scholarly journals Academic Achievement and Conceptual Understanding of Electrodynamics: Applications Geoelectric Using Cooperative Learning Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-175
Author(s):  
Rizqi Prastowo ◽  
Syamsul Huda ◽  
Rofiqul Umam ◽  
Kittisak Jermsittiparsert ◽  
Andika Eko Prasetiyo ◽  
...  

Students' comprehension of the theory is often implemented as an effort to improve their achievements. However, other learning processes are rarely carried out by teachers, such as the practice or tools uses as the lesson application. The purpose of this study is to analyze the learning effectiveness by applying the geophysical surveys practice method or the use of environmental geophysics tools. The assessment of students' abilities is based on the interpretation results of environmental geophysical survey data and the presentations and discussions about the results of interpretation. The TGT Cooperative learning model was used with a quasi-experimental method and quantitative design. Data collection was carried out using a series of research instruments in the form of questionnaires. The results of the study were based on comparisons between the experimental class and the control class. The results show that the experimental class has excellent findings. 1) Based on the results of the post-test, the TGT cooperative learning method is very effective in this study, because teamwork can maintain students' enthusiasm and understanding during the learning process. 2) Retrieval of field data makes students better understand the application of geoelectric concepts and determination of rock resistivity.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Lasmi Lasmi ◽  
Masri Masri

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa antara model discovery learning dan jigsaw. Jenis penelitian adalah eksperimen semu. Tempat penelitian diaksanakan di SMP Negeri 18 Kota Bengkulu. Populasi pada penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VII. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak sederhana yaitu kelas VII.1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model discovery learning, kelas VII.5 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw, dan kelas VII.3 sebagai kelas kontrol, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kelas eksperimen 1 memperoleh nilai rata-rata tes akhir (post-test) kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yaitu 12,13, nilai rata-rata eksperimen 2 yaitu 11,45, dan nilai rata-rata kelas kontrol yaitu 9,26. Berdasarkan hasil analisis uji anava satu jalur, dengan signifikan 0,05 diperoleh 𝐹ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 = 𝐹𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 = 0,34, maka H0 ditolak. Artinya ada perbedaan signifikan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa pada kelas eksperimen 1, kelas eksperimen 2, dan kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan uji beda nyata (BNT) menunjukan bahwa pembelajaran yang memberikan hasil penalaran matematis yang berbeda adalah model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan konvensional, dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan konvensional. Sedangkan pembelajaran dengan model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw tidak memberikan hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang berbeda. Model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw memberikan hasil lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan model konvensional.Kata kunci: kemampuan penalaran matematis, model discovery learning, model Jigsaw AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine students' mathematical reasoning abilities with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of class VII SMP Negeri 18 Bengkulu City in the   academic year 2019/2020. The sample of this study was selected by simple random sampling, namely class VII.1 as experimental class 1 using the discovery learning models, class VII.5 as experimental class 2 using the jigsaw type cooperative learning models, and class VII.3 as control class using conventional learning models. Data were collected by means of tests of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA test, there are significant differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the experimental class 1, experiment class 2 and the control class. The results          of the real difference test (BNT) show that learning that gives different results is the discovery learning models with conventional learning models, and the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with conventional learning models. Meanwhile, learning with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models does not give different results for students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models give better results when compared to conventional learning.Keywords: mathematical   reasoning   ability,   discovery   learning   model,   Jigsaw   model


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Nur Fadilah Aning Detri ◽  
Ni Nyoman Sri Putu Verawati ◽  
Satutik Rahayu

[Title: The Effect of STAD and Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model on the Physics Concepts Mastery]. This research aims to determine the influence of cooperative learning model of STAD and Jigsaw type through physics concept mastery of XI grade students in SMAN 1 Kediri. This type of research is the quasi experimental with posttest only control group design. The population of this research is all students of XI grade in SMAN 1 Kediri of 2018/2019 year of lesson with cluster random sampling taking technique. There are two samples that is the class that given treatment by cooperative learning model STAD’s type (class experiment 1) and class that given treatment by Jigsaw’s type (class experiment 2). The result revealed that the mean score of the post-test for concept mastery for two class in row are 73.69 and 61.07. The two class was homogeny and normal disrtribution. The research hypothesis was tested using t-test polled variances. The result showed that the value of ttab was higher than tarith, (2.841>2.021) at 5% as significancy, that mean H0 rejected and Ha received. Based on result of data analysis and discussion, the conclusion are there was an effect between cooperative learning model STAD and Jigsaw type through physics concept mastery of XI grade students in SMAN 1 Kediri.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-144
Author(s):  
Nazirin Nazirin

The research analyses the effect of cooperative learning model Jigsaw type and learning motivation on student’s understanding on citizenship subject. The research method uses quasi experimental design with post test only control design. The subject of research was 44 students which constitutes two classes, experiment and control classes. The data collection employs test and questionnaire. The data was analyzed using Two-way Anova test. The results show that cooperative learning model Jigsaw type hasa significant effect on student’s conceptual understanding. The ANOVA test produce significant level below 0.05, which indicates there is significant effect of the Jigsaw model and learning motivation on student achievement. It can be concluded that the cooperative learning model contributes better to learning achievement than conventional learning model, and a high learning motivation contributes better to students learning achievement in citizentship subject than a low learning motivation.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan motivasi terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa sekolah dasar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi eksperimen dengan post test only control design. Subjek penelitian sebanyak 44 siswa yang terdiri dari 22 siswa sebagai kelas eksperimen dan 22 siswa sebagai kelas kontrol. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Anova 2 jalur. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw yang positif dan signifikan terhadap hasil belajar siswa berupa pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa. Siswa dengan tingkat motivasi yang tinggi lebih baik dalam hal penggunaan model Jigsaw dan hasil belajar, dibandingkan dengan siswa yang mempunyai motivasi rendah. Terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran ceramah untuk mencapai  hasil belajar yang lebih baik, dan bahwa siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang rendah dalam penggunaan atau pemanfaatan model pembelajaran Jigsaw dan hasil belajarnya.


Author(s):  
Imanuel Alan Onibala ◽  
Parsaoran Tamba ◽  
Denny Maukkar

ABSTRAK. Media pendidikan sebagai salah satu sarana meningkatkan mutu pendidikan sangat penting dalam proses PBM. Penggunaan media pendidikan dapat memperbaiki PBM siswa yang pada gilirannya dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar yang dicapainya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) terhadap hasil siswa pada mata pelajaran Motor Bensin kelas XI di SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. Penelitian ini dikategorikan dalam penelitian Eksperimen Semu (quasi exsperimental). Desain penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah desain jenis pre-test dan post-test group design. Berdasarkan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai t hitung sebesar 4,4360 dan nilai t tabel 1,6772 artinya  nilai t hitung lebih besar dari t tabel maka signifikan. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada penggunaan model pembelajaran Kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization)  dan konvensional terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di SMK N 1 Motoling. Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar, Team Assisted Individualization.   ABSTRACT. Educational media as a means of improving the quality of education is very important in the PBM process. The use of educational media can improve students' PBM which in turn can improve the learning outcomes they achieve. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) cooperative learning model on student outcomes in the XI class of gasoline motorbike subjects at SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. This research is categorized as a quasi-experimental research. The research design used in this study was a pre-test and post-test group design. Based on the hypothesis test, the t value is 4.4360 and the t table value is 1.6772, which means that the t value is greater than the t table, so it is significant. These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the use of the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and conventional to the achievement of student learning outcomes at SMK N 1 Motoling. Keywods: Learning Outcomes, Team Assisted Individualization.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 132
Author(s):  
Nazirin Nazirin

The research analyses the effect of cooperative learning model Jigsaw type and learning motivation on student’s understanding on citizenship subject. The research method uses quasi experimental design with post test only control design. The subject of research was 44 students which constitutes two classes, experiment and control classes. The data collection employs test and questionnaire. The data was analyzed using Two-way Anova test. The results show that cooperative learning model Jigsaw type hasa significant effect on student’s conceptual understanding. The ANOVA test produce significant level below 0.05, which indicates there is significant effect of the Jigsaw model and learning motivation on student achievement. It can be concluded that the cooperative learning model contributes better to learning achievement than conventional learning model, and a high learning motivation contributes better to students learning achievement in citizentship subject than a low learning motivation. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan motivasi terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa sekolah dasar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi eksperimen dengan post test only control design. Subjek penelitian sebanyak 44 siswa yang terdiri dari 22 siswa sebagai kelas eksperimen dan 22 siswa sebagai kelas kontrol. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Anova 2 jalur. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw yang positif dan signifikan terhadap hasil belajar siswa berupa pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa. Siswa dengan tingkat motivasi yang tinggi lebih baik dalam hal penggunaan model Jigsaw dan hasil belajar, dibandingkan dengan siswa yang mempunyai motivasi rendah. Terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran ceramah untuk mencapai  hasil belajar yang lebih baik, dan bahwa siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang rendah dalam penggunaan atau pemanfaatan model pembelajaran Jigsaw dan hasil belajarnya.


2022 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-57
Author(s):  
Imanuel Alan Onibala ◽  
I. Parsaoran Tamba ◽  
Denny Maukar

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) terhadap hasil siswa pada mata pelajaran Motor Bensin kelas XI di SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. Penelitian ini dikategorikan dalam penelitian Eksperimen Semu (quasi exsperimental). Desain penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah desain jenis pre-test dan post-test group design. Berdasarkan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai t hitung sebesar 4,4360 dan nilai t tabel 1,6772 artinya  nilai t hitung lebih besar dari t tabel maka signifikan. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada penggunaan model pembelajaran Kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization)  dan konvensional terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di SMK N 1 Motoling.     Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar, Team Assisted Individualization. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) cooperative learning model on student outcomes in the XI class of gasoline motorbike subjects at SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. This research is categorized as a quasi-experimental research. The research design used in this study was a pre-test and post-test group design. Based on the hypothesis test, the t value is 4.4360 and the t table value is 1.6772, which means that the t value is greater than the t table, so it is significant. These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the use of the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and conventional to the achievement of student learning outcomes at SMK N 1 Motoling.           Keywods: Learning Outcomes, Team Assisted Individualization.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurhakiki . . ◽  
Katrina . Samosir

ABSTRAK Penelitian yang dilakukan di SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Medan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematik siswa dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Team Achievement Division berbantuan GeoGebra dan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Teams Games Tournament berbantuan GeoGebra di kelas. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Medan yang terdiri dari 7 kelas. Sedangkan yang menjadi sampel dalam penelitian ini ada dua kelas, yaitu kelas VII-B yang berjumlah 27 orang yang memperoleh pembelajaran koooperatif tipe STAD sebagai kelas eksperimen I dan kelas VII-A yang berjumlah 24 orang yang memperoleh pembelajaran koooperatif tipe TGT sebagai kelas eksperimen II. Penentuan sampel dilakukan secara acak. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tes berbentuk uraian sebanyak 5 soal yang telah dinyatakan valid. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pengujian hipotesis dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan penalaran matematik siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran koooperatif tipe STAD berbantuan GeoGebra lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran koooperatif tipe TGT berbantuan GeoGebra pada materi jajargenjang dan belah ketupat, dengan  dan   pada taraf nyata α = 0,05 dan dk = 49. Karena  yaitu maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa  diterima yang berarti kemampuan penalaran matematik siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD berbantuan GeoGebra  lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TGT berbantuan GeoGebra pada materi jajargenjang dan belah ketupat. Rata-rata nilai postes kelas eksperimen I lebih tinggi daripada rata-rata nilai postes kelas eksperimen II yaitu 75,67 dengan standar deviasi  dan  dengan standar deviasi . Kata Kunci : Kemampuan Penalaran Matematik, Student Team Achievement Division, Teams Games Tournament, GeoGebra ABSRACTThis study is conducted in SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Medan aims to know the difference of a mathematic reasoning ability by using cooperative learning model types Student Team Achievement Division and GeoGebra and cooperative learning model types Teams Games Tournament and GeoGebra in grade VII. The population of this study is all students grade VII SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Medan consistings of 7 classes. While the sample of this study is two classes namely grade VII-B consistings of 27 students whom got cooperative learning typed STAD as an experimental class I and grade VII-A consistings of 24 students whom got cooperative learning typed TGT as an experimental class II. The determination of the sample is randomly conducted. The instrument used in this study is essay test as many as 5 tests which are claimed valid. Based on the result of the study and testing the hypothesis can be concluded that students’ mathematic reasoning ability which get cooperative learning typed STAD and GeoGebra are higher than students who get cooperative learning typed TGT and GeoGebra at array and belah ketupat, tcount = 3,15 and ttable = 1,68 taraf nyata α = 0,05 dan dk = 49. Because  yaitu, thus can be concluded that  is accepted, means students’ mathematic reasoning ability who get cooperative learning model typed STAD and GeoGebra are higher than the students who get cooperative learning typed TGT and  GeoGebra at array and belah ketupat array. The average of experimental class I post-test is higher than the average of  experimental class II namely 75,67 and its deviation standard is   while  and its deviation standard is .      Keywords : mathematic reasoning ability, Student Team Achievement Division, Teams Games Tournament, GeoGebraa


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya' Julyanto

This research was motivated when the teacher delivered material tended to use conventional method (lectures) which resulted in students becoming bored. The models and strategies used in classroom learning to tend to be less attractive so that students' enthusiasm for learning decreases. As well as props/ media that are rarely used related to the material to be achieved so that students' motivation is less to participate in learning in thematic subjects, especiallyscience. This study aims to determine the effect of the example non example cooperative learning model on students' learning motivation in science subjects outside the body of plants and their function in Class IV SDN 06 Raut. This research uses Quasi experimental design or quasi experiment. While the design in this experimental study used the research design One group pre test and post test. And the method in this research is simple linear regression. Theresults of students' learning motivation in Science were obtained through analysis pretest and post test data, namely pretest (before) obtained an average of 53.95% while the post test data analysis (after) obtained an average of 56.3%. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the use of the example non example cooperative learning model does not have an insignificant effect on the motivation to learn science in the material outside the body ofanimals and plants and its function in grade IV SDN 06 Raut.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-20
Author(s):  
Iin Khairunnisa ◽  
Sugiharsono Sugiharsono

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Keefektifan model pembelajaran kooperatif metode Problem Solving dan tipe Team-Assisted Individualization (TAI)  dapat meningkatkan minat dan hasil belajar IPS, dan (2) Perbedaan keefektifan pembelajaran kooperatif metode Problem Solving dan tipe Team- Assisted Individualization dalam meningkatkan minat dan hasil belajar IPS. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh peserta didik SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Depok tahun pelajaran 2013-2014 yang terbagi menjadi 12 kelas. Sampel dalam penelitian ini terdiri atas tiga kelas yaitu dua kelas untuk kelas eksperimen dan satu kelas untuk kelas kontrol. Teknik sampling yang digunakan ialah purposive sampling. Pengumpulan data menggunakan test dan tugas. Penentuan keefektifan kedua model tersebut diuji dengan Anava satu jalur. Hasil penelitian adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Model pembelajaran kooperatif  metode Problem Solving dan tipe Team-Assisted Individualization efektif untuk meningkatkan minat dan hasil belajar IPS. (2) Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Team-Assisted Individualization lebih efektif untuk meningkatkan minat belajar peserta didik dibandingkan dengan metode Problem Solving, sedangkan metode  Problem Solving lebih efektif untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik dibandingkan dengan tipe Team-Assisted Individualization.Kata Kunci: penelitian ekperimen, problem solving, team-assisted individualization , minat belajar dan hasil belajar. ______________________________________________________________ EFFECTIVENESS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING PROBLEM SOLVING AND TAI TO IMPROVE LEARNING OUTCOMES INTERESTS AND IPS Abstract This study aims to reveal: (1) the cooperative learning model of Problem Solving method and Team-Assisted Individualization type in increasing the interest and learning outcomes in IPS, and (2) the difference the effectiveness of the cooperative learning model of Problem Solving method and Team-Assisted Individualization Type in increasing the interest and learning outcomes in IPS. This study was a quasi-experimental study. The population was all students of SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Depok in 2013-2014 divided into 12 classes. The sample consisting of three classes, two experimental classes and one control class, was establisted using the purposive sampling technique. The data were collected using a test and assignments. The determination of the effectiveness of these two models was tested with one-way Anova. The results are as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of the Problem Solving method and Team-Assisted Individualization types effective increase the interest and learning outcomes in IPS. (2) The Team-Assisted Individualization type is more effective to increase the interest of the learners than the Problem Solving method, and the Problem Solving method is more effective to improve the learning outcomes of the students than the Team-Assisted Individualization type. Keywords: experimental study, problem solving, team assisted individualization, interest in learning and learning outcomes


AKSIOMA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-293
Author(s):  
I Putu Ade Andre Payadnya ◽  
Ida Bagus Ketut Perdata ◽  
Putu Yudi Antara

AbstrakJenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu (quasi experimental), desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah Post-test Only Control Design. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMAN 6 Denpasar tahun pelajaran 2018/2019. Sempel diambil dengan teknik Cluster Random Sampling, diperoleh 2 kelas yaitu kelas X IPA 3 sebagai kelompok kontrol dan kelas X IPA 4 sebagai kelompok eksperimen dengan total sampel sebanyak 83 siswa. Data dianalisis menggunakan t-test satu pihak (pihak kanan) dengan taraf signifikansi 5%. Rata-rata hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI berbantuan media powerpoint () adalah 80,00 sedangkan rata-rata hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran konvensional () adalah 73,7. Hasil analisis data penelitian menunjukkan bahwa thitung > ttabel yaitu 4,01 > 1,98969. Diperoleh thitung > ttabel maka H0 ditolak dan Ha diterima. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut terlihat bahwa hasil belajar kelompok eksperimen yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) berbantuan media powerpoint lebih baik daripada kelompok control yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran konvensional pada siswa kelas X SMAN 6 Denpasar tahun pelajaran 2018/2019. Penyebab lebih baiknya nilai rata-rata siswa pada kelas eksperimen dikarenakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) adalah salah satu tipe atau model pembelajaran kooperatif yang mudah diterapkan, melibatkan, aktivitas seluruh siswa tanpa harus ada perbedaan status, melibatkan peran siswa sebagai tutor sebaya dan reinforcement.Kata kunci: Perbedaan, Hasil Belajar, Kooperatif, TAI, Konvensional.  AbstractThis type of research is quasi-experimental research, the research design used is "Post-test Only Control Design". The population of this study was all students of class X SMAN 6 Denpasar in 2018/2019 academic year. The sample was chosen with the Cluster Random Sampling technique, obtained 2 classes namely Class X IPA 3 as a control group and Class X IPA 4 as an experimental group with a total of 83 students. Data were analyzed using a one-tail t-test (right tail) with a significance level of 5%. The average student learning outcomes taught by the TAI type cooperative learning model assisted by powerpoint media (1) is 80.00 while the average student learning outcomes taught by conventional learning models (2) are 73.7. The results of the analysis of the research data show that tcount> ttable is 4.01> 1.98969. Obtained tcount >ttable then H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. Based on these results it can be seen that the experimental group learning outcomes taught using the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) assisted by powerpoint media are better than the control group taught with conventional learning models in class X students of SMAN 6 Denpasar in the 2018/2019 academic year. The reason for the better average scores of students in the experimental class is because the cooperative learning model type TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) is one type or model of cooperative learning that is easy to apply, involves, activities of all students without having differences in status, involving the role of students as tutors peer and reinforcement.Keywords: Differences, Results, Learning, Model, TAI, Conventional.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document