scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH (Studi tentang Musrenbang di Kabupaten Sumenep)

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soengkono Sidik

Regional Development Planning through Musrenbang a means to foster initiativeand active role in community development planning (Bottom Up Planning) aremechanically and functionally with activities planned development based on theprinciple of consensus, mobilize and improve the initiatives and participation ofthe community to carry out development in an integrated and foster the dynamicconditions of the community. This research method using a qualitative approach.Research carried out by focusing on two districts and three villages and thevillages and informants deliberately determined among the actors involved in theimplementation of planning forums. Of the several theories of implementation, thecombination approach better able to explain than the top-down, bottom-upapproach and the critical-creative approach. While the implementation modelMerilee Griddle (1980) combined with Elmore models more appropriate toanalyze the implementation of Musrenbang compared with models otherimplementations.Keywords: Implementation, Musrenbang, Public Participation

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Novy Setia Yunas

The success of the development in a region will be greatly determined by the quality of development planning. As planning became the sign posts are clear about what the needs of the citizens with has clear and measurable targets. Development Planning System emphasizes a combination of approaches between top-down and bottom up, which emphasizes the ways aspirational and participatory, so it is realized through the process of development planning or deliberation Musrenbang neighborhood start at various levels up to nationwide. This paper is the result of research that are descriptive studies library which describes the process of implementing E-Musrenbang in Surabaya with a variety of problems. E-Musrenbang successfully applied in Surabaya at least be innovations in development  planning system in which during this society wants a forum or social contacts among citizens with the Government in regional development planning. The application of the system of E-Musrenbang in Surabaya became an important lesson for the construction paradigm of society, where society is not only made of the objects but rather the subject of development. Keberhasilan pembangunan di suatu wilayah ditentukan oleh kualitas perencanaan pembangunannya. Sebagaimana perencanaan menjadi penunjuk arah yang jelas tentang apa yang menjadi kebutuhan warga dengan target yang jelas dan terukur. Sistem perencanaan menekankan kombinasi pendekatan antara top-down dan bottom-up, yang lebih menekankan cara-cara aspiratif dan partisipatif, sehingga hal tersebut diwujudkan melalui proses musyawarah perencanaan pembangunan atau Musrenbang di berbagai tingkatan mulai kelurahan hingga Nasional. Tulisan ini merupakan hasil penelitian yang bersifat deskriptif dengan studi kepustakaan yang menjelaskan proses pelaksanaan E- Musrenbang di Surabaya dengan berbagai permasalahannya. Sistem E- Musrenbang yang berhasil diterapkan di Kota Surabaya setidaknya menjadi inovasi dalam sistem perencanaan pembangunan dimana selama ini masyarakat menginginkan sebuah forum atau kontak sosial antara warga dengan pemerintah dalam perencanaan pembangunan daerah. Penerapan sistem E- Musrenbang di Kota Surabaya menjadi sebuah pelajaran penting bagi perencanaan pembangunan berparadigma masyarakat, dimana masyarakat tidak hanya dijadikan objek melainkan subjek pembangunan. 


Author(s):  
Hariawan Bihamding

Based on the spirit of reform required a fundamental change in improving the welfare of society widely, it needs empowerment and support community involvement in development planning and implementation. Top-down development of paradigm in the centralized Orde Baru regime immediately changed with the issuance of Constitution No. 25 in 2004 about National Development Planning System, with the strengthening of aspiration and inclusion of stakeholders from the lowest level to the highest level. In order to optimize the implementation of development, one way that must be taken is strategic planning. During the 10 years of implementation, we need to know the extent to where public participation in the activity today. Therefore through this paper, the research objectives formulated to determine how public participation in the implementation of the strategic plan. This study also determined descriptive method study using a quantitative approach. And, by taking the locus of research in the Rappocini district, Makassar, it obtained analysis results that the level of public participation is relative to be good enough to the planning and implementation of strategic planning, but in terms of maintenance tends, it has the opposite results. In anticipation of these terms, it needs persuasive approaches to encourage more optimal public confidence in supporting the implementation of the development.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 377
Author(s):  
Any Wahyu Purwandari ◽  
Mussadun -

ABSTRACT The key to the implementation of the Village Development Planning Forum (Musrenbangkel) is community participation, so that the priority of development programs in accordance with community needs. However, there is a decrease in the implementation of community participation because no realization of development programs proposed society, especially the poor, as well as the implementation tends to be formal and monotonous so as to make people bored and tired. It happened also in the Kelurahan Semanggi which has the densest population with the highest number of poor people in Sub District of Pasar Kliwon. Under these conditions, the purpose of this study was to determine the public participation in the implementation of Musrenbangkel in Kelurahan Semanggu by reviewing Musrenbangkel process, forms of public participation, the level of community participation, as well as internal and external factors that affect the level of community participation. The method used is descriptive quantitative with a Likert scale for questionnaire, frequency distribution and multiple linear regression, as well as qualitative descriptive with purposive sampling and snowball sampling. This study shows that the bottom-up approach to the implementation of Musrenbangkel only be a compromise because the people (still) very dependent on the role of community and government leaders, as well as very poor community initiatives that the government (still) in control in determining local development priorities. Keywords: community participation, Musrenbangkel, Village ABSTRAK Kunci dari pelaksanaan Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan Kelurahan (Musrenbangkel) adalah partisipasi masyarakat, supaya prioritas program pembangunan sesuai dengan kebutuhan masyarakat. Namun demikian, dalam perkembangannya terjadi penurunan partisipasi masyarakat karena tidak terealisasinya program-program pembangunan yang diajukan masyarakat, terutama masyarakat miskin, serta penyelenggaraannya yang cenderung formal dan monoton sehingga membuat masyarakat bosan dan jenuh. Hal tersebut terjadi pula di Kelurahan Semanggi yang memiliki penduduk terpadat dengan jumlah penduduk miskin terbanyak di Kecamatan Pasar Kliwon. Berdasarkan kondisi tersebut, maka tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui partisipasi masyarakat pada pelaksanaan Musrenbangkel di Kelurahan Semanggi dengan cara mengkaji proses Musrenbangkel, bentuk partisipasi masyarakat, tingkat partisipasi masyarakat, serta faktor internal dan eksternal yang berpengaruh terhadap tingkat partisipasi masyarakat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kuantitatif menggunakan kuesioner dengan skala likert, distribusi frekuensi dan regresi liner berganda, serta deskriptif kualitatif dengan purposive sampling dan snowball sampling. Hasil analisa penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan bottom up pada pelaksanaan Musrenbangkel hanya bersifat kompromis karena masyarakat (masih) sangat bergantung pada peran tokoh masyarakat dan pemerintah, serta masyarakat sangat miskin inisiatif sehingga pemerintah (masih) memegang kendali pada penentuan prioritas pembangunan daerah.


Teknika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Agus Sarwo edi Sudrajat

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p>Sanitation is one of the basic urban infrastructure and requires special attention in its management. The causes of poor sanitation conditions in Indonesia are weak sanitation development planning: not integrated, misdirected, not according to needs, and unsustainable, as well as lack of public attention to clean and healthy living behavior (PHBS). The poor sanitation conditions have a negative impact on many aspects of life, ranging from the decline in quality of life, contamination of drinking water sources, increasing number of diarrhea incidents and the emergence of diseases in infants, decreased competitiveness and image, to the economic downturn. One of the efforts to improve sanitation conditions is by preparing a responsive and sustainable sanitation development plan that has principles based on actual data, at the district / city scale, prepared by the local government: from, by and for districts / cities, and incorporating a bottom-up approach up and top-down. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of a sanitary condition including the behavior of people who are at risk for environmental health both in the household and its surroundings so that accurate initial information will be obtained according to reality and can be used as a basis for sanitation risk assessment as well as consideration for policy making sanitation sector. One method used is the EHRA is a participatory study to identify the condition of sanitation, hygiene and community behavior on a household scale. The resulting data can be used for the development of sanitation programs including advocacy in the district / city up to the village. Based on the results of the EHRA analysis, it can be concluded that Kedungwuni District has various sanitation risks. The IRS results indicate that the village with a level of risk: is less risk is 6 villages; moderate risk is 5 villages; high risk is 6 villages and very high risk 2 villages.</p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Sanitasi merupakan salah satu prasarana dasar perkotaan dan memerlukan perhatian yang khusus dalam pengelolaannya. Penyebab buruknya kondisi sanitasi di Indonesia adalah lemahnya perencanaan pembangunan sanitasi: tidak terpadu, salah sasaran, tidak sesuai kebutuhan, dan tidak berkelanjutan, serta kurangnya perhatian masyarakat pada perilaku hidup bersih dan sehat (PHBS). Buruknya kondisi sanitasi ini berdampak negatif di banyak aspek kehidupan, mulai dari turunnya kualitas hidup, tercemarnya sumber air minum, meningkatnya jumlah kejadian diare dan munculnya penyakit pada balita, turunnya daya saing maupun citra, hingga menurunnya perekonomian. Salah satu upaya memperbaiki kondisi sanitasi adalah dengan menyiapkan sebuah perencanaan pembangunan sanitasi yang responsif dan berkelanjutan serta memiliki prinsipberdasarkan data aktual, berskala kabupaten/kota, disusun sendiri oleh pemerintah daerah: dari, oleh, dan untuk kabupaten/kota, serta menggabungkan pendekatan <em>bottom-up</em> dan <em>top-down</em>. Adapun tujuan dalam studi ini adalah memberikan hasil gambaran dari suatu kondisi sanitasi termasuk perilaku masyarakat yang berisiko terhadap kesehatan lingkungan baik dalam rumah tangga maupun sekitarnya sehingga akan diperoleh informasi awal yang akurat sesuai realita dan dapat dipergunakan sebagai dasar dalam penilaian risiko sanitasi sekaligus pertimbangan bagi pengambilan kebijakan bidang sanitasi. Salah satu metode yang digunakan adalah EHRA yaitu sebuah studi partisipatif di untuk mengenai kondisi sanitasi dan higinitas serta perilaku-perilaku masyarakat pada skala rumah tangga.Data yang dihasilkan dapat dimanfaatkan untuk pengembangan program sanitasi termasuk advokasi di kabupaten/kota sampai dengan desa/kelurahan. Berdasarkan hasil analisa EHRA dapat disimpulkan bahwa Kecamatan kedungwuni memiliki resiko sanitasi beragam. Hasil IRS menunjukkan bahwa desa/ kelurahan dengan tingkat resiko: kurang beresiko yaitu 6desa; resiko sedang yaitu 5 desa; resiko tinggi yaitu 6 desa dan resiko sangat tinggi 2 desa.</p>


PERSPEKTIF ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 763-777
Author(s):  
Muhammad Fauzi Pulungan ◽  
Nina Siti Salmaniah Siregar ◽  
Rudi Salam Sinaga

So the formulation of the problem is how the effectiveness of the performance in the field of development and community empowerment at the East Medan District Head Office, Medan City? What are the obstacles in the field of development and community empowerment at the East Medan District Head Office, Medan City? The research method used in this research is qualitative analysis. Data collection is obtained from interviews, documentation, and observations. With the results of research on the productivity performance of employees in the field of Community Development and Empowerment, the East Medan Sub-district Office, Medan City has been effective. This can be seen in providing services in the form of the Implementation of Village Development Planning Deliberations for Preparation of Work Plans every year. Service quality in the field of Community Development and Empowerment, Medan Timur Sub-district Office, Medan City has not been effective. Responsiveness in the field of Community Development and Empowerment, Medan Timur Sub-district Office, Medan City is considered quite effective in setting goals and objectives to be achieved. Responsibility for Community Development and Empowerment, Medan Timur Sub-district Office, Medan City has been running effectively from the existence of priority programs. The accountability of activities carried out for the community and employees is very responsible and effective. The performance barrier in the field of Community Development and Empowerment is Human Resources. That education has a significant influence on employee performance. The suggestion from this research is to improve the quality by participating in training or coaching in order to increase the insight and motivation of personnel or human resources.


Author(s):  
Ian White ◽  
Tony Falkland ◽  
Taaniela Kula

UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goal 6 presents difficulties for small island developing states such as the Kingdom of Tonga, which relies on rainwater and groundwater lenses for freshwater supply. Planning and managing water resources to supply demands in dispersed small islands under variable climate and frequent extreme events is challenging. Tensions between water planning using top-down versus bottom-up processes have long been recognized. Tonga’s overarching national planning instrument is the Tonga Strategic Development Framework, 2015-2025 (TSDFII). This identifies desired national outcomes and is used to direct and resource Ministries and address international and regional commitments. Water supply was a low priority in the three-month consultations that led to TSDFII. Community Development Plans (CDPs), developed by rural villages throughout Tonga’s five Island Groups over nine years, involved participation from 80% of each village population who ranked local priorities. Analysis of priorities in 117 available village CDPs reveals improvements to village water supply was the highest overall priority in all five Island Groups and ranked within the top three priorities by 76% of all villages, with women, youth and men returning figures of 83%, 66% and 80% respectively. The mismatch between top-down and bottom-up priorities appears to result from an urban/rural divide.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document