scholarly journals PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIK SISWA YANG MEMPEROLEH PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT BERBANTUAN GEOGEBRA DI KELAS VII SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 3 MEDAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurhakiki . . ◽  
Katrina . Samosir
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Class I ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Essay Test ◽  
Student Team

ABSTRAK Penelitian yang dilakukan di SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Medan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematik siswa dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Team Achievement Division berbantuan GeoGebra dan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Teams Games Tournament berbantuan GeoGebra di kelas. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Medan yang terdiri dari 7 kelas. Sedangkan yang menjadi sampel dalam penelitian ini ada dua kelas, yaitu kelas VII-B yang berjumlah 27 orang yang memperoleh pembelajaran koooperatif tipe STAD sebagai kelas eksperimen I dan kelas VII-A yang berjumlah 24 orang yang memperoleh pembelajaran koooperatif tipe TGT sebagai kelas eksperimen II. Penentuan sampel dilakukan secara acak. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tes berbentuk uraian sebanyak 5 soal yang telah dinyatakan valid. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pengujian hipotesis dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan penalaran matematik siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran koooperatif tipe STAD berbantuan GeoGebra lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran koooperatif tipe TGT berbantuan GeoGebra pada materi jajargenjang dan belah ketupat, dengan  dan   pada taraf nyata α = 0,05 dan dk = 49. Karena  yaitu maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa  diterima yang berarti kemampuan penalaran matematik siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD berbantuan GeoGebra  lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TGT berbantuan GeoGebra pada materi jajargenjang dan belah ketupat. Rata-rata nilai postes kelas eksperimen I lebih tinggi daripada rata-rata nilai postes kelas eksperimen II yaitu 75,67 dengan standar deviasi  dan  dengan standar deviasi . Kata Kunci : Kemampuan Penalaran Matematik, Student Team Achievement Division, Teams Games Tournament, GeoGebra ABSRACTThis study is conducted in SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Medan aims to know the difference of a mathematic reasoning ability by using cooperative learning model types Student Team Achievement Division and GeoGebra and cooperative learning model types Teams Games Tournament and GeoGebra in grade VII. The population of this study is all students grade VII SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Medan consistings of 7 classes. While the sample of this study is two classes namely grade VII-B consistings of 27 students whom got cooperative learning typed STAD as an experimental class I and grade VII-A consistings of 24 students whom got cooperative learning typed TGT as an experimental class II. The determination of the sample is randomly conducted. The instrument used in this study is essay test as many as 5 tests which are claimed valid. Based on the result of the study and testing the hypothesis can be concluded that students’ mathematic reasoning ability which get cooperative learning typed STAD and GeoGebra are higher than students who get cooperative learning typed TGT and GeoGebra at array and belah ketupat, tcount = 3,15 and ttable = 1,68 taraf nyata α = 0,05 dan dk = 49. Because  yaitu, thus can be concluded that  is accepted, means students’ mathematic reasoning ability who get cooperative learning model typed STAD and GeoGebra are higher than the students who get cooperative learning typed TGT and  GeoGebra at array and belah ketupat array. The average of experimental class I post-test is higher than the average of  experimental class II namely 75,67 and its deviation standard is   while  and its deviation standard is .      Keywords : mathematic reasoning ability, Student Team Achievement Division, Teams Games Tournament, GeoGebraa

scholarly journals The Difference of Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability Taught by Cooperative Learning Model Think Talk Write Type and Numbered Head Together Type

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiva Marthaulina Lestari Siahaan ◽  
E. Elvis Napitupulu
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Posttest Score ◽  
Class I ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Communication Ability ◽  
The Difference

The purpose of this research was to know there was any difference in student’s mathematical communication ability in cooperative learning Think TalkWrite (TTW) type and Numbered Head Together (NHT) type. The population was all students at SMP Negeri 1 Lubuk Pakam. The sample was two classes which each consist of 36 students, VII A as experimental class I which taught by TTW and VII B as experimental class II which taught by NHT. The sample was taken by cluster random sampling. Collecting data technique of this research was mathematical comunication ability essay test that was given in the end of learning either in experimental class I or experimental class II. From the data analysis of each of experimental class were obtained that the average of posttest score in TTW classroom was higher than in NHT classroom. It was also obtained that score of mathematical communication indicators in TTW classroom was higher than in NHT classroom. From the data analysis of posttest score by using t-test with significance level α = 0.05, it was obtained that tcount = 4.687 and ttable = 1.667. It means that tcount > ttable then H0 was rejected and Ha was accepted. So, it can be concluded that there was difference of student’s mathematical communication ability who taught by cooperative learning model type TTW with NHT at SMP Negeri 1 Lubuk Pakam.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISTEM KOMPUTER SISWA KELAS X JURUSAN TEKNIK KOMPUTER JARINGAN DI SMK NEGERI 5 PADANG

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aprayanti Nasution ◽  
Nelda Azhar ◽  
Sukaya Sukaya
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Control ◽  
Student Team

The problem of the research is the low learning results of the students on the subjects of computer systems of SMK Negeri 5 Padang. This is due to several factors one of which is the method or strategy learning that is less innovative. The purpose of the research is to know the difference of result the study by using cooperative learning model of type Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subjects of a computer system class X TKJ of  SMK Negeri 5 Padang. This type of research is experimental. Where is to take the sampling by using random sampling technique. As the experimental class is class X TKJ A which will be treated by using cooperative learning model type STAD and control class is X TKJ B which will be treated by using inquiry model of learning. The technique of collecting data from post test, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results get the average value 82, 29, while the control class gets an average value of 76.93. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got  thitung> ttabel  that is (2,182> 2,056) Because thitung  is bigger than ttabel hence hypothesis (H0) rejected and hypothesis (Ha) accepted. From the calculation of the learning result Gain where O1 is the average of the experimental class and O2 is the control class, the percentage of learning result is increased by 6.79%. It can be concluded that by using cooperative learning model of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type has an effect on student learning result which proves from improvement of learning result. Keyword    : Learning Resultss, Cooperative Learning Model TypeSTAD, Inquiry Learning Model.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MENERAPKAN DASAR-DASAR KELISTRIKAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
M. Alfajri ◽  
Edidas Edidas ◽  
Thamrin Thamrin
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Experiment Control ◽  
Result Show ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Student Team

This research aims to confirm the magnitude of the influence of cooperative learning models of the student team achievement division (STAD) on the learning outcomes of class X EI students in study Menerapkan Dasar-dasar Kelistrikan (MDDK) at SMKN 4 Pariaman. This type of research is a quasy experiment with a post test only design. The sample of this study was the X class majoring in industrial electronics at SMKN 4 Pariaman. Class X EI A / I as the experimental class given the treatment of cooperative learning model STAD type and class X EI B / I as the control class given treatment the direct learning model. The results of the research found an average of 76,83 experimental class and 69,17 control class. After done the t test, the result show that thitung > ttabel then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted.After calculation, the difference in learning outcomes was found to be 11.07%. The conclusion is that there is an effect to student learning outcomes from the application of cooperative learning models of student team achievement division type.Keywords: Student team achievement division, learning models, learning outcomes, experiment, control

scholarly journals Perbandingan Metode Pembelajaran Number Heads Together (NHT) Dan Metode Pembelajaran Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VII Di MTs Madinatussalam

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-201
Author(s):  
Adha Siagian ◽  
◽  
Kartika Manalu ◽  
Khairuddin Khairuddin
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Test Score ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Choice Test ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
High Category ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Difference

This study aims to determine the differences between NHT) and STAD learning outcomes of clas VII Biology MTs Madinatussalam. The sample of this research is class VII-1 with 32 student as NHT class and 32 student in VII-2 as STAD class. The instrument used in this study was a multiple choice test concisting of 20 questions. The results of analysis showed that the average post-test score for the experimental class I NHT was 82 very high category. Meanwhile, the experimental class II STAD the average post-test score was 67,2 high category. The hypothesis test of the difference in learning outcomes of students in expremental class I NHT and expremental class II STAD, obtained tcount = 6,036>ttable = 1.999, then Ho is rejected and Ha is acepted. This shows that there is a difference in the biology lerning out comes of student who are thought using NHT learning method and those taught using the STAD learning method.

scholarly journals The Effect of The Student Team Achivment Division Type Cooperative Learning Model on Basic School Student Learning Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Robi’atul Adawiyah ◽  
Mohammad Taufiq ◽  
Sri Hartatik ◽  
Akhawani
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
School Students ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Student Team

This study aims to analyze the application of the cooperative learning model of the Student Team Achivment Division type in improving the learning outcomes of elementary school students and to find out the difference in the increase in learning outcomes obtained by students when using the Cooperative learning model of the Student Team Achivment Division type. The difference in the improvement of learning outcomes obtained from 10 relevant journals was caused by the subjects selected by different researchers such as different research sites, different abilities possessed by each selected subject, and different years of research. This type of research is quantitative research using the meta-analysis method. The research begins with formulating research, looking for relevant journals available in electronic media. Based on the analysis of the cooperative learning model, the Student Team Achivment Division type can improve student learning outcomes by an average of 78.59 from the previous 53.53. Based on this research, the application of the cooperative learning model type Student Team Achivment Division can be used as a suggestion to be applied in elementary schools.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF USE MODEL MAKE A MATCH & PICTURE AND PICTURE AND STUDY LEARNING STYLE ON LEARNING RESULTS OF SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE CLASS II CLUSTER XI CIBINONG-BOGOR

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-49
Author(s):  
Ajat Sudrajat ◽  
Marfuah Darojat
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Social Knowledge ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Knowledge Learning

This research is a quantitative research that aims to know the difference of learning result of Social Knowledge learners using learning model make a match and picture and picture; Differences in learning outcomes of Social Knowledge learners who have a tendency of visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning styles; And the influence of interaction between cooperative learning model and student learning style tendency toward Social Knowledge learning result. The research was conducted in Cibinong District XI Cluster with sample of students of class II of SDN Ciriung 02 ( Public School Ciriung 2) which amounted to 78 students. Instrument used in this research is questionnaire and test result of learning. Data analysis techniques in this study using Saphiro Wilk Test to test the normality of data and Bartlett Test to test the homogeneity of data. After that, two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) Test was done to test the difference of mean value between groups followed by Tukey HSD test to see group interaction with reference to significant level α = 0,05. The results showed that there was a difference between learning outcomes of IPS learners using cooperative learning model make a match and picture and picture with significance of 0,000; There are differences in learning outcomes of Social Knowledge learners who have a tendency of visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning styles with significance of 0,001; And there is no direct interaction effect between the use of cooperative learning model and the learner's learning style tendency toward Social Knowledge learning result. This is indicated by a significance of 0,535.Keywords : Make a Match, Picture and Picture, learning style, Social Science learning result.

scholarly journals PERBEDAAN PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DAN TIPE JIGSAW TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aris Doyan ◽  
Wayan Gunada ◽  
Susilawati ◽  
Ida AYu Desy Adriani
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Achievement Motivation ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Class I ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Learning Analysis

The research is aimed to finding difference of effect the implementation of cooperative learning model STAD and Jigsaw type on the result of physic learning, difference of effect the students whose achievement motivation on result of physic learning and interaction of effect between the learning model implementation and the achievement motivation on the result of physic learning. This type of research is quasi experimental with Factorial Design of 2x2. The population in this research is all Class VIII SMPN 12 Mataram with used technique cluster random sampling. There are two samples that are class VIII C as an experiment class I and class VIII D as experiment class II. The experiment class I used the treatment STAD cooperative learning model and the experiment class II used the treatment Jigsaw cooperative learning. Analysis technique using analysis of variance (ANOVA) two way different cells. Based on by calculation hypothesis testing obtained that, FA hint (6,37) > Ftable (4,02) then Ho1 rejected, FB hint (12,37) > Ftable (4,02) then Ho2 rejected,, FAB hint (0,96) < Ftable (4,02) then Ho3accepted. With significant level 0,05 obtained that there is a difference of effect the implementation of cooperative learning model STAD and Jigsaw type on the result of physic learning, there is a difference of effect the students whose achievement is high and low motivation on the result of physic learning and there is no interaction between of cooperative learning model STAD and Jigsaw type with achievement motivation towards of physics learning.

scholarly journals Academic Achievement and Conceptual Understanding of Electrodynamics: Applications Geoelectric Using Cooperative Learning Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-175
Author(s):  
Rizqi Prastowo ◽  
Syamsul Huda ◽  
Rofiqul Umam ◽  
Kittisak Jermsittiparsert ◽  
Andika Eko Prasetiyo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Geophysical Surveys ◽  
Environmental Geophysics ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Practice Method ◽  
Quantitative Design

Students' comprehension of the theory is often implemented as an effort to improve their achievements. However, other learning processes are rarely carried out by teachers, such as the practice or tools uses as the lesson application. The purpose of this study is to analyze the learning effectiveness by applying the geophysical surveys practice method or the use of environmental geophysics tools. The assessment of students' abilities is based on the interpretation results of environmental geophysical survey data and the presentations and discussions about the results of interpretation. The TGT Cooperative learning model was used with a quasi-experimental method and quantitative design. Data collection was carried out using a series of research instruments in the form of questionnaires. The results of the study were based on comparisons between the experimental class and the control class. The results show that the experimental class has excellent findings. 1) Based on the results of the post-test, the TGT cooperative learning method is very effective in this study, because teamwork can maintain students' enthusiasm and understanding during the learning process. 2) Retrieval of field data makes students better understand the application of geoelectric concepts and determination of rock resistivity.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stand (Student Team Achivement Division) Guna Meningkatkan Pemahaman dan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pelajaran Wadah Budidaya Perikanan di Kelas II TBP Sekolah Usaha Perikanan Menengah (SUPM) Negeri Sorong

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-53
Author(s):  
Elmi Hidayah
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Student Activity ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Class Average ◽  
Student Team ◽  
Comparison Data

This classroom action research (CAR) aims to improve the learning outcomes of class II TBP SUPM N Sorong through the STAD type learning model. For the outline, there are four stages of CAR, namely (1) planning, (2) implementation, (3) observation, and (4) reflection. This research was conducted in 3 cycles, cycle 1 as comparison data for cycles 2 and 3. The number of students who were active in this study was 30 students. The results showed that the STAD type of cooperative learning model can provide better learning outcomes. This can be seen by the average value acquisition in cycle 1 38.06 and learning completeness score 16.6% then an increase in the average value in cycles 2 and 3 with cooperative learning type STAD, namely, cycle 2 class average value of 73.3 with a percentage of completeness learning 76.6% and cycle 3 class average value of 74.16 with a percentage of learning completeness 90%. Likewise with student activity has increased.

HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF SISWA MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE AIR DAN NHT

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Idham Kamil ◽  
Kashardi Kashardi
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Understanding ◽  
Class I ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Class Viii

This study aims to find out the significant differences between students' mathematical understanding abilities that are taught using the Cooperative Learning Model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and conventional learning models, and which learning model gives better results to improve students' mathematical understanding abilities. This type of research is quasi-experimental. The population in this study was class VIII 27 of Seluma State Junior High School consisting of 4 classes. The sample of this study was chosen 3 classes randomly, namely class VIII A as the experimental class I using the Cooperative learning model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), class VIII B as the experimental class II using the cooperative learning model type Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and Class VIII C as a control class using conventional learning models. Data collection on student mathematics learning outcomes in the form of tests consisting of pre-test and post-test. Data were analyzed using ANAVA and BNT. Based on ANAVA results, there are differences between students' mathematics learning outcomes in experimental class I, experimental class II, and control class. Based on the LSD test it was found that the treatment between the experimental class I with the experimental class II, the experimental class I with the control class, and the experimental class II with the control class there were differences. Auditory IntellectualyReceptition (AIR) cooperative learning model provides better results than the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model and Conventional learning model.Keywords: mathematical understanding ability,  AIR,  NHT, learning model

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document