Study of Community Participation in the Process of Villages Infrastructure Development on Program PNPM Mandiri in Jayapura Regency

Community participation in each process of public policy making is an important issue as the mirror of principle of democracy in a country. It would be very precise when participation of community later became one of the principles that should be implemented by the government in an effort to realize good governance. The importance of participation and form of participation given a supporting factor for the success of the government program. The aim of Road Infrastructure development program is to increase local community welfare so they are able to access a wide range economy, social and politic activities. For example, in economic activity, the local producer can easily carry and sell their product to the local market when compared to the previous moment when road was damaged, especially during the rainy seasons. Therefore it is necessary participation of community to engage in solving the road infrastructure problem in their respective villages and districts. This research is located in Jayapura Regency, and using explanatory research with qualitative approach. The Techniques of data collection on this study is using questionnaire, distributed to 80 respondents. The result of this research shows that community participation community in the planning, implementation and evaluation is very good. Community participation on implementation phase of National Program of Community Empowerment (PNPM Mandiri) is really determined by the level community involvement in the planning stages. The important reasons related to community participation are: a) the engagement of community, either directly or indirectly, are able to create feel of belongings to all public asset that has been built with high cost. b) Through community participation, they know about the limitation of government resources (funds, manpower). c) Involvement of local society in those development stages could be a control tools to supervise all development financing in the level of village, district, and regency as well.

Download Full-text

Community Participation in the Implementation of Constitutional Laws through the Village Tourism Development in Tanjungsari County Rowosari Subdistrict Kendal

Journal of Social Science Studies ◽

10.5296/jsss.v5i1.12016 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 184 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Suwarno Widodo ◽

Rosalina Ginting ◽

Supriyono P. S. ◽

R. Istiyaningsih

Keyword(s):

Community Participation ◽

Local Community ◽

Tourism Development ◽

Development Program ◽

Community Empowerment ◽

Qualitative Descriptive ◽

Tourist Village ◽

The Government ◽

Tourism Potential ◽

The Village

The study was backed by the existence of equitable development and the acceleration efforts around countryside, has done several programs/activities at the village level -based community empowerment as well as optimize the local potential in the village such as tourist village. With the participation of the community directly in the tourist village development, then it can also be used for local community empowerment efforts. This research aim is to find the community participation in the legislation implementation through the Village tourism development Tanjungsari County of Rowosari Sub district Kendal. This research type is qualitative, descriptive research was carried out in the village in Kendal. Focus of the study was excavation of the tourism potential village, forms management in the development of tourism and other forms of activities upon community participation through the development of village tourism. Data collection methods used is interviews, observation, documentations. Technique of data analysis applies qualitative approach. The results shows that the Tanjungsari Village developed into a decent Education about how to cultivate fish and make crafts calligraphy that has tourism potential among other industrial centers household processing and marketing Fish Boiled & smoked fish, as well as the calligraphy craft. Tanjungsari Village Development model geared at empowering communities by involving the community in the development of tourist villages ranging from socialization and decision making in order to prepare the tourism components and the Pokdarwis formation. The research conclusion indicates that public participation can be rated high enough and enthusiastic but there has been no support program from the Government to prioritize the village tourism development. While the obstacles faced that there isn’t law regulation because the tourist village development program is not yet contained in the RPJMDES and RKP village then be followed up with SK (Circulating Letter) Regent Tanjungsari assignment as rural education. It suggests that socialization program in order to disseminate the existence in Tanjungsari Village with invites schools to learn to cultivate fish, creating crafts calligraphy through website and social media.

Download Full-text

Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam program pembangunan Infrastruktur Perdesaan (PPIP)

Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa ◽

10.32669/villages.v1i1.12 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 45-60

Author(s):

Lina Kumala Dewi ◽

Bambang Triono ◽

Dian Suluh Kusuma Dewi

Keyword(s):

Development Program ◽

Study Data ◽

Community Empowerment ◽

Infrastructure Development ◽

Development Programs ◽

Technical Documentation ◽

Rural Infrastructure ◽

High Participation ◽

Qualitative Descriptive ◽

Household Heads

The construction of public participation has paid his dues. This is that in realizing development projects readily undergoing a failure that empowers people. Related in all process that deals with planning, implementation, the use of results and development monitoring. The rural infrastructure development program (PPIP) is development programs community empowerment. Where people have got to dive headlong in village development, especially physical development he purposes of this research is to find how the participation of the community in the Rural infrastructure development program (PPIP), Ngranget Village, Dagangan District, Madiun Regency. The kind of research is qualitative descriptive. In research, this is the population is the number of household heads involved in the delivery rabat concrete development in Ngranget village which consisted of 95 KK. The majority of informants interviewed in this research was 12 people. Was used in the study data collection method that is Technical Documentation interviews and data available for analysis namely described the results of research or data with a form of what is he got writer whether it is the results of the interviews, or result in appreciating documentation then investigated and the studies of the issue and. The result that the community participation in development in the village of rabat concrete Ngranget mind (planning), low participation in the form of energy high, participation in the form of expertise, quite low in the form of goods low, the form of money and participation is very low.

Download Full-text

PENGARUH PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR TERHADAP PDRB DI PROVINSI INDONESIA

Wahana ◽

10.35591/wahana.v22i1.146 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

pp. 15-27

Author(s):

Suripto Suripto ◽

Eva Dwi Lestari

Keyword(s):

Economic Growth ◽

Economic Development ◽

Panel Data ◽

Infrastructure Investment ◽

Water Infrastructure ◽

Infrastructure Development ◽

Road Infrastructure ◽

Health Infrastructure ◽

Spatial Coverage ◽

The Government

Economic growth is one indicator to measure the success of economic development in a country. Economic development is closely related to infrastructure. Infrastructure development will have an impact on economic growth both directly and indirectly. Therefore, the role of the government in determining infrastructure development policies is very important to increase economic growth in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of infrastructure on economic growth in Indonesia including road infrastructure, electricity infrastructure, investment, water infrastructure, education infrastructure and health infrastructure in Indonesia in 2015-2017.The analytical tool used in this study is panel data regression with the approach of Fixed Effect Model. The spatial coverage of this study is all provinces in Indonesia, namely 34 provinces, with a series of data from 2015 to 2017 with a total of 102 observations. The data used is secondary data obtained from BPS Indonesia.The results of the study show that (1) the road infrastructure variables have a negative and not significant effect on GDRP. (2) electrical infrastructure variables have a negative and not significant effect on GDRP. (3) investment variables have a positive and significant effect on GDRP. (4) water infrastructure variables have a positive and not significant effect on GDRP. (5) educational infrastructure variables have a positive and not significant effect on GDRP. (6) health infrastructure variables have a positive and significant effect on GDRP. Keywords: development, infrastructure, investment, GDRP, panel data

Download Full-text

Gender- and Poor-inclusive Community-managed Sanitation and Hygiene in Urban Indonesia

Water Practice & Technology ◽

10.2166/wpt.2010.103 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

R. Mozar ◽

C. Sijbesma

Keyword(s):

Technical Assistance ◽

Solid Waste Management ◽

Development Program ◽

Action Planning ◽

Project Planning ◽

Community Empowerment ◽

Management Support ◽

Urban Sanitation ◽

Sanitation And Hygiene ◽

The Government

The Government of Indonesia executed the Indonesia Sanitation Sector Development Program (ISSDP, April 2006 - January 2010), with financial support from the Governments of the Netherlands and Sweden, as well as management support from the World Bank's Water and Sanitation Program (WSP). The program assisted a dozen cities to improve sanitation in a wider sense. It covered safe disposal of human excreta and waste water, local drainage, solid waste management and promotion of hygienic practices. The program was demand-based: the cities brought in their own human and financial resources, but got technical assistance for sanitation situation assessments and mapping, sanitation strategy and program development, and finding additional resources for increased implementation. The program had three major thrusts: (1) develop an enabling sanitation environment, (2) raise sanitation awareness and promote good hygiene, and (3) build city sanitation planning capacities and develop city sanitation strategies. The promotion component included development of poor-inclusive sanitation intervention, assisting men, women and children in the poorest neighborhoods to strengthen good and improve bad sanitation and hygiene conditions and practices. Community empowerment is important in urban sanitation development, but at the same time, requires that the social and technical institutions in charge of empowerment and sanitation adopt new skills and techniques for working with communities. Without the right skills to assist the communities, build their skills, and provide some minimal monitoring of performance afterwards, there is a risk of over-expecting what a community can manage. Community empowerment with gender- and poor-inclusive approaches must be integrated into all stages of urban sanitation development, i.e. (1) the organizational development, (2) review of related existing projects and services, (3) formulation of an overall city sanitation strategy and program, and (4) local project planning. Equitably attention for gender and poor is part of the overall organization, strategy formulation, local action planning, program and projects development and implementation, and monitoring and evaluation of outputs, outcomes and impacts.

Download Full-text

Pengembangan Desa Wisata Pentingsari, Kabupaten Sleman dalam Perspektif Partisipasi Masyarakat

Jurnal Aspirasi ◽

10.46807/aspirasi.v10i2.1386 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 91-106

Author(s):

Dinar Wahyuni

Keyword(s):

Community Participation ◽

Tourism Industry ◽

Community Empowerment ◽

Qualitative Approach ◽

Development Activity ◽

Implementation Phase ◽

Village Community ◽

Full Support ◽

Evaluation Phase ◽

Village Government

Village tourism is one form of tourism that applies the concept of community empowerment so that community participation is the most important component in its development. This study aims to describe the development of the Pentingsari Tourism Village in the perspective of community participation. This research is descriptive with a qualitative approach. The results showed that the development of the Pentingsari Tourism Village received full support from the Pentingsari community and local government through its participation in tourism activities. At the planning and decisionmaking stages, the community participated from planning, socialization to community and village government, to making decisions about the formation of a tourism village. Community participation in the implementation phase is carried out by giving thought, material, and being directly involved in every tourism village development activity and trying to create a tourism village that is ready to compete in the tourism industry. Participation in the stage of enjoying the results is shown by improving the living conditions of the Pentingsari community due to tourism activities. This means that the community enjoys the results of tourism, economically, socially, culturally, and environmentally. Furthermore, community participation in the evaluation phase was demonstrated through their involvement in regular meetings between village tourism managers, village government and local government.AbtrakDesa wisata merupakan salah satu bentuk wisata yang menerapkan konsep pemberdayaan masyarakat sehingga partisipasi masyarakat menjadi komponen terpenting dalam pengembangannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan tentang pengembangan Desa Wisata Pentingsari dalam perspektif partisipasi masyarakat. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengembangan Desa Wisata Pentingsari mendapat dukungan penuh dari masyarakat Pentingsari dan pemerintah daerah melalui partisipasinya dalam kegiatan wisata. Pada tahap perencanaan dan pengambilan keputusan, masyarakat berpartisipasi mulai dari perencanaan, sosialisasi ke masyarakat dan pemerintah desa hingga pengambilan keputusan tentang pembentukan desa wisata. Partisipasi masyarakat dalam tahap implementasi dilakukan dengan memberikan pemikiran, materi, dan terlibat langsung dalam setiap kegiatan pengembangan desa wisata serta berupaya menciptakan desa wisata yang siap bersaing di industri pariwisata. Partisipasi dalam tahap menikmati hasil ditunjukkan dengan peningkatan kondisi kehidupan masyarakat Pentingsari akibat kegiatan wisata. Hal ini berarti bahwa masyarakat menikmati hasil dari kegiatan wisata baik secara ekonomi, sosial, budaya, dan lingkungan. Selanjutnya partisipasi masyarakat dalam tahap evaluasi ditunjukkan melalui keterlibatannya dalam pertemuan rutin antarpengelola desa wisata, pemerintah desa, dan pemerintah daerah setempat.

Download Full-text

IMPROVEMENT OF SLUM AREA WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION FACILITIES IN THE NORTH KEMBANGAN AREA OF WEST JAKARTA

ICCD ◽

10.33068/iccd.vol2.iss1.173 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 199-201

Author(s):

Muhammad Isradi ◽

Acep Hidayat

Keyword(s):

Community Participation ◽

Community Empowerment ◽

Slum Area ◽

Residential Areas ◽

The North ◽

Surrounding Environment ◽

Community Behavior ◽

The Government ◽

Development Outcomes

Environmental sanitation is part of public health which includes the principles of efforts to eliminate or master environmental factors that can cause disease through activities aimed at (i) water sanitation, (ii) food sanitation, (iii) sewage systems, (iv) air sanitation, (v) vector control and disease rodents, (vi) home hygiene. When sanitation problems arise in dense residential areas that are not well ordered and are also not handled in a way that is not sanitary, it will pollute the surrounding environment. Changes in community behavior to be more environmentally friendly do not just happen, but through the process of forming behavior that has a background and motivation. The motivation then raises behavior that influences the actions and efforts of the community towards the sustainability of the activity. So that this study will also analyze the role of the community and other involved stakeholders in the mechanism of improving the sanitation of the slum environment. MCK management activities are part of the practice of community behavior in improving sanitation. The government of the North Kembangan village has tried to improve this condition through programs to improve the settlement environment with the concept of community empowerment, this program involves community participation starting from the planning, implementation to the utilization and maintenance stages. It is expected that with this community participation a sense of ownership of development outcomes can be achieved so that the sustainability of the program can be achieved.

Download Full-text

Identifikasi bentuk partisipasi masyarakat Dalam pelaksanaan program Peningkatan kualitas permukiman Studi Kasus : Pada Pelaksanaan Program PLPBK di Permukiman Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah di Kelurahan Tenilo Kota Gorontalo

Gorontalo Journal of Infrastructure and Science Engineering ◽

10.32662/gojise.v1i1.147 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 73

Author(s):

Mochamad Athar Jantu

Keyword(s):

Community Participation ◽

Low Income ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Community Empowerment ◽

Improvement Program ◽

Community Group ◽

Internal Factors ◽

Gender Education ◽

The Government ◽

The Individual

The participation of the community in an implementation of the program or activity greatly affects the success of the program. This participation itself was born because of the factors from inside and outside the individual as members of that community group. This writing is based on a study that takes place in low-income community settlements in Tenilo RT II / RW II Kelota Kelota Gorontalo, Gorontalo Province with the aim of identifying the forms of community participation as well as the factors that influence the participation of the community in the implementation of the quality improvement program which is part of the Community-Based Settlement Environment Management (PLPBK) program by the government in the National Urban Empowerment Community Empowerment Program (PNPM-Mandiri Urban). The method used in this research is by qualitative analysis approach to analyze the primary and secondary data. The study finds that the form of community participation in the implementation of the program of improving the quality of settlements of low income community groups in Tenilo RT II / RW II Kelota District Gorontalo in the form of energy and goods . Internal factors that influence are gender, education, occupation, age, and income, while external factors as the incentive is the willingness, ability and opportunity.

Download Full-text

Community Participation in the Village Fund Program in Kemang Manis Village, Tebing Tinggi District, Empat Lawang Regency, South Sumatra

Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences ◽

10.37275/oaijss.v1i1.2 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 23-38

Author(s):

Hikmah Adila ◽

Andy Alfatih ◽

Alfitri

Keyword(s):

Community Participation ◽

Community Involvement ◽

Financial Management ◽

Development Project ◽

Community Empowerment ◽

Land Values ◽

Infrastructure Development ◽

Daily Work ◽

Village Government ◽

The Village

This study aimed to find out how community participation in the Village Fund program in Kemang Manis Village in the Four Lawang District in 2016 and the factors that supported and blocked community participation in the village fund program in Kemang Manis Village. The method used was qualitative so that the data obtained through interviews, observation and study of documentation and qualitative descriptive analysis techniques. The results showed that at the decision making stage, the participation of the Kemang Manis village community in the Village Fund Program in 2016 was still low because the data synchronization activities were not carried out, only the village elite community and workers as well as grant providers, were invited, attended, gave opinions, and approve the results of the meeting's decision. At the implementation stage (community participation) was quite good, it appeared in the crowded community who registered themselves as candidates for village infrastructure activities, following the work briefing and direction from the village government. At the time of implementation the community brought their own carpentry equipment, donated food and drinks, and received wages or daily work incentives, and participants of community empowerment activities received transport money. The stages of the utilization of benefits (benefits) the community felt the benefits of the results of village development. Roads could be passed by 4-wheeled vehicles, making it easier to transport agricultural produce, residents began to build houses because roads were available and land values had also increased. The community had not yet been involved in the monitoring, supervision and evaluation stages, because in the planning stages of the Village RPJM and Village RKP documents the community involvement is still low. At the stage of implementation of village development the community was involved as an implementer, but the procurement and financial management and administration activities were carried out by the village government. There were no complaints from the public and information disclosure regarding the new Village Fund in the form of a Village Infrastructure development project board.

Download Full-text

Analysing Indonesia’s infrastructure deficits from a developmentalist perspective

Competition & Change ◽

10.1177/10245294211043355 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 102452942110433

Author(s):

Kyunghoon Kim

Keyword(s):

Development Strategy ◽

Market Failure ◽

Good Governance ◽

Public Investment ◽

Institutional Reform ◽

Investment Efficiency ◽

Infrastructure Development ◽

The Government ◽

Private Investors ◽

Bureaucratic Reform

This paper analyses the performance and appropriateness of the Indonesian government’s ‘good governance’ institutional reform aimed at stimulating infrastructure construction. During the 15 years after the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the government attempted to strengthen formal institutions with the goal of improving public investment efficiency and attracting private investors. By analysing policies in the construction industry in terms of company registration, procurement and state enterprises, the paper finds that the outcome was far from what was expected by technocratic-bureaucratic reform promoters as interest groups frequently succeeded in capturing the new institutional system. This paper then challenges the dominant narrative that overwhelmingly blames incomplete institutional reform for Indonesia’s slow infrastructure construction. Given the inherent market failure and political challenges in institutional reform, the paper argues that passive developmentalist policies, which resulted in conflictual state–business relations and insufficient public investment, were a prime cause that then set the stage for the emergence of state-led infrastructure development strategy from the mid-2010s.

Download Full-text

PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT MELALUI PROGRAM PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR PERDESAAN DALAM MENINGKATKAN KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT KECAMATAN WANASALAM KABUPATEN LEBAK

Sawala Jurnal Administrasi Negara ◽

10.30656/sawala.v3i2.229 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Ahmad Sururi

Keyword(s):

Public Awareness ◽

Development Program ◽

Policy Decision ◽

Community Empowerment ◽

Development Cooperation ◽

Public Welfare ◽

Infrastructure Development ◽

Rural Infrastructure ◽

Informal Leaders ◽

People’S Attitudes

This study aims to describe and analyze the empowerment of communities through the Rural Infrastructure Development Program (PPIP) in Improving Public Welfare Wanasalam District of Lebak.From the results of this study concluded that the Community Empowerment through Rural Infrastructure Development (PPIP) in improving public welfare Wanasalam District of Lebak has implemented 10 (ten) of the 12 (twelve) principles proposed community empowerment in Mardikanto Dahatma and Bhatnagar (2013: 106), then through the Community Empowerment for Rural Infrastructure Development (PPIP) in improving public welfare Wanasalam District of Lebak not carry two (2) principles of community empowerment which principles of community development cooperation is based on the analysis of the participation and empowerment of the principle of democratic society based on the analysis in the application science, this is due 1.Less public's understanding of the meaning of community empowerment and the existence of the Rural Infrastructure Development Program (PPIP), 2 Lack of socialization given by the community facilitators and institutional devices village in providing information on the activities and the lack of public awareness both as individuals and members of society concerning the conditions and environment, 3 There is a culture of compliance citizens against warlords (formal and informal leaders) that affect people's attitudes in policy decision making.

Download Full-text