scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and the Heart

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Larisa Mocan-Hognogi ◽  
Sebastian Trancǎ ◽  
Anca Daniela Farcaş ◽  
Radu Florin Mocan-Hognogi ◽  
Andrada Viorica Pârvu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Self Tolerance ◽  
Autoimmune Processes ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Case Presentations

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a break-through treatment for a large number of cancer types. This treatment is increasingly being recommended. ICIs are prescribed for primary tumours and for metastases, adjuvant/neo-adjuvant therapy. Thus, there is an increased need for expertise in the field, including the ways of response and toxicities related to them. ICIs become toxic because of the removal of self-tolerance, which in turn induces autoimmune processes that affect every organ. However, when relating to the heart, it has been noticed to be leading to acute heart failure and even death caused by various mechanisms, such as: myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmia, and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. This review aims to address the above issues by focusing on the latest findings on the topic, by adding some insights on the mechanism of action of ICIs with a special focus on the myocardial tissue, by providing information on clinical manifestations, diagnosis and (wherever possible) treatment of the cardiotoxic events related to this therapy. The information is expanding and in many cases, the articles we found refer mainly to case-presentations and studies conducted on small populations. However, we consider that it is worthwhile to raise awareness of this new treatment, especially since it is widely now and it provides a significant increase in the survival rate in patients who receive it.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Basics and Challenges

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (17) ◽  
pp. 3009-3025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Li ◽  
Ho Lam Chan ◽  
Pingping Chen
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Shed Light

Cancer is one of the most deadly diseases in the modern world. The last decade has witnessed dramatic advances in cancer treatment through immunotherapy. One extremely promising means to achieve anti-cancer immunity is to block the immune checkpoint pathways – mechanisms adopted by cancer cells to disguise themselves as regular components of the human body. Many review articles have described a variety of agents that are currently under extensive clinical evaluation. However, while checkpoint blockade is universally effective against a broad spectrum of cancer types and is mostly unrestricted by the mutation status of certain genes, only a minority of patients achieve a complete response. In this review, we summarize the basic principles of immune checkpoint inhibitors in both antibody and smallmolecule forms and also discuss potential mechanisms of resistance, which may shed light on further investigation to achieve higher clinical efficacy for these inhibitors.

scholarly journals Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAE) in Cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) and Survival Outcomes Correlation: To Rechallenge or Not?

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 989
Author(s):  
Heidar J. Albandar ◽  
Jacob Fuqua ◽  
Jasim M. Albandar ◽  
Salahuddin Safi ◽  
Samuel A. Merrill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Survival Difference ◽  
Histopathologic Diagnosis ◽  
Cancer Types

Introduction: There is growing recognition of immune related adverse events (irAEs) from immune checkpoint therapies being correlated with treatment outcomes in certain malignancies. There are currently limited data or consensus to guide management of irAEs with regards to treatment rechallenge. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis with an IRB-approved protocol of adult patients seen at the WVU Cancer Institute between 2011–2019 with a histopathologic diagnosis of active cancers and were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy. Results: Demographics were similar between the ICI interrupted irAE groups within cancer types. Overall, out of 548 patients who received ICI reviewed, there were 133 cases of ≥1 irAE found of any grade. Being treated with anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor ICI was associated with lower risk of death compared to anti-PD-1 ICI. The overall survival difference observed for irAE positive patients, between rechallenged (37.8 months, reinitiated with/without interruption; 38.6 months, reinitiated after interruption) and interrupted/non-reinitiated (i.e., discontinued) groups (24.9 months) was not statistically significant, with a numerical trend favoring the former. Conclusions: Our exploratory study did not identify significantly different survival outcomes among the Appalachian West Virginia adult cancer patients treated with ICI who developed irAE and had treatment reinitiated after interruption, when compared with those not reinitiated.

Genetic ancestry and clinical outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitors among seven common cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10536-10536
Author(s):  
Amin Nassar ◽  
Elio Adib ◽  
Sarah Abou Alaiwi ◽  
Elie Akl ◽  
Talal El Zarif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
East Asian ◽  
Genetic Ancestry ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Cancer Types

10536 Background: Prior studies and clinical trials report associations between self-reported race and clinical outcomes to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). However, comprehensive studies of ancestry-associated differences in clinical outcomes have not been performed. We derived genetic ancestry scores and assessed clinical outcomes in 1341 patients with cancer treated with ICIs. Methods: Patients at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute treated with ICIs only and with relevant cancer types and targeted exome sequencing data (Oncopanel) were included. Relevant cancer types included colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and urothelial carcinoma (UC). We developed a bioinformatics pipeline to infer fine-scale genetic ancestry for each patient (n=1341) directly from tumor sequencing data by leveraging off and on-target sequenced reads and external ancestry reference panels. Three ancestry scores were determined (African, East Asian, European). Overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) were compared by Cox logistic regression between ancestral populations. Hazard ratio (HR) was derived using multivariable analysis, adjusted for single versus combination therapy, prior lines of therapy, and tumor mutational burden (TMB, as percentiles). Results: Median follow-up was 37.8 months (m; interquartile range: 35.7-39.5m). Common cancer types included CRC (n=52), EGC (n=114), HNSCC (n=88), melanoma (n=274), NSCLC (n=571), RCC (n=99), and UC (n=143). A higher East Asian ancestry (EAS) was significantly associated with worse OS ( p=0.03) and TTF ( p=0.002) in patients with RCC, independent of the histologic subtype (Table). There was no significant association between any of the three ancestral populations and clinical outcomes in the other 6 cancer types. Conclusions: We described clinical outcomes to ICIs across three global populations in 7 cancers. As the medical field re-evaluates the use of self-reported race in clinical decision-making, we utilize a novel ancestry pipeline that can be readily applied to tumor-only sequencing panels and better characterize non-white populations. We find no ancestry differences in clinical outcomes except in patients with RCC treated with ICIs which will require future validation. We plan to analyze genomic correlates of response by ancestry in each of the cancer types to better understand these diverge clinical behaviors.[Table: see text]

Gut Microbiota and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Based Immunotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingming Tian ◽  
Si Zhang ◽  
Yujen Tseng ◽  
Xizhong Shen ◽  
Ling Dong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune System ◽  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Recent Progress ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Antitumor Response ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Patients Experience

: Application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a major breakthrough in the field of cancer therapy, which has displayed tremendous potential in various types of malignancies. However, their response rates range widely in different cancer types and a significant number of patients experience immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) induced by these drugs, limiting the proportion of patients who can truly benefit from ICIs. Gut microbiota has gained increasing attention due to its emerging role in regulating the immune system. In recent years, numerous studies have shown that gut microbiota can modulate antitumor response, as well as decrease the risk of colitis due to ICIs in patients receiving immunotherapy. The present review analyzed recent progress of relevant basic and clinical studies in this area and explored new perspectives to enhance the efficacy of ICIs and alleviate associated irAEs via manipulation of the gut microbiota.

scholarly journals Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. 1228-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Duffy ◽  
John Crown
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Cancer Types

Abstract BACKGROUND Immunotherapy, especially the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized the management of several different cancer types in recent years. However, for most types of cancer, only a minority of patients experience a durable response. Furthermore, administration of immunotherapy can result in serious adverse reactions. Thus, for the most efficient and effective use of immunotherapy, accurate predictive biomarkers that have undergone analytical and clinical validation are necessary. CONTENT Among the most widely investigated predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy are programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), microsatellite instability/defective mismatch repair (MSI/dMMR), and tumor mutational burden (TMB). MSI/dMMR is approved for clinical use irrespective of the tumor type, whereas PD-L1 is approved only for use in certain cancer types (e.g., for predicting response to first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer). Although not yet approved for clinical use, TMB has been shown to predict response to several different forms of immunotherapy and across multiple cancer types. Less widely investigated predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy include tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes and specific gene signatures. Despite being widely investigated, assays for MSI/dMMR, PD-L1, and TMB lack standardization and are still evolving. An urgent focus of future research should be the optimization and standardization of method for determining these biomarkers. SUMMARY Biomarkers for predicting response to immunotherapy are paving the way for personalized treatment for patients with diverse cancer types. However, standardization of the available biomarker assays is an urgent requirement.

scholarly journals Immunobiology of Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Implications for Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (23) ◽  
pp. 9056
Author(s):  
Valentina Tateo ◽  
Lisa Manuzzi ◽  
Andrea De Giglio ◽  
Claudia Parisi ◽  
Giuseppe Lamberti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Cancer Biology ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Thymic Epithelial Tumors ◽  
Epithelial Tumors ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Light Side ◽  
Thoracic Malignancies

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are a group of rare thoracic malignancies, including thymic carcinomas (TC) and thymomas (Tm). Autoimmune paraneoplastic diseases are often observed in TETs, especially Tms. To date, chemotherapy is still the standard treatment for advanced disease. Unfortunately, few therapeutic options are available for relapsed/refractory TETs. In the last few years, the deepening of knowledge on thymus’ immunobiology and involved altered genetic pathways have laid the foundation for new treatment options in these rare neoplasms. Recently, the immunotherapy revolution has landed in TETs, showing both a dark and light side. Indeed, despite the survival benefit, the occurrence of severe autoimmune treatment-related adverse events has risen crescent uncertainty about the feasibility of immunotherapy in these patients, prone to autoimmunity for their cancer biology. In this review, after summarizing immunobiology and immunopathology of TETs, we discuss available data on immune-checkpoint inhibitors and future perspectives of this therapeutic strategy.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Progresses and Challenges

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-Tian Liu ◽  
Meng-Jie Jiang ◽  
Zhu-Jian Deng ◽  
Le Li ◽  
Jian-Li Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Research Progress ◽  
T Cell Signaling ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
New Treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumor in the world and its incidence is increasing in many countries. In recent years, with the deepening understanding of the immune and pathological mechanisms of HCC, immunotherapy based on the regulation of tumor immune microenvironment has become a new treatment choice for patients with HCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed death protein-1, programmed death protein-ligand-1, or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 are the most widely used. Instead of general immune-enhancing therapies, ICIs can reactivate anti-tumor immune responses by disrupting co-inhibitory T cell signaling. In this review, the research progress and existing problems of ICIs in the treatment of HCC in recent years are reviewed.

scholarly journals Combination of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Radiotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Zexi Xu ◽  
Jia Feng ◽  
Yiming Weng ◽  
Yao Jin ◽  
Min Peng
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) combined with radiotherapy (RT) have emerged as a breakthrough therapy in the treatment of various cancers. The combination has a strong rationale, but data on their efficacy and safety are still limited. Hence, we comprehensively searched the database and performed this study to elucidate the clinical manifestations of this combined strategy. Methods. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared ICI plus RT with placebo plus RT or ICI alone for the treatment of advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and prostate cancer. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was adopted depending on between-study heterogeneity. Results. Three trials involving 1584 patients were included. ICI plus RT was significantly associated with improvement of OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70–0.94, P = 0.004 ), PFS (HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.56–0.72, P < 0.00001 ), and DCR (relative risk [RR] = 1.38; 95% CI 1.03–1.84, P = 0.03 ). A significant predictor for PFS with the combination of ICI and RT was age, as a significant improvement in PFS (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.37–0.64, P < 0.00001 ) was observed in NSCLC patients aged under 65 years. In safety analyses, patients receiving ICI plus RT had a significantly higher incidence of dyspnea (RR = 2.43; 95% CI 1.16–5.08, P = 0.02 ) and pneumonitis of grade 3 or higher (RR = 2.78; 95% CI 1.32–5.85, P = 0.007 ). Conclusion. The combination of ICI and RT was associated with improved OS, PFS, and DCR. Patients under 65 years will be the dominant beneficiaries. However, the incidence of dyspnea and pneumonia of grade 3 or higher also increased, which deserves our vigilance.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Related Thyroid Dysfunction: Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Possible Pathogenesis, and Management

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Zhan ◽  
Hong-fang Feng ◽  
Han-qing Liu ◽  
Lian-tao Guo ◽  
Chuang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune System ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Thyroid Dysfunction ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Killing Effect ◽  
Cell Death Gene

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a group of drugs employed in the treatment of various types of malignant tumors and improve the therapeutic effect. ICIs blocks negative co-stimulatory molecules, such as programmed cell death gene-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), reactivating the recognition and killing effect of the immune system on tumors. However, the reactivation of the immune system can also lead to the death of normal organs, tissues, and cells, eventually leading to immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). IRAEs involve various organs and tissues and also cause thyroid dysfunction. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, possible pathogenesis, and management of ICIs-related thyroid dysfunction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document