scholarly journals CONTENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND PEDAGOGICAL CONDITIONS IN THE PROCESS OF CONTRIBUTING TO STUDENTS’ PROFESSIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION (USING THE EXAMPLE OF A PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY)

Author(s):  
Светлана Васильевна Шаляпина

Введение. В условиях быстрых изменений в общественной и профессиональной сфере актуальным становится вопрос о том, как организовывать процесс профессионального самоопределения и эффективного трудоустройства выпускников вузов. В этой связи рассмотрено содержание организационно-педагогических условий содействия профессиональному самоопределению студентов педагогического вуза. Цель – поиск и определение содержания организационно-педагогических условий содействия профессиональному самоопределению студентов педагогического вуза. Материал и методы. Использованы теоретические (изучение, анализ, обобщение литературы, изучение статистических данных, моделирование) и эмпирические (анкетирование, опрос, апробация) методы исследования. Обоснование комплекса условий строится на основе эмпирического обобщения деятельности центра содействия занятости студентов. Обзор литературы. Представлены подходы современных исследователей к дефиниции «организационно-педагогические условия». Выделена группа ученых, рассматривающих организационно-педагогические условия как совокупность факторов. Описана позиция исследователей, считающих, что организационно-педагогические условия – это комплекс каких-либо мероприятий. Отдельно проанализированы научно-исследовательские работы ученых, считающих, что в дефиниции «организационно-педагогические условия» выделяются две смысловые составляющие: организационные условия и педагогические условия. Результаты и обсуждение. На основе анализа литературы и обобщения эмпирического опыта уточнено, что под организационными условиями в работе будут пониматься факторы, которые обеспечивают управление процессом, а под педагогическими – факторы, включающие в себя содержание, методы, приемы, формы обучения, воспитания, обеспечивающие достижение педагогических целей. При этом объединение организационных и педагогических условий в один комплекс, подчиненный общей цели, будет являться организационно-педагогическими условиями. На основе этого на базе Томского государственного педагогического университета определен и апробирован комплекс организационно-педагогических условий содействия профессиональному самоопределению студентов. Заключение. Предложено уточненное определение организационно-педагогических условий содействия профессиональному самоопределению обучающихся педагогического вуза, в том числе студентов с низкой мотивацией на педагогическую профессию, которое может быть использовано в качестве основы для деятельности вузовских центров по трудоустройству выпускников. Introduction. Under rapid changes in social and professional spheres urgent appears the question of organizing the process of professional self-determination and effective employment of university graduates. In connection with it, the article will cover the content of organizational and pedagogical conditions in the process of contributing to the professional self-determination of students of a pedagogical university. Aim – to search for and define the content of organizational and pedagogical conditions contributing to the professional self-determination of students of a pedagogical university. Material and methods. Such methods of analysis as theoretical methods (analyzing and summarizing what is in literature, analyzing statistical data, modelling) and empirical methods (using surveys, questioning, testing) were applied. Stating the set of conditions is based on summarizing empirically the activities of the center for students’ employment. Modern researchers’ approaches to defining “organizational and pedagogical conditions” are presented. Apart from others is the group of researchers analyzing organizational and pedagogical conditions as a set of factors. Also, the article reveals the point of view of researchers who think that organizational and pedagogical conditions are a set of some schemes. Separately we analyze research works by scientists who think that in the definition of “organizational and pedagogical conditions” there are two sensible components: organizational conditions and pedagogical conditions. Results and discussion. Analyzing issues and summarizing empirical experience, it was specified that under organizational conditions we will mean factors that guarantee controlling the process and pedagogical conditions will be understood as factors including content, methods, means, forms of teaching, upbringing that provide achieving pedagogical goals. In such a case, putting together organizational conditions and pedagogical conditions into one set used for achieving one mutual goal will result in organizational and pedagogical conditions together. On the basis of it in Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Tomsk State Pedagogical University” we made up and tested a set of organizational and pedagogical conditions contributing to students’ professional self-determination. Conclusion. There has been put forward the definition of organizational and pedagogical conditions contributing to the professional self-determination of students of a pedagogical university, including students with low motivation for pedagogical profession, that can be used as a basis for the activities of university centers for students’ employment.

The paper proposes a model for managing the distribution of university graduates from the point of view of meeting the demand of the population for educational services and providing the regional economy with specialists with higher education, formalizing the task of employing a university graduate in a specialty, defining the nature of the functional dependence of the university's throughput on the student's professional self-determination, using real data to obtain a system of production rules, which makes it possible to formulate recommendations for adjusting the professional self-determination of prospective employment of future graduates.


Author(s):  
I.B. Umnyashova

The development of reflexive abilities of students is an important condition for the development of professional competence of future specialists, which affects the life and professional self-determination of studying universities. The article describes the conditions for the development of reflexive abilities of students of higher and secondary professional education organizations studying in the areas of “Education and Pedagogical Sciences” and “Psychological Sciences”: a reflexive environment as a system of conditions favorable for the development of the intellectual and personal spheres of students; reflexive activities aimed at developing skills in the analysis and evaluation of personal strategies and actions; a clear system for assessing the quality of performance of reflexive tasks and works; psychological and pedagogical support for the process of self-determination of students. It is noted that the creation of the above conditions requires certain resources, including the qualifications of university employees in the field of organizing the developing educational environment of an educational institution, material, technical and organizational conditions, and the university has an expanded network of social partners.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. E. Serebrovskaya ◽  
I. S. Kohergina

Introduction. The interest of the scientific community in the issue of ontogeny of subjectivity in the era of changes in all spheres of life, the reform of national education associated with the digitalization of education and other challenges is growing again. The problem of psychological support for the formation of subjectivity during the period of study at school is of particular relevance. It is subjectivity that is an integrative characteristic of a student's personality associated with transformative activity and the achievement of one's own goals. Subjectivity determines how a person interacts with the surrounding world and people, how he defends his position in interaction with people and society as a whole. The personal and professional choice of a student is associated with the ability to understand and model possible alternatives to his life path and to be responsible for the results. In primary school age, there are personal prerequisites for the development of subjectivity. The components of subjectivity in the structure of a student's personality are his features, such as the presence of an educational and professional motive, a motive for achievement and development, responsibility for one's actions and decisions, the ability to control oneself in a variety of situations, including difficult life situations, and an active behavioral position. School education, which includes not only the pedagogical influence on the student, but also his subjective educational activity, involving his active participation in building his own personality, is precisely the space that bears a great semantic and functional load from the point of view of the formation and development of intrapersonal mechanisms and formations. The creation of "correct", creative conditions for the education and development of a child in the process of schooling is a significant moment in the work on the formation of his subjectivity, including in relation to the choice of a professional path. The work on the formation of the subjectivity of schoolchildren in the field of modern general education is becoming an important and responsible task from the point of view of the development of a full-fledged personality and the future professional self-determination of school graduates.Materials and Methods. The article is an analytical review with elements of a pact research, where an attempt was made to systematize scientific psychological and pedagogical knowledge on the problem of the formation of subjectivity during the period of schooling. To study this personal characteristic, we conducted a theoretical and empirical study. The formation of subjectivity is due to the development of self-awareness and the motivational-semantic sphere of the individual. The most important, from our point of view, are such criteria for the development of subjectivity in a student as motivational indicators, the ability to reflect, the nature of interaction with adults, and the level of self-regulation. In accordance with the criterion-level approach, we identified three levels of development of the subjectivity of schoolchildren: low, medium and high.Results. All selected and studied by us criteria of subjectivity of primary and secondary schoolchildren are in the stage of active formation. That is why this study is of a trial, pilot nature. The data we have obtained demonstrate only the existing trend in relation to the personal development of children at certain stages of schooling. That is why the above mentioned criteria for the development of the subjectivity of schoolchildren need further study, and their typology needs additional refinement.Discussions and Conclusions. The conclusion is substantiated that the above mentioned criteria for the development of the subjectivity of schoolchildren need further study, and their typology needs additional refinement, which is a promising direction for further theoretical and empirical research. The work on the formation of the subjectivity of schoolchildren in the field of modern general education is becoming an important and responsible task from the point of view of the development of a full-fledged personality and the future professional self-determination of school graduates. Based on the results of the study, we consider it necessary to create meaningful and systemic conditions conducive to the development of the child's ability to subjective activity, awareness of himself and his life. The conditions are listed, that allow the development of the child's internal potential as a subject of his own activity in various aspects, not only educational, but also extracurricular, conducive to creative activity and self-development.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21
Author(s):  
Liudmila V. Semenova ◽  
◽  
Valentina A. Osnovina ◽  
Marina M. Shubovich ◽  
◽  
...  

The article reveals the problem of professional self-determination of students in the conditions of network interaction with a pedagogical university when implementing the specialised training in accordance with the requirements of the State Educational Standard of Secondary General Education. The article presents the system of work of summer schools, specialised schools, Academies for children, which are complementary to the training profiles implemented in partner schools (technological, natural-scientific, humanitarian, socio– economic, universal). The article analyses the system of professional self-determination of students, implemented at the Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University named after I.N. Ulyanov, in the context of network interaction with partner schools of the distributed lyceum. Monitoring procedures for identifying and evaluating the effectiveness of the network interaction of partner schools of the distributed lyceum within the framework of the project became the research methods. The planned result is a positive dynamics of graduates of specialised classes of partner schools of the distributed lyceum, who have decided to become future teachers.


Author(s):  
Alexander A. Nechitaylo ◽  
Tatiana Yu. Deptsova ◽  
Anna A. Gnutova ◽  
Natalia V. Priadilnikova ◽  
Anna S. Nikitina

The main factors influencing the professional self-determination of university entrants and students are analyzed, the dynamics of the integration processes of universities with the domestic labor market is traced. Theauthors of the article tried to assess the competence status of a university graduate, which affects its implementation in the labor market. The problem of revising the criteria for assessing the quality of educational services within the framework of regulatory guillotine is comprehended. The article analyzes the effectiveness of creation and functioning of flagship universities, their potential in creating real competition for the capital's educational institutions due to the ability to provide regional labor markets with qualified scientific and professional personnel, in demand for solving the problem of developing a particular subject of the federation. The problems of conjugation of Federal state standards of higher education and professional standards, resulting from an insufficiently coordinated approach to the classification of areas of professional activity, are considered. The need to strengthen the connection between educational institutions and the real sector of the economy is emphasized. According to the authors, one of the aspects of solving this problem is the participation of employersboth in the development of professional standards and in the preparation of educational programs, in order tomaintain the composition of competencies in an up-to-date state that meets the real needs of employers.


Author(s):  
Nataliia Оshurkevych

The article is devoted to the study of the problem of professional self-determination of personality and its relevance in contemporary socio-economic conditions. An analysis of the work of domestic and foreign scholars on the problem of professional self-determination of personality, made it possible to find out that there is no single theory in the understanding of the process of professional self-determination of personality. The article reveals the essence of the concepts of «personality», «profession», «professional self-determination», «professional self-determination of personality», «self-determination». The genesis is analyzed and approaches to the definition of the essence of the concept of «professional self-determination of personality» are considered. The emphasis is placed on the professional self-determination of a personality as a multicomponent phenomenon that is interconnected with professional development and the formation of an individual. The author’s definition of the concept of «professional self-determination of personality» is proposed as a prolonged, dynamic and phased process of self-knowledge and professional choice, influenced by external and internal factors of the subject. It has been established that in the writings of leading scholars there is an increased interest in the problem of professional self-determination of personality. The great experience of the various concepts and theoretical approaches developed to understanding the problem of professional self-determination of personality points to the complexity and multicomponent nature of the phenomenon of «professional self-determination of personality», as well as its close connection with the person’s self-determination of the person, his self-realization, self-actualization and self-knowledge in professional activity.


2020 ◽  
pp. 36-47
Author(s):  
Светлана Ивановна Поздеева ◽  
Светлана Васильевна Шаляпина

Представлено исследование мотивов и факторов профессионального выбора как одной из характеристик профессионального самоопределения студенческой молодежи. Материалом послужили исследования 1990-х гг. ученых Е. А. Климова, Н. В. Кузьминой, В. А. Сластенина, Г. Н. Пашкевич и проведенное авторами в октябре 2019 г. анкетирование студентов 1-го курса Томского государственного педагогического университета. Исследование проводилось на основе теоретических (анализ научной литературы и статистических данных приемной кампании 2019 г.) и эмпирических (анкетирование студентов) методов. Цель статьи – представить педагогическому сообществу факторы, влияющие на профессиональный выбор студентов-первокурсников, ставших участниками исследования 2019 г., в сравнении с исследованиями в этой области периода 1990-х гг. Были сделаны следующие выводы: получение педагогической профессии остается наиболее привлекательным для девушек; сохраняется внутригосударственная и международная образовательная миграция абитуриентов; довузовский педагогический опыт помогает сделать осознанный выбор направления подготовки в педагогическом вузе; у современных студентов-первокурсников присутствуют внутренние мотивы, но преобладают положительные внешние. По сравнению с исследованиями В. А. Сластенина, увеличился процент студентов, которые отнесли к факторам, повлиявшим на выбор педагогического вуза, факторы «желание получить высшее образование» и «так сложились обстоятельства», что дает основание говорить об актуальности содействия в профессиональном самоопределении студентов в период обучения в вузе. The article presents a look into the motives and factors of the professional choice as one of the characteristics of students’ professional self-determination. Material for this research was obtained from researches of the 1990s by the scientists E. A. Klimova, N. V. Kuzmina, V. A. Slastyonin, G. N. Pashkevich and from questionnaires of first-year students at Tomsk State Pedagogical University in October, 2019. The research was carried out by means of theoretical methods (analysis of the scientific literature and statistical data of the 2019 admission campaign) and empirical methods (student questioning). This article is compiled to reveal to the pedagogical alumni the factors influencing the professional choice of first-year students who became the participants of the research in 2019 with comparison to researches of such type carried out in the 1990s. As a result of this research the following conclusions were drawn: obtaining a pedagogical profession is the most attractive for young females; inner-state and international educational migration of prospective students remain; the pedagogical experience prospective students have before they enter a university help them to realize what major to choose at a pedagogical university; contemporary first-year students have intrinsic motives, but have more extrinsic motives. Comparing with researches by V. A. Slastyonin of the 1990s there increased the per cent of students who put forward as the factors that influenced their choice of a pedagogical university such factors as that of willing to get higher education and that of circumstances, these results allow to confirm current necessity to help students with their professional self-determination while they study at a university.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document