Using Valsiner Theory To Enhance Mathematical Representation Ability

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Tirto Madawistama Page (167-171)

The purpose of this research was to determine the upgrade mathematical representations of college students using learning based theory Valsiner better than the ability of mathematical representations of students who use conventional learning models and know the rest of the indicator to which students have difficulty in solving problems ability mathematical representations after being given learning based Theory Valsiner. The method used is a quasi-experimental. The population in this study are prospective teachers of mathematics education in universities Siliwangi Tasikmalaya. While the subject of the sample were college students who follow courses in semester V probability theory which consists of an experimental class and the control class in Mathematics Education. Samples were taken at random based on class, grade VB as experimental class amount 34 students, and the class as a class VD control with the amount of 34 students. The technique of collecting data using mathematical representations ability tests. The research instrument set of test questions. Data were analyzed using two different test average. From processing data analysis and hypothesis testing using real level test a = 1% result increased ability mathematical representations of students by using learning based on theory Valsiner better than the ability of mathematical representations of students who use conventional learning models, and the greatest difficulties experienced by students in solving ability representation mathematics is the visual representation indicator with a percentage of 39.71%

Eksponen ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 08-20
Author(s):  
Hartono Hartono ◽  
Muhammad Firdaus ◽  
Sipriyanti Sipriyanti

The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of mathematical representation through an open-ended approach to functional material in class VIII MTs. Sirajul Ulum Pontianak. The research method used was the experimental method with Quasi experimental research and the design used in this study was posttest-only control design. The results obtained were (1) the average ability of students' mathematical representation after being taught with an open-ended approach was 72 with the criteria classified as good; (2) The average mathematical representation ability of students is 57 with criteria classified as sufficient; and (3) The ability of mathematical representations given to the treatment of open-ended approaches is better than students given the treatment of conventional learning models, this can be seen from the average results and has been proven using inferential statistics. Every student in the control class or experiment experiences problems on each indicator, which is what distinguishes the average.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhtarom Muhtarom ◽  
Nizaruddin Nizaruddin ◽  
Farida Nursyahidah ◽  
Nurina Happy

This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) to improve students' multi-representation ability. A quasi-experimental design was used in this research. Sixty-four samples from the seventh-grade students of Junior School were randomly selected and divided into two classes: experimental class was treated using RME and control class was treated using conventional learning, with each class consisting of thirty-two students. The essay test was used to measure the multi-representation ability of students and the questionnaire was used to measure students' responses in RME learning. The data from the essay test were analyzed by N-Gain test and t-test in which normality and homogenity test were conducted previously, while the students' learning completeness and student responses were presented descriptive quantitative. The result of the research concluded that the multi-representation ability of students who get RME learning is better than the multi-representation ability in students who get conventional learning. 87.25% of students who get RME learning with the developed device have completed the KKM, and many students are very enthusiastic and interested in RME based learning, thus increasing their learning spirit in a learning process.


GERAM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Fenny Anita

This research was conducted to explain the effect of the learning model CIRC and reading interest on the results of the descriptive essay writing skills of class X SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. This type of research is a quantitative study using a quasi-experimental method and a 2x2 factorial experimental design. The population of this study was students of class X SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Sampling was done by purposive sampling with a sample size of 60 students. Data collection was carried out using two instruments, namely questionnaires and performance tests. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that four things are as follows. First, the skills of writing essays of descriptions of students taught using the learning model CIRC are better than those taught by conventional learning models of class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Second, the writing skills of students who have high reading interest who are taught using the learning model CIRC are higher than students who have high reading interest who are taught using the conventional learning model of class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Third, the writing skills of students who have low reading interest who are taught using the learning model CIRC are higher than students who have low reading interest who are taught using the conventional learning model of class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Fourth, there is no interaction between reading interest and learning models in influencing the writing skills of descriptive essays of class X SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang.


Author(s):  
Riki Andriatna

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah yang dikombinasikan dengan menulis matematika terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dengan tinjauan kemampuan awal matematis siswa dengan kategori tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan menggunakan satu kelompok eksperimen dengan perlakukan model pembelajarann berbasis masalah yang dikombinasikan dengan menulis matematika dan satu kelompok kontrol yang hanya diberikan perlakukan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Metode pengumpulan data terdiri dari tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis variansi dua jalan sel tidak sama. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah yang dikombinasikan dengan menulis matematika lebih baik daripada kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang hanya menggunakan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah secara umum maupun berdasarkan kategori kemampuan awal matematis. Ditinjau dari kategori kemampuan awal matematis, siswa kategori tinggi dan sedang menunjukkan tidak adanya perbedaan kemampuan pemecahan masalah yang signifikan, sedangkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa kategori tinggi dan sedang lebih baik jika dibandingkan dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa kategori rendah. Kata kunci: pembelajaran berbasis masalah, menulis matematika, kemampuan pemecahan masalah, kemampuan awal matematis.   ABSTRACT This study aims to look at the effect of problem-based learning models combined with mathematical writing on problem solving abilities with a review of students' mathematical early capabilities in high, medium, and low categories. This research is a quasi-experimental study using one experimental group with the treatment of problem-based learning models combined with writing mathematics and a control group that is only given the treatment of problem-based learning models. Data collection methods consist of tests of mathematical problem solving abilities. Data analysis techniques using two path analysis of variance are not the sam cell. The results showed that the problem-solving ability of students who use problem-based learning models combined with writing mathematics is better than the problem-solving abilities of students who only use problem-based learning models in general or by the category of mathematical early ability. Judging from the early mathematical ability category, high and medium category students showed no significant difference in problem solving abilities while the problem solving ability of high and medium category students was better when compared to the problem solving ability of low category students. Keywords: problem based learning, writing mathematics, problem solving ability, mathematics early ability.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati

The purpose of this research is to know the influence of Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Numbered Head Together (NHT) model to the students 'mathematical learning achievement that reviewed students' mathematical reasoning ability. This research is a quasi-experimental research with 3 × 3 factorial design. The researcher uses 2 indicators of learning achievement that is (1) Mathematics achievement test and (2) Test of mathematical communication ability. Analysis of the data used is the analysis of two-way variants with different cells. The results of this research can be summarized as follows. (1) Learning using TGT learning model makes better student's mathematical learning achievement compared to student's mathematical learning achievement with NHT learning model and conventional learning, while NHT model gives a better result of student's mathematical learning achievement from student's learning achievement with conventional learning. (2) Learners with high mathematical reasoning ability have better learning achievement compared with learners with medium ability as well as medium ability better than low ability. (3) Students have high and moderate reasoning abilities with the three learning models giving the same mathematical achievement, whereas students with low mathematical reasoning ability using TGT and NHT models provide the same mathematical achievement, but better than conventional learning models, and conventional learning models and NHT produces the same mathematical achievement. (4) The learning model of TGT and NHT in students with high, medium and low mathematical reasoning ability produce the same mathematical achievement, whereas conventional learning model on students with high and medium mathematical reasoning has the same mathematical achievement but better than students with reasoning low math.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-248
Author(s):  
Irena Puji Luritawaty

AbstrakLatar belakang penelitian ini yaitu fakta bahwa kemampuan komunikasi matematik terbukti berperan strategis dalam berbagai kegiatan pembelajaran, termasuk matematika. Tetapi, pencapaiannya belum optimal. Penelitian ini diantaranya bertujuan menemukan sulusi untuk pengembangan kemampuan komunikasi dalam matematika melalui pembelajaran berbasis Take and Give di kalangan mahasiswa agar mempunyai kompetensi untuk berkomunikasi matematika dengan baik sebagai persiapan untuk menjadi guru. Metode kuasi eksperimen digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Adapun populasi yang dipilih yaitu mahasiswa prodi pendidikan matematika pada institut pendidikan swasta di Garut, dengan mahasiswa tingkat IIA dan IIB sebagai sampel dengan jumlah 50 mahasiswa. Penelitian menggunakan instrumen berbentuk tes uraian untuk pretest dan posttest. Dari hasil penelitian secara garis besar diketahui bahwa mahasiswa dengan pembelajaran Take and Give mempunyai kemampuan komunikasi matematik yang lebih baik daripada pembandingnya yaitu mahasiswa dengan pembelajaran ceramah biasa. Pembelejaran Take and give terbukti signifikan dalam mengembangkan kemampuan komunikasi matematik. Development of Mathematical Communication Ability through Take and Give LearningAbstractBackground of this study is the fact that mathematical communication ability is proven to be a strategic role in various learning activities, including mathematics. But, the achievement is not optimal. This research included the aim of finding solutions to the development of communication skills in mathematics through Take and Give learning among college students in order to have the competence to communicate mathematics well in preparation for becoming a teacher. This research used The quasi-experimental method. The population chosen is college students of the mathematics department at private education institutes in Garut, with students of level IIA and IIB as a sample with 52 students. The study used a descriptive test instrument for pretest and posttest. Based on the results of this research in broad outline, it is known that students with Take and Give learning have mathematical communication skills that are better than the comparison, namely students with regular lecture learning. Take and give learning proved to be significant in developing mathematical communication skills.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Rois Mahfud Setiawan ◽  
Senja Putri Merona

This study aimed to determine whether the problem based learning models was better than conventional learning models in terms of critical thinking and mathematics conceptual understanding. Based on observations at MTs-N Sampung Ponorogo, it was obtained that students’ mathematics conceptual understanding and critical thinking were quite low. This research was a quasi-experimental with the population students of class VII MTs-N Sampung Ponorogo. The sample was class VII A given a conventional learning model and class VII B given a problem-based learning model. Reasearch data was collected by using test. Pretest and postest was used to get preliminary and final data. Pretest data was analyzed by using t-test while posttest data was analyzed by using the Mann Withney U test. The results of this study were the students’ ability on critical thinking and matematical conceptual understanding used problem based learning models was better than students’ used conventional learning models


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desi Tri Utami ◽  
Nuning Melianingsih

<p>This research aims to prove the effect of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model on students' mathematics learning achievement in terms of logical-mathematical intelligence. The research is a quasi-experimental study. The population of the research is all seventh grade students of State Junior High Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. The data analysis technique used is a two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. The conclusions of the research are: (1) TPS learning model produces learning achievement better than conventional learning model; (2) there is no difference in mathematics learning achievement between students with high and average logical-mathematical intelligence, and students with average and low logical-mathematical intelligence; students with high logical-mathematical intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than those with low logical-mathematical intelligence; (3) in the group of students with high, average, and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; (4) in the group of students with high and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; in the group of students with average logical-mathematical intelligence, the TPS learning model produces learning achievements better than conventional learning model</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Saidi Perri Marbun ◽  
Mukhtar . ◽  
R. Mursid

Abstrak: tujuan penelitian ini adalah (1) untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Katolik; (2) untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan interpersonal tinggi  dengan siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan interpersonal rendah; (3) untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kecerdasan interpersonal dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Pendidikan Agama Katolik. Metode dalam penelitian quasi-eksperimen. Desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Hasil belajar Pendidikan Agama Katolik siswa dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD; (2) Hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan interpersonal tinggi lebih baik dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan interpersonal rendah; dan (3)             Terdapat nteraksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan kecerdasan interpersonal dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar PAK.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran, kooperatif tipe JIGSAW dan STAD, kecerdasan interpersonal, pendidikan agama katolik Abstract: the objectives of this study are (1) to find out the differences in student learning outcomes that are taught using the Jigsaw type cooperative learning model and the STAD type cooperative learning model in Catholic Religious Education subjects; (2) to find out the difference in learning outcomes of students who have high interpersonal intelligence and students who have low interpersonal intelligence; (3) to determine the interaction between learning models and interpersonal intelligence in influencing the learning outcomes of Catholic Religious Education. Methods in quasi-experimental research. 2 x 2 factorial research design. The results showed that: (1) The learning outcomes of Catholic Religious Education students with a jigsaw type cooperative learning model were better than the STAD type cooperative learning model; (2) The learning outcomes of students who have high interpersonal intelligence are better than the learning outcomes of students who have low interpersonal intelligence; and (3) There is interaction between cooperative learning models and interpersonal intelligence in influencing PAK learning outcomes. Keywords: learning models, JIGSAW and STAD cooperative types, interpersonal intelligence, catholic religious education


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Mrs Isty Yulianti ◽  
Mr Kusnandi

This article presents the results of quasi-experimental research design with pretest-post test control group to assess the ability of the mathematical representation student’s using experience-based learning model of type Knisley-Mulyana. The study was conducted on student of junior high school. Two classes were randomly selected to serve as the study sample. Students in experimental class get Knisley-Mulyana learning, while students in the control class get the conventional learning. There are two main instruments used, namely the ability test of mathematical representation and questionnaires. Questionnaires used to evaluate the response of students towards learning with Knisley-Mulyana model. The Results showed that students who acquire the learning of mathematics by using Knisley-Mulyana model provide a achievement of the mathematical representation capability better than students who received conventional learning. Viewed from the mathematical skills, students in the high group and low group with Knisley-Mulyana learning achieve their ability of mathematical representation better than students in the same group who received conventional learning. In other words the most effective group of students in the application of Knisley-Mulyana learning is a high and low groups. In addition, students responded well to learning by using Knisley-Mulyana model.Key words: Knisley-Mulyana, Mathematical Representation


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document