scholarly journals Identifying Barriers to Implementing Pain Management for Piglet Castration: A Focus Group of Swine Veterinarians

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooklyn Wagner ◽  
Kenneth Royal ◽  
Rachel Park ◽  
Monique Pairis-Garcia

Surgical castration is a painful husbandry procedure performed on piglets in the United States (US) to improve meat quality. Veterinarians play a crucial role in developing pain management protocols. However, providing pain management for castration is not common practice in US swine production systems. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to identify factors influencing swine veterinarian decision-making in regard to pain management protocols for piglet castration using focus group methodologies. Swine veterinarians (n = 21) were recruited to participate in one of three focus groups. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by two independent coders who identified three areas of focus, including (1) the lack of approved products validated for efficacy, (2) economic limitations and challenges, and (3) deficient guidelines and training for veterinarians to develop protocols. Although participating veterinarians acknowledged the importance of pain management from an animal welfare standpoint, these barriers must be addressed to ensure that castration pain can be successfully mitigated on-farm.

2006 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 743-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
WONDWOSSEN A. GEBREYES ◽  
SIDDHARTHA THAKUR ◽  
W. E. MORGAN MORROW

Conventional swine production evolved to routinely use antimicrobials, and common occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella has been reported. There is a paucity of information on the antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in swine production in the absence of antimicrobial selective pressure. Therefore, we compared the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from antimicrobial-free and conventional production systems. A total of 889 pigs and 743 carcasses were sampled in the study. Salmonella prevalence was significantly higher among the antimicrobial-free systems (15.2%) than the conventional systems (4.2%) (odds ratio [OR] = 4.23; P < 0.05). Antimicrobial resistance was detected against 10 of the 12 antimicrobials tested. The highest frequency of resistance was found against tetracycline (80%), followed by streptomycin (43.4%) and sulfamethoxazole (36%). Frequency of resistance to most classes of antimicrobials (except tetracycline) was significantly higher among conventional farms than antimicrobial-free farms, with ORs ranging from 2.84 for chloramphenicol to 23.22 for kanamycin at the on-farm level. A total of 28 antimicrobial resistance patterns were detected. A resistance pattern with streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline (n = 130) was the most common multidrug resistance pattern. There was no significant difference in the proportion of isolates with this pattern between the conventional (19.5%) and the antimicrobial-free systems (18%) (OR = 1.8; P > 0.05). A pentaresistance pattern with ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline was strongly associated with antimicrobial-free groups (OR = 5.4; P = 0.01). While showing the higher likelihood of finding antimicrobial resistance among conventional herds, this study also implies that specific multidrug-resistant strains may occur on antimicrobial-free farms. A longitudinal study with a representative sample size is needed to reach more conclusive results of the associations detected in this study.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecile A. Feldman ◽  
Janine Fredericks-Younger ◽  
Shou-En Lu ◽  
Paul J. Desjardins ◽  
Hans Malmstrom ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Everyday people die unnecessarily from opioid overdose-related addiction. Dentists are among the leading prescribers of opioid analgesics. Opioid seeking behaviors have been linked to receipt of initial opioid prescriptions following the common dental procedure of third molar extraction. With each opioid prescription a patient’s risk for opioid misuse or abuse increases. With an estimated 56 million tablets of 5 mg hydrocodone annually prescribed after third molar extractions in the United States, 3.5 million young adults may be unnecessarily exposed to opioids by dentists who are inadvertently increasing their patient’s risk for addiction.Methods: A double blind, stratified randomized, multi-center clinical trial has been designed to evaluate whether a combination of over-the-counter non-opioid containing analgesics is not inferior to the most prescribed opioid analgesic. The impacted 3rd molar extraction model is being used due to the predictable severity of the post-operative pain and generalizability of results. Within each site/clinic and gender type (male/female), patients are randomized to receive either OPIOID (hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/300 mg) or NON-OPIOID (ibuprofen/acetaminophen 400/500 mg). Outcome data include pain levels, adverse events, overall patient satisfaction, ability to sleep, and ability to perform daily functions. To develop clinical guidelines and a clinical decision making tool, pain management, extraction difficulty and number of tablets taken is being collected enabling an experimental decision making tool to be developed. Discussion: The proposed methods address the short comings of other analgesic studies. Although prior studies have tested short-term effects of single doses of pain medications, patients and their dentists are interested in managing pain for the entire post-operative period, not just the first 12 hours. After surgery, patients expect to be able to perform normal daily functions without feeling nauseous or dizzy and they desire a restful sleep at night. Parents of young people are concerned with the risks of opioid use and misuse, either related to treatments received or to subsequent use of leftover pills. Upon successful completion of this clinical trial, dentists, patients, and their families will be better able to make informed decisions regarding post-operative pain management.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04452344. Registered on June 20, 2020


2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (Special Issue) ◽  
pp. 169-169
Author(s):  
Anca Sterie ◽  
◽  
Eve Rubli Truchard ◽  
Ralf J. Jox ◽  
◽  
...  

"Health decisions occur in a rich context in which social influences are omnipresent. The tendency to compare oneself with others has been described as one of the critical social factors influencing decision making. Based on a collection of 43 audio-recordings of hospital admission encounters which were analyzed though a conversation analytic methodology, we present findings and reflections in regard to how patients and physicians discuss cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. The phenomena of interest concerns how and when patients and physicians refer to what other people decide (for example: “Often the patients tell us: No futile care”). This practice is encountered in 6 of the conversations recorded. Reference to other people’s decisions is a way to talk about options, but it does much more than just enumerating them. As a resource in interaction, this reference is employed when the patient can’t or doesn’t express a preference (thereby clarifying options) or when the preference the patient expressed is problematic (because contrary to expectations). By using this reference, decision making is projected as a matter of membership to a group of individuals, and not as a matter of individual prognostic.The ethical implications of referring to other people’s choices are significant, since it can influence the patient and pose a serious threat to autonomous decisions. We argue that findings such as ours, stemming from data-driven studies of healthcare communication, are pivotal for informing ethics education in its effort to address the biases that physicians impose upon patients during decision making. "


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3001-3001
Author(s):  
Amanda Ribbands ◽  
Boris Gorsh ◽  
Abigail Bailey ◽  
Natalie Boytsov ◽  
Emily Luke ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: With each successive line of therapy (LOT), treatment choice for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) becomes increasingly complicated due to existing regimens and the lack of consensus on the standard of care for relapsed/refractory disease. There is a need for more real-world (RW) information on current MM treatments and clinical practices. More insight into the complexity of treatment choices for MM, increasing with each LOT, is also needed to better understand and inform patient treatment as their MM progresses. We aimed to examine current clinical practice and decision-making in the RW setting in MM. Methods: Data were derived from the Adelphi MM Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of hematologists and hemato-oncologists conducted in the United States of America between August 2020 and July 2021, collating descriptive information on MM treatment patterns and decision-making from first-line (1L) to fourth-line therapy and beyond (4L+). Physicians completed online patient record forms for their next 8 consulting patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of MM and were actively receiving 1L-4L+ treatment (ie, a quota of ≥2 patients on each LOT). Results: A total of 63 physicians were included in the interim analysis, reporting patients who ever received, or are on at the time of data collection, a specific LOT. Data were provided for 259 patients with 1L treatment, 186 with second-line (2L), 120 with third-line (3L), 60 with 4L, and 2 with fifth-line treatment. Of the patients included in the study, 66% were male with a mean age of 67.7 years (standard deviation 8.16 years); 59% of patients used Medicare for their health insurance and 32% of patients had commercial insurance. The majority of patients received triplet regimens in each LOT (1L: 72%, 2L: 72%, 3L: 68%, 4L: 43%). The top 5 triplet regimens are shown in Table 1. Regimens including cluster of differentiation (CD)38-targeted treatments were used across all LOTs, with the most frequent use seen in earlier relapsed/refractory settings (1L: 8%, 2L: 45%, 3L: 26%, 4L: 19%). Retreatment with the same drug class occurred in 53% of patients treated with a proteasome inhibitor, 50% of patients treated with immunomodulatory drugs, and 4% of patients treated with CD38-targeted treatment. Disease progression/relapse was the most frequent reason for treatment cessation across all LOTs among patients who used either mono, doublet, triplet, or quad regimens (1L: n=92 [48%], 2L: n=72 [61%], 3L: n=37 [63%], 4L: n=2 [100%]). For all LOTs, the leading factors influencing physicians' treatment choice were good clinical data regarding overall survival (OS) (1L: 59%, 2L: 65%, 3L: 52%, 4L: 48%) followed by better efficacy overall (1L: 48%, 2L: 53%, 3L: 45%, 4L: 41%). In 3L, high overall response rate was also important (24%). Good clinical data regarding OS was the most frequent factor influencing choice of triplet regimens at 1L, 2L, and 3L (56%, 62%, and 50%, respectively), whereas manageable side effects profile was the leading factor driving choice of triplet regimen at 4L+ (43%). Other factors that influenced treatment choice included long-term safety, transplant eligibility, and effective use of the treatment as part of a combination therapy. Conclusion: We provide valuable RW data on current treatment patterns and decision-making in MM. Interim analyses revealed a trend for use of triplet therapies across all LOTs, high retreatment rate with the same drug class, and the importance of survival data and clinical efficacy as key factors influencing physician selection of treatment. Additional analyses will be conducted as physicians complete their patient reporting for the study to identify unmet needs and opportunities for new treatment strategies in MM. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline (Study 209997). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ribbands: Adelphi Real World, paid employee: Current Employment. Gorsh: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Boytsov: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Luke: Adelphi Real World, paid employee: Current Employment. Lambert: Adelphi Real World, paid employee: Current Employment. Hogea: GlaxoSmithKline, paid employee: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months.


Author(s):  
Laura H. Barg-Walkow ◽  
Sara E. McBride ◽  
Michael J. Morgan ◽  
Tracy L. Mitzner ◽  
Ellen E. Clarke ◽  
...  

Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of chronic pain, affecting approximately one-third of older adults in the United States and imposing a financial burden on the healthcare system. Pain management for osteoarthritis is complex; there is a need for a technology to support people with osteoarthritis to capture, integrate, and display information on pain and mediating factors critical for pain management. We developed a system that can support self-management of osteoarthritis pain, including identification of factors influencing pain. The efficacy of this system was tested with seven older adults— who reported experiencing osteoarthritis pain for at least three years—and three healthcare providers—who reported experience assisting older adults in managing osteoarthritis pain within the past year. For both groups, our system improved their ability to answer comprehension questions about osteoarthritis pain. Overall, this system for tracking and managing pain supported users’ understanding of osteoarthritis pain and its mediators, which could ultimately lead to improved management of osteoarthritis pain.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 1008-1027
Author(s):  
Eric G. Lambert ◽  
Eugene A. Paoline ◽  
Nancy L. Hogan

Role strain has many negative outcomes. While the majority of role strain research has focused on its effects, this study explored possible antecedents of role strain among staff at a large, urban Southern jail in the United States. Based on regression analysis of survey data, instrumental communication, views that policy is followed, input into decision-making, formalization, and supervisory support each had significant negative effects on role strain. Administrative support and positive relations with coworkers, however, had nonsignificant effects. Jail administrators should attempt to reduce role strain by creating clear structure of job duties and expectations (formalization), providing staff with a greater organizational voice (input into decision-making), explaining the importance of organizational policies being followed and how they benefit staff, improving the flow of critical information about job and organizational matters (instrumental communication), and training supervisors about how to provide support to their subordinates and reward them for doing so (supervisory support).


Author(s):  
Jeremy N. Marchant-Forde ◽  
Laura A. Boyle

The COVID-19 pandemic highlights that we exist in a global community. From a single city, it spread to 188 countries across the world and infected 30 million people by September 18, 2020. Decades of modeling pandemics predicted potential consequences, but COVID-19's impact on the food supply chain, and specifically livestock production was unexpected. Clusters of cases among workers in meat processing plants evolved quickly to affect human, animal, and environmental welfare in several countries. In processing plants, the hygiene focus is on product quality and food safety. Because of their close proximity to one another, COVID-19 spread rapidly between workers and the lack of sick leave and health insurance likely resulted in workers continuing to work when infectious. In the United States (U.S.) many processing plants shut down when they identified major outbreaks, putting pressure especially on pig and poultry industries. At one point, there was a 45% reduction in pig processing capacity meaning about 250,000 pigs per day were not slaughtered. This resulted in longer transport distances to plants in operation with extra capacity, but also to crowding of animals on farm. Producers were encouraged to slow growth rates, but some had to cull animals on farm in ways that likely included suffering and caused considerable upset to owners and workers. Carcass disposal was also associated with potential biosecurity risks and detrimental effects on the environment. Hence, this is a One Welfare issue, affecting human, animal, and environmental welfare and highlighting the fragility of intensive, high-throughput livestock production systems. This model needs to be re-shaped to include the animal, human, and environmental elements across the farm to fork chain. Such a One Welfare approach will ensure that food production systems are resilient, flexible, and fair in the face of future challenges.


2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Walmsley ◽  
M. J. McPhee ◽  
V. H. Oddy

The BeefSpecs fat calculator is a decision-support system developed to assist decision making on-farm to improve compliance rates with beef carcass specifications. BeefSpecs is underpinned by a research model run in conjunction with a translation process that converts inputs recorded in live animal and carcass assessment language into research model parameters. In contrast to many other research modelling systems, the changes in body composition predicted by the research model that underpins BeefSpecs are driven by growth rate. Use of this model removes the need for information concerning feed intake and dietary characteristics, which are impractical to collect on a routine basis in commercial production systems. A translation process was developed to use traits that are recorded routinely on-farm during normal production activities while allowing the original modelling system to run efficiently and accurately. This process aligns BeefSpecs with the language used by industry and increases the confidence of users in the underlying model theories. The outputs produced by BeefSpecs include final liveweight, final subcutaneous fat depth and hot standard carcass weight at the end of a specified feeding period. These traits contribute to the carcass specifications used to determine carcass value in the domestic and international markets supplied by the Australian beef industry, which directly aligns BeefSpecs with the decision-making styles of beef producers. During the development of BeefSpecs, potential users were consulted and enlisted in the evaluation process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 343-344
Author(s):  
Calia Morais ◽  
Michael Robinson ◽  
Roger Fillingim ◽  
Emily Bartley

Abstract Pain is the number one reason for seeking medical attention, and a top contributor to healthcare costs in the United States. Considerable evidence highlights racial/ethnic disparities in pain with Latinx communities being disproportionally affected at higher rates. Compared to other ethnic minority groups, Latinx older adults are more socioeconomically disadvantaged and experience higher rates of disability and frailty (Garcia, Downer, Crowe, & Markides, 2017). Given the rapidly growing population of Latinx, it is anticipated that the incidence of pain and its associated impact will adversely affect the quality of life of many older adults. The public health focus on improving pain management with non-opioid treatment options also highlights the need to provide culturally responsive care for Latinx older adults. However, limited efforts have addressed this important target for intervention. Following the biopsychosocial model of pain, this presentation will provide an overview of biological, psychosocial and cultural factors influencing pain disparities among older adults. Findings from experimental and clinical settings will be discussed. The presenter will also review current evidence highlighting the preference for self-management strategies for pain management among Latinxs, as well as the need to increase accessibility to psychosocial treatments for chronic pain, such as cognitive behavioral therapy for pain (CBT-pain). Furthermore, preliminary findings from a qualitative study will be presented to illustrate the need to offer culturally adapted treatments for pain management (Torres, Thorn, Kapoor, & DeMonte, 2017). Future research is needed to study sociocultural factors influencing pain disparities to help identify modifiable targets for intervention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document