DEVELOPMENT OF RELATIONS BETWEEN KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKISTAN AT THE PRESENT STAGE

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
G. Baikushikova ◽  
◽  
G. Apsattarova ◽  

The article assesses the process of development of relations between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, describes the impact on bilateral relations of current events in international relations. Kazakh-Uzbek relations have a historical character, emphasize the common position between the two countries, the importance of common interests. The author, assessing the prospects for cooperation between the two countries, first of all focused on the influence of external factors. He gave data on the events taking place in modern international relations, analyzed the relations between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan in the new conditions.

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 124-132
Author(s):  
Bowen Yi

The signing of Abraham Accords can promote the realization of the common interests among countries to a certain extent. However, it may also trigger some conflicts among nations. This paper mainly analyzes the important factors contributing to the signing of the Abraham Accords from three perspectives: (1) the external factors -- the intervention of the US; (2) the internal factors -- the Arab and Israel’s adaptation to the current international situations; (3) other factors -- the impact of COVID-19, the dictatorship of Arab leaders, and the personal political pursuits of the leaders from other nations. In this paper, Classical Realism is used to analyze the interests between countries, and the influence of some political decisions made by relevant state leaders is supplemented by Neo-realism. Additionally, in this paper, Neoliberalism and Constructivism are also employed to analyze the negotiations between national interests, including compromise, containment, and obstruction, as well as how negotiations promote the realization of common interests. It is expected that this paper can be of some reference significance to future research on the interests between nations as well as their cooperation and conflicts in the context of globalization.


1993 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan I. Charney

In this shrinking world, states are increasingly interdependent and interconnected, a development that has affected international law. Early international law dealt with bilateral relations between autonomous states. The principal subjects until well into this century were diplomatic relations, war, treaties and the law of the sea. One of the most significant developments in international law during the twentieth century has been the expanded role played by multilateral treaties addressed to the common concerns of states. Often they clarify and improve rules of international law through the process of rendering them in binding written agreements. These treaties also promote the coordination of uniform state behavior in a variety of areas. International organizations, themselves the creatures of multilateral treaties, have also assumed increasing prominence in the last half of this century. They contribute to the coordination and facilitation of contemporary international relations on the basis of legal principles.


Author(s):  
D. О. Nikolaieva

The positions of Turkey and Jordan as subjects of the Middle East Re­gional System of International Relations are analyzed. The role of Turkey and Jordan in building a regional security architecture in the Middle East has been revealed. The features of bilateral cooperation and its dynamics are characterized. The problems of common interest have been identified: the settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict; the civil war in Syria and the refugee problem it has caused; strengthening mutually beneficial economic cooperation, etc.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 166-176
Author(s):  
D. V. GORDIENKO ◽  

China's views on the system of international relations in the XXI century. are undergoing significant changes. The PRC is close to entering the stage of transformation into a superpower. The concept of a Community of Shared Destiny for Humanity describes China's “new” approach to international relations, which replaces the outdated model. The purpose of this article is to assess the possible consequences of the implementation of the Community Concept of the common destiny of mankind for the system of international relations in the XNUMXst century. and analysis of the national security of the People's Republic of China, the United States of America and the Russian Federation. As a result, an approach to such an assessment and consideration of changes in the policy of the states of the Russia-China-USA "strategic triangle" is proposed, which allows identifying the policy priorities of China, the USA and Russia in various regions of the world. The results of assessing the impact of the possible consequences of the implementation of the Concept of the Community of the common destiny of mankind on the system of international relations in the XXI century. can be used to substantiate recommendations to the military-political leadership of our country. It is concluded that China's views on the system of international relations in the XXI century. are of great importance for the implementation of the current economic and military policy of this country.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anwar Faraj ◽  
Jalil Ali

The democratic transition is one of the common terms in academic and societal circles, but it is noticeable that there are discussions and differences of opinions about how to transform from a non-democratic system to a democratic one. Among the things that are disputed is the question; Is the priority given to internal factors or external factors in the transfers? Can democracy be imposed if the state is not internally qualified to accept the transition? This research attempts to address the role of the external factor in the processes of democratic transition by standing on the contribution of theoretical literatures presented in the field of political science and international relations on this topic.


The article analyzes the current concepts of US foreign policy, the direction of US foreign policy, and examines the economic background of US foreign policy. In particular, the fundamental indicators of US economic development have been studied, which allow the state to be a regional and world leader and pursue a hegemony strategy. The subject of research in the article is to determine the general and specific aspects of US foreign policy at the present stage. The goal is to determine the impact of US policy on the geopolitical transformation of the world. Objectives: the study of modern concepts of US foreign policy in the context of globalization and regionalization of the world. The study used the following general scientific methods: using the system analysis, the evolution of the US foreign policy in the globalization languages of the world was considered; In order to generalize the activities of various administrations and governments, compare their positions on shaping the country's foreign policy, a comparative historical method was used. relationship. The following results were obtained: on the basis of the analysis of the current US policy, the political strategies of the United States in Europe and the Middle East were discovered and analyzed in detail. Conclusions: The United States remains the key actor in international relations at the present stage, and so far retains its influence on the processes in the world. US foreign policy is aimed at stabilizing international relations in such key regions as the Middle East and the EU. A comprehensive analysis of the presidents and their administrations suggests the continuity of US foreign policy in the Middle East. With the arrival of D. Trump, the foreign policy of American Republicans is saturated with power and cruelty.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-24
Author(s):  
Florin Anghel

Between the Acts of Union and, respectively, of Independence of 1918 and 1926 Romania and Lithuania shared no strategic interests or common regional politics. Although the Bucharest diplomacy insistently asked Warsaw to debate over its Baltic policy, at the end the Romanian-Polish anti-Soviet alliance became one of the most important pieces of so-called “cordon sanitaire” geopolitics, which included Baltic and Black Seas regions countries, but no Lithuania. Both states became locked in cold relations with no contacts and no recognition (until August 1924), which was due to regional politics, but contrary to common interests. The diplomatic relations, officially opened in August 1924, lacked any practical political consequences. The Kaunas coup d’état of December 1926 had little political and media impacts in Bucharest and, in the rarely definitions of Antanas Smetona new nationalist regime, most of Romanians condemned it (contrary with their attitude towards the coup d’état of Warsaw in May 1926). It was only in the last half of the ‘30s that between Bucharest and Kaunas new avenues in bilateral relations had opened, the impact of the fortunate decision of foreign minister Nicolae Titulescu in 1934 to create a Romanian Legation to cover Lithuania.


Author(s):  
T. Andreeva

The author of the article retraces the development of the British immigration and asylum legislations which occurs under the impact of the Common European immigration legislation development. The subject of the article is the assessment of the British and EU immigration legislation mutual enrichment degree which shows the will and ability of Great Britain to integrate in the EU immigration legislation in order to strengthen its role in the modern international relations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELIZABETH A. BLOODGOOD

AbstractWhat can models of interest group behaviour from American politics tell us about the existence, activities, and influence of international non-governmental advocacy organisations (advocacy INGOs) in International Relations? In this article I detail an analogy between traditional American interest groups and advocacy INGOs in order to suggest a new approach to theorising INGOs. American politics theories of interest groups provide insights to questions which International Relations has been unable to answer satisfactorily, including where INGOs are likely to be found; how INGOs will grow in the future; the organisational structure of INGOs; the impact of competing groups on the quality and content of foreign policy and international agreements; and the roles of INGOs in different stages of the policy process. Viewing INGOs as interest groups provides a curative to the tendency to view them as self-sacrificing knights in shining armour. Competing INGOs representing narrow interests can nevertheless contribute to the common good in the form of effective, efficient policy.


2016 ◽  
pp. 52-63
Author(s):  
V. Rozumyk

The article investigates the common aspects of home policy determinants of foreign policy. The author argues that before the modern political science international relations raises questions about the possibility of aggravation of geopolitical confrontation in the process of alternative models of world order and the impact of the internal heterogeneity of the leading countries in the world in the development of a new system of international relations. On the example of the Peloponnesian War, the internal factors of international relations are reviewed and analyzed, the inadequacy and inaccuracy of many of the stereotypes of the theory of international relations, inspired liberal propaganda are clearly demonstrated. Falseness of the statements about the innate aggressiveness of authoritarian regimes is proved, the position about an inherent pacifism of democracies is refuted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document