trap charge
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

77
(FIVE YEARS 22)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 624 ◽  
pp. 413438
Author(s):  
M.L. Chithambo ◽  
A.J. Lontsi Sob ◽  
J.M. Kalita

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (24) ◽  
pp. 12151
Author(s):  
Tae Jun Ahn ◽  
Sung Kyu Lim ◽  
Yun Seop Yu

We have simulated a monolithic three-dimensional inverter (M3DINV) structure by considering the interfacial trap charges generated thermally during the monolithic three-dimensional integration process. We extracted the SPICE model parameters from M3DINV structures with two types of inter-layer dielectric thickness TILD (=10, 100 nm) using the extracted interface trap charge distribution of the previous study. Logic circuits, such as inverters (INVs), ring oscillators (ROs), a 2 to 1 multiplexer (MUX), and D flip-flop and 6-transistor static random-access memory (6T SRAM) containing M3DINVs, were simulated using the extracted model parameters, and simulation results both with and without interface trap charges were compared. The extracted model parameters reflected current reduction, threshold voltage increase, and subthreshold swing (SS) degradation due to the interface trap charge. HSPICE simulation results of the fanout-3 (FO3) ring oscillator considering the interface trap charges showed a 20% reduction in frequency and a 30% increase in propagation delay compared to those without the interface trap charges. The propagation delays of the 2 × 1 MUX and D flip-flop with the interface trap charges were approximately 78.2 and 39.6% greater, respectively, than those without the interface trap charges. The retention static noise margin (SNM) of the SRAM increased by 16 mV (6.4%) and the read static noise margin (SNM) of SRAM decreased by 43 mV (35.8%) owing to the interface trap charge. The circuit simulation results revealed that the propagation delay increases owing to the interface trap charges. Therefore, it is necessary to fully consider the propagation delay of the logic circuit due to the generated interface trap charges when designing monolithic 3D integrated circuits.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 4252-4257
Author(s):  
Tae Jun Ahn ◽  
Yun Seop Yu

We investigated the effect of the interface trap charge in a monolithic three-dimensional inverter structure composing of JLFETs (M3DINV-JLFET), using the interface trap charge distribution extracted in the previous study. The effect of interface trap charge was compared with a conventional M3DINV composing of MOSFETs (M3DINV-MOSFETs) by technology computer-aided design simulation. When the interface trap charges in both M3DINV-JLFET and M3DINV-MOSFET are added, the threshold voltages, on-current levels, and subthreshold swings of both JLFETs and MOSFETs increase, decrease, and increase, respectively, and switching voltages and propagation delays of M3DINV are shifted and increased, respectively. However, since JLFET and MOSFET have different current paths of bulk and interface in channel, respectively, MOSFET is more affected by the interface trap, and M3DINV-JLFET has almost less effect of interface trap at different thickness of interlayer dielectric, compared to M3DINV-MOSFET.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document