scholarly journals PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PANITIA PENERIMA HASIL PEKRJAAN (PPHP) PADA PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMRINTAH

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigid Budiyono

This study intended to analyze about the shape of authority and criminal responsibility of the recepient procurement of goods and sevices government committee. Legal issues that arise in this study include: about the authority of the recipient procurement of goods and service government committee, and what defense criminal responsibility of the recipient procurement of goods and sevices government committee. This study is normative legal research based on the consideration that this study departs from the analysis of legislation that describes the scribes the scribes the scribes the authority and criminal responsibility of the recipient procurement of goods and sevices government committee. Approach to be adopted is the approach legislation approach to the concept and historial approach. Legal materials colletion techniques with study of literature. Based on the result of this study concluded this from authority recepient procurement of goods and sevices government committee. This authority Atribution that is the authority of the posititon, authority established together with the position tersebut, responsibility criminal of goods and services is a position responsibility in the recipient procurement on government and personal responsibility on procurement goods and services goverment

Author(s):  
Supardin ◽  
Amiruddin ◽  
Lalu Parman

The study aims to determine the concept of criminal liability for work group errors in the procurement of goods or services. This research is normative legal research. The Concept of Criminal Liability for Errors of the Working Group in the Procurement of Goods and Services, namely all acts or actions that are illegal That is, that actions or actions in the procurement of goods or services are not in accordance with the laws and regulations starting from the stage of carrying out the preparation and implementation of selection of providers, carrying out preparation and implementation of selection of providers for electronic catalogs, and determining the winner/provider for the selection method. What results in a loss of state loss is a criminal act as stipulated in the law on corruption, namely Article 2 or Article 3 of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crime changes to the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication Corruption Crime.


Author(s):  
Adhyaksa Mahasena

The unlimited economic necessaries but not accompanied by adequate income, encourage people to commercialize without thinking of any consequences. One such activity is by human organs trafficking. Any negative consequences arising from such activities should be criminally justified on the basis of applicable rules. The legal issues in this writing are how criminal liability for the perpetrator of human organs trafficking in Indonesian criminal law and how criminal liability for the perpetrator of human organs trafficking in the renewal of Indonesian criminal law. The type of research is normative legal research. The conclusion of this research is according to the Indonesian criminal laws and the draft of national criminal laws, individuals and corporation can be charged with criminal responsibility if it’s proven to committing the criminal act of human organs trafficking. Kebutuhan ekonomi yang kian hari makin tidak terbatas namun tidak sejalan pula dengan finansial yang didapat, mengakibatkan adanya dorongan untuk melakukan kegiatan komersial tanpa memikirkan segala resiko yang ditimbulkan. Salah satunya adalah dengan melakukan jual beli organ tubuh manusia. Berbagai akibat negatif yang timbul dari kegiatan tersebut, seharusnya dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara pidana berdasarkan aturan yang berlaku.  Rumusan masalah dalam penulisan ini adalah bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi pelaku tindak pidana jual beli organ tubuh manusia dalam hukum positif di Indonesia dan bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi pelaku tindak pidana jual beli organ tubuh manusia dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana Indonesia. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian ini adalah menurut hukum positif dan RUU-KUHP Nasional, orang perseorangan maupun korporasi dapat dibebani pertanggungjawaban secara pidana jika terbukti melakukan tindak pidana jual beli organ tubuh manusia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 146-161
Author(s):  
Ruli Purnamasari ◽  
Solihan Solihan ◽  
Viyola Azzahra

Abstrak   Efektivitas penegakan hukum terhadap produsen makanan berbahaya menuju Indonesia Sehat 2025 tersebut didasarkan apabila pelaku usaha memproduksi dan memperdagangkan produk makanan yang mengandung bahan kimia serta membahayakan kesehatan dan keselamatan konsumen, maka pelaku usaha/produsen melanggar Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan, Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2012 tentang Pangan, Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang perlindungan Konsumen.  Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normative yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui Faktor yang mempengaruhi terhadap efektivitas penegakan hukum terhadap produsen makanan berbahaya menuju Indonesia Sehat 2025. Faktor hukumnya, yaitu lemahnya sanksi terhadap pelanggarnya, proses penanganan masalah berbelit-belit, kurang profesionalnya para aparatur penegak hukum dan kurangnya koordinasi antar penegak hukum. Tanggung jawab pidana produsen terhadap kerugian yang diderita konsumen akibat makanan berbahaya yang diproduksi, dipasarkan, ditawarkan dan diperdagangkannya, secara yuridis, dalam konsepsi Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait lainnya.   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ON FOOD MANUFACTURERS IN INDONESIA   Abstract   The effectiveness of law enforcement against dangerous food producers towards Healthy Indonesia 2025 is based on if business actors produce and trade food products that contain chemicals and endanger the health and safety of consumers, then the business actor/producer violates Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health, Law No. Law Number 18 of 2012 concerning Food, Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This research is a normative legal research that aims to determine the factors that influence the effectiveness of law enforcement against producers of dangerous food towards Healthy Indonesia 2025. The legal factors are the weakness of sanctions against violators, the process of handling problems is complicated, the lack of professionalism of law enforcement officials and the lack of coordination between law enforcement. The producer's criminal responsibility for the loss suffered by the consumer due to the dangerous food produced, marketed, offered and traded, legally, in the conception of the Consumer Protection Act and other relevant laws and regulations.   Keywords: Effectiveness, Law Enforcement, Food Producers


Author(s):  
Rosa Salvador Concepción

Resumen: La vigente Ley Orgánica 5/2000, de 12 de Enero reguladora de la Responsabilidad Penal de los Menores, en lo sucesivo la LORPM, se dictó para la determinación de la responsabilidad de las personas mayores de catorce años y menores de dieciocho por la comisión de hechos tipificados como delitos o faltas en el Código Penal o en las leyes penales especiales, lo que conlleva que actualmente una proporción importante de los menores imputados y procesados según esta Ley, sean menores inmigrantes que por distintos motivos se ven abocados a una actuación delictiva que les va a conllevar una responsabilidad penal. Es por lo que, en este trabajo vamos a estudiar los aspectos más importantes relacionados con esta delincuencia desde un enfoque pormenorizado hacia el menor infractor cuando éste es inmigrante, analizando la especial problemática de este fenómeno juvenil con el estudio de las cuestiones tanto de carácter social como de carácter jurídico que convergen en su tratamiento. Abstract: The Law 5/2000 of January 12 regulating the Criminal Responsibility of Juveniles – LORPM- was issued for determining the responsibility of persons aged fourteen and under eighteen for committing acts classified as offenses under the Penal Code or special penal laws, which currently carries a significant proportion of juveniles charged and prosecuted under this act, whether immigrant children who for various reasons are forced into a criminal act that they will lead to a criminal responsibility. It is the reason that in this work we are going to study the most important aspects related to this kind of crime with a detailed approach to the juvenile offender when he is an immigrant, analyzing the special problems of this phenomenon by studying social and legal issues that converge in their treatment


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-242
Author(s):  
Ramot H.P Limbong ◽  
I Gusti Bagus Suryawan ◽  
I Nyoman Sutama

Political parties as legal entities may be subject to criminal liability as they are seen from the characteristic of political parties in accordance with the characteristics of the legal entity. The dissolution of political parties becomes one of the legal issues governed by Indonesian legislation. The problem of this research is: 1) how is the Constitutional Court Authority in the dissolution of political parties in Indonesia? 2) How is the mechanism of dissolution of political parties? The type of research and approach problems used is normative legal research and statutory approaches. The source of the legal material used is the primary source of legal material and the source of secondary legal material. The technique of collecting legal materials is the technique of library study. The collected legal materials are processed and analyzed using legal arguments. The result of this research is the procedure of the dissolution of political parties in the Constitutional Court as follows: Application submission, application registration and trial schedule, preliminary examination, trial examination, meeting Judge, the verdict of the Constitutional Court. The result of the dissolution of political parties may result in external rights and obligations, due to elected positions, due to the status of managers and members and the consequences of internal rights and obligations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Mohd Din ◽  
Ida Keumala Jeumpa ◽  
Nursiti Nursiti

This research aimed to study how the party`s accountability for offences committed by legislative candidates. What action that taken by a party of electoral violations and whether the party can be charged for. In the doctrine of Criminal Law known by criminal responsibility related to offenders, and in progress subject to criminal law, not only individual but institution or agency or corporation/firms. So, they should be responsible for it. It was a normative legal research, studying the principles of law related to criminal responsibility. Collecting data were done by two stages that were literature and field research. The first aimed to obtain secondary data namely, law material ;primary, secondary and tertiary. And then, the second, collecting data with an in-depth interview with certain key informant. It used a qualitative method.The result showed that party never asked for their responsibility related to offences by legislative candidates who committed election crime because the act did not rule it. The party had not take action associated with offences were done by them. Politic party as cooperation/firms ideally should take account to candidates who conducted the crime. It was a necessary regulation that managed its accountability as in cooperation. Besides, the party should give politics education and strict sanctions to them who did despicable manners. Key words: accountability, party, election of criminal act, legislative ABSTRAK Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengkaji bagaimana pertanggungjawaban partai terhadap pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh Calon Anggota Legislatif, Apa tindakan yang diambil oleh partai terhadap pelanggaran pemilu yang dilakukan oleh Calon Anggota  Legislatif dan apakah  partai dapat dipersalahkan terhadap pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh Calon Anggota legislatif. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi oleh karena di dalam doktrin hukum pidana dikenal adanya pertanggungjawaban pidana yang dikaitkan dengan pelaku, dan dalam perkembangannya subyek hukum pidana bukan hanya orang perorangan, malainkan juga suatu badan atau korporasi. Sehingga yang dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban adalah juga suatu badan atau korporasi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, yang mengkaji asas hukum yang terkait dengan pertanggungjawaban pidana, namun demikian diperlukan data lapangan sebagai pelengkap. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui dua tahap yaitu penelitian kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan. Penelitian Kepustakaan (library research), untuk memperoleh data sekunder  berupa bahan hukum; primer, sekunder dan tertier. Penelitian lapangan dilakukan dengan cara wawancara mendalam (deptintevew) dengan narasumber yang ditentukan. Data yang terkumpul baik dari hasil penelitian lapangan maupun dari penelitian kepustakaan dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Partai tidak pernah dimintai pertanggungjawaban sehubungan dengan pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh calon anggota legislatif yang melakukan tindak pidana Pemilu, karena Undang-undang  tidak mengatur pertanggungjawaban Partai terhadap tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh calon anggota ligeslatif. Partai tidak pernah melakukan tindakan terkait dengan calon legislatif yang melakukan pelanggaran. Partai Politik sebagai Korporasi idealnya juga harus bertanggungjawab terhadap tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh calon anggota legislatif. Diperlukan regulasi  yang mengatur pertanggungjawaban partai terhadap tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh Calon anggota legislatif sebagaimana pertanggungjawaban dalam tindak pidana korporasi. Di samping itu, hendaknya partai melakukan pendidikan politik kepada anggotanya dan memberikan sanksi tegas kepada anggota partai politik yang merlakukan perbuatan yang tercela. Kata Kunci: Tindak pidana Pemilu


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-276
Author(s):  
Kadek Agus Adi Mego ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti

Selebgrams are celebrities who exist on lnstagram social media accounts and become public figures on lnstagram social media. The viral figure of celebrities on Instagram is used as an opportunity for business people to endorse/promote cosmetic products through Celegram's Instagram account. However, these activities have a negative impact, namely, the products being promoted are illegal goods that do not have permission from the relevant institutions and this can cause harm to consumers. In terms of writing this research the writer discusses two legal issues, namely the legal arrangement for celebrities who endorse/promote cosmetic medicinal products and legal sanctions against celebrities who endorse/promote illegal goods in cosmetic medicinal products. This research aims to determine the regulations and legal sanctions against celebrities who promote illegal cosmetic medicinal products. This research uses the type of normative legal research, Law No. 8 of 1999, Law No. 19 of 2016, and the Civil Code as a legal basis to determine legal arrangements and legal sanctions against celebrities who endorse/promote illegal goods. The problem approach used is the approach by analyzing legislation related to the problem. The results of this study indicate that the imposition of legal sanctions on celebrities is different from business actors who are producers of these products.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-43
Author(s):  
Ida Bagus Bayu Brahmantya

This research is entitled "Misappropriation of Establishment Objectives of Supporting Business Activities by Foundation Institutions in Foundation Law Perspectives." The background of this research is the opportunity to misuse Foundation institutions that can occur because the Foundation can carry out business activities to achieve the aims and objectives of establishing the Foundation with how to set up a business entity or participate in a business entity. Article 5 of the Foundation Law stipulates that the wealth of the Foundation, including the proceeds of the Foundation's business activities, is the full wealth of the Foundation to be used to achieve the aims and objectives of the Foundation. Criminal provisions against violations of the Article are regulated in Article 70 of the Foundation Law, for those who violate the provisions of imprisonment for a maximum of 5 (five) years and are obliged to return it. Article 6 of the Foundation Law is used as a shield against the prohibition. This study focuses on two legal issues, namely, how is the Foundation's business activities to obtain profits as capital in managing the Foundation according to the Foundation Law? And what about sanctions for misappropriation of a Foundation's business activities according to the Foundation Law? The research method used in analyzing legal issues in this study is the normative legal research method. This normative legal research is carried out using the statutory approach, the historical approach to the comparative approach. Based on the analysis, it is known that the Foundation Law uses the method of prevention by including provisions that do not allow or at least, complicating the misuse of the foundation by the organs of the Foundation. However, in the Foundation Law there is a legal obscurity that affects the attitude and quantity of non-compliance and has a real effect on legal behavior, including the behavior of lawbreakers. Keywords: Foundation, Criminal, Business Entity, Misappropriation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 158-180
Author(s):  
Aishath Muneeza

Malaysia is considered as the cranium of Islamic banking. The purpose of this paper is to find out the significance of Central Bank of Malaysia Act (CBMA) to Islamic banking by analysing the relevant provisions of CBMA and the reported case law in Malaysia in this regard. This is a legal research where the provisions of this Act relevant to Islamic banking is reviewed and assessed in the light of reported case law. It is found that there is a need for the legislature to come up with the specific directions or practice notes in which Shariah issues of the case could be differentiated from factual issues/legal issues. It is hoped that the outcome of this paper will assist those jurisdictions aspiring to have a sophisticated legal framework for Islamic banking to comprehend the significance of having statutory provisions to establish the apex Shariah Advisory Council at the Central Bank level.


Author(s):  
Mohammad Azam Hussain ◽  
Rusni Hassan ◽  
Alias Azhar ◽  
Aznan Hasan

Abstract: In Malaysia, the appointment of members to the Shariah Advisory Council (SAC) of the Central  Bank  of Malaysia (CBM) is prescribed by the Central Bank of Malaysia Act 2009 (Act 701). The Act stipulates the provisions pertaining to the eligible persons to be appointed to the SAC, procedures, terms and conditions of appointment and also remuneration and allowances for the members of the SAC. In this regard, the question arises whether the prescribed provisions are sufficient to regulate the appointment of members to the SAC and free from any shortcomings. Hence, this study sought to analyse the existing legislations governing the appointment of members to the SAC and to analyse the legal issues arising from the existing legislations. By using legal research methodology, this article analysed the entire provisions dealing with the appointment matter. Based on the data collected from statutes passed by the Parliament of and Malaysia published materials, the analytical method was used by scrutinizing the related provisions of the law pertaining to the appointment of members to the SAC. This study found that, several loopholes  exist  in  the  statutory requirement of the existing law which needs to be addressed by the respective authoritative body in order to avoid any legal conflict in the future. Hence this study is significant in order to strengthen the existing legislation governing the SAC especially related the appointment process.   Keywords: Shariah advisory council, Shariah advisor, Islamic finance, Islamic law, Central Bank of Malaysia Act 2009.   Abstrak: Di Malaysia, pelantikan anggota Majlis Penasihat Shariah (MPS) Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) ditetapkan oleh Akta Bank Negara Malaysia 2009 (Akta 701). Akta menetapkan peruntukan-peruntukan berkaitan orang yang layak untuk dilantik menganggotai MPS, prosedur, terma dan syarat-syarat perlantikan dan juga saraan dan elaun anggota-anggota MPS. Dalam hal ini, persoalan timbul sama ada peruntukan yang ditetapkan memadai untuk mengawal selia pelantikan anggota MPS dan bebas daripada sebarang kekurangan. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis undang-undang sedia ada yang mentadbir pelantikan anggota MPS dan untuk menganalisis isu-isu undang-undang yang timbul daripada undang-undang sedia ada. Dengan menggunakan metodologi penyelidikan undang-undang, artikel ini menganalisis keseluruhan peruntukan yang berkaitan urusan pelantikan anggota MPS. Berdasarkan data yang telah kumpul daripada statut-statut yang diluluskan oleh Parlimen Malaysia, kaedah analisis telah digunakan dengan meneliti peruntukan-peruntukan undang-undang yang berkaitan pelantikan anggota MPS. Kajian ini mendapati bahawa, beberapa kelemahan wujud dalam kehendak statut dalam undang-undang sedia ada yang perlu diberi perhatian oleh pihak berkuasa yang berkaitan dalam usaha mengelak daripada berlaku sebarang konflik undang-undang pada masa hadapan. Oleh itu, kajian ini adalah sangat penting untuk mengukuhkan undang- undang sedia ada yang mengawal selia MPS terutamanya berkaitan proses pelantikan.   Kata kunci: Majlis Penasihat Shariah, Penasihat Shariah, Kewangan Islam, Undang-undang Islam, Akta Bank Negara Malaysia 2009.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document