New class of transcription factors controls flagellar assembly by recruiting RNA polymerase II in Chlamydomonas

Cells have developed regulatory mechanisms that underlie flagellar assembly and maintenance, including the transcriptional regulation of flagellar genes, an initial step for making flagella. Although transcriptional regulation of flagellar gene expression is required for flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas, no transcription factor that regulates the transcription of flagellar genes has been identified. We report that X chromosome-associated protein 5 (XAP5) acts as a transcription factor to regulate flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas. While XAP5 proteins are evolutionarily conserved across diverse organisms and play vital roles in diverse biological processes, nothing is known about the biochemical function of any member of this important protein family. Our data show that loss of XAP5 leads to defects in flagellar assembly. Posttranslational modifications of XAP5 track flagellar length during flagellar assembly, suggesting that cells possess a feedback system that modulates modifications to XAP5. Notably, XAP5 regulates flagellar gene expression via directly binding to a motif containing a CTGGGGTG-core. Furthermore, recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) machinery for transcriptional activation depends on the activities of XAP5. Our data demonstrate that, through recruitment of Pol II, XAP5 defines a class of transcription factors for transcriptional regulation of ciliary genes. This work provides insights into the biochemical function of the XAP5 family and the fundamental biology of the flagellar assembly, which enhance our understanding of the signaling and functions of flagella.

Download Full-text

Cohesin removal reprograms gene expression upon mitotic entry

10.1101/678003 ◽

2019 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Carlos Perea-Resa ◽

Leah Bury ◽

Iain Cheeseman ◽

Michael D. Blower

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Transcriptional Regulation ◽

Rna Polymerase Ii ◽

Chromosome Segregation ◽

List Type ◽

Mitotic Chromosomes ◽

Rna Pol Ii ◽

Pol Ii ◽

Mitotic Entry ◽

Nascent Transcripts

SummaryEntering mitosis, the genome is restructured to facilitate chromosome segregation, accompanied by dramatic changes in gene expression. However, the mechanisms that underlie mitotic transcriptional regulation are unclear. In contrast to transcribed genes, centromere regions retain transcriptionally active RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) in mitosis. Here, we demonstrate that chromatin-bound cohesin is sufficient to retain RNAPII at centromeres while WAPL-mediated removal of cohesin during prophase is required for RNAPII dissociation from chromosome arms. Failure to remove cohesin from chromosome arms results in a failure to release elongating RNAPII and nascent transcripts from mitotic chromosomes and dramatically alters gene expression. We propose that prophase cohesin removal is the key step in reprogramming gene expression as cells transition from G2 to mitosis, and is temporally coupled with chromosome condensation to coordinate chromosome segregation with changes in gene expression.HighlightsMitotic centromere transcription requires cohesinCohesin removal releases elongating RNA Pol II and nascent RNA from chromatinThe prophase pathway reprograms gene expression during mitosis

Download Full-text

A Global View of Transcriptional Regulation by Nuclear Receptors: Gene Expression, Factor Localization, and DNA Sequence Analysis

Nuclear Receptor Signaling ◽

10.1621/nrs.06005 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. nrs.06005 ◽

Cited By ~ 52

Author(s):

Miltiadis Kininis ◽

W. Lee Kraus

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Transcriptional Regulation ◽

Rna Polymerase Ii ◽

Nuclear Receptors ◽

Dna Sequences ◽

Target Genes ◽

Large Body ◽

Pol Ii ◽

Global View ◽

Genomic Analyses

Recent genomic analyses of transcription factor binding, histone modification, and gene expression have provided a global view of transcriptional regulation by nuclear receptors (NRs) that complements an existing large body of literature on gene-specific studies. The picture emerging from these genomic studies indicates that NRs bind at promoter-proximal and promoter-distal enhancers in conjunction with other transcription factors (e.g., activator protein-1, Sp1 and FOXA1). This binding promotes the recruitment of coregulators that mediate the posttranslational modification of histones at promoters and enhancers. Ultimately, signaling through liganded NRs stimulates changes in the occupancy of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) or the activation of preloaded Pol II at target promoters. Chromosomal looping and/or Pol II tracking may underlie promoter-enhancer communication. Interestingly, the direct target genes of NR signaling represent a limited subset of all the genes regulated by NR ligands, with the rest being regulated through secondary effects. As suggested by previous gene-specific analyses, NR-mediated outcomes are highly cell type- and promoter-specific, highlighting the complexity of transcriptional regulation by NRs and the value of genomic analyses for identifying commonly shared patterns. Overall, NRs share common themes in their patterns of localization and transcriptional regulation across mammalian genomes. In this review, we provide an overview of recent advances in the understanding of NR-mediated transcription garnered from genomic analyses of gene expression, factor localization, and target DNA sequences.

Download Full-text

Transcriptional Regulation of Autophagy Genes via Stage-Specific Activation of CEBPB and PPARG during Adipogenesis: A Systematic Study Using Public Gene Expression and Transcription Factor Binding Datasets

Cells ◽

10.3390/cells8111321 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (11) ◽

pp. 1321 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mahmoud Ahmed ◽

Trang Huyen Lai ◽

Jin Seok Hwang ◽

Sahib Zada ◽

Trang Minh Pham ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Transcription Factor ◽

Transcriptional Regulation ◽

Transcription Factors ◽

High Throughput Sequencing ◽

Cell Model ◽

Cell Types ◽

Autophagy Gene ◽

Occupancy Patterns ◽

Differentiation Stage

Autophagy is the cell self-eating mechanism to maintain cell homeostasis by removing damaged intracellular proteins or organelles. It has also been implicated in the development and differentiation of various cell types including the adipocyte. Several links between adipogenic transcription factors and key autophagy genes has been suggested. In this study, we tried to model the gene expression and their transcriptional regulation during the adipocyte differentiation using high-throughput sequencing datasets of the 3T3-L1 cell model. We applied the gene expression and co-expression analysis to all and the subset of autophagy genes to study the binding, and occupancy patterns of adipogenic factors, co-factors and histone modifications on key autophagy genes. We also analyzed the gene expression of key autophagy genes under different transcription factor knockdown adipocyte cells. We found that a significant percent of the variance in the autophagy gene expression is explained by the differentiation stage of the cell. Adipogenic master regulators, such as CEBPB and PPARG target key autophagy genes directly. In addition, the same factor may also control autophagy gene expression indirectly through autophagy transcription factors such as FOXO1, TFEB or XBP1. Finally, the binding of adipogenic factors is associated with certain patterns of co-factors binding that might modulate the functions. Some of the findings were further confirmed under the knockdown of the adipogenic factors in the differentiating adipocytes. In conclusion, autophagy genes are regulated as part of the transcriptional programs through adipogenic factors either directly or indirectly through autophagy transcription factors during adipogenesis.

Download Full-text

Tissue-specific actions of Pax6 on proliferation-differentiation balance in the developing forebrain are Foxg1-dependent

10.1101/374074 ◽

2018 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Idoia Quintana-Urzainqui ◽

Zrinko Kozić ◽

Soham Mitra ◽

Tian Tian ◽

Martine Manuel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Cell Cycle ◽

Transcription Factor ◽

Transcriptional Regulation ◽

Transcription Factors ◽

Cell Cycle Gene ◽

Tissue Specific ◽

Proliferation And Differentiation ◽

Multiple Regions ◽

Cell Cycle Gene Expression

SummaryDifferences in the growth and maturation of diverse forebrain tissues depends on region-specific transcriptional regulation. Individual transcription factors act simultaneously in multiple regions that develop very differently, raising questions about the extent to which their actions vary regionally. We found that the transcription factor Pax6 affects the transcriptomes and the balance between proliferation and differentiation in opposite directions in murine diencephalon versus cortex. We tested several possible mechanisms to explain Pax6’s tissue-specific actions and found that the presence of the transcription factor Foxg1 in cortex but not diencephalon was most influential. We found that Foxg1 is responsible for many of the differences in cell cycle gene expression between diencephalon and cortex. In cortex lacking Foxg1, Pax6’s action on the balance of proliferation versus differentiation became diencephalon-like. Our findings reveal a mechanism for generating regional forebrain diversity in which the actions of one transcription factor completely reverse the actions of another.

Download Full-text

Disruption of cardiac Med1 inhibits RNA polymerase II promoter occupancy and promotes chromatin remodeling

AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology ◽

10.1152/ajpheart.00580.2018 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 316 (2) ◽

pp. H314-H325 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Duane D. Hall ◽

Kathryn M. Spitler ◽

Chad E. Grueter

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Transcription Factors ◽

Rna Polymerase ◽

Rna Polymerase Ii ◽

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ◽

Chromatin Accessibility ◽

Gene Promoters ◽

Specific Expression ◽

Pol Ii ◽

Transcriptional Start Sites

The Mediator coactivator complex directs gene-specific expression by binding distal enhancer-bound transcription factors through its Med1 subunit while bridging to RNA polymerase II (Pol II) at gene promoters. In addition, Mediator scaffolds epigenetic modifying enzymes that determine local DNA accessibility. Previously, we found that deletion of Med1 in cardiomyocytes deregulates more than 5,000 genes and promotes acute heart failure. Therefore, we hypothesized that Med1 deficiency disrupts enhancer-promoter coupling. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation-coupled deep sequencing (ChIP-seq; n = 3/ChIP assay), we found that the Pol II pausing index is increased in Med1 knockout versus floxed control mouse hearts primarily due to a decrease in Pol II occupancy at the majority of transcriptional start sites without a corresponding increase in elongating species. Parallel ChIP-seq assays reveal that Med1-dependent gene expression correlates strongly with histone H3 K27 acetylation, which is indicative of open and active chromatin at transcriptional start sites, whereas H3 K27 trimethylated levels, representing condensed and repressed DNA, are broadly increased and inversely correlate with absolute expression levels. Furthermore, Med1 deletion leads to dynamic changes in acetyl-K27 associated superenhancer regions and their enriched transcription factor-binding motifs that are consistent with altered gene expression. Our findings suggest that Med1 is important in establishing enhancer-promoter coupling in the heart and supports the proposed role of Mediator in establishing preinitiation complex formation. We also found that Med1 determines chromatin accessibility within genes and enhancer regions and propose that the composition of transcription factors associated with superenhancer changes to direct gene-specific expression. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Based on our previous findings that transcriptional homeostasis and cardiac function are disturbed by cardiomyocyte deletion of the Mediator coactivator Med1 subunit, we investigated potential underlying changes in RNA polymerase II localization and global chromatin accessibility. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing, we found that disrupted transcription arises from a deficit in RNA polymerase II recruitment to gene promoters. Furthermore, active versus repressive chromatin marks are redistributed within gene loci and at enhancer regions correlated with gene expression changes.

Download Full-text

Two Tandem Mechanisms Control Bimodal Expression of the Flagellar Genes in Salmonella enterica

Journal of Bacteriology ◽

10.1128/jb.00787-19 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 202 (13) ◽

Author(s):

Xiaoyi Wang ◽

Santosh Koirala ◽

Phillip D. Aldridge ◽

Christopher V. Rao

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Salmonella Enterica ◽

Feedback Loop ◽

Growth Conditions ◽

Double Negative ◽

Flagellar Gene ◽

Content Type ◽

Motile Cells ◽

Flagellar Assembly ◽

Flagellar Genes

ABSTRACT Flagellar gene expression is bimodal in Salmonella enterica. Under certain growth conditions, some cells express the flagellar genes whereas others do not. This results in mixed populations of motile and nonmotile cells. In the present study, we found that two independent mechanisms control bimodal expression of the flagellar genes. One was previously found to result from a double negative-feedback loop involving the flagellar regulators RflP and FliZ. This feedback loop governs bimodal expression of class 2 genes. In this work, a second mechanism was found to govern bimodal expression of class 3 genes. In particular, class 3 gene expression is still bimodal, even when class 2 gene expression is not. Using a combination of experimental and modeling approaches, we found that class 3 bimodality results from the σ28-FlgM developmental checkpoint. IMPORTANCE Many bacterial use flagella to swim in liquids and swarm over surface. In Salmonella enterica, over 50 genes are required to assemble flagella. The expression of these genes is tightly regulated. Previous studies have found that flagellar gene expression is bimodal in S. enterica, which means that only a fraction of cells express flagellar genes and are motile. In the present study, we found that two separate mechanisms induce this bimodal response. One mechanism, which was previously identified, tunes the fraction of motile cells in response to nutrients. The other results from a developmental checkpoint that couples flagellar gene expression to flagellar assembly. Collectively, these results further our understanding of how flagellar gene expression is regulated in S. enterica.

Download Full-text

PKA-activated ApAF–ApC/EBP heterodimer is a key downstream effector of ApCREB and is necessary and sufficient for the consolidation of long-term facilitation

The Journal of Cell Biology ◽

10.1083/jcb.200512066 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 174 (6) ◽

pp. 827-838 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Jin-A Lee ◽

Sue-Hyun Lee ◽

Changhoon Lee ◽

Deok-Jin Chang ◽

Yong Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Transcription Factor ◽

Transcriptional Regulation ◽

Transcription Factors ◽

Long Term Memory ◽

Term Memory ◽

Downstream Effector ◽

Necessary And Sufficient ◽

Long Term Facilitation

Long-term memory requires transcriptional regulation by a combination of positive and negative transcription factors. Aplysia activating factor (ApAF) is known to be a positive transcription factor that forms heterodimers with ApC/EBP and ApCREB2. How these heterodimers are regulated and how they participate in the consolidation of long-term facilitation (LTF) has not, however, been characterized. We found that the functional activation of ApAF required phosphorylation of ApAF by PKA on Ser-266. In addition, ApAF lowered the threshold of LTF by forming a heterodimer with ApCREB2. Moreover, once activated by PKA, the ApAF–ApC/EBP heterodimer transactivates enhancer response element–containing genes and can induce LTF in the absence of CRE- and CREB-mediated gene expression. Collectively, these results suggest that PKA-activated ApAF–ApC/EBP heterodimer is a core downstream effector of ApCREB in the consolidation of LTF.

Download Full-text

Two tandem mechanisms control bimodal expression of the flagellar genes in Salmonella enterica

10.1101/2019.12.18.881938 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Xiaoyi Wang ◽

Santosh Koirala ◽

Phillip D. Aldridge ◽

Christopher V. Rao

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Salmonella Enterica ◽

Feedback Loop ◽

Growth Conditions ◽

Double Negative ◽

Flagellar Gene ◽

Motile Cells ◽

Flagellar Assembly ◽

Mixed Populations ◽

Flagellar Genes

ABSTRACTFlagellar gene expression is bimodal in Salmonella enterica. Under certain growth conditions, some cells express the flagellar genes whereas others do not. This results in mixed populations of motile and non-motile cells. In the present study, we found that two independent mechanisms control bimodal expression of the flagellar genes. One was previously found to result from a double negative-feedback loop involving the flagellar regulators YdiV and FliZ. This feedback loop governs bimodal expression of class 2 genes. In this work, a second mechanism was found to govern bimodal expression of class 3 genes. In particular, class 3 gene expression is still bimodal even when class 2 gene expression is not. Using a combination of experimental and modeling approaches, we found that class 3 bimodalilty results from the σ28-FlgM developmental checkpoint.IMPORTANCEMany bacterial use flagella to swim in liquids and swarm over surface. In Salmonella enterica, over fifty genes are required to assemble flagella. The expression of these genes is tightly regulated. Previous studies have found that flagella gene expression is bimodal in S. enterica, which means that only a fraction of cells express flagellar genes and are motile. In the present study, we found that two separate mechanisms induce this bimodal response. One mechanism, which was previously identified, tunes the fraction of motile cells in response to nutrients. The other results from a developmental checkpoint that couples flagellar gene expression to flagellar assembly. Collectively, these results further our understanding of how flagellar gene expression is regulated in S. enterica.

Download Full-text

Subnuclear compartmentalization of sequence-specific transcription factors and regulation of eukaryotic gene expression

Biochemistry and Cell Biology ◽

10.1139/o05-062 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 83 (4) ◽

pp. 535-547 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Gareth N Corry ◽

D Alan Underhill

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Transcription Factor ◽

Transcription Factors ◽

Transcriptional Activation ◽

Current Knowledge ◽

Nuclear Architecture ◽

Subnuclear Localization ◽

Modular Structures

To date, the majority of the research regarding eukaryotic transcription factors has focused on characterizing their function primarily through in vitro methods. These studies have revealed that transcription factors are essentially modular structures, containing separate regions that participate in such activities as DNA binding, protein–protein interaction, and transcriptional activation or repression. To fully comprehend the behavior of a given transcription factor, however, these domains must be analyzed in the context of the entire protein, and in certain cases the context of a multiprotein complex. Furthermore, it must be appreciated that transcription factors function in the nucleus, where they must contend with a variety of factors, including the nuclear architecture, chromatin domains, chromosome territories, and cell-cycle-associated processes. Recent examinations of transcription factors in the nucleus have clarified the behavior of these proteins in vivo and have increased our understanding of how gene expression is regulated in eukaryotes. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding sequence-specific transcription factor compartmentalization within the nucleus and discuss its impact on the regulation of such processes as activation or repression of gene expression and interaction with coregulatory factors.Key words: transcription, subnuclear localization, chromatin, gene expression, nuclear architecture.

Download Full-text

The AML-associated K313 mutation enhances C/EBPα activity by leading to C/EBPα overexpression

Cell Death and Disease ◽

10.1038/s41419-021-03948-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 (7) ◽

Author(s):

Ian Edward Gentle ◽

Isabel Moelter ◽

Mohamed Tarek Badr ◽

Konstanze Döhner ◽

Michael Lübbert ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Cell Culture ◽

Transcription Factor ◽

Transcription Factors ◽

Transcriptional Activity ◽

Target Gene ◽

Wild Type ◽

Elevated Expression ◽

Factor C ◽

Acute Myeloid

AbstractMutations in the transcription factor C/EBPα are found in ~10% of all acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cases but the contribution of these mutations to leukemogenesis is incompletely understood. We here use a mouse model of granulocyte progenitors expressing conditionally active HoxB8 to assess the cell biological and molecular activity of C/EBPα-mutations associated with human AML. Both N-terminal truncation and C-terminal AML-associated mutations of C/EBPα substantially altered differentiation of progenitors into mature neutrophils in cell culture. Closer analysis of the C/EBPα-K313-duplication showed expansion and prolonged survival of mutant C/EBPα-expressing granulocytes following adoptive transfer into mice. C/EBPα-protein containing the K313-mutation further showed strongly enhanced transcriptional activity compared with the wild-type protein at certain promoters. Analysis of differentially regulated genes in cells overexpressing C/EBPα-K313 indicates a strong correlation with genes regulated by C/EBPα. Analysis of transcription factor enrichment in the differentially regulated genes indicated a strong reliance of SPI1/PU.1, suggesting that despite reduced DNA binding, C/EBPα-K313 is active in regulating target gene expression and acts largely through a network of other transcription factors. Strikingly, the K313 mutation caused strongly elevated expression of C/EBPα-protein, which could also be seen in primary K313 mutated AML blasts, explaining the enhanced C/EBPα activity in K313-expressing cells.

Download Full-text