scholarly journals Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMA dengan Gaya Belajar Visual dalam Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasetyo Budi Darmono ◽  
Mei Wijayadi ◽  
Nila Kurniasih

<p><em>The difficulties of student in solving HOTS problems are caused</em><em> by</em><em> some factors. One of them is student learning style. Student learning styles are divided </em><em>into three types, namely</em><em> visual, auditorial, and kinest</em><em>h</em><em>etic</em><em>s</em><em>. This research focuses on visual learning style. This research uses a qualitative method aiming to d</em><em>e</em><em>scribe the difficulties of student in solving HOTS mathematic problems by visual learning style. The subject was taken using snowball sampling and purposive sampling technique. The data collection techniques were questionnaire, test, interview, and note range. Analysis techniques used on in this research were data reduction, data display and conclusion drawing. The result of this research was student who had a visual learning style got difficulty in using concept at problem with C6 grade. That was because the students were not familiar with HOTS problems.</em><em></em></p>

Author(s):  
Siti Halimah ◽  
Zulfahmi Lubis ◽  
Saidatun Nisa Nasution

The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the influence of the value clarification technique (VCT) learning model on student learning result. (2) Knowing the influence of learning styles on student learning result. (3) Knowing the interaction between learning models and learning styles on student learning result.   The population of this study were students of class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong Labuhan Batu Utara consisting of three classes. The sample chosen for the class with the VCT learning model was class VIII-3 with 30 students, while students who were taught using the expository model were 32 students. The cluster random sampling technique is influenced by analysis of variance at a significant level (α = 0.05) followed by Scheffe. The results of this study are: (1) the average value of students taught with the VCT learning model (= 33.6) is higher than students taught with the expository learning model (= 24.68) with Fcount 0.0023 < Ftable 3,988. (2) The average value of learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with visual learning styles (= 27.5), auditory (= 29.56) and kinesthetic (= 28.26) with Fcount = 0.068 < Ftable = 3,988. (3) There is an interaction between learning models and learning styles on students' learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with Fcount 28.96 < Ftable 3,988. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that students with visual and auditory characteristics, the appropriate learning model is the VCT, while students with the kinesthetic learning style are expository. The implication is that teachers must be trained in how to understand student learning styles. Thus it is suggested that in planning the learning process the characteristics of students must be considered.


Author(s):  
Ahmad Ilham Habibi ◽  
Tri Asih Wahyu Hartati ◽  
Purwaning Budi Lestari

Lecturers must know and understand the characteristics and learning styles of their students so that their interactions can take place well in the learning and teaching process. However, in reality in the field most of the Lecturers are Educational Study Programs Physical Health and Recreation (PJKR) does not yet know and understand student learning styles optimally. Therefore this study aims to determine the tendency of PJKR student learning styles at IKIP Budi Utomo Malang. This research is a qualitative descriptive study.The instruments of this study were student learning style questionnaires, interview guidelines for lecturers and interview guidelines for students. The results showed that the most dominant PJKR student learning style was the visual learning style with a total of 98 students (63.23%). The next dominant student learning style is the kinesthetic learning style with a total of 23 students (14.84%).The conclusion of this study is that most PJKR students have a visual learning style and some others have kinesthetic learning styles.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-37
Author(s):  
Chaira Wati ◽  
Muzakkir Muzakkir

Teacher must understand Students learning style, because the learning style each student in learning mathematics is different. The aim of this study is to determine student learning style in learning mathematics at SMPN 10 Banda Aceh. The methodology use in this study is a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The data are collected by using observation and questionnaires. The data analysis technique uses percentages and describes. The subjects of this research were the students of class VIII-C SMPN 10 Banda Aceh. The results of observations made in class indicate that students tend to have a visual learning style. Then the results of the student questionnaire showed that their students tended to have a visual learning style. Based on the research results obtained through observations and questionnaires on student learning styles in mathematics in class VIII-C of SMPN 10 Banda Aceh, they are more likely to have a visual learning style.Keywords: Mathematics Learning, Learning Style AbstrakPengetahuan guru tentang gaya belajar siswa sangat penting, dikarenakan setiap siswa memiliki gaya belajar yang berbeda – beda antara satu dengan lainnya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui gaya belajar matematika siswa di SMPN 10 Banda Aceh. Metedologi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Pegumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan instrumen observasi dan angket. Teknik analisis data menggunakan persentase dan mendeskripsikan data yang diperoleh dari observasi dan angket. Subjek penelitian merupakan seluruh siswa kelas VIII-C SMPN 10 Banda Aceh. Hasil observasi yang dilakukan di kelas menunjukkan bahwa siswanya memiliki gaya belajar visual. Hasil angket siswa menunjukkan gaya belajar visual lebih dominan dari gaya belajar yang lain. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang diperoleh melalui observasi dan angket gaya belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII-C SMPN 10 Banda Aceh didominasi oleh gaya belajar visual.Kata kunci: Pembelajaran Matematika, Gaya Belajar


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Dian Saputra

This study aims to find out the relationship between learning style and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject at SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu, the type of research is quantitative and the subject of research is grade X in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu. Data collection techniques using observation, Questionnaire and documentation. Data analysis techniques used were Descriptive Analysis, and inferential Statistical Analysis. The results of visual learning style post-test were 11 people with a mean of 76.36, an auditory learning style of 8 people at a mean of 62.14, a kinesthetic learning style of 3 people at a mean of 50.33, apart from that (r x y = 2.35) and the magnitude of r is reflected in the table (r table = 0.4132). Then rxy > r table ie = 2.35> 0.4132. In other words, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It has a significant relationship between the learning styles of students and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject of grade X TKJ in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rista Damesari Saragih ◽  
Lince Sihombing ◽  
Eddi Setia

The objectives of this research are to investigate whether: (1) students’ achievement of grammar taught by applying inductive approach higher than taught by applying deductive approach, (2) achievement of grammar of visual learning style students higher than achievement of grammar of auditory learning style students, and (3) there is an interaction between instructional approaches and learning styles on the students’ achievement of grammar. The population was students of Grade X of Vocational High School 1 Beringin Deli Serdang. Based on Cluster Sampling technique, two classes were chosen, namely Grades X1 and X3. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with 2 × 2 factorial design. The result reveals that (1) Students` grammar achievement taught by using inductive instructional approach is higher than that taught by using deductive instructional Approach (81,20 > 72,10), (2) Students with visual learning style have higher achievement in grammar than students with auditory learning style (81,90 > 72) and (3) there is significant interaction between instructional approaches and learning styles on students` achievement of grammar (4.906 > 3.96). Thus, it can be concluded that the application of instructional approaches and learning styles can affect students` achievement in grammar.   Keywords: Grammar; Instructional Approach; Learning Styles


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Jeanete Ophilia Papilaya ◽  
Neleke Huliselan

The objective of this study was to identify learning styles of students. The approach used in this study is a quantitative approach with survey method. The variable in this study is a single variable , namely the identification of student learning styles. The study population is students of Guidance and Counseling FKIP Pattimura University totaling 388 people. Samples were used as samples in the amount of 10% of the population of 39 people. The sampling technique using Simple Random Sampling. Learning styles questionnaire prepared based on the opinion of De Poter & Hernacki is used as a data collection tool. Learning styles identified as visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetic learning style. Data analysis techniques in this study is the descriptive statistical analysis methods. Based on the survey results revealed that students of guidance and counseling FKIP Pattimura University has a tendency to one learning style. Of the 39 students found that 6 students had a tendency visual learning style, 20 students have a tendency to auditory learning style, 1 student has a tendency kinestheticlearning style, and 12 students have a tendency to mix between learning styles and learning styles visual auditorylearning styles.


Author(s):  
Nastiti ◽  
Wahyu Rika Agustin

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference between learning outcomes based on VAK learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) in Integrated Social Studies subjects for seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. Researchers used a comparative quantitative approach with a comparative causal design or ex post facto. The population in the study were all students of class VII, amounting to 295 students and the sample was 59 students taken from class VII H and I. The sample was taken using simple random sampling technique. The study used a questionnaire and documentation as data collection instruments. While the data analysis technique used kruskal wallis. The results showed that good learning outcomes based on visual learning styles were 20%, low learning outcomes were 60%, and moderate learning outcomes were 20%. Furthermore, good learning outcomes based on auditory learning styles are 68%, low learning outcomes are 3%, and moderate learning outcomes are 29%. Finally, good kinesthetic learning outcomes are 22%, low learning outcomes are 73%, and low learning outcomes are 5%. Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes based on learning styles using the VAK learning style in Integrated Social Studies subjects class VII SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. This can be seen from the sig value. namely 0.000 <from the significance level of 5% (0.05).


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Fithria Ulfani Yuliatin

The purpose of this study is to describe the application of Learning Styles in the vocabulary used by students of SMAN 1 Sakra Timur. To know the percentage of student learning style in vocabulary. Students of grade 2 IPA 1 are less in applied learning styles, students are more sitting and silent, whether they understand what is described or not. In keeping the results of research, conducted data collection using qualitative descriptive. Data obtained from the results of vocabulary and questionnaire tests. On the other hand, the qualitative data comes from student observations as well. Then the data can be seen that students have problems with the vocabulary, from 37 students who are able to achieve it consists of 15 students (40%) able to achieve the Minimum Mastery Criteria with qualifications consisting of 5 students (14%) to Prima, 9 students (24% to Very good, and 10 students (27%) became good, while there were 13 students (35%) who were unable to achieve minimum mastery with poor or failing qualifications. For percentage of learning style preferred by students to learn to use visual learning style, (89%) SS, 3 (8%) S, 1 (2%) TT and nobody chose disagree and strongly disagree. In addition, from the observation, Students are less active to respond to lessons taught due to lack of force learning applied by the teacher.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inda Syahra ◽  
Sarkadi Sarkadi ◽  
Nurzengky Ibrahim

This study aims to obtain the influence of learning models and learning styles on historical learning outcomes. Students are given a CTL and conventional learning model by measuring visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. This type of research is a quantitative study using an experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The population is all students of class X 2019/2020 school year. The sampling technique used is multistage random sampling. Class X-A as an experimental class and grade X-B  as a control class with a total of 70 students construct validity is analyzed by the correlation between items using Product Moment Correlation, and Cronbach's alpha formula tested reliability. The results showed that learning outcomes with the CTL learning model were higher than conventional learning models. While student learning outcomes using visual learning styles are more effective than auditory learning styles. There is a relationship between learning models with learning styles.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-308
Author(s):  
Ali Murfi ◽  
Noneng Siti Rosidah

This study was conducted, first, analyzed to determine the learning styles of students excel in Mathematics and Science subjects in class XI SMAN 1 and MAN 1 Yogyakarta by applying the theory of David Kolb's learning style. Second, to predict the differences and similarities of learning styles of students achievement in learning Mathematics Class XI SMAN 1 and MAN 1 Yogyakarta. 18 research subjects were drawn from students of class XI. Determining the subject of research is done by using purposive sampling technique that refers to the result of the average value of UTS Mathematics which is the third highest of any class. The results showed that: (1). Students' learning styles achievement in Mathematics and Science subjects in class XI SMA N 1 and MAN 1 Yogyakarta is varied. This is evidenced by the results if the data obtained show that the student has a unique learning style of each and likely to lead to the individual's personality. Based on the analysis of student learning styles achievement shows that students SMA N 1 Yogyakarta been the subject of much research as 4 students have a learning style Assimilator, 3 students have learning styles Konverger, one student has a learning style Akomodator and one student has a learning style Diverger again. While students perform at MAN 1 Yogyakarta who is the subject of research, as many as four people have Akomodator learning styles, each two students have learning styles Assimilator and Diverger, then one student again has a learning style Konverger. (2). Differences in learning styles that happens is the individual habits that become unique to them. Students perform at SMA N 1 Yogyakarta dominates the Assimilator learning styles, while students of MAN 1 Yogyakarta dominates the Akomodator learning styles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document