scholarly journals The Effects of Gaming on University Student Quiz Performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-119
Author(s):  
Corinne M Gist ◽  
Natalie Andzik ◽  
Elle E Smith ◽  
Menglin Xu ◽  
Nancy A Neef
Keyword(s):  
Student Performance ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Classroom Engagement ◽  
Electric Device ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Competitive Games ◽  
Education Courses ◽  
Quiz Scores

The use of competitive games to increase classroom engagement has become common practice among many teachers. However, it is unclear if using games as an assessment tool is a viable way to increase student performance. This study examined the effects of administering quizzes through a game-based system, Kahoot!,versusprivately on an electronic device. The quiz scores of 56 undergraduate students, enrolled in one of two special education courses, were evaluated. A linear regression was used to compare student scores across the two conditions, as well as performance over the course of a 15-week semester. No significant difference in quiz scores was found between the two conditions, and quiz scores in both conditions improved similarly over time. Sixty-eight percent of the students reported preferring to take the quiz privately on an electric device as opposed to on Kahoot!. Limitations and recommendations for practitioners are discussed.

scholarly journals Perception of OSCE as An Assessment Tool in Undergraduate Students of Private Medical College in Karachi, Pakistan

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2370-2374
Author(s):  
Saba Pario ◽  
Shaista Bashir Anwar ◽  
Zafar Haleem Baloch ◽  
Saira Ghafoor ◽  
Shazia Aftab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Tool Material ◽  
P Value ◽  
Practical Skills ◽  
Undergraduate Medical Students ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Significant Difference

OBJECTIVE: To explore the perception of undergraduate students of United Medical and dental college towards objective structured clinical examination as an assessment tool. MATERIAL & METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study included undergraduate medical students, RESULTS: 153 students who completely filled the proforma were included in study among them 31% were male and 69% were females. Mostly agreed that stations in OSCE were simple and easily interpretable and assessed practical skills thoroughly. Majority of students accepted that skills inquired were taught in clinics, stations were according to course and stations were appropriately timed. 66 % confirmed that adequate instructions were provided before exam. 84.31% believed that OSCE is preferable to viva. 57.51% of candidates stated that examiners during OSCE were attentive and gracious but 20.91 % objected it , while 21.57% remained neutral. Almost half of examinees labelled it as comprehensive clinical assessment .Overall, 67.97 % perceived OSCE as demanding and tough assessment. Finally views of students for statement that OSCE is unbiased, reliable and valid were positive in 50.32%.There was a significant difference in the opinion of male and female( p-value is less than 0.05) in statement that OSCE thoroughly assessed practical skills, stations were according to course of instruction, Adequate instructions were provided before exam, superior and preferable to viva, assists in improvement of clinical skills, demanding and tough and finally OSCE was unbiased, reliable and valid CONCLUSION: OSCE was perceived as fair, comprehensive, un-biased format of examination but believed it was more stressful than traditional examination methods . KEY WORDS: Assessment, Attitude, OSCE, Perception, Undergraduate Medical students.

scholarly journals Application of a Simulation-Based Interprofessional Teamwork Assessment Tool (SITAT) to Individual Student Performance in a Team-Based Simulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 238212052110424
Author(s):  
Brittany J Daulton ◽  
Laura Romito ◽  
Zach Weber ◽  
Jennifer Burba ◽  
Rami A Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Student Performance ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Individual Performance ◽  
Individual Student ◽  
Interprofessional Teamwork ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Simulation Based

There are a very limited number of instruments to assess individual performance in simulation-based interprofessional education (IPE). The purpose of this study was to apply the Simulation-Based Interprofessional Teamwork Assessment Tool (SITAT) to the individualized assessment of medicine, pharmacy, and nursing students (N = 94) in a team-based IPE simulation, as well as to explore potential differences between disciplines, and calculate reliability estimates for utilization of the tool. Results of an analysis of variance provided evidence that there was no statistically significant difference among professions on overall competency ( F(2, 91)  =  0.756, P  = .472). The competency reports for nursing ( M = 3.06, SD = 0.45), medicine ( M = 3.19, SD = 0.42), and pharmacy ( M = 3.08, SD = 0.49) students were comparable across professions. Cronbach's alpha provided a reliability estimate of the tool, with evidence of high internal consistency ( α = .92). The interrater reliability of the SITAT was also investigated. There was moderate absolute agreement across the 3 faculty raters using the 2-way mixed model design and “average” unit (kappa = 0.536, P = .000, 95% CI [0.34, 0.68]). The novel SITAT demonstrates internal consistency and interrater reliability when used for evaluation of individual performance during IPE simulation. The SITAT provides value in the education and evaluation of individual students engaged in IPE curriculum.

scholarly journals Quantifying the impact of mathematics support on the performance of undergraduate engineering and computing students

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Calum Macdonald
Keyword(s):  
Built Environment ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Mathematical Content ◽  
Undergraduate Engineering ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

The School of Computing, Engineering and Built Environment at Glasgow Caledonian University has provided mathematics support for all students in the school since 2012/13. This paper compares the performance of two groups of undergraduate students; those who engaged with mathematics support, through attending targeted lectures, and those who chose not to engage. Data collected over the five years from 2013/14 to 2017/18 for 4,690 engaging and non-engaging students, enrolled on modules with a substantial mathematical content, were analysed. Module marks achieved at first diet for the two groups of students, at all undergraduate levels, were selected as a measure of how mathematics support impacts on student performance. The study showed that there was a substantial and significant difference between the marks achieved by students that engaged with support and those that did not. Students who engaged on average showed an 8% increase in their module mark compared with those who did not engage. 

scholarly journals Using a personal response system as an in-class assessment tool in the teaching of basic college chemistry

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzy-Ling Chen ◽  
Yu-Li Lan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Large Classes ◽  
Course Content ◽  
College Chemistry ◽  
Effective Use ◽  
Actual Learning

<p>Since the introduction of personal response systems (PRS) (also referred to as "clickers") nearly a decade ago, their use has been extensively adopted on college campuses, and they are particularly popular with lecturers of large classes. Available evidence supports that PRS offers a promising avenue for future developments in pedagogy, although findings on the advantages of its effective use related to improving or enhancing student learning remain inconclusive. This study examines the degree to which students perceive that using PRS in class as an assessment tool effects their understanding of course content, engagement in classroom learning, and test preparation. Multiple, student-performance evaluation data was used to explore correlations between student perceptions of PRS and their actual learning outcomes. This paper presents the learning experiences of 151 undergraduate students taking basic chemistry classes and incorporating PRS as an in-class assessment tool at the National Chung Hsing University in Taiwan. While the research revealed positive student perceived benefits and effectiveness of PRS use, it also indicated the need for further studies to discover what specific contribution PRS can make to certain learning outcomes of a large chemistry class in higher education.</p><br />

Relationship Between Approved Clinical Instructors' Assessment of Athletic Training Student Clinical Performance and Their Clinical Grade

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 152-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin P. Ambegaonkar ◽  
Shane Caswell ◽  
Amanda Caswell
Keyword(s):  
Student Performance ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Clinical Grade ◽  
Clinical Instructors ◽  
Approved Clinical Instructors

Context: Approved Clinical Instructors (ACIs) are integral to athletic training students' professional development. ACIs evaluate student clinical performance using assessment tools provided by educational programs. How ACI ratings of a student's clinical performance relate to their clinical grade remains unclear. Objective: To examine relationships between ACI evaluations of student clinical performance using an athletic training-specific inventory (Athletic Training Clinical Performance Inventory; ATCPI) and the student's clinical grade (CG) over a clinical experience. Design: Correlational. Setting: Large metropolitan university. Participants: 48 ACIs (M=20; F=28; Certified for 7.5+3.2yrs; ACIs for 3.2+1.5yrs) evaluating 62 undergraduate students (M=20; F=42). Interventions: ACIs completed the ATCPI twice (mid-semester, and end-of semester) during their student's clinical experience. The ATCPI is a 21-item instrument: Items 1–20 assess the student's clinical performance based on specific constructs (Specific) and item 21 is a rating of the student's overall clinical performance (Overall). ACIs also assigned students a clinical grade (CG). Pearson product-moment correlations examined relationships between Specific, Overall, and CG, with separate paired t-tests examining differences (p&lt;.05). Main Outcome Measures: The ATCPI used a 4-point Likert-type scale anchored by 1 (Rarely) and 4 (Consistently), and CG (A=4, B=3, C=2 D =1, 0=F). Results: Two-hundred and sixty-six ATCPI instruments were completed over 4 academic years. The ATCPI demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha=.88). All three measures were positively correlated (Specific and Overall, r(264)=.65, P &lt;.001; Specific and CG r(264)=.63, P &lt;.001; Overall and CG r(264)=.55, P&lt;.001). No differences existed between Specific (3.5±0.4) and CG (3.5±0.7; t=.60, P =.55). However, Overall (3.6±0.7) was significantly higher than both Specific (t=−3.45, P&lt;.000) and CG (t=2.05, P =.04). Conclusions: ACIs reliably assessed students' specific clinical performance and provided a relatively accurate grade. However, since the overall scores were higher than specific item scores, ACIs overestimated students' overall clinical performance. Additional research is necessary to examine the ATCPI as an assessment tool across multiple institutions and to determine how other variables affect ACI assessments of student performance.

scholarly journals Using Portfolio as an Alternative Assessment Tool to Enhance Thai EFL Students’ Writing skill

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arab World English Journal ◽  
Rusma Kalra ◽  
Chutamas Sundrarajun ◽  
Hathaichanok Komintarachat
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Alternative Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
And Control

This present study investigates the effects of portfolios on the development of English as a foreign language ( EFL) learners’ writing skills. For the purpose of this study 56 senior Thai undergraduate students majoring in Business English at an International University in Thailand were selected and divided into experimental and control groups. Each group, consists of 26 students, both of them were given pretest to ensure the same proficiency level. Throughout the eight weeks in which the experiment was carried, the experimental group was taught through portfolio assessment technique and the control group was taught using the conventional method. Besides, an independent sample t-test was carried out to see the significant differences between the two groups. In order to see the differences within each group, a paired sample t-test was applied. The statistical results showed that there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups which signifies that those receiving the treatment, in this case, the portfolio based assessment, outperformed their control group counterpart in the area of writing skill.

Effects of Audience Response Systems on Student Achievement and Long-Term Retention

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1431-1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selcuk Karaman
Keyword(s):  
Academic Success ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Audience Response ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Audience Response Systems ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Response Systems

The effects of audience response systems (ARS) on students' academic success and their perceptions of ARS were examined in this study. Participants, comprising 44 undergraduate students, were randomly assigned to a control or treatment group. The course design was the same for both groups and the instructor prepared the multiple-choice questions in advance; students in the control group responded to these questions verbally whereas the treatment group used ARS. Two paper-based examinations were used to measure the learning of concepts and skills that were taught. Students' perceptions of ARS were collected via a questionnaire. Results showed that ARS usage has a significant learning achievement effect in the first 4 weeks but not at the end of the second 4 weeks. There was no significant difference in retention between either group. Students perceived the ARS tool positively, finding it very enjoyable and useful.

Musical pantophagy: Is there an effect on changes in preference resulting from repeated exposure?

2021 ◽  
pp. 030573562098729
Author(s):  
Rebecca R Johnston ◽  
Gina M Childers
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Classical Music ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Affective Response ◽  
Repeated Exposure ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Preference Rating ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Music Consumption ◽  
Post Test

The purpose of this research was to examine the effects of musical pantophagy, classical music consumption, and initial receptivity to select musical examples on changes in preference rating resulting from a program of repeated exposure. Participants included undergraduate students enrolled in a section of music appreciation at a large Southeastern university ( n = 67). Data were collected using a research designed preference rating measure (PRM) administered during a 5-week period within which there were eight test measures. Participants were divided into quartiles. Pre- to post-test measures resulted in a general positive trend for all participants. Comparisons of Q1 (lowest pantophagy) and Q3 (highest pantophagy) on PRMs 1–8 yielded no differences between groups, and PRM 8 was significantly different from PRM 1 for both groups. The same comparisons for Q1 (non-Classical music consumption) indicated significant difference with large effect size and for Q1 (lowest initial receptivity) indicated significant difference. Results suggest that regardless of musical pantophagy, repetition is an effective means by which to increase affective response to music, and that students who do not currently consume formal art music and who have low initial receptivity may report greater increases in affective response to music over time.

scholarly journals Measuring supports from learning assistants that promote engagement in active learning: evaluating a novel social support instrument

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dania Hernandez ◽  
Gema Jacomino ◽  
Uma Swamy ◽  
Krista Donis ◽  
Sarah L. Eddy
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Active Learning ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Social Supports ◽  
Informational Support ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Appraisal Support ◽  
Instrument Measuring ◽  
Support Students

Abstract Background Active learning supports student performance, but can be challenging to implement in large courses. The Learning Assistant (LA) Program is a growing intervention to support students in large active learning classrooms. This program places advanced undergraduates who have training in pedagogical methods in active learning classrooms to interact with and support students during in-class activities. LAs increase student performance, but the mechanism behind this is still unclear. Social support is a promising framework to help elucidate the types and extent of assistance LAs provide to students and begin exploring the “how” behind LAs effectiveness. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument measuring undergraduate students’ perceptions of the social supports for active learning available to them in the classroom. This instrument was based on both the broader social support literature and the literature on what factors encourage students to engage deeply in active learning. To provide initial evidence of validity, the instrument was completed in six sections of General Chemistry I at one R1 university. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were applied to determine the internal structure of the instrument. Then the instrument’s relationship to engagement in active learning was evaluated as another form of validity evidence. Results These analyses best supported a three-factor instrument that included five items representing supportive feedback provided during active learning (appraisal support), eight items representing emotional support during active learning, and six items representing the communications of norms and values related to active learning (informational support). All three factors were individually correlated with three measures of engagement. In regression analyses with all three factors measured together, only informational support predicted changes in two of the three measures of engagement. Conclusions This study supports the use of the Perception of Social Supports for Active Learning (PSSALI) instrument to understand students’ perceptions of the supports they are receiving to engage in active learning in chemistry courses. One implication of this work is that in order to increase engagement, learning assistants should clearly communicate the value of active learning and the classroom norm of active participation.

scholarly journals 136 Reflections on the foundational scientific knowledge of undergraduate animal science students: a three-year study

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 79-79
Author(s):  
Lauren R Thomas ◽  
Jeremy G Powell ◽  
Elizabeth B Kegley ◽  
Kathleen Jogan
Keyword(s):  
Student Performance ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Undergraduate Teaching ◽  
Experimental Unit ◽  
Student Knowledge ◽  
Animal Science ◽  
Muscle Foods ◽  
Assessment Scores ◽  
Percentage Points

Abstract In 2015, the University of Arkansas Department of Animal Science developed a strategy for assessing student-learning outcomes within its undergraduate teaching program. The first recognized outcome states that students will demonstrate foundational scientific knowledge in the general animal science disciplines of physiology, genetics, nutrition, muscle foods, and production animal management. Subsequently, a 58-item assessment tool was developed for direct assessment of student knowledge—focusing primarily on freshmen and senior students. Over the past 3 academic calendar years, 381 students (196 freshmen, 48 sophomores, 19 juniors, 113 seniors, 5 graduates) were assessed, either during an introduction to animal science course or by appointment with outgoing seniors majoring in animal science. Scores were categorized using demographic data collected at the beginning of the assessment tool. Comparison categories included academic class, major, and general student background (rural or urban). Data analysis were performed using the Glimmix procedure of SAS, with student serving as the experimental unit and significance set at P ≤ 0.05. Generally speaking, animal science majors performed better (P < 0.01) than students from other majors, and students with a rural background performed better (P < 0.01) than their urban-backgrounded peers. Overall, senior assessment scores averaged 23-percentage points greater (P < 0.01) than freshmen assessment scores, and the average scores for freshmen and seniors were 43% and 66% respectively. In regards to student performance within each discipline, there was an average improvement of 24 percentage points between freshmen and seniors in all of the measured disciplines except for muscle foods, which only saw a 10-percentage point improvement between the two classes. While the overall improvement in scores is indicative of increased student knowledge, the department would like to see greater improvement in all discipline scores for seniors majoring in animal science.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document