Republic of Indonesia, one of which is a Limited Liability Company. This study aims to determine the arrangement of electronic signatures in the General Meeting of Shareholders of Limited Liability Companies and to find out the legal consequences of the signatures conducted electronically in the deed of decree of the General Meeting of Shareholders of Limited Liability Companies. The method used in this research is the normative research approach is legislation. Then, the data that has been analyzed are presented in an informal form, through the words described in paragraphs. The results of this study address that the regulation of electronic signatures in the deed of the decision of the decision of the general meeting of shareholders of the Limited Liability Company through tracing and transformation according to structured translation by reasoning based on logic that electronic information or electronic documents and / or printouts can be used as evidence legal law, which is also an expansion of legal legal evidence based on the provisions of article 11 jo. Article 5 of the Law. Therefore, the evidence according to the procedural law above made in the form of electronic information or electronic documents, is valid evidence under the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, so that all electronic transactions that utilize electronic media produce electronic signatures that are loaded on the deed of determination of the results of the GMS decision, the Limited Liability Company can be considered as a deed. Then, due to the legal signature that was carried out through electronic media the outcome of the determination of the GMS had a legal impact on the legalization status of the deed which according to the relevant Act was declared valid insofar as the deed was seen as a deed under the hand.

scholarly journals Dynamic stereotype and its role in written language diagnostics

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 113-119
Author(s):  
Valery Shepitko
Keyword(s):  
Written Language ◽  
Forensic Linguistics ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Important Place ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Electronic Signatures ◽  
Electronic Information Resources ◽  
New Directions ◽  
E Mail

The article is devoted to the role of a dynamic stereotype in the diagnosis of writ­ten speech. Author paid attention to: 1 global processes in the exchange of information between people; 2 changes in the tool base for the texts writing; 3 the usage of electronic documents and electronic signatures; 4 the exchange of e-mail messages. The study of the written language in criminalistics is carried out within the framework of forensic handwriting examination judicial handwriting and forensic linguistics. The dynamic stereo­type took the important place in these branches of criminalistic techniques – the neuro­physiological basis of skills, a definite integral system of conditioned reflex reactions.­The dynamic stereotype is also typical for various modern ways of performing texts including using of electronic information resources. Reader attention is focused on new directions in the diagnostic examination of written texts, the formation of forensic crim­inalistic linguistics and psycholinguistics, as well as the development of psycholinguistic study of texts for identification purposes.

scholarly journals Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Hukum Sertipikat Tanah Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata

Widya Bhumi ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24
Author(s):  
Dian Dewi Khasanah
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Paper ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Analog To Digital ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Court Proceedings

The role of electronic evidence, namely electronic certificates as part of electronic documents in civil cases, is still questionable. The presence of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, which is the legal umbrella for the validity of electronic certificates, apparently still raises pros and cons, even in the eyes of law enforcers, therefore more specific regulations are needed so that the validity and strength of proof of electronic certificates are no longer questioned in court proceedings, especially civil cases. Electronic certificate or also known as electronic land certificate as one of the products from The Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency which is currently being discussed will implement a media transfer process from analog to digital form. For this reason, it is necessary to prepare further regarding regulations to regulate how the later position and strength of evidence from electronic land certificates in Civil Procedure Law as an extension of evidence in civil cases. The method used in writing this scientific paper is legal research with the socio-legal method, namely by normatively examining the regulations regarding the Information dan Electronic Transaction of law in which have been used in civil proceedings in court and by looking at the existing norms and responses that are developing in the community. In the provisions of Article 6 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, an electronic document is considered valid if it is accessible, displayable, assured as to its integrity, and accountable. However, because it does not have perfect evidentiary power, it is necessary to accelerate the discussion of the Draft Civil Procedure Law, so that electronic land certificates as part of electronic documents have perfect evidentiary power in court, especially in civil cases.Keywords: Electronic Land Certificate, Evidence, Civil Procedure Law Intisari: Peran alat bukti elektronik yaitu sertipikat elektronik sebagai bagian dari dokumen elektronik dalam perkara perdata sampai saat ini masih dipertanyakan keabsahannya. Kehadiran UU ITE yang menjadi payung hukum dari keabsahan sertipikat elektronik rupanya masih menimbulkan pro dan kontra, bah­kan di mata penegak hukum, oleh karenanya dibutuhkan regulasi yang lebih spesifik agar keab­sahan dan kekuatan pembuktian dari sertipikat elektronik tidak lagi dipertanyakan dalam beracara di pengadilan khususnya perkara perdata. Sertipikat elektronik atau dapat juga disebut sertipikat tanah elektronik sebagai salah satu produk dari Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/ Badan Pertanahan Nasional (ATR/BPN) yang saat ini sedang diwacanakan akan diberlakukan atau akan dilaksanakan proses alih media dari bentuk analog ke bentuk digital. Untuk itu perlu dipersiapkan lebih lanjut menge­nai regulasi untuk mengatur bagaimana nantinya kedudukan dan kekuatan pembuktian dari sertipikat tanah elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Perdata sebagai perluasan alat bukti pada perkara perdata. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan karya ilmiah ini adalah penelitian hukum dengan metode sosio legal, yaitu dengan mengkaji secara yuridis normatif berbagai ketentuan perundang-undangan dan pengaturan mengenai dokumen elektronik yang selama ini dapat digunakan dalam beracara secara perdata di pengadilan serta dengan melihat norma dan respon yang ada dan berkem­bang di tengah masyarakat. Dalam ketentuan Pasal 6 UU ITE, suatu dokumen elektronik dianggap sah apabila dapat diakses, ditampilkan, dijamin keutuhannya, dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Namun karena belum memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna, maka perlu segera dipercepat pemba­hasan mengenai Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata, agar sertipikat tanah elektronik sebagai bagian dari dokumen elektronik memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna di muka pengadilan khususnya perkara perdata.Kata Kunci: Sertipikat Tanah Elektronik, Pembuktian, Hukum Acara Perdata

scholarly journals KEBIJAKAN PERLUASAN ALAT BUKTI HUKUM ACARA PIDANADALAM UPAYA MEWUJUDKAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM BERKEADILAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
Ani Triwati ◽  
A. Heru Nuswanto ◽  
Endah Pujiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Electronic Document ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Witness Statements ◽  
Article 5

<em>One of the renewal of legal instruments in criminal procedural law is the expansion of evidence ie electronic information and / or electronic document and / or its printed outcome. Arrangement of evidence in criminal procedural law in Indonesia pursuant to Article 184 KUHAP, Article 5 paragraph (1) and (2) and Article 44 letter of Information and Electronic Transaction Act, covering witness statements, expert information, letters, instructions, defendants, electronic information and / or electronic documents and / or prints. The decision of the Constitutional Court Number 20 / PUU-XIV / 2016 that for electronic information and / or electronic document as evidence is done in the framework of law enforcement at the request of the police, prosecutor and / or other law enforcement institutions determined by law. Electronic information and / or electronic documents as evidence must be obtained in accordance with the provisions of Article 31 paragraph (3) of the Information and Electronic Transactions Act, this relates to the value of legal certainty and the value of justice for the litigant</em>

scholarly journals PENEMUAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM MELALUI PEMBUKTIAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM MENGADILI DAN MEMUTUS SENGKETA PERDATA

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-102
Author(s):  
Efa Laela Fakhriah
Keyword(s):  
Documentary Evidence ◽  
Electronic Trading ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Law System ◽  
Legal Evidence ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Modern Business ◽  
Witness Statement ◽  
Legal Discovery

ABSTRAKBerdasarkan sistem hukum acara perdata yang berlaku, hakim terikat pada alat-alat bukti yang sah, yang berarti bahwa hakim hanya boleh menjatuhkan putusan berdasarkan alat-alat bukti yang ditentukan oleh undang-undang saja sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 164 HIR. Di samping itu juga alat bukti pemeriksaan setempat sebagaimana dan keterangan saksi ahli Hukum pembuktian yang berlaku saat ini, secara formal belum mengakomodasi dokumen elektronik sebagai alat bukti, sedangkan dalam praktiknya di masyarakat melalui transaksi perdagangan secara elektronik, alat bukti elektronik sudah banyak digunakan, terutama dalam transaksi bisnis modern. Tulisan ini menghasilkan simpulan bahwa dalam hal memeriksa perkara yang pembuktiannya menggunakan bukti-bukti bersifat elektronik, karena hukum acara perdata (HIR) sebagai hukum formil tidak mengaturnya, maka hakim dapat mendasarkan pembuktian pada hukum materiil yang juga mengatur tentang hukum acara, dalam hal ini Undang-undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik atau Undang-undang Dokumen Perusahaan. Akan tetapi seandainya pun tidak ada peraturan materil yang mengatur tentang bukti elektronik sebagai alat bukti yang sah dipersidangan, atau hakim tidak mau mendasarkan pembuktian pada hukum materiil, hakim dapat melakukan penemuan hukum dengan cara analogi atau penafsiran hukum terhadap bukti yang bersifat elektronik agar dapat digunakan sebagai alat bukti di persidangan sebagaimana halnya alat bukti yang diatur dalam hukum acara perdata.Kata kunci: bukti elektronik; pembuktian; penemuan hukum. ABSTRACTAccording to the Civil Procedural Law system, the judges were bound to the legal evidences, which meant that the judges might only impose the verdict based on legal evidences which determined by the law as stated in Article 164 HIR for instances: documentary evidence, witness’ statement, allegation, recognition, and oath. In addition, the local inspection as legal evidence was also regulated in Article 153 HIR, and the expert statement stipulated in Article 154 HIR. The current of evidentiary law, was not accommodating electronic documents yet as legal evidence, while in fact electronic trading transactions among societies needed electronic evidence had been widely used, especially in modern business transactions. The problem was how the judge conducted a legal discovery in giving verdict in lawsuit dispute which was handled to use electronic evidence as legal evidence, in the other hand, according to the Civil Procedural Law system stated that evidentiary was legitimate when done using the evidence that had been determined/regulated in the Civil Procedural Regulation.Keywords: electronic evidence; evidentiary; legal discovery.

scholarly journals Analysis of Electronic Evidence as an Evidence Tools in Criminal Case Post Decision of Constitutional Court Number: 20/PUU-XVI/ 2016

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 770
Author(s):  
Manshur Manshur ◽  
Rodliyah Rodliyah ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Valid Evidence

The position of electronic evidence after the enactment of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, in cases of criminal acts of Information and Electronic Transactions it is as separate evidence, namely electronic evidence which is an extension of the types of valid evidence stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code while in cases outside criminal acts of Information and Electronic Transactions, electronic evidence is only located as evidence. The strength of evidence from electronic evidence obtained is not in the context of law enforcement and not at the request of law enforcement officials after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 20/PUU-XIV/2016 is not having the power of proof both as evidence and evidence except electronic evidence that is public.

scholarly journals CULTURAL DEVELOPMENTS IN ELECTRONIC LAW ENFORCEMENT IN CRIMINAL ACTS OF THEORY IN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusep Mulyana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Legal Evidence ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
Material Requirements

The culture of proving electronic evidence in law enforcement of criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia is Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions ("UU ITE") which provides a legal basis for the legal culture of electronic and formal evidence and material. requirements for electronic evidence to be accepted in court. Electronic Evidence is Electronic Information and/or Electronic Documents that meet the formal requirements and material requirements stipulated in the ITE Law. Article 5 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law stipulates that Electronic Information and/or Electronic Documents and/or their printouts are legal evidence. The implementation of the regulation of electronic evidence in law enforcement of criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia is the use of evidence in the form of wiretapping and video recordings which were actually applied in the 2002 Bali Bombing Case. 1 of 2002 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism. Despite the controversy, the Public Prosecutor emphasized that the reading of the statements of witnesses from Malaysia and Singapore who were unable to attend the trial was legal because it was in accordance with the description of the evidence in the law. The same is regulated in the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions. Article 5 states that electronic information and/or printed electronic information are legal evidence and have legal consequences. Of course, electronic information is declared valid if it uses an electronic system in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI PERJANJIAN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-96
Author(s):  
Leonard Parulian
Keyword(s):  
Communication Networks ◽  
Business Processes ◽  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Electronic Document ◽  
Electronic Signature ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Electronic Signatures ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
Procedural Law

ABSTRACTOne form of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 that we can recognize in everyday life is electronic commerce, namely the use of communication networks and computers to carry out business processes that are agreed upon and carried out by the parties and set forth in electronic agreements/contracts. The electronic agreement/contract is carried out on the basis of trust obtained by providing legal recognition of electronic written form in the form of an electronic signature. If there is a broken promise/default by one of the parties entering into an electronic agreement/contract with electronic document evidence signed with electronic signature as evidence, then it must be known carefully the strength of the evidence of electronic agreement on the electronic document and the method of settling the civil dispute.This study aimed to examine and analyze the strength of the evidence of electronic agreements on authentic deeds and patterns of settlement of civil case disputes submitted by the parties with evidence in the form of electronic agreements. The study used a normative juridical method with legal and conceptual approaches and primary and secondary sources of legal material.From the results of the study it can be concluded that the strength of proof of electronic documents signed with electronic signatures is contrary to the strength of proof of authentic deeds made by or in front of public officials in charge where the deed was made or by the authorized public official. In addition, related to the recognition of electronic documents in the judicial system, there is a void in procedural law because it does not regulate electronic documents as evidence but rather electronic documents in the form of decisions or indictments as appeals for cassation requests and reconsideration.Keywords: Electronic Agreement, Electronic Signature, Authentic Deed, Evidence

scholarly journals Kedudukan Alat Bukti Website dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Terorisme (Studi Putusan Nomor 140/PID.SUS/2018/PN.JKT.SEL)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-134
Author(s):  
Gemaya Wangsa ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya
Keyword(s):  
Digital Media ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
Device Classification ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
Case Number

The development of information technology and correspondence resulted in a shift in the format of print media to digital media, so that this growth was followed by the continuation of the development of a new criminal class that rode digital media in criminal acts of terrorism. This study aims to determine the regulations for the use of website evidence and the position of using website evidence in handling terrorism crimes in case number 140 / Pid.Sus / 2018 / PN.Jkt.Sel. This research uses a normative legal exploration method whose data comes from the determination related to the use of website evidence in Article 184 of the Criminal Code. The results of the research show that the determination of the exploitation of website evidence, which when based on Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means that electronic material is not classified as an abash instructional device classification, but if it is based on statutory regulations in a special crime, the electronic evidence media has resistance as a valid evidence, this can be seen in the provisions of Article 5 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law which are reaffirmed in the provisions of Article 44 of the ITE Law. Utilization of electronic evidence in the process of evidence in court is sourced from website evidence in law enforcement for criminal acts of terrorism in the Case Number 140 / Pid.Sus / 2018 / PN.Jkt.Sel scandal. Criminal Procedure, especially Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but has a judicial guideline that the judge cannot refuse to explore and decide the matters brought against him, provided that the law is unclear or non-existent, then the judges' rules should expose the meaning of continued and continuous law in the consortium, up to the provisions as contained in the ITE Law which regulates electronic instruction instruments as valid instruction devices.

scholarly journals Kekuatan Pembuktian Fotokopi Surat yang Tidak Dapat Dicocokkan dengan Aslinya dalam Perkara Perdata

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-352
Author(s):  
Devina Puspita Sari
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
District Court ◽  
Witness Testimony ◽  
High Court ◽  
Original Letter ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Opposing Party ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Valid Evidence

The photocopy acceptable in the court if it matched with the original letter and the strength of that photocopy is the same as the original letter. However, sometimes the original letter has been lost so that it cannot be shown at trial. This paper discusses whether a photocopy that cannot be matched with the original letter can be accepted in the civil procedural law and if it can be accepted how the strength of it, then the discussion will look at the judge’s consideration in two cases related to the issue. The results of discussions are that photocopies that cannot be matched with the original letter can be accepted as evidence if the photocopy matches or is strengthened with other evidence, as the jurisprudence of Decision Nr. 112 K/Pdt/1996 and Decision Nr. 410 K/pdt/2004. The jurisprudence has been followed by similar cases, which is the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Nr. 164/Pdt.G/2004/PN.Jkt.Pst jo. Decision of The Jakarta High Court Nr. 234/Pdt/2005/PT.DKI jo. Decision of The Supreme Court Nr. 1498 K/Pdt/2006 which in this case a photocopy can be accepted because it is strengthened by the recognition of the opposing party and The Pontianak District Court Nr.52/Pdt.G/2003/PN.Ptk which received a photocopy because it was strengthened with  witness testimony. The photocopy has a free power of proof (depends on the judge’s assessment). The use and assessment of the strength of the photocopy cannot be independent, but must be linked to other valid evidence. Abstrak Fotokopi surat dapat diterima dalam persidangan apabila dapat dicocokkan dengan aslinya, dan kekuatan pembuktiannya sama seperti surat aslinya. Tulisan ini membahas, dalam hal surat aslinya tidak dapat ditunjukkan di persidangan, apakah fotokopi surat dapat diterima dalam pembuktian hukum acara perdata, dan, apabila dapat diterima, bagaimanakah kekuatan pembuktiannya. Artikel ini menunjukkan, fotokopi surat yang tidak dapat dicocokkan dengan aslinya dapat diterima sebagai alat bukti surat jika bersesuaian atau dikuatkan dengan alat bukti lain, sebagaimana Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 112 K/Pdt/1996 dan Putusan Nomor 410 K/pdt/2004 yang telah menjadi yurisprudensi. Yurisprudensi ini telah diikuti dalam perkara serupa, yaitu dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 164/Pdt.G/2004/PN.Jkt.Pst jo. Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Nomor 234/Pdt/2005/PT.DKI jo. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1498 K/Pdt/2006, di mana dalam perkara ini fotokopi surat dapat diterima karena dikuatkan dengan pengakuan pihak lawan. Demikian juga dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pontianak Nomor 52/Pdt.G/2003/PN.Ptk, yang menerima fotokopi surat yang tidak dapat dicocokkan dengan aslinya karena dikuatkan dengan alat bukti keterangan saksi. Dengan demikian, fotokopi surat memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang bebas, artinya diserahkan kepada penilaian hakim. Penggunaan dan penilaian kekuatan pembuktian fotokopi tersebut tidak dapat berdiri sendiri, tetapi harus dikaitkan dengan alat bukti lainnya yang sah.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document