scholarly journals Clinical applicability of optogenetic gene regulation

Author(s):  
Nina Wichert ◽  
Martin Witt ◽  
Thomas Scheper ◽  
Cornelia Blume

The field of optogenetics is rapidly growing in relevance and number of developed tools. Amongst other things, the optogenetic repertoire includes light-responsive ion channels and methods for gene regulation. This review will be confined to the optogenetic control of gene expression in mammalian cells as suitable models for clinical applications. Here optogenetic gene regulation might offer an excellent method for spatially and timely regulated gene and protein expression in cell therapeutic approaches. Well-known systems for gene regulation, such as the LOV-, CRY2/CIB-, PhyB/PIF-systems, as well as other, in mammalian cells not yet fully established systems will be described. Advantages and disadvantages with regard to clinical applications are outlined in detail. Among the many unanswered questions concerning the application of optogenetics, we discuss items such as the use of exogenous chromophores and their effects on the biology of the cells and methods for a gentle, but effective gene transfection method for optogenetic tools for in vivo applications.

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Mrinmoyee Majumder ◽  
Viswanathan Palanisamy

Control of gene expression is critical in shaping the pro-and eukaryotic organisms’ genotype and phenotype. The gene expression regulatory pathways solely rely on protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid interactions, which determine the fate of the nucleic acids. RNA–protein interactions play a significant role in co- and post-transcriptional regulation to control gene expression. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a diverse group of macromolecules that bind to RNA and play an essential role in RNA biology by regulating pre-mRNA processing, maturation, nuclear transport, stability, and translation. Hence, the studies aimed at investigating RNA–protein interactions are essential to advance our knowledge in gene expression patterns associated with health and disease. Here we discuss the long-established and current technologies that are widely used to study RNA–protein interactions in vivo. We also present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed in the review.


1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 7158-7167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Delva ◽  
Jean-Noël Bastie ◽  
Cécile Rochette-Egly ◽  
Radhia Kraïba ◽  
Nicole Balitrand ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Two sorts of proteins bind to, and mediate the developmental and homeostatic effects of, retinoic acid (RA): the RAR and RXR nuclear receptors, which act as ligand-dependent transcriptional regulators, and the cellular RA binding proteins (CRABPI and CRABPII). CRABPs are generally known to be implicated in the synthesis, degradation, and control of steady-state levels of RA, yet previous and recent data have indicated that they could play a role in the control of gene expression. Here we show for the first time that, both in vitro and in vivo, CRABPII is associated with RARα and RXRα in a ligand-independent manner in mammalian cells (HL-60, NB-4, and MCF-7). In the nucleus, this protein complex binds the RXR-RAR-specific response element of an RA target gene (RARE-DR5). Moreover, in the presence of retinoids that bind both the nuclear receptors and CRABPII, enhancement of transactivation by RXRα-RARα heterodimers is observed in the presence of CRABPII. Thus, CRABPII appears to be a novel transcriptional regulator involved in RA signaling.


2009 ◽  
Vol 1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Tsuchiya ◽  
Takeshi Mori ◽  
Yuki Naritomi ◽  
Jeong-Hun Kang ◽  
Daisuke Asai ◽  
...  

AbstractWe have developed new gene expression-regulating polymer that can activate transgene expression in response to target intracellular signals. Here, we tried applying sonoporation system to this gene regulation system to enhance the gene expression efficacy. Sonoporation is the method for effective gene transfection in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, the method might enhance the transfection efficiency in our polymer and realize an efficient and safe gene delivery system. Results suggested that the combination of our polymer and sonoporation could improve the gene expression compared to the system using only our polymer that transfers genes into cells via endocytosis. It also kept the ability of the gene regulation responding to cellular signals.


Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (14) ◽  
pp. 3246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashiqur Rahman ◽  
Julia Lin ◽  
Francisco E. Jaramillo ◽  
Dennis A. Bazylinski ◽  
Clayton Jeffryes ◽  
...  

Bionanotechnology, the use of biological resources to produce novel, valuable nanomaterials, has witnessed tremendous developments over the past two decades. This eco-friendly and sustainable approach enables the synthesis of numerous, diverse types of useful nanomaterials for many medical, commercial, and scientific applications. Countless reviews describing the biosynthesis of nanomaterials have been published. However, to the best of our knowledge, no review has been exclusively focused on the in vivo biosynthesis of inorganic nanomaterials. Therefore, the present review is dedicated to filling this gap by describing the many different facets of the in vivo biosynthesis of nanoparticles (NPs) using living eukaryotic cells and organisms—more specifically, live plants and living biomass of several species of microalgae, yeast, fungus, mammalian cells, and animals. It also highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the synthesis methodologies and the NP characteristics, bio-applications, and proposed synthesis mechanisms. This comprehensive review also brings attention to enabling a better understanding between the living organisms themselves and the synthesis conditions that allow their exploitation as nanobiotechnological production platforms as these might serve as a robust resource to boost and expand the bio-production and use of desirable, functional inorganic nanomaterials.


2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3589-3597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keri Fair ◽  
Melanie Anderson ◽  
Elena Bulanova ◽  
Huaifeng Mi ◽  
Maximilian Tropschug ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The PHD fingers of the human MLL and Drosophila trx proteins have strong amino acid sequence conservation but their function is unknown. We have determined that these fingers mediate homodimerization and binding of MLL to Cyp33, a nuclear cyclophilin. These two proteins interact in vitro and in vivo in mammalian cells and colocalize at specific nuclear subdomains. Overexpression of the Cyp33 protein in leukemia cells results in altered expression ofHOX genes that are targets for regulation by MLL. These alterations are suppressed by cyclosporine and are not observed in cell lines that express a mutant MLL protein without PHD fingers. These results suggest that binding of Cyp33 to MLL modulates its effects on the expression of target genes.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yale S. Michaels ◽  
Mike B. Barnkob ◽  
Hector Barbosa ◽  
Toni A. Baeumler ◽  
Mary K. Thompson ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTPrecise, analogue regulation of gene expression is critical for development, homeostasis and regeneration in mammals. In contrast, widely employed experimental and therapeutic approaches such as knock-in/out strategies are more suitable for binary control of gene activity, while RNA interference (RNAi) can lead to pervasive off-target effects and unpredictable levels of repression. Here we report on a method for the precise control of gene expression levels in mammalian cells based on engineered, synthetic microRNA response elements (MREs). To develop this system, we established a high-throughput sequencing approach for measuring the efficacy of thousands of miR-17 MRE variants. This allowed us to create a library of microRNA silencing-mediated fine-tuners (miSFITs) of varying strength that can be employed to control the expression of user specified genes. To demonstrate the value of this technology, we used a panel of miSFITs to tune the expression of a peptide antigen in a mouse melanoma model. This analysis revealed that antigen expression level is a key determinant of the anti-tumour immune response in vitro and in vivo. miSFITs are a powerful tool for modulating gene expression output levels with applications in research and cellular engineering.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuriko Kakimoto ◽  
Shinya Tashiro ◽  
Rieko Kojima ◽  
Yuuki Morozumi ◽  
Toshiya Endo ◽  
...  

Functional integrity of eukaryotic organelles relies on direct physical contacts between distinct organelles. However, the entity of organelle-tethering factors is not well understood due to lack of means to analyze inter-organelle interactions in living cells. Here we evaluate the split-GFP system for visualizing organelle contact sites in vivo and show its advantages and disadvantages. We observed punctate GFP signals from the split-GFP fragments targeted to any pairs of organelles among the ER, mitochondria, peroxisomes, vacuole and lipid droplets in yeast cells, which suggests that these organelles form contact sites with multiple organelles simultaneously although it is difficult to rule out the possibilities that these organelle contacts sites are artificially formed by the irreversible associations of the split-GFP probes. Importantly, split-GFP signals in the overlapped regions of the ER and mitochondria were mainly co-localized with ERMES, an authentic ER-mitochondria tethering structure, suggesting that split-GFP assembly depends on the preexisting inter-organelle contact sites. We also confirmed that the split-GFP system can be applied to detection of the ER-mitochondria contact sites in HeLa cells. We thus propose that the split-GFP system is a potential tool to observe and analyze inter-organelle contact sites in living yeast and mammalian cells.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (46) ◽  
pp. 7415-7427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Wang ◽  
Xiao-Tao He ◽  
Xin-Yue Xu ◽  
Yuan Yin ◽  
Xuan Li ◽  
...  

Modification of the transmucosal site of an implant by plasmid-mediated pLAMA3-CM gene transfection is a potential method for future clinical applications.


2006 ◽  
Vol 291 (3) ◽  
pp. E429-E438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A. Davey ◽  
Helen E. MacLean

Genetically modified mouse models have been used widely to advance our knowledge in the field of endocrinology and metabolism. A number of different approaches to generate genetically modified mice are now available, which provide the power to analyze the role of individual proteins in vivo. However, there are a number of points to be considered in the use and interpretation of these models. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages involved in the generation and use of different genetically modified mouse models in endocrine research, including conventional techniques (e.g., overexpression, knockout, and knock-in models), tissue- and/or time-specific deletion of target genes [e.g., Cre- loxP and short interfering (si)RNA transgenic approaches], and gene-trap approaches to undertake functional genomics. This review also highlights the many factors that should be considered when assessing the phenotype of these mouse models, many of which are relevant to all murine physiological studies. These approaches are a powerful means by which to dissect the function of genes and are revolutionizing our understanding of endocrine physiology and metabolism.


2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Li ◽  
Shihua He ◽  
Jian-Min Sun ◽  
James R Davie

The Sp family of transcription factors is united by a particular combination of three conserved Cys2His2 zinc fingers that form the sequence-specific DNA-binding domain. Within the Sp family of transcription factors, Sp1 and Sp3 are ubiquitously expressed in mammalian cells. They can bind and act through GC boxes to regulate gene expression of multiple target genes. Although Sp1 and Sp3 have similar structures and high homology in their DNA binding domains, in vitro and in vivo studies reveal that these transcription factors have strikingly different functions. Sp1 and Sp3 are able to enhance or repress promoter activity. Regulation of the transcriptional activity of Sp1 and Sp3 occurs largely at the post-translational level. In this review, we focus on the roles of Sp1 and Sp3 in the regulation of gene expression.Key words: Sp1, Sp3, gene regulation, sub-cellular localization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document