Hak Asasi Manusia Mantan Narapidana Korupsi dalam Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 Perspektif Maqashid Syariah Jasser Auda

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-80
Author(s):  
Fathor Rahman ◽  
Muhammad Saiful Anam
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Systems Approach ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
General Election ◽  
Social Dimension ◽  
Legislative Elections ◽  
State Of Mind ◽  
Commission Regulation ◽  
Election Commission

This article aims to discussing the conception of ex-corruption convicts human rights according to the General Election Commission Regulation No. 20 of 2018 systematically; regarding the concept of human rights and the explicit human rights of former corruption convicts in the General Election Commission Regulation No. 20 of 2018 in the perspective of Jasser Auda's Islamic maqashid concept.This research is qualitative research with a literature review. The perspective in this discussion is the concept of maqashid sharia Jasser Auda which uses a systems approach in Islamic law. The results shows that: 1) the current state of mind of the Indonesian people cannot be separated from contemporary issues regarding human rights, democracy, the nation state, the rule of law, and the ideals of progress and national prosperity in the national context; 2) PKPU Number 20 of 2018 is in line with maqashid al-sharia with a systems approach; 3) the prohibition of former corruption convicts from running for legislative elections is justified in the perspective of maqashid al-sharia Jasser Auda, in his avoidance with various dimensions, namely the social dimension, the bureaucratic dimension to achieve good governance, the political education dimension, the state philosophy dimension and justice.

scholarly journals Hak Mantan Narapidana untuk Turut Serta dalam Pemerintahan

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noer Sida
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
General Election ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Commission Regulation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Election Commission ◽  
Democratic Country

AbstractThe general election is a means of implementing the people's sovereignty to elect people who will occupy the seat of government. This general election was held to realize a democratic country, where the leaders were chosen based on the majority of votes. Countries that adhere to democracy generally accommodate the political rights of their citizens in an election, whether they are direct or indirect. Basically everyone has the right to participate in government in other words everyone has the right to be elected or elected. Regarding to Election Commission Regulation Number 20 Year 2018 regarding the Nomination of Members of The House Representatives, Assembly at Provincial and Assembly at Regional, there is one requirement for legislative candidate became controversial because there is a prohibition on ex-prisoners of corruption, drugs (as a dealer), and sexual crimes against children to be the Nomination of Members of The House Representatives, Assembly at Provincial and Assembly at Regional. Some ex-convicts already did judicial review, therefore we need to understand the legality of the regulation for ex-convicts regarding to election.Key Words: Human Rights, Right to Participate in Government, Ex-convictAbstrakPemilihan umum adalah adalah sarana pelaksanaan kedaulatan rakyat untuk memilih orang-orang yang akan menduduki kursi pemerintahan. Pemilihan umum ini diadakan untuk mewujudkan negara yang demokrasi, di mana para pemimpinnya dipilih berdasarkan suara mayoritas terbanyak. Negara-negara yang menganut demokrasi, pada umumnya mengakomodir hak politik warga negaranya dalam suatu penyelenggaraan pemilihan umum, baik itu bersifat langsung maupun tidak langsung. Pada dasarnya setiap orang memiliki hak untuk berpartisipasi dalam pemerintahan dengan kata lain setiap orang memiliki hak untuk dipilih maupun memilih. Peraturan KPU Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 tentang Pencalonan Anggota DPR, DPRD Provinsi dan DPRD Kabupaten/Kota memberikan batasan satu syarat bagi calon anggota legislatif yang menjadi kontroversi karena adanya larangan bagi mantan narapidana  korupsi, narkoba (sebagai bandar), dan kejahatan seksual terhadap anak untuk mencalonkan diri sebagai anggota DPR, DPRD Provinsi dan DPRD Kabupaten/Kota. Beberapa pihak yang merasa dirugikan oleh peraturan tersebut mengajukan judicial review, oleh karena itu, patut dikaji bagaimana legalitas hak yang dimiliki oleh mantan narapidana dalam pemilihan umum.Kata Kunci: Hak Asasi Manusia, Hak untuk Turut Serta dalam Pemerintahan, Mantan Narapidana.

scholarly journals PERAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU DALAM PEMILIHAN LEGISLATIF 2014 DI KABUPATEN SIDOARJO

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Dwi Purnamasari ◽  
Ashabul Kahfi ◽  
Arief Fatchur Rachman
Keyword(s):  
Mass Media ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
General Election ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legislative Elections ◽  
Election Commission

This study aims to analyze and determine the role of the Election Supervisory Committee and the Commission (general election commission) Implementation of legislative elections in 2014 in Sidoarjo and analyze the factors that cause a lack of understanding of policy formulation election organizers in the respective organizers of the Role of Election Supervisory Committee and the General Election Commission. This research method is using descriptive qualitative approach. The data needed is a secondary data in the form of books, journals, articles, print media (newspapers) and the mass media as well as primary data obtained from informants through. Based on the results of this study concluded that the role of each institution in the administration of elections has not run optimally in accordance with Law Number 15 of 2011 on the Election. In the implementation on the ground found some constraints on each institution in organizing legislative elections in 2014 related to the duties and responsibilities between the Role of the Election Supervisory Committee and the General Election Commission.

scholarly journals Pemilihan Umum Menurut Hukum Islam

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sodikin Sodikin
Keyword(s):  
Presidential Elections ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
General Election ◽  
Legislative Elections ◽  
The Law ◽  
Islamic View ◽  
Western Democracies

This article discuss the implementating general election in Islamic law, both the legislative elections, elections of regional heads and presidential elections. Indonesian elections in accordance with the mechanism of the western democracies, so that the election is the only way in choosing representatives and leaders. In the Islamic view of the elections is not the only way but one of the ways to choose a government or leader. Elections according to the Islamic view of the law may permissible, but must be in accordance with the implementation of sharia, not using a mechanical cause many western democracies not helpful.DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v15i1.2848

scholarly journals ANALISIS PRINSIP KEADILAN TENTANG SYARAT MENJADI ANGGOTA LEGISLATIF BAGI KEPALA DESA BERDASARKAN UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2017 DAN PERATURAN KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sayuni ◽  
Elidar Sari ◽  
Teuku Nazaruddin
Keyword(s):  
General Election ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Election Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Principle Of Justice ◽  
Commission Regulation ◽  
Principles Of Justice ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Village ◽  
Election Commission

General Election is a means of implementing people's sovereignty which is carried out directly, freely, secretly, honestly and fairly based on the Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Implementation of Elections is the implementation of the stages of elections which are carried out freely, fairly, and honestly.   The purpose of this study is to analyze the principle of justice in the requirements to become a legislative member for the Village Head based on Law Number 7 of 2017 and Election Commission Regulation Number 20 of 2018. The results of the study showed that the first election held in 2019 did not implement the principles of justice in terms of the legislative candidate for the Village Head. The public can provide legal certainty for the implementation of the 2019 Election law. It is recommended to the General Election Commission to revise the Election Commission Regulation regarding the nomination of members of the DPR, Provincial DPRD, and Regency / City DPRD specifically in the requirements for candidates for the Village Head in Article 8 paragraph 1 letter b number 6 point b, to guarantee the rights of citizens and fulfill the principles of justice.

PARTISIPASI PEMILIH PEMULA MAHASISWA FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS ATMA JAYA YOGYAKARTA DALAM PEMILU TAHUN 2014

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Krisna Hardjanti, Yohanes Hartono
Keyword(s):  
Informal Education ◽  
Voting Rights ◽  
General Election ◽  
Legislative Elections ◽  
The People ◽  
The Right ◽  
High Level ◽  
Law Student ◽  
First Time ◽  
Election Commission

AbstractThis research seeks to analyze how the use of suffrage by a law student voters Atma Jaya Yogyakarta University in legislative and presidential elections in 2014 and the factors that determine the choice. Respondents who gave point of views are all students of the Faculty of Law, University of Atma Jaya Yogyakarta who elected for the first time and have the right to vote because it has been qualified in terms of age. Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that; generally, the use of suffrage showed a fairly high level, compared legislatif election in the legislative elections of use suffrage show the increasing of participation. amounted to 11.62%. However, they found there are quite a lot of voters who do not use their voting rights. Most common reasons which become factor why they did not vote is because it is not registered as a voter, Respondents, whether in using their suffrage in presidential or general election have the same consideration in  determining the choice. where figur candidates (legislative / president) factors was chosen as the most consideration in determining the choice, followed by factors figur and political party who support related to candidates figur in legislative and presidential elevtion have similarities, humble and sociablefollowed by commitment, moral and strictness .Recommendations which can be given, is that it should be increased voter participation in elections as a manifestation of the rights and responsibilities of the people (voters) in maintaining the survival of the nation and the state. Thus, it should be developed political consciousness of society that can be obtained through political education, whether through formal and informal education. Communities should also actively follow and understand information/socialization which are organized by election organizers (General Election Commission), including rules concerning voter registration.Keywords: Use of Suffrage, Beginner Voters, Legislative Election, Presidential Election factors that determine the choice.IntisariPenelitian ini hendak menganalisis bagaimana penggunaan hak pilih oleh pemilih pemula mahasiswa fakultas hukum universitas atma jaya yogyakarta dalam pemilu legislatif dan pemilu presiden tahun 2014 dan faktor-faktor yang menentukan pilihan. Responden yang dimintakan pandangan adalah seluruh mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta yang baru pertama kali memiliki hak pilih karena telah memenuhi syarat dari segi usia. Mendasarkan pada analisis, dapat disimpulkan bahwa; Secara umum penggunaan hak pilih menunjukkan tingkat yang cukup tinggi, peningkatan sebesar 11,62 % merupakan hal cukup positif. Namun demikian masih didapati adanya pemilih yang tidak menggunakan hak pilihnya. Alasan yang paling banyak menjadi faktor tidak menggunakan hak pilih adalah karena tidak terdaftar sebagai pemilih. Responden dalam menggunakann hak pilihnya dalam pemilu legislatif dan pemilu presiden memiliki kesamaan dalam hal pertimbangan yang digunakan sebagai dasar dalam menentukan pilihan. Rekomendasi yang dapat diberikan, adalah bahwa Perlu ditingkatkan partisipasi pemilih dalam penyelenggaraan pemilu sebagai wujud dari hak dan tanggung jawab masyarakat (pemilih) dalam mempertahankan kelangsungan hidup bangsa dan negara. Tingkat partisipasi pemilih yang tinggi juga dapat meningkatkan legitimasi terhadap kekuasaan yang diperoeh dari rakyat melalui pemilu. Untuk itu perlu ditumbuhkan kesadaran politik masyarakat yang dapat diperoleh melalui pendidikan politik, baik melalui pendidikan formal maupun informal. Terkait dengan pemilih yang tidak terdaftar dalam pemilihan umum, masyarakat juga harus secara aktif mengikuti dan memahami informasi/sosialisasi yang dilakukan penyelenggara pemilu (Komisi Pemilihan Umum), termasuk aturan-aturan yang menyangkut pendaftaran pemilih. Kata Kunci: hak pilih,  pemilih pemula, Pemilu

PERUBAHAN KEWENANGAN BADAN PENGAWAS PEMILIHAN UMUM TERHADAP PELANGGARAN PEMILIHAN UMUM LEGISLATIF BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PEMILIHAN UMUM

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-61
Author(s):  
Jumardi Harsono
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legislative Elections ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Election Administration ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Election Results ◽  
Election Commission

ABSTRAKPerubahan Kewenangan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum terhadap Pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum Legislatif berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah: (1). Untuk mengetahui latar belakang terjadinya perubahan kewenangan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum terhadap pelanggaran pemilihan umum legislative berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum, (2). Untuk mengetahui mekanisme penyelesaian pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum oleh Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum terhadap pelanggaran pemilihan umum legislatif berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 7 tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum yang bersifat yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan dua pendekatan yakni pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian yang melatarbelakangi perubahan kewenangan pelanggaran Pemilu yakni adanya aspirasi Bawaslu yang kesulitan dalam praktik, dimana saat terjadi pelanggaran administrasi Pemilu yang semestinya diselesaikan dengan cepat, tidak bisa dilakukan karena proses penerusan laporan dari pengawas Pemilu ke Komisi Pemilihan Umum/Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah tidak diproses secara cepat dan tidak diberi putusan serta tindakan. Disisi lain adanya usulan agar Bawaslu dan Mahkamah Konstitusi menjadi dua lembaga yang menangani perselisihan Pemilu. Mahkamah Konstitusi menangani perselisihan hasil Pemilu, sedangkan Bawaslu menangani pelanggaran ketentuan Administrasi pemilu, menjadi penyidik dan penuntut pelanggaran ketentuan pidana Pemilu, perselisihan antara Komisi Pemilihan Umum dengan peserta Pemilu, perselisihan antara peserta Pemilu. Bawaslu hendak dikembangkan menjadi penegak hukum dan menyelesaikan sebagian sengketa Pemilu. Pelanggaran Pemilu dibagi menjadi enam jenis yaitu Tindak Pidana Pemilu, Kode Etik Penyelenggara Pemilu, Pelanggaran Administrasi Pemilu, Sengketa Pemilu, Perselisihan hasil Pemilu, sengketa tata usaha Negara. Keseluruhan pelanggaran Pemilu ini ditangani oleh masing-masing lembaga yang berbeda.Kata kunci: pemilu legislatif; pelanggaran pemilu; mekanisme penanganan pelanggaran pemiluABSTRACTT Changes to the Authority of the General Election Supervisory Board on Violations of Legislative General Elections based on Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. The objectives of this study are: (1). To find out the background of the change in authority of the General Election Supervisory Agency against violations of the legislative general election based on Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, (2). To find out the mechanism for resolving violations of the General Election by the General Election Supervisory Board against violations of legislative elections based on Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. This type of research is legal normative juridical research using two approaches namely the approach of legislation and a conceptual approach. The results of the research behind the change in election violation authority are the aspirations of Bawaslu which have difficulties in practice, where during the election administration violations which should be resolved quickly, cannot be done because the process of forwarding reports from Election supervisors to the Election Commission/Regional Election Commission is not processed quickly and not given decisions and actions. On the other hand there is a proposal that the Election Supervisory Body and the Constitutional Court be two institutions that handle election disputes. The Constitutional Court handles disputes over election results, while the Election Supervisory Body handles violations of electoral administration provisions, becomes investigators and prosecutors of violations of Election criminal provisions, disputes between the General Election Commission and election participants, disputes between election participants. Bawaslu wants to be developed into law enforcement and resolve some election disputes. Election Violations are divided into six types, namely Election Crimes, Election Organizers Code of Ethics, Election Administration Violations, Election Disputes, Election Results Disputes, State administrative disputes. All of these Election violations are handled by different institutions.Keywords: legislative elections; election violations; mechanism for handling election violations

scholarly journals KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERANGKAT DESA YANG IKUT SERTA DALAM KAMPANYE PEMILU DI KABUPATEN INDRAGIRI HILIR

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-145
Author(s):  
Fitri Wahyuni ◽  
Aris Irawan
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
General Election ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
Commission Regulation ◽  
Government Bureaucracy ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Village

The general election or regional head election (hereinafter referred to as the Regional Head Election) in a country is an effort to realize good governance and the realization of a democratic state. However, it raises legal problems in the field, such as the occurrence of the attitudes of state officials or state apparatus in this case, one of which is village officials who participate in efforts to win one of the candidates for election and post-conflict local election. This needs to be investigated through legal studies using normative legal research methods, with legal research sources namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials and the analysis used in this study using qualitative analysis. The Village Head is one part of the Government Bureaucracy which has been clearly regulated in the Election Law. All government bureaucracies may not be involved or support one candidate, including one of them is the Village Head, but in practice there are still many Village Heads who support certain candidates. In article 66 clause 2 part C about The General Election Commission Regulation Number 7 of 2015 was emphasized in the campaign, candidate pairs and/or campaign teams are prohibited from involving “village head or other designations/lurah and village apparatus or other designations/kelurahan.” The prohibition to include village heads and village apparatus is contained in Article 280 paragraph (2) of the Election Law. It is clear that if the campaign involves the village apparatus, it is included in the election violation and is included in an election crime and can be given a criminal sanction if it is proven to have committed an election crime.   Pemilihan umum ataupun  juga pemilihan kepala daerah (yang selanjutnya disebut dengan Pemilukada) dalam suatu negara merupakan upaya untuk mewujudkan pemerintahan yang baik serta terwujudnya negara demokrasi. Namun menimbulkan persoalan-persoalah hukum di lapangan seperti terjadinya sikap-sikap aparat negara atau perangkat-perangkat negara dalam hal ini salah satunya adalah perangkat desa yang ikut serta dalam upaya memenangkan salah satu calon peserta pemilu maupun pemilukada. Hal ini perlu diteliti melalui kajian hukum dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan sumber penelitian hukum yakni bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder serta analisa yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Kepala Desa merupakan salah satu bagian dari Birokrasi Pemerintah yang telah diatur secara jelas di dalam Undang-Undang Pemilu. Semua birokrasi pemerintahan tidak boleh terlibat ataupun mendukung salah satu calon termasuk salah satunya adalah Kepala Desa namun dalam pelaksanaannya masih banyak seorang Kepala Desa menjadi pendukung bagi calon tertentu. Pada pasal 66 ayat 2 bagian C Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 7 tahun 2015 ditegaskan dalam kampanye, pasangan calon dan/atau tim kampanye dilarang melibatkan “kepala desa atau sebutan lain/lurah dan perangkat desa atau sebutan lain/kelurahan ”Larangan mengikut sertakan kepala desa dan perangkat desa terdapat dalam Pasal 280 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Pemilu. Jelas bahwa apabila dalam kampanye melibatkan  dan perangkat desa  termasuk dalam pelanggaran pemilu dan masuk dalam tindak pidana pemilu dan dapat diberi sanksi berupa pidana apabila terbukti melakukan tindak pidana pemilu.

scholarly journals EFEKTIVITAS PENYELESAIAN PELANGGARAN ADMINISTRATIF PEMILIHAN UMUM BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
Evi Noviawati ◽  
Mamay Komariah
Keyword(s):  
General Election ◽  
Political Education ◽  
The Political ◽  
Election Campaign ◽  
Limited Time ◽  
The People ◽  
National Leaders ◽  
Commission Regulation ◽  
Election Commission

The Elections (Elections) in Indonesia is a process of democratization to elect national leaders and people's representatives who are elected directly by the people. The process of organizing the General Election is carried out through the stages stipulated in the Election Commission Regulation. One of the stages that must be passed in the holding of elections is the implementation of campaigns that are part of the political education of the community. In the implementation of an election campaign, election participants can form a campaign team that is responsible for the technical implementation of the campaign. Election administrative violations often occur in the stages of the campaign carried out by election participants which can consequently be detrimental to the election organizers and fellow election participants. Every settlement of election administrative violations can be decided by the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) no later than 7 (seven) working days after the findings and reports are received and registered and then recommended to the KPU for further action. In reality on the ground, there are still many cases of election administrative violations that cannot be resolved due to several obstacles faced, namely the difficulty of finding the reporting party and the limited time in the process of filing reports and findings

scholarly journals PENGATURAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG HAK POLITIK MANTAN TERPIDANA KASUS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI SEBAGAI CALON ANGGOTA LEGISLATIF PADA PEMILIHAN UMUM TAHUN 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-80
Author(s):  
Hamidi Hamidi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Scientific Paper ◽  
General Election ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Higher Law ◽  
Election Commission

General election is a means of democracy that is used to elect people's representatives to sit as legislative members in the MPR, DPR, DPD and DPRD. The election was conducted in accordance with Article 2 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. The 2019 election was also attended by former convicted corruption cases. This is in accordance with PKPU rules Number 20 of 2018. With this decision, an extra-judicial polemic arises which is appropriate and important to be studied more specifically and academically. The formulation of the problem in this research is, How to regulate the political rights of former convicted corruption cases as legislative candidates in the 2019 general election? What are the implications of regulating the political rights of former convicts of corruption as a candidate for legislative members in the 2019 General Elections on Human Rights? The specification of this research is normative juridical research, which is a form of research that aims to describe the applicable laws and regulations, linked to legal theories and practice of positive law enforcement, which will later be linked to the problems examined in this scientific paper. Based on the results of the analysis, answers can be obtained: 1) The Political Rights Regulation of Former Convicted Corruption Crime Cases as Legislative Candidates in the General Election Year contradicts a higher law because based on the mandate of article 4 paragraph (3) Number 20 of 2018 concerning Election Commission Regulations General as well as article 240 paragraph (1) letter (g) of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. Article 28 letter d of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. 2) Implications of regulating the political rights of former convicted corruption cases as candidates for legislative members in the 2019 general election against human rights, revocation of political rights for convicted corruption cases by human rights law activists (HAM) is of the view that deprivation of political rights is a violation of human rights. This is still debatable, because every sentence is basically a violation of human rights, but the violation is allowed, as long as it is based on the law.

scholarly journals Pertentangan Asas Perundang-undangan dalam Pengaturan Larangan Mobilisasi Anak pada Kampanye Pemilu

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 657
Author(s):  
Meta Suriyani
Keyword(s):  
Child Protection ◽  
General Election ◽  
Election Campaign ◽  
Political Activities ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
Commission Regulation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Election Commission ◽  
Year 2013

Article 32 paragraph (1) letter k Election Commission Regulation No. 15 Year 2013 describes implementers, participants, and officials are prohibited from mobilizing campaigns Indonesian citizens who do not meet syarats as Voters. However, Law No. 8 of 2012 on General Election of DPR, DPD and DPRD itself, does not expressly prohibit the mobilization of Indonesian citizens who do not yet qualify as a selector or exploitation of children in political activities, including campaign. So that the Commission regulation violates the hierarchy of legislation that is in of commencement shall contrary to the Law on Election of Members of Legislative as higher regulations. Therefore, it is also not in line with Law No. 35 of 2014 on the Amendment of Act No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection. Mobilization of children in the activities of the election campaign is the deprivation of the rights of the child. Intentionally or unintentionally, the actual implementers, participants, and campaign officers have done wrong treatment (exploitation) by mobilizing children who do not qualify as voters in political activities in the activities of the election campaign for the DPR, DPD and DPRD held at central and regional levels occur in almost all parts of Indonesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document