Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Fisika antara Siswa yang Diajarkan dengan Model Pembelajaran Numbered Heads Together (NHT) dan Snowball Throwing pada Kelas X SMAN 5 Banda Aceh

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Wahyuni ◽  
Silvia Ria Merisca ◽  
Muhammad Syukri
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Method ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Research Type ◽  
Banda Aceh

Siswa cenderung merasa sulit dan jenuh ketika mempelajari Fisika. Untuk menghindari hal tersebut, digunakanlah model pembelajaran yang dapat mengaktifkan siswa dikelas sehingga siswa tidak merasa jenuh. Model Pembelajaran yang dipilih oleh peneliti Numbered Heads Together (NHT) dan Snowball Throwing. Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan antara model pembelajaran NHT dan Snowball Throwing. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen dengan metode kuantitatif. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X pada SMAN 5 Banda Aceh dan sampel yang dipilih adalah kelas X MIA-1 sebagai kelas NHT dan X MIA-2 sebagai kelas Snowball Throwing. Kedua kelas diberikan pretes dan postes. Hasil nilai postes dari kedua kelas berdistribusi normal dan homogen. Hasil postes kemudian diuji-t, dengan uji-t dua pihak diperoleh thitung < ttabel menunjukkan bahwa menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara siswa yang diajarkan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran NHT dan Snowball Throwing. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara siswa yang diajarkan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran NHT dan Snowball Throwing.   Students fell to find it difficult and tired when studying Physics. To avoid this, used a learning model that can enable students in class so that students do not feel bored. Learning model chosen by Numbered Heads Together (NHT) and Snowball Throwing researchers. The purpose of this research is to know the difference between learning model of NHT and Snowball Throwing. This research type is experiment with quantitative method. The population of this study were all students of class X at SMAN 5 Banda Aceh and the selected sample was class X MIA-1 as NHT and X MIA-2 classes as Snowball Throwing class. Both classes are given pretest and postes. The result of the postes value of both classes is normal and homogeneous distributed. Posttest results are then tested with t-test, with two parties test obtained tcount < ttable shows that there is no significant difference between students taught using NHT and Snowball Throwing learning models. The conclusion of this study is that there is no significant difference between students taught by using NHT learning model and Snowball Throwing.

scholarly journals PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN KOGNITIF SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KANCING GEMERINCING DAN JIGSAW PADA PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK TEMA 9 KELAS V SD

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 758
Author(s):  
Lutfi Alimatus Sholehah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Model ◽  
Cognitive Skill ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Experiment Research ◽  
Real Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Independent Variable ◽  
Research Type

Abstract:Cooperative learning ringing button and jigsaw model is two learning model which has similarity and different characteristic. The research type is quasi experiment research. Research variables consist of Independent variable which is ringing button learning model and jigsaw and dependent variable, which is student cognitive skill. Research sample consist of two grade V which are class VA Muhammadiyah 4 Batu Elementary school. The research is measured using Independent Sample T -test with the help of SPSS 17 for windows. Research shows that post-test found count t value for -0,970 with significance for 0,336 table tvalue in free degree of 56 and real rate 0,05 for 2,003. When there’s comparison, so that count t< table t or significance > 0,05 and concluded that Ho is accepted which means there’s no significant difference is students’ cognitive skill using ringing button and jigsaw learning model.Keyword:Cognitive abilities, learning models, Jinks, Jigsaw, thematic learning.Abstrak:.Pembelajaran kooperatif model Kancing Gemerincing dan J igsaw merupakan dua modelajaran yang memiliki memiliki perbedan karakteristik. Penelitian ini eksperimen semu. Variabel penelitian terdiri dari variabel bebas yaitu model pembelajaran Kancing Gemerincing dan Jigsaw dan variabel terikat yaitu kemampuan kognitif siswa. Sampel penelitian ini terdiri dari 2 kelas V SD Muhammadiyah 4 Batu tahun ajaran 2014/2015 yaitu kelas VA yang berjumlah 30 siswa dan kelas VB yang berjumlah 30 siswa.Analisis data dilakukan dengan uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, dan uji hipotesis menggunakan Independent Sample T-Test dengan bantuan SPSS 17 for windows.Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa post-test diperoleh nilai thitung sebesar -0,970 dengan nilai signifikansi sebesar 0,336. Nilai ttabel pada derajat bebas 56 dan taraf nyata 0,05 sebesar 2,003. Apabila dilakukan pembandingan maka |thitung| < t tabel atau nilai signifikansi > 0,05 disimpulkan Ho diterima yang berarti bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan kemampuan ko gnitif siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Kancing Gemerincing dan Jigsaw.Kata Kunci:Kemampuan kognitif, model pembelajaran, Kancing Gemerincing, Jigsaw, pembelajaran tematik

scholarly journals PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN KOGNITIF SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KANCING GEMERINCING DAN JIGSAW PADA PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK TEMA 9 KELAS V SD

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 758
Author(s):  
Lutfi Alimatus Sholehah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Model ◽  
Cognitive Skill ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Experiment Research ◽  
Real Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Independent Variable ◽  
Research Type

Abstract:Cooperative learning ringing button and jigsaw model is two learning model which has similarity and different characteristic. The research type is quasi experiment research. Research variables consist of Independent variable which is ringing button learning model and jigsaw and dependent variable, which is student cognitive skill. Research sample consist of two grade V which are class VA Muhammadiyah 4 Batu Elementary school. The research is measured using Independent Sample T -test with the help of SPSS 17 for windows. Research shows that post-test found count t value for -0,970 with significance for 0,336 table tvalue in free degree of 56 and real rate 0,05 for 2,003. When there’s comparison, so that count t< table t or significance > 0,05 and concluded that Ho is accepted which means there’s no significant difference is students’ cognitive skill using ringing button and jigsaw learning model.Keyword:Cognitive abilities, learning models, Jinks, Jigsaw, thematic learning.Abstrak:.Pembelajaran kooperatif model Kancing Gemerincing dan J igsaw merupakan dua modelajaran yang memiliki memiliki perbedan karakteristik. Penelitian ini eksperimen semu. Variabel penelitian terdiri dari variabel bebas yaitu model pembelajaran Kancing Gemerincing dan Jigsaw dan variabel terikat yaitu kemampuan kognitif siswa. Sampel penelitian ini terdiri dari 2 kelas V SD Muhammadiyah 4 Batu tahun ajaran 2014/2015 yaitu kelas VA yang berjumlah 30 siswa dan kelas VB yang berjumlah 30 siswa.Analisis data dilakukan dengan uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, dan uji hipotesis menggunakan Independent Sample T-Test dengan bantuan SPSS 17 for windows.Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa post-test diperoleh nilai thitung sebesar -0,970 dengan nilai signifikansi sebesar 0,336. Nilai ttabel pada derajat bebas 56 dan taraf nyata 0,05 sebesar 2,003. Apabila dilakukan pembandingan maka |thitung| < t tabel atau nilai signifikansi > 0,05 disimpulkan Ho diterima yang berarti bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan kemampuan ko gnitif siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Kancing Gemerincing dan Jigsaw.Kata Kunci:Kemampuan kognitif, model pembelajaran, Kancing Gemerincing, Jigsaw, pembelajaran tematik

scholarly journals Perbedaan Kecerdasan Emosional pada Mahasiswa yang Mengikuti UKM Musik dan Mahasiswa yang Mengikuti UKM Non-Musik

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Annisa Aulia Putri ◽  
Haryanto Haryanto
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Quantitative Method ◽  
T Test ◽  
Intelligence Scale ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference

The aim of this study is to determine the difference in emotional intelligence of students from musical extracurricular and students from non-musical extracurricular. This research used quantitative method. Data collected with Emotional Intelligence Scale. The hypothesis in this study is that emotional intelligence of students from musical extracurricular higher than students from non-musical extracurricular. Total participant of this study were 83 active student members of the extracurricular in Universitas Gadjah Mada. Through the use of Independent T-test, found that there’s no significant difference between students from musical extracurricular than non-musical extracurricular, since mean of students from non-musical extracurricular (M = 180,750) is higher than students from musical extracurricular (M = 175,171). Therefore, emotional intelligence of students from musical extracurricular is not higher than students from non-musical extracurricular.

scholarly journals Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-266
Author(s):  
Putri Yulia ◽  
Maya Riskayani ◽  
Selvia Erita
Keyword(s):  
Communication Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference

This study aims to find out (1) the POGIL learning model effective on mathematical communication skills. (2) conventional learning models are effective against mathematical communication skills. (3) the difference between the POGIL learning model and the conventional model of mathematical communication skills. This research is quasi-experimental research with the research design of The Nonequivalent Posttest Only Control Group Design. The population in this study is all students of grade VII MTS Negeri 02 Kerinci. This study's sample consisted of an experimental class and a control class selected by a random sampling cluster. The research instrument is a test f mathematical communication ability, and the data is analyzed using one-sample t-test statistics and independent t-test samples. This study shows that (1) the POGIL learning model is effective on mathematical communication skills. (2) conventional learning models are ineffective against mathematical communication skills. (3) there is a difference between the POGIL learning model and the conventional model of mathematical communication skills.

scholarly journals Somatic, Auditory, Visual and Intellectual (SAVI) Learning Models Affect Students 'Mathematics Learning Achievement

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 376
Author(s):  
Leni Fajriah ◽  
Meiliana Nurfitriani ◽  
Rahmat Permana
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Material ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Class V ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Interview Methods ◽  
Innovative Learning ◽  
The Difference

The low mathematics learning achievement of students due to the less than optimal use of innovative learning models makes it difficult for students to understand the learning material as the reason why this study was conducted. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the application of Somatic, Auditory, Visual and Intellectual (SAVI) learning. This type of this study was expresearcherimental research, with quantitative data. This study used the experimental design of The Non-Equivalent Group Design. The population of this study were all students of class V, amounting to 61 students. The technique in determining the research sample is random sampling. Test and interview methods were used in collecting research data. The results of data analysis showed that the average mathematics learning achievement of students in the group given the SAVI learning model got 83.6 results while the average mathematics learning achievement of students in the conventional taught group got 61.66 results. The difference can also be seen from the average N gain, namely the experimental class is 0.68 in the quite effective category, while for the average N gain, and the control class is 0.22, in the ineffective category. Thus, there is a significant difference in students' mathematics learning achievement between the experimental class that uses the SAVI learning model and the control class that does not use the SAVI learning model.

scholarly journals The Effect of Make a Match Learning Models and Cognitive Ability to Recognize the Concept of Number

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 1873-1883
Author(s):  
Siti Rahmatunnisa ◽  
Anita Yus ◽  
Evi Eviyanti
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Number Concept ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Model Based ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Banda Aceh

This study aims to investigate: (1) the difference of ability to recognize the concept of numbers between children taught by Make a Match learning model based on creativity and children taught by Make a Match learning model; (2) the difference of ability to recognize the concept of numbers between children who have high cognitive abilities and low cognitive abilities, and (3) the interaction between Make a Match learning model with children's cognitive abilities on the ability to recognize concepts. The sample in this study is 28 children in class B1 for the experimental class who are taught by Make a Match based on creativity and for the control class, class B2 consisted of 28 children who were taught by Make a Match.  They are 5-6 years old children  at Raudhatul Athfal Mutiara Bunda Banda Aceh. The results show that: (1) The ability of children who taught by Make a Match learning model based on creativity  is 44.96, it is higher than children who taught by Make A Match learning, it is  34.64, (2) The ability to recognize the number concept of children who have high cognitive abilities obtained an average value of = 46.89, while children who have low cognitive abilities obtained an average value of = 33.21,  and (3) The results show that there was no significant interaction between the use of learning and children's cognitive abilities (high and low) in influencing the ability to recognize the concept of numbers.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of argumentation based learning and problem based learning models in improving student’s argumentation skills about salt hydrolysis concept

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-240
Author(s):  
Anisa Puspita Sari ◽  
◽  
Harizon Harizon ◽  
Muhammad Haris Effendi-Hasibuan ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
The Difference

Learning model that can train students in developing their argumentative skills includes the Argumentation Based Learning (ABL) and Problem Based Learning (PBL). This study aimed to see the effectiveness of the ABL and PBL models in improving students' argumentation skills about the concept of salt hydrolysis. The study was conducted in the class XI MIA SMAN 1 Tebo Jambi with a sample consisting of two classes. Some 50 students were recruited purposively to be the participants of this study. Concurrent embedded mix method using two group pretest posttest control group design was used in this study. The results of independent t-test showed that ABL was more effective than PBL (t= 4.864; p-value=0.00 < 0.05) in improving the students' argumentation skills. This was supported by the N-gain test of ABL which was 0.82 and the N -Gain test of PBL was 0.68. The results of observations revealed that the ABL students had more intensive opportunities to debate their argumentation than those in the PBL class. This was believed as the major factor influencing the difference in the students’ argumentation skills.

scholarly journals THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ARIAS LEARNING MODEL ASSISTED AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA IMPROVING LEARNING OUTCOMES

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Laila Molla ◽  
Muhammad Arif Budiman Sucipto
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Audiovisual Media ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Independent Test

ARIAS learning model instills confidence, relevance, interest, attention, and evaluation to find out success and pride in the results of achievement. With the help of audiovisual media, it will further enhance students' interest, attention, and activeness. Research Objectives 1) finding out differences in learning outcomes of significant ARIAS learning model with audiovisual media and conventional learning models. 2) Determining effectiveness of using ARIAS Learning Model assisted by audiovisual assisted audiovisual media in improving learning outcomes with conventional learning models. Quantitative research is a true design experiment. Design used was a pretest-posttest control group design. The population is all the third-semester students majoring in economics. Sample by means of non probability sampling with a purposive sampling technique, Data analysis techniques use independent test t-test and paired test. Results of independent test t test obtained t count = 3.375 with sig (2tailed) = 0.001 <0.05 which means a significant difference in learning outcomes between ARIAS learning model with conventional learning models. Paired test results obtained a value of t count of -20,378 with the sig. (2-tailed) = 0.00 <0.05 which means an increase in learning outcomes between ARIAS learning models with conventional models. The results obtain of average pre-test is 56.07 and post-test is 79.97. Furthermore, the conclusion is Arias assisted audiovisual learning model effectively improved learning outcomes of English subjects.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERTIF TIPE STAD TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA SISWA KELAS V SD NEGERI JOMBLANGAN TAHUN AJARAN 2019/2020

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annisa Lola Apriyani S ◽  
Yuli Prihatni
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Science Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
High Category ◽  
Significant Difference

The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the extent of the tendency of science learning outcomes with the STAD learning model (Student Teams Achievement Divisions). (2) The extent to which the tendency of science learning outcomes with expository learning models (3) find out the differences in science learning outcomes in class students V Jomblangan Public Elementary School uses the STAD learning model with expository learning model. This research was conducted in class V of SD Negeri Jomblangan, Bantuntapan district, Bantul, academic year 2019/2020 with a population of 64 students consisting of 2 classes. This type of research is quasi-experimental, VA, and VB grade students are taken as research samples. Data collection techniques used were test and documentation techniques. Validity and reliability tests are calculated using Microsoft Excel. The data analysis technique used is the initial ability test, normality test, homogeneity test, and independent-sample t-test. The results showed (1) the tendency of science learning outcomes using the STAD model was in the very high category with an average of 19.96 with a standard deviation of 7.86. (2) the tendency of science learning outcomes by using expository learning models in the high category with an average of 17.88 with a standard deviation of 8.72. (3) independent t-test results obtained t = 4,401 and p = 0,000 shows that there is a very significant difference between STAD learning models and expository learning models because of p <0,000.

Retail Mix Dan Kepuasan Konsumen Minimarket

Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62
Author(s):  
Siti Maryama ◽  
Yayat Sujatna
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Satisfaction ◽  
Quantitative Method ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
T Test ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Retail Industry ◽  
Location Data ◽  
Store Design ◽  
Customer Services ◽  
The Difference

The purpose of this study is to (1) analyzing the level of retail mix consumer satisfaction; (2) analyze the dominant variable in retail mix consumer satisfaction; (3) analyze the difference of retail mix consumer satisfaction performed. The observed of the retail industry is Alfamidi and Indomaret. The study was designed into a descriptive-quantitative method. The source of primary data obtained from the questionnaire of 100 respondents. The formulating variable of retail mix includes: merchandise assortments, pricing, customer services Store design and display, communication mix, and location. Data analyze by using descriptive, analysis of factors, and t-test. The result confirmed that the level of retail mix consumer satisfaction in both industry is relatively similar. However, it can be stated that the respondents were more satisfied to Indomaret compared with Alfamart.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document