scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PEROLEHAN KONSEP BERBASIS MASALAH TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP FISIKA PESERTA DIDIK KELAS XI MIA MAN 1 MATARAM

Author(s):  
Hidayatul Aini ◽  
Sutrio Sutrio ◽  
Aris Doyan

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran perolehan konsep berbasis masalah  terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan pemahaman konsep fisika peserta didik  kelas XI MIA MAN 1 Mataram. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian quasi experiment dengan desain penelitian non-equivalent control group design. Subjek dari penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas XI MIA 1 sebanyak 37 peserta didik sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI MIA 2 sebanyak 38 peserta didik sebagai kelas kontrol. Kelas eksperimen diberi perlakuan berupa model pembelajaran perolehan konsep berbasis masalah sedangkan kelas kontrol diberi perlakuan berupa pembelajaran konvensional. Tes uraian digunakan untuk mengukur kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika peserta didik berjumlah 5 butir soal dan tes pilihan ganda untuk mengukur pemahaman konsep fisika peserta didik sebanyak 10 butir soal yang sudah diuji validitas, reliabilitas, daya pembeda dan tingkat kesukarannya. Hipotesis penelitian diuji menggunakan uji MANOVA. Hasil uji hipotesis menunjukkan nilai signifikansi sebesar 0,00. Taraf signifikan yang digunakan ialah 0,05 maka dapat dikatakan 0,00 < 0,05 yang artinya bahwa H0 ditolak dan Ha diterima, sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran perolehan konsep berbasis masalah terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan pemahaman konsep fisika peserta didik kelas XI MIA MAN1 Mataram. Kata kunci: model pembelajaran perolehan konsep berbasis masalah; kemampuan pemecahan masalah; pemahaman konsep. ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine the effect of the learning model of problem-based concept acquisition on problem solving abilities and understanding of physics concepts of students of class XI MIA MAN 1 Mataram. This research is a quasi-experimental with a non-equivalent control group design. The subjects of this study were 37 XI MIA 1 students as experimental class and 38 MIA 2 XI students as control class. The experimental class given treatment problem-based concept learning model while the control class given treatment conventional learning. Description test is used to measure the students 'physical problem-solving abilities totaling 5 items and multiple choice tests to measure students' understanding of physics concepts by 10 items that have been tested for validity, reliability, distinguishing power and degree of difficulty. The research hypothesis was tested using the MANOVA test. The results of the hypothesis test showed a significance value of 0.00. Significant level used is 0.05, it can be said to be 0.00 <0.05, which means that H0 is rejected and Ha accepted, so can be concluded that there are significant acquisition of concept-based learning model on problem solving skills and understanding of physics concepts of students of class XI MIA MAN 1 Mataram. Keywords: concept attainment learning model of problem based; problem solving abilities; understanding concept

EDUSAINS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-248
Author(s):  
Wartono Wartono ◽  
John Rafafy Batlolona ◽  
Rizqi Maulidina Mahfi

ENHANCEMENT OF PHYSICS PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS WITH INQUIRY-DISCOVERY LEARNING MODEL AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine differences in problem solving abilities of students who were given inquiry-discovery learning through web-assisted empirical-theoretical reviews with students who were given conventional learning. This study uses a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design. The average gain score of the problem solving ability test shows that students who are taught with inquiry-discovery learning through web-assisted empirical-theoretical reviews are higher than students who are taught with conventional learning. Hypothesis test results show that students who are learning with inquiry-discovery learning through web-assisted empirical-theoretical reviews have higher problem solving abilities than students who are taught with conventional learning, this also applies to students with high or low initial abilities. AbstrakTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang diberi pembelajaran inquiry-discovery melalui tinjuan empiris-teoritis berbantuan web dengan siswa yang diberi pembelajaran konvensional. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan quasi exsperiment pretest-posttest control group design. Hasil rata-rata gain score tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah menunjukkan siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan pembelajaran inquiry-discovery melalui tinjuan empiris-teoritis berbantuan web lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil uji hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang dibelajarakan dengan pembelajaran inquiry-discovery melalui tinjuan empiris-teoritis berbantuan web memiliki peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang dibelajarakan dengan pembelajaran konvensional, hal ini juga berlaku pada siswa yang berkemampuan awal tinggi maupun rendah. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-210
Author(s):  
Rivdya Eliza ◽  
Fitri Aulia

The purpose of this research are: 1) to know the learning activity of learners mathematics which is taught by Search, Solve, Create, and Share (SSCS), and 2) model to know the ability of problem solving of mathematics learners who taught by SSCS learning model in the class XI MIA MAN 1 Muara Labuh academic year 2016/2017. This research belongs to a kind of quasi-experimental research with randomized control group only design. In this study design, a group of subjects taken from a particular population were randomly assigned into two groups, the experimental group and the control group. After analyzing the data, it is known that the learning activity of the students after applying the SSCS learning model has improved towards the better from the first meeting to the fifth meeting, ie 35%, 45%, 55%, 68%, 77%. Based on the hypothesis test obtained ttable = 1.645 and tcount = 2.598 so obtained (2.598> 1.645) at 95% confidence interval. Because tcount > ttable then hypothesis in this research accepted. Thus, students 'math-problem-solving skills taught by SSCS learning models are higher than the students' uneducated mathematical problem-solving skills with SSCS learning modelsKeywords: Problem solving abilities, search, solve, sreate and share (SSCS) learning models


INFERENSI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Baskoro Adi Prayitno ◽  
Bowo Sugiharto

The purpose of this study was to investigate, (1) the influence of constructivist metacognitive model compared to constructivist novick, and conventional model toward critical thinking, (2) the influence of academic achievement toward critical thinking, and (3) interaction of learning model and academic achievement toward critical thinking. The sample of this study consisted of 102 eleventh grade student from 3 state senior high schools in Surakarta. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental research Pretest-Posttest, Non-Equivalent Control Group Design. Anacova was used to analyze the data. Critical thinking test was administered to the experimental and the control group as pre and post-tests to measure the critical thinking. The result showed that, (1) constructivist metacognitive and constructivist novick are not significantly different but those are significantly different from the conventional model toward critical thinking, (2) Upper academic students have higher critical thinking than lower academic students, (3) There is not interaction of learning model and academic achievement toward critical thinking


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Made Dwi Antari ◽  
Ketut Agustini ◽  
Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana

AbstrakPembelajaran TIK hendaknya dapat menyiapkan kondisi yang mendukung agar aktivitas dan kreativitas siswa memperoleh pengetahuan sendiri melalui proses belajar. Pemilihan model pembelajaran yang tepat sesuai karakteristik siswa akan membantu keberhasilan suatu pembelajaran. Penelitian studi komparatif akan membandingkan dua model pembelajaran, untuk mengetahui model manakah yang lebih baik. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui(1) Pengaruh hasil belajar TIK siswa kelas XI di SMA Negeri 1 Seririt dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Talking Stick dan Snowball Throwing, (2) Hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi antara model pembelajaran Talking Stick atau Snowball Throwing, (3) respon siswa terhadap penerapan model pembelajaran Talking Stick  dan Snowball Throwing.Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan rancangan Post Test Only With Non Equivalent Control Group Design. Pengumpulan data dilakukandenganmetodetespilihangandauntukmengukurranahkognitifdanujiketerampilanuntukranahPsikomotor. Data hasilbelajardianalisismelaluiujiprasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan homogenitas dengan hasil ketiga kelompok berdistribusi normal dan homogen, dilanjutkan dengan ujihipotesismenggunakan Anova Satu jalur lalu dilanjutkan dengan uji berpasangan t-Scheffe.Hasil uji anova satu jalur menyatakan terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan dalam penggunaan model pembelajaran Talking Stick, Snowball Throwing, dan konvensional. Karena terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan maka dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Scheffe dengan hasil terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara masing-masing pasangan. Kemudian dilihat dari rata-rata hasil belajar disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran Talking Stick lebih baik dengan rata-rata hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi. Sedangkanuntukresponmenggunakanmetodeangket. Hasil analisis angket model Talking Stick diketahui 36% respon sangat positif, 61% respon positif dan 3% respon cukup positif. Sedangkan untuk model Snowball Throwing diketahui 25% respon sangat positif, 67% respon positif dan 8% respon cukup positif. Kata kunci:  Studi Komparatif, TIK, Talking Stick, Snowball Throwing,  hasil belajar, dan respon siswa AbstractTIK learning must have to prepared student’s activities and creativities to obtained the own knowledge by means of learning process. An appropriate learning model election agree with students characteristics would help an success learning. The comparative study research would have to compared both of learning model, to know which model was better. This research aimed to know (1) The influenced about the result of students’ TIK study used Talking stick and Snowball Throwing learning model (2) the highest result of study between Talking stick and Snowball Throwinglearning model (3) the students’ response toward Talking stick and Snowball Throwing learning model application.Kind of this research was quasi experiment by Post Test Only with Non Equivalent Control Group Design. The data accumulation done by multiple choice tests to measured cognitive domain and skill test to psychomotor domain. The students’ result study analyzed by prerequisite test was normality test and homogeneity by the result of the three group which normal distribution and homogeneous, continued by hypothesis test used a strip Anova then continued by t-SheffeThe result of one way onova exist a significance influenced on the used of Talking Stick leaarning model, Snowball Throwing and conventional. Because of thee was a significance difereences between each partner. Afterwards, seen from the result average of study  can be concluded the Talking Stick learning model better than the higest result average of study. Meanwhile, the respond of used questionnaire method, the result of Talking stick model questionnaire known 36% very positive responses, 61% positive responses and 3% positive sufficient responses. Then, Snowball Throwing model known 25% very positive responses, 67% positive responses, and 8% positive sufficient responses. Keywords : The Comparrative Study, TIK, Talking stick, Snowball Throwing, the                   study result,  students’ respond


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 242
Author(s):  
Lenny Sasmita ◽  
Thamrin Tayeb ◽  
Lisnasari Andi Mattoliang ◽  
Andi Ika Prasasti Abrar ◽  
Mardhiah Mardhiah

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektivitas penerapan model pembelajaran project based learning dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis peserta didik. Pendekatan penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kuantitatif dengan jenis penelitian eksperimen semu yang didesain menggunakan teknik Non-Equivalent Control Group Design. Sampel penelitian adalah peserta didik kelas VIII MTs Negeri Model Makassar. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan inferensial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) kelas eksperimen sebelum menerapkan model pembelajaran project based learning memperoleh nilai rata-rata hasil tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah sebesar 79,28. Setelah menerapkan model pembelajaran project based learning diperoleh nilai rata-rata hasil tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah sebesar 91,24 sehingga terjadi peningkatan rata-rata sebesar 15,086%; 2) secara signifikan, terjadi peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah untuk kelas yang menggunakan model pembelajaran project based learning di MTs Negeri Model Makassar.  AbstractThis research was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the application of the project based learning model in improving students' mathematical problem solving abilities. This research approach is a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental type of research designed using the Non-Equivalent Control Group Design technique. The research sample was class VIII MTs Negeri Model Makassar.. The data analysis technique used descriptive and inferential analysis, namely t test. The results showed that 1) the experimental class before applying the project-based learning model obtained an average value of the problem-solving ability test results of 79.28. After applying the project based learning learning model, the average value of the problem solving ability test results was 91.24, resulting in an average increase of 15.086%; 2) there is a significant increase in problem-solving abilities for classes that use the project-based learning model at MTs Negeri Model Makassar.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanti Tanti ◽  
Jamaluddin Jamaluddin ◽  
Boby Syefrinando

The aim of this research was to investigate the effect of problem-based learning on students’ beliefs about physics and learning physics. The research design is quasi-experimental, non-equivalent control group design with samples were senior high school students grade XI at SMAN 1 Jambi City. The research used the Colorado Learning Atttudes About Science Survey (CLASS). Through data analysis using ANCOVA Test can be seen that there was no significant result effect of problem-based learning on students’ beliefs about physics and learning physics. The study’s finding indicates that students’ beliefs about characteristic and obtaining knowledge are difficult to change. Nonetheless, the use of various learning models that focus on the formation of the model building on the physics world through problem solving that are contextual and real, as well as providing opportunities for students to actively engage in problem solving can help students develop the belief that they have about the physics from novice-like belief into expert-like belief.Penelitian ini bertujuan menginvestigasi pengaruh penggunaan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah terhadap belief siswa tentang fisika dan pembelajaran fisika. Desain penelitian kuasi eksperimen non-equivalent control group design dengan sampel siswa kelas XI Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri (SMAN) 1 Kota Jambi. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuesioner the Colorado Learning Attitudes About Science Survey (CLASS). Hasil uji Ancova terlihat bahwa tidak ada pengaruh signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah terhadap belief siswa tentang fisika dan pembelajaran fisika. Temuan penelitian mengindikasikan bahwa belief siswa tentang karakteristik dan cara memperoleh suatu pengetahuan sulit untuk diubah. Meskipun demikian, penggunaan berbagai model pembelajaran yang berfokus pada pada pembentukan model (model-building) dari dunia fisika melalui pemecahan masalah-masalah yang bersifat kontekstual dan nyata, serta memberikan kesempatan siswa untuk aktif terlibat dalam pemecahan masalah dapat membantu siswa mengembangkan belief yang mereka miliki tentang fisika dari belief sebagai seorang pemula (novice-like belief) menjadi belief sebagai seorang ahli (expert-like belief).


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 274
Author(s):  
Hani Wardah Latipah ◽  
Adman Adman

The Problem in this research is about the low of student learning outcomes of learners on the basic competence to identifying facilities and office environment in class X of Office Administration Program in SMK Negeri 3 Bandung. It was shown from the daily test score that are still under Minimum Mastery Criteria.The objective of this research is to measure students learning outcomes, using Mind Mapping model and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model so that it can be known which learning model improves learners' learning outcomes. It can be seen by the improvement of learning outcomes after the treatment which is analyzed based on N-Gain.The method used in this research is quasi experimental method and used the Nonequivalent Control Group Design.. The research subject were grade X of Office Administration program namely X Office Administration 1 as the experimental class and X Office Administration 4 as the control class.The results shows that the learners' learning outcomes are equivalent. The evidence is from the N-Gain results in the experimental class of 0.646 and the control class of 0.582 in the medium category. Based on normalized N-Gain and hypothesis test using different test (t-Test) proven that tcount < ttable is 1.236251286 <1.666293697. Hence, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference between using Mind Mapping learning model with the model of learning Numbered Head Together (NHT).Permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah rendahnnya hasil belajar peserta didik pada kompetensi dasar mengidentifikasikan fasilitas dan lingkungan kantor di kelas X program keahlian Administrasi Perkantoran SMKN 3 Bandung yang terlihat dari nilai ulangan harian yang masih dibawah KKM.Tujuan dilaksanakannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengukur hasil belajar peserta didik, dengan menggunakan model Mind Mapping dan model Numbered Head Together (NHT) sehingga dapat diketahui manakah model pembelajaran yang meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik. Hal ini dilihat dari peningkatan hasil pembelajaran setelah dilakukan treatment yang dianalisis berdasarkan N-Gain.Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen semu (quasi experiment) dengan desain Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Subjek penelitian ini yaitu kelas XAP1 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan XAP4 sebagai kelas kontrol.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hasil belajar peserta didik setara. Hal ini terbukti dari hasil N-Gain pada kelas eksperimen sebesar 0.646 dan pada kelas kontrol sebesar 0.582 yang berada pada kategori sedang. Berdasarkan N-Gain ternormalisasi dan uji hipotesis menggunakan uji beda (t-Test) yang terbukti bahwa thitung < ttabel yaitu 1.236251286 < 1.666293697. Sehingga, dapat disimpulkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping dengan model pembelajaran Numbered Head Together (NHT). 


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
A. Sriyanti ◽  
Ridwan Idris ◽  
Rikayanti Rahman

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah melihat efektivitas model pembelajaran Numbered Heads Together (NHT) berbantuan media pembelajaran question card di kelas VIII SMPN 1 Sanrobone dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep matematika siswa di kelas VIII  SMPN 1 Sanrobone. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu (Quasi Eksperimental) dengan non-equivalent control grup design. Sampel terdiri dari dua kelas yaitu kelas eksperimen menggunakan model pembelajaran Numbered Heads Together (NHT) berbantuan media pembelajaran question card dan kelas kontrol tidak dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Numbered Heads Together (NHT) berbantuan media pembelajaran question card dengan teknik pengambilan sampel purposive sampling. Hasil uji hipotesis dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 menunjukkan bahwa nilai  (2-tailed)  atau  artinya tidak terdapat perbedaan rata-rata pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Numbered Heads Together (NHT) berbantuan media pembelajaran question card dan kelas yang tidak diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Numbered Heads Together (NHT) berbantuan media pembelajaran question card. Berdasarkan kesimpulan dapat diketahui bahwa penerapan model pembelajaran Numbered Heads Together (NHT) berbantuan media pembelajaran question card  tidak efektif meningkatkan pemahaman konsep matematika siswa. AbstractThis research aims to examine the effectiveness of Numbered Heads Together (NHT) learning model which is equipped with Question Card learning media in promoting seventh grader’s understanding of mathematical concepts in SMPN 1 Sanrobone. In investigating the issue, this research used quasi experimental research with non-equivalent control group design. The research samples were selected using purposive sampling technique and were divided into two groups. The first group is an experimental class where Numbered Heads Together (NHT) learning model and Question Card learning media are implemented, while the second group is control class where Numbered Heads Together (NHT) learning model and Question Card learning media are not implemented. The results of hypothesis testing with significance rate of α = 0,05 shows that the value of  (2-tailed)  atau  . This further indicates that there is no difference in students’ understanding of mathematical concepts whether or not they are taught using Numbered Heads Together (NHT) learning model and Question Card learning media. Therefore, this research concludes that the implementation of Numbered Heads Together (NHT) learning model and Question Card learning media is not effective in promoting seventh graders’ understanding of mathematical concepts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76
Author(s):  
Lalu Zulkifli ◽  
Sutrio Sutrio ◽  
Jannatin ‘Ardhuha

Abstrak: Salah satu model yang dapat digunakan untuk melatih kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik adalah model pembelajaran guided discovery. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran guided discovery terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan hasil belajar fisika peserta didik pada tahun  2019 bertempat di SMA 6 Mataram. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan kuasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian non-equivalent control group design with pre-testand post-test. Teknik pengambilan sampel digunakanpurposive sampling, sehingga terpilih XI MIPA 4 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan XI MIPA 5 sebagai kelas kontrol. Kelas eksperimen diberi perlakuan berupa model  pembelajaranguided discovery sedangkan kelas kontrol diberi perlakuan berupa model pembelajaran konvensional. Instrumen penelitian terdiri atas tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah (KPM) berupa tes uraian dan tes hasil belajar berupa tes pilihan ganda untuk pre-tes digunakan materi gerak harmonis sederhana, untuk post-tes digunakan materi elastisitas zat padat,  dengan mempertimbangkan validitas, reliabilitas, taraf kesukaran soal dan daya beda soal. Uji analisis hipotestis  menggunakan uji manova bantuan IBM SPSS 23. Hasil uji hipotesis didapatakan nilai signifikan 0,004 pada taraf nilai signifikan 0,05 yang artinya H0 ditolak. Berdasarkan hasil analisis tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran guided discovery terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan hasil belajar fisika peserta didik.Kata kunci: Guided discoveri, Kemampuan pemecahan masalah, Hasil belajarAbstract: One model that can be used to practice problem solving skills and improve student learning outcomes is the guided discovery learning model. This study aims to determine the effect of guided discovery learning models on problem solving abilities and physics learning outcomes of students in 2019 at SMA 6 Mataram. This type of research used quasi-experimental research design with non-equivalent control group design with pre-test and post-test. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling, so XI MIPA 4 was chosen as the experimental class and XI MIPA 5 was chosen as the control class. The experimental class was treated as a guided discovery learning model while the control class was treated as a conventional learning model. The research instrument consisted of a problem solving ability test in the form of a breakdown test and a test of learning outcomes in the form of a multiple choice test for pre-tests using simple harmonic motion material, for post-tests the material used was solidity elasticity, taking into account validity, reliability, level of difficulty problems and different power problems. Hypothesis analysis test using IBM SPSS 23 manova test. Hypothesis test results obtained a significant value of 0.004 at a significant value of 0.05 which means that H0 is rejected. Based on the results of the analysis it can be concluded that there is an influence of guided discovery learning models on the ability of problem solving and student physics Learning resultKeywords: Guided discovery, Problem solving abolities,Learning result


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinda . Syafrida ◽  
Erlinawaty . Simanjuntak

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS pada materi aturan sinus dan cosinus. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan desain penelitian posttest Only Control Group Design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X-MIA SMA Negeri 3 Medan yang terbagi dalam 15 kelas dan yang menjadi sampel penelitian adalah 2 kelas yang dipilih dengan teknik cluster sampling yaitu kelas X MIA-4 menjadi kelas eksperimen 1 dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan kelas X MIA-14 menjadi kelas eksperimen 2 dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS. Sebelum pengujian hipotesis terlebih dahulu diuji normalitas data dengan menggunakan uji Liliefors dan homogenitas data menggunakan uji F. Setelah diberikan perlakuan pada kelas eksperimen 1 diperoleh nilai rata-rata posttest adalah 78,44 sedangkan pada kelas eksperimen 2 nilai rata-rata posttest adalah 71,75. Setelah diuji terbukti data berdistribusi normal dan homogen. Setelah data terbukti berdistribusi normal dan homogen dilakukan uji hipotesis untuk menjawab hipotesis penelitian dengan menggunakan uji t pihak kanan. Dari hasil uji hipotesis diperoleh thitung (2,7347) > ttabel (1,6646) maka Ha diterima. Dengan demikian disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS pada materi aturan sinus dan cosinus. Kata kunci: Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika, STAD, TPS ABSTRACT The aim of this study were to know whether the problem solving skills of mathematics students who learn by using STAD type cooperative learning model is higher than the ability of problem solving mathematics students who learn by using cooperative learning model of TPS type on the material rules of sinus and cosine. This type of research is a pseudo experiment with posttest Only Control Group Design research design. The population in this research is all students of X-MIA class X SMA Negeri 3 Medan which is divided into 15 classes and the research sample is 2 classes selected by cluster sampling technique that class X MIA-4 into experiment class 1 by using cooperative learning model type STAD and X class MIA-14 into experiment class 2 by using model of cooperative learning type of TPS. Before testing the hypothesis first tested the normality of the data by using the Liliefors test and homogeneity of data using the F test. After being given treatment in the experimental class 1 obtained the average value of posttest is 78.44 while in the experimental class 2 the average posttest value is 71.75 . After tested the data proved normal and homogeneous distribution. After the data proved to be normal and homogeneous distributions, hypothesis test is done to answer the research hypothesis by using the right side t test. From result of hypothesis test obtained tcount (2,7347) > ttable (1,6646) hence Ha accepted. Thus it is concluded that the problem solving ability of mathematics of students who learn by using STAD type cooperative learning model higher than the ability of problem solving mathematics students who learn by using model of cooperative learning TPS type on the material rules of sinus and cosine. Keywords: Mathematics Problem Solving Ability, STAD, TPS


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document