scholarly journals Pembaharuan Hukum Di Dalam Perjanjian Perkawinan

alashriyyah ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Jamaludin
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Right ◽  
Husband And Wife

Marriage Agreement has been regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 specifically article 29. Marriage Agreement is the right of each party to enter into a marriage agreement. The background of entering into an agreement is their respective rights. With the holding of the Marriage Agreement there is legal certainty about what was promised by them to do a legal action against what was promised. After the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015, the Marriage Agreement which can only be made by prospective husbands and future wives before the prenuptal agreement, through legal renewal, can be made by husband and wife after the marriage takes place.

scholarly journals KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM PERBUATAN HUKUM ATAS HARTA BERSAMA PADA PEMBELIAN DAN PENJAMINAN HAK ATAS TANAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Jane Elizabeth Priscillia Chendra ◽  
Nurfaidah Said ◽  
Kahar Lahae
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Marital Property ◽  
The Right ◽  
Husband And Wife ◽  
Laws And Regulations

AbstractThis research aims to analyze whether a husband/wife has the right to act by themselves in the case of land right purchase or mortgage, also the means that can be done to induce legal certainty in this matter. The purchase of land rights using money from the marital property should be done together by the husband and wife, or with a statement of approval from the husband/wife. The mortgage of a land right which is a part of a marital property or inheritance property must be done together by all the joint-owners; if an authority is required, it must be given in the form of Power of Attorney to Impose Mortgage. The means that can be done to induce legal certainty in this matter is by making some changes in the laws and regulations concerning marriage, land, and mortgage. IntisariPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah seorang suami/istri berwenang untuk bertindak sendiri dalam membeli dan/atau menjaminkan harta bersama berupa hak atas tanah serta upaya untuk mewujudkan kepastian hukum dalam hal tersebut. Pembelian hak atas tanah menggunakan uang dari harta bersama seharusnya dilakukan bersama-sama oleh suami-istri atau diberikan pernyataan persetujuan dari istri/suaminya. Penjaminan hak atas tanah yang merupakan harta bersama maupun harta warisan seharusnya dilakukan bersama-sama oleh para mede-eigenaar; jika menggunakan kuasa, harus dalam bentuk Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan. Upaya untuk mewujudkan kepastian hukum dalam hal ini adalah mengubah beberapa ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai perkawinan, pertanahan dan Hak Tanggungan.

scholarly journals BATASAN TERHADAP IMUNITAS ADVOKAT YANG DIPERLUAS BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 26/PUU-XI/2013

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-48
Author(s):  
Oey Valentino Winata ◽  
Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Professional Code ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The basis for granting immunity to advocates is in Article 16 of Law No. 18 of 2003, that advocates cannot be prosecuted both civil and criminal in carrying out their professional duties in good faith in the interests of the Client's defense in court proceedings. The immunity obtained by advocates is not only within the scope of the court, but also protects it outside the court. The immunity has been expanded based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 26 / PUU-XI / 2013. The granting of immunity to such advocates is considered as an act that violates the provisions of Article 28 D of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, that everyone has the right to recognition, guarantee protection and fair legal certainty and equal treatment before the law. However, the right to immunity from lawsuits (immunity) to advocates does not conflict with Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution if given with limitations to advocates who are one of law enforcers in Indonesia, these restrictions apply both outside and in court proceedings. The limitation is in the form of a professional code of ethics and legislation, as well as good faith. Any action that goes beyond or beyond these three limits cannot be protected by immunity, so that if one of the three limits is exceeded, advocates can be legally processed and sentenced based on applicable regulations.Dasar pemberian imunitas kepada advokat ada pada Pasal 16 UU No. 18 Tahun 2003, bahwa advokat tidak dapat dituntut baik secara perdata maupun pidana dalam menjalankan tugas profesinya dengan iktikad baik untuk kepentingan pembelaan Klien dalam sidang pengadilan. Imunitas yang didapatkan advokat ternyata tidak hanya dalam lingkup pengadilan, tetapi juga melindunginya diluar pengadilan. Imunitas tersebut telah diperluas berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 26/PUU-XI/2013. Pemberian imunitas kepada advokat tersebut dianggap sebagai suatu perbuatan yang melanggar ketentuan Pasal 28D Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945, bahwa setiap orang berhak atas pengakuan, jaminan perlindungan dan kepastian hukum yang adil serta perlakuan yang sama dihadapan hukum. Tetapi hak atas kekebalan dari tuntutan hukum (imunitas) kepada advokat tersebut menjadi tidak bertentangan dengan Pasal 28D UUD 1945 apabila diberikan dengan batasan-batasan kepada advokat yang merupakan salah satu penegak hukum di Indonesia, batasan tersebut berlaku baik di luar maupun di dalam sidang pengadilan. Batasan tersebut berupa kode etik profesi dan peraturan perundang-undangan, serta iktikad baik. Setiap tindakan yang melampaui atau diluar ketiga batasan tersebut, tidak bisa dilindungi oleh imunitas, sehingga atas dilampauinya salah satu dari ketiga batasan tersebut maka advokat dapat diproses secara hukum dan dijatuhi hukuman berdasarkan peraturan yang berlaku.

scholarly journals Ekstensifikasi Subjectum Litis dalam Perselisihan Pemilu Legislatif dan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 828
Author(s):  
Oly Viana Agustine
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Electoral System ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legislative Elections ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Threshold Difference ◽  
Electoral Laws ◽  
The Will ◽  
The Right

Subjectum litis in The Legislative and Regional Head Election Disputes in Indonesia has been determined in a limited manner in The legislation and The regulation of the Constitutional Court. However along with the election, there is expansion and constriction of subjectum litis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the determinant factors that cause flexibility of subjectum litis in legislative and regional head election dispute. In addition, no previous studies that examine factors associated with the causes flexibility of subjectum litis in the legislative and the regional headselestion.The method used in this research is using qualitative methods with normative juridical approach by collecting data and information of the legislative and head regional election dispute advance in literature. The results obtained in this study that the shift in legislative elections expanded not only to political parties and individuals DPD that can be subjectum litis but also those of individual candidates of political parties can be subjectum litis in the legislative election disputes. The factor that caused it is the choice of electoral system is still used to 2014 electoral system. Meanwhile, the Regional Head election disputes in general as subjectum litis are that couple candidates for Governor and Vice Governor, Regent and Vice Regent and the Mayor and Deputy Mayor. But in its development, the narrowing of the only candidates who met the threshold difference of votes that can act as an applicant. Besides narrowing, there is also an extension where Consitutional court accommodate domestic election observers were registered and accredited by the KPU / KIP can act as subjectum litis and as the applicant would be candidates in the General Election of 2010. Factors that cause the narrowing and expansion in the elections of regional heads are the will of lawmakers and the limited authority of the Consitutional court as well as the presence of a single candidate who is not predictable by lawmakers in drafting electoral laws regional head. Whereas in 2010, the expansion of subjectum litis because the Court did extensive interpretation caused by serious violations of the right to be elected (rights to be a candidate). Suggestions for lawmakers tobe more thoroughly formulate norms by looking at the existing state of society so it can bring justice and legal certainty both for the expectant couple and society.

scholarly journals Konsekuensi Yuridis Berlakunya Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 295
Author(s):  
Si Ngurah Ardhya ◽  
I Putu Windu Mertha Sujana
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Way Of Life ◽  
Civil Registration ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Justifiable Reason ◽  
Husband And Wife

Philosophically PMK (Constitutional Court Decision) Nr. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 based on way of life, awareness, and legal ideals such as the mystical atmosphere and Indonesian Nation according Pancasila and The Constitutional of The Republic of Indonesia Article 28E Paragraph (2). Sociologically, based on legal needs society regarding the leniency when the marriage agreement was made that is the phenomenon of a husband and wife for some reason feels they needed to make a marriage agreement after the wedding day was held. Juridically, the issuance of PMK Nr. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 is not solely on the basis of unconstitutionality, but also on a conflict of norms between Article 29 Paragraph (1) of Act Nr.  Year 1974 with general provisions of the ageement in Book III Code of Civil Law. Referring to PMK No.69/PUU-XIII/2015 which was strengthened by Act Nr. 2 Year 2014, Notary has the right to ratified the marriage agreement into an authentic deed so that there is no justifiable reason for the Department of Population and Civil Registration and Office of Religious Affairs rejects the authentic nature of the deed which is validated bay notary. 

scholarly journals IA TAFSIRAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP PEMUFAKATAN JAHAT OLEH KORUPTOR (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 21/PUU-XIV/2016)

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-245
Author(s):  
Irfan Ardian Syah
Keyword(s):  
State Power ◽  
Dual Role ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Negative Role ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Case Number

Hopes that the Constitutional Court (CC) is not acting as legislator (maker norm) was not easy to achieve. This is because in some cases the judicial examined, tried, and decided, the CC actually act as a norm-making body (one of them in the Case Number 21/PUU-XIV/2016). Thus, in terms of the concept of state power, the CC has a dual role as the holders of state power in the judiciary and the legislature. The problem of this study is the interpretation of the CC of the of conspiracy and the relationship between of conspiracy according to Article 88 of the Code of Penal (CP) in accordance with Article 15 of the Law on the Eradication of Corruption (LEC) before and after the enactment quo decision. CC interpretation against conspiracy is the right step to ensure legal certainty. However, the CC for an interpretation of action are included unlawful. Thus, in hearing and deciding the case a quo, the CC took a negative role, namely to uphold the law by breaking the law. The relationship between conspiracy under Article 88 of CP with according to Article 15 of LEC before the stipulated judgment a quo is not applied the principle of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generalis after adoption of a quo decision to do is to be the application of the principle of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generalis.

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 18/PUU-XVII/2019 DI PT PEGADAIAN KANTOR WILAYAH II KOTA PEKANBARU

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-203
Author(s):  
Devie Rachmat ◽  
Ade Pratiwi ◽  
Suhendro Suhendro
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Small Businesses ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Specific Target ◽  
Efficient Process ◽  
Economic Class ◽  
Good Material ◽  
The Right

In line with the government's program to encourage lending to small businesses and the weak economic class which is the largest part of the Indonesian people. So it is expected that with credit based on fiduciary system can help both credit recipients and creditors. One of the parameters of a good material debt guarantee is when the right of guarantee can be executed quickly with a simple, efficient process and contains legal certainty. The specific target of this study is to explain the problem solving about the implementation of Fiduciary Guarantee Object Execution Based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 at PT Pegadaian KantorWilayah II Pekanbaru City.

scholarly journals El principio de confianza legítima en el derecho a la vivienda: una asignatura pendiente de la doctrina constitucional

2018 ◽  
pp. 333-376
Author(s):  
María Begoña CRESPO HIDALGO
Keyword(s):  
Rental Housing ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Social Significance ◽  
Social State ◽  
The Social ◽  
Legitimate Expectations ◽  
The Right ◽  
Rental Housing Market

LABURPENA: Etxebizitzak alokatzeko merkatua malgutzeko eta sustatzeko neurriei buruzko ekainaren 4ko 4/2013 Legearen bigarren xedapen gehigarriari buruz, urriaren 22ko 216/2015 KAE, maiatzaren 10eko 51/2018 KAE, eta maiatzaren 24ko 56/2018 KAE eman dira. Lehenengoa a) apartatuari buruzkoa da, zeinaren bitartez zehazten den ez direla berritu behar Etxebizitzako estatu mailako planetan emandako laguntzak eta diru-laguntzak, eta beste biak, b) apartatuari buruzkoak, zeinaren bitartez bi baldintza ezartzen diren babestutako etxebizitza bat eskuratzeko sarrerarako estatuko zuzeneko laguntzak jasotzeko eskubidea izateko. Epai horiek kontuan hartuta, lan honetan konfiantza legitimoaren printzipioaren urraketak duen garrantzi soziala aztertu da, etxebizitza duin eta egoki bat izateko eskubidean proiektatzen denean hain zuzen. Erabaki konstituzionalak, jurisprudentzialak eta doktrinalak aztertu dira estatu sozial batean konfiantza legitimoa bermatzeko segurtasun juridikoari eta legegileek duten mugei dagokionez, baita arauen aurreikusgarritasunari eta aurretik doktrina jurisdikzionala ez egotearen ondoriozko segurtasun juridiko ezari dagokionez. RESUMEN: A raíz de las SSTC 216/2015, de 22 de octubre, 51/2018, de 10 de mayo y 56/2018, de 24 de mayo, sobre la disposición adicional segunda de la Ley 4/2013, de 4 de junio, de Medidas de Flexibilización y Fomento del Mercado del Alquiler de Viviendas, la primera de ellas respecto al apartado a) que determina no renovar las ayudas y subvenciones concedidas en el marco de los Planes Estatales de Vivienda, y las otras dos, sobre el apartado b) que establece dos requisitos para obtener el derecho al abono de las ayudas estatales directas a la entrada para la adquisición de una vivienda protegida, en este trabajo se analiza la transcendencia social de la vulneración del principio de confianza legítima cuando se proyecta sobre un derecho como es el derecho a una vivienda digna y adecuada. Se estudian una serie de pronunciamientos constitucionales, jurisprudenciales y doctrinales en relación con la seguridad jurídica y los límites del legislador para garantizar la confianza legítima en un estado social, así como la previsibilidad de las normas y la inseguridad jurídica derivada de la no existencia de una doctrina jurisdiccional al respecto. ABSTRACT: As a result of judgments 216/2015 of October 22, 51/2018 of May 10 and 56/2018 of May 24 on the second additional provision to Act 4/2013 of June 4 on measures aimed at the flexibilization and promotion of the rental housing market, the first one regarding section a) that determines not to renew aids and subsidies awarded in the framework of the National Government Housing plans and the others regarding section b) that establishes two requirements in order to gain the right to be awarded with state direct aids for the deposit to buy a government-sponsored housing, we analyze the social significance of the infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations when a right such as the right to a decent and appropriate home is impaired. Some series of constitutional, court and doctrine declarations are studied in connection with legal certainty and the limits of the legislator to guarantee legitimate expectations in a Social state, together with the predictability of the rules and the legal insecurity that derivesfrom the lack of a case law doctrine in respect thereof.

scholarly journals Tindak Pidana Informasi Elektronik Dalam Kerangka Hukum Positif

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-111
Author(s):  
Rio Armanda Agustian ◽  
Jeanne Darc Noviayanti Manik
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Cultural Values ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Private Life ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
The Right ◽  
Media And Communication

Act No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions is the first Act  in the field of information technology and electronic transactions as a product of much-needed legislation and has become the spearhead that lays the groundwork for regulation in the field of technology utilization, although now during the implementation of the ITE Act experienced some problems regarding legal certainty about criminal provisions after the decision Constitutional Court, protection personal data and criminal investigation. Method in this study is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. Government supports the development of IT through its legal infrastructure and arrangements so that the use of IT is carried out safely to prevent its misuse by paying attention to the religious and socio-cultural values of Indonesian people. Side of protection and legal certainty in the use of information technology, media, and communication in order to develop optimally. Protection of personal data in conducting activities in cyberspace can be the right to enjoy a private life and free from all kinds of interference, right to be able to communicate with others without the act of spying and right to supervise access to information about one's personal life and data.

“Cruelty of the Worst Kind”: Religious Slaughter, Xenophobia, and the German Greens

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Smith
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
September 11 ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Human Society ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Religious Expression ◽  
Federal Constitutional ◽  
Religious Slaughter ◽  
The Right ◽  
German Court

In 1995, before the Leitkultur debate about a hegemonic German culture to which immigrants might aspire, disputes over the wearing of headscarves, and September 11, a federal German court effectively banned Muslims from slaughtering animals without prior stunning. The court ruled that the practice was not required by their religion and was thus not protected by the constitution's guarantee of freedom of religious expression. In January 2002, however, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that the right to freedom of religious expression and choice of occupation did in fact ensure the entitlement of Germany's Muslims, or at least those responsible for their provision with halal meat, to resume stunningless methods for such ends without the threat of legal action. Religious slaughter has been problematic throughout Germany's history and the reemergence of opposition to it late in the twentieth century was not without precedent. The issue throws up numerous areas for possible examination. But what does it have to do with the Greens and with their positions on animals and human society?

scholarly journals MENYOAL KEMBALI PERKAWINAN DI BAWAH TANGAN (NIKAH SIRRI) DI INDONESIA

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Nafilah Abdullah
Keyword(s):  
Family Life ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Religious Law ◽  
Legal Consequence ◽  
Harmonious Family ◽  
Husband And Wife

All people who enter the gates of family life through marriages intend to achieve a  prosperous and harmonious family life and receive blessing in this world and the next. Marriages must therefore be done in accordance with religious law. A marriage is legal if conducted in accordance with one’s religion, and must be recorded in the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA). Marriages which are not recorded by authorized officials are sirri marriages, and are contrary to legislation. Furthermore, its harm can be seen from its consequence, the lack of legal certainty between husband and wife and the children. This entails the legal consequence that sirri marriages do not have a Marital Deed and children borne of such marriage receive no government recognition, and are considered children born out of wedlock, only having civil relations with the mother and the mother’s family. The wife and children abandoned by a biological father cannot take legal action for the fulfillment of their economic rights or for joint marital assets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document