scholarly journals TFmotifView: a webserver for the visualization of transcription factor motifs in genomic regions

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (W1) ◽  
pp. W208-W217
Author(s):  
Clémentine Leporcq ◽  
Yannick Spill ◽  
Delphine Balaramane ◽  
Christophe Toussaint ◽  
Michaël Weber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Genomic Region ◽  
Regions Of Interest ◽  
P Value ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Genomic Regions ◽  
Motif Information

Abstract Transcription factors (TFs) regulate the expression of gene expression. The binding specificities of many TFs have been deciphered and summarized as position-weight matrices, also called TF motifs. Despite the availability of hundreds of known TF motifs in databases, it remains non-trivial to quickly query and visualize the enrichment of known TF motifs in genomic regions of interest. Towards this goal, we developed TFmotifView, a web server that allows to study the distribution of known TF motifs in genomic regions. Based on input genomic regions and selected TF motifs, TFmotifView performs an overlap of the genomic regions with TF motif occurrences identified using a dynamic P-value threshold. TFmotifView generates three different outputs: (i) an enrichment table and scatterplot calculating the significance of TF motif occurrences in genomic regions compared to control regions, (ii) a genomic view of the organisation of TF motifs in each genomic region and (iii) a metaplot summarizing the position of TF motifs relative to the center of the regions. TFmotifView will contribute to the integration of TF motif information with a wide range of genomic datasets towards the goal to better understand the regulation of gene expression by transcription factors. TFmotifView is freely available at http://bardet.u-strasbg.fr/tfmotifview/.

scholarly journals The biological characteristics of transcription factors AP-2α and AP-2γ and their importance in various types of cancers

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Damian Kołat ◽  
Żaneta Kałuzińska ◽  
Andrzej K. Bednarek ◽  
Elżbieta Płuciennik
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Diagnostic Biomarkers ◽  
Oncological Patients ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Non Coding Rnas

Abstract The Activator Protein 2 (AP-2) transcription factor (TF) family is vital for the regulation of gene expression during early development as well as carcinogenesis process. The review focusses on the AP-2α and AP-2γ proteins and their dualistic regulation of gene expression in the process of carcinogenesis. Both AP-2α and AP-2γ influence a wide range of physiological or pathological processes by regulating different pathways and interacting with diverse molecules, i.e. other proteins, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) or miRNAs. This review summarizes the newest information about the biology of two, AP-2α and AP-2γ, TFs in the carcinogenesis process. We emphasize that these two proteins could have either oncogenic or suppressive characteristics depending on the type of cancer tissue or their interaction with specific molecules. They have also been found to contribute to resistance and sensitivity to chemotherapy in oncological patients. A better understanding of molecular network of AP-2 factors and other molecules may clarify the atypical molecular mechanisms occurring during carcinogenesis, and may assist in the recognition of new diagnostic biomarkers.

scholarly journals Expresso: A database and web server for exploring the interaction of transcription factors and their target genes in Arabidopsis thaliana using ChIP-Seq peak data

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delasa Aghamirzaie ◽  
Karthik Raja Velmurugan ◽  
Shuchi Wu ◽  
Doaa Altarawy ◽  
Lenwood S. Heath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Motif Analysis ◽  
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing

Motivation: The increasing availability of chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq) data enables us to learn more about the action of transcription factors in the regulation of gene expression. Even though in vivo transcriptional regulation often involves the concerted action of more than one transcription factor, the format of each individual ChIP-Seq dataset usually represents the action of a single transcription factor. Therefore, a relational database in which available ChIP-Seq datasets are curated is essential. Results: We present Expresso (database and webserver) as a tool for the collection and integration of available Arabidopsis ChIP-Seq peak data, which in turn can be linked to a user’s gene expression data. Known target genes of transcription factors were identified by motif analysis of publicly available GEO ChIP-Seq data sets. Expresso currently provides three services: 1) Identification of target genes of a given transcription factor; 2) Identification of transcription factors that regulate a gene of interest; 3) Computation of correlation between the gene expression of transcription factors and their target genes. Availability: Expresso is freely available at http://bioinformatics.cs.vt.edu/expresso/

scholarly journals Quantitative models for accelerated protein dissociation from nucleosomal DNA

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (15) ◽  
pp. 9753-9760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Chen ◽  
Ralf Bundschuh
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Binding Model ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Protein Dissociation

Abstract Binding of transcription factors to their binding sites in promoter regions is the fundamental event in transcriptional gene regulation. When a transcription factor binding site is located within a nucleosome, the DNA has to partially unwrap from the nucleosome to allow transcription factor binding. This reduces the rate of transcription factor binding and is a known mechanism for regulation of gene expression via chromatin structure. Recently a second mechanism has been reported where transcription factor off-rates are dramatically increased when binding to target sites within the nucleosome. There are two possible explanations for such an increase in off-rate short of an active role of the nucleosome in pushing the transcription factor off the DNA: (i) for dimeric transcription factors the nucleosome can change the equilibrium between monomeric and dimeric binding or (ii) the nucleosome can change the equilibrium between specific and non-specific binding to the DNA. We explicitly model both scenarios and find that dimeric binding can explain a large increase in off-rate while the non-specific binding model cannot be reconciled with the large, experimentally observed increase. Our results suggest a general mechanism how nucleosomes increase transcription factor dissociation to promote exchange of transcription factors and regulate gene expression.

Subnuclear compartmentalization of sequence-specific transcription factors and regulation of eukaryotic gene expression

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth N Corry ◽  
D Alan Underhill
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Nuclear Architecture ◽  
Subnuclear Localization ◽  
Modular Structures

To date, the majority of the research regarding eukaryotic transcription factors has focused on characterizing their function primarily through in vitro methods. These studies have revealed that transcription factors are essentially modular structures, containing separate regions that participate in such activities as DNA binding, protein–protein interaction, and transcriptional activation or repression. To fully comprehend the behavior of a given transcription factor, however, these domains must be analyzed in the context of the entire protein, and in certain cases the context of a multiprotein complex. Furthermore, it must be appreciated that transcription factors function in the nucleus, where they must contend with a variety of factors, including the nuclear architecture, chromatin domains, chromosome territories, and cell-cycle-associated processes. Recent examinations of transcription factors in the nucleus have clarified the behavior of these proteins in vivo and have increased our understanding of how gene expression is regulated in eukaryotes. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding sequence-specific transcription factor compartmentalization within the nucleus and discuss its impact on the regulation of such processes as activation or repression of gene expression and interaction with coregulatory factors.Key words: transcription, subnuclear localization, chromatin, gene expression, nuclear architecture.

scholarly journals The AML-associated K313 mutation enhances C/EBPα activity by leading to C/EBPα overexpression

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Edward Gentle ◽  
Isabel Moelter ◽  
Mohamed Tarek Badr ◽  
Konstanze Döhner ◽  
Michael Lübbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Culture ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Elevated Expression ◽  
Factor C ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractMutations in the transcription factor C/EBPα are found in ~10% of all acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cases but the contribution of these mutations to leukemogenesis is incompletely understood. We here use a mouse model of granulocyte progenitors expressing conditionally active HoxB8 to assess the cell biological and molecular activity of C/EBPα-mutations associated with human AML. Both N-terminal truncation and C-terminal AML-associated mutations of C/EBPα substantially altered differentiation of progenitors into mature neutrophils in cell culture. Closer analysis of the C/EBPα-K313-duplication showed expansion and prolonged survival of mutant C/EBPα-expressing granulocytes following adoptive transfer into mice. C/EBPα-protein containing the K313-mutation further showed strongly enhanced transcriptional activity compared with the wild-type protein at certain promoters. Analysis of differentially regulated genes in cells overexpressing C/EBPα-K313 indicates a strong correlation with genes regulated by C/EBPα. Analysis of transcription factor enrichment in the differentially regulated genes indicated a strong reliance of SPI1/PU.1, suggesting that despite reduced DNA binding, C/EBPα-K313 is active in regulating target gene expression and acts largely through a network of other transcription factors. Strikingly, the K313 mutation caused strongly elevated expression of C/EBPα-protein, which could also be seen in primary K313 mutated AML blasts, explaining the enhanced C/EBPα activity in K313-expressing cells.

scholarly journals Transcription Factors as the “Blitzkrieg” of Plant Defense: A Pragmatic View of Nitric Oxide’s Role in Gene Regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 522
Author(s):  
Noreen Falak ◽  
Qari Muhammad Imran ◽  
Adil Hussain ◽  
Byung-Wook Yun
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Plant Defense ◽  
Systemic Acquired Resistance ◽  
Defense Mechanism ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Genetic Components ◽  
Transcriptional Changes

Plants are in continuous conflict with the environmental constraints and their sessile nature demands a fine-tuned, well-designed defense mechanism that can cope with a multitude of biotic and abiotic assaults. Therefore, plants have developed innate immunity, R-gene-mediated resistance, and systemic acquired resistance to ensure their survival. Transcription factors (TFs) are among the most important genetic components for the regulation of gene expression and several other biological processes. They bind to specific sequences in the DNA called transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) that are present in the regulatory regions of genes. Depending on the environmental conditions, TFs can either enhance or suppress transcriptional processes. In the last couple of decades, nitric oxide (NO) emerged as a crucial molecule for signaling and regulating biological processes. Here, we have overviewed the plant defense system, the role of TFs in mediating the defense response, and that how NO can manipulate transcriptional changes including direct post-translational modifications of TFs. We also propose that NO might regulate gene expression by regulating the recruitment of RNA polymerase during transcription.

scholarly journals Interplay between cofactors and transcription factors in hematopoiesis and hematological malignancies

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi Wang ◽  
Pan Wang ◽  
Yanan Li ◽  
Hongling Peng ◽  
Yu Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Hematologic Disorders ◽  
Cell Lineages ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Transcription Complexes ◽  
Insight Into

AbstractHematopoiesis requires finely tuned regulation of gene expression at each stage of development. The regulation of gene transcription involves not only individual transcription factors (TFs) but also transcription complexes (TCs) composed of transcription factor(s) and multisubunit cofactors. In their normal compositions, TCs orchestrate lineage-specific patterns of gene expression and ensure the production of the correct proportions of individual cell lineages during hematopoiesis. The integration of posttranslational and conformational modifications in the chromatin landscape, nucleosomes, histones and interacting components via the cofactor–TF interplay is critical to optimal TF activity. Mutations or translocations of cofactor genes are expected to alter cofactor–TF interactions, which may be causative for the pathogenesis of various hematologic disorders. Blocking TF oncogenic activity in hematologic disorders through targeting cofactors in aberrant complexes has been an exciting therapeutic strategy. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the models and functions of cofactor–TF interplay in physiological hematopoiesis and highlight their implications in the etiology of hematological malignancies. This review presents a deep insight into the physiological and pathological implications of transcription machinery in the blood system.

scholarly journals Candida albicans Ferric Reductases Are Differentially Regulated in Response to Distinct Forms of Iron Limitation by the Rim101 and CBF Transcription Factors

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1168-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Un Baek ◽  
Mingchun Li ◽  
Dana A. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Candida Albicans ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Iron Acquisition ◽  
Mammalian Host ◽  
Regulatory Sequence ◽  
Ferric Reductase ◽  
Reductase Gene ◽  
Ferric Reductases

ABSTRACT Iron is an essential nutrient that is severely limited in the mammalian host. Candida albicans encodes a family of 15 putative ferric reductases, which are required for iron acquisition and utilization. Despite the central role of ferric reductases in iron acquisition and mobilization, relatively little is known about the regulatory networks that govern ferric reductase gene expression in C. albicans. Here we have demonstrated the differential regulation of two ferric reductases, FRE2 and FRP1, in response to distinct iron-limited environments. FRE2 and FRP1 are both induced in alkaline-pH environments directly by the Rim101 transcription factor. However, FRP1 but not FRE2 is also induced by iron chelation. We have identified a CCAAT motif as the critical regulatory sequence for chelator-mediated induction and have found that the CCAAT binding factor (CBF) is essential for FRP1 expression in iron-limited environments. We found that a hap5Δ/hap5Δ mutant, which disrupts the core DNA binding activity of CBF, is unable to grow under iron-limited conditions. C. albicans encodes three CBF-dependent transcription factors, and we identified the Hap43 protein as the CBF-dependent transcription factor required for iron-limited responses. These studies provide key insights into the regulation of ferric reductase gene expression in the fungal pathogen C. albicans.

Regulation of type II adenylyl cyclase mRNA in rabbit skeletal muscle by chronic motor nerve pacing

1996 ◽  
Vol 271 (2) ◽  
pp. E253-E260 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. Torgan ◽  
W. E. Kraus
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Adenylyl Cyclase ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Rabbit Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Electrical Pacing ◽  
Fast Twitch

Skeletal muscle exhibits a wide range in functional phenotype in response to changes in physiological demands. We have observed that, in response to changes in work patterns, alterations in gene expression of some proteins coincide with changes in adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity [Kraus, W.E., J.P. Longabaugh, and S. B. Liggett. Am. J. Physiol 263 (Endocrinol. Metab. 26): E266-E230, 1992]. We now examine AC isoform transcript prevalence in various rabbit skeletal muscles and in response to changing work demands. Using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, we detected type II AC isoform transcripts in rabbit skeletal muscle. Ribonuclease protection analyses revealed that expression of the type II isoform significantly correlated with the percentage of fast-twitch type IIb/IId fibers (r2 = 0.765, P < 0.01). When a fast-twitch muscle was converted to a slow-twitch muscle via chronic electrical pacing, expression of type II AC mRNA significantly decreased. This response occurred 3 days after the onset of stimulation (78% decrease) and was still present after 21 days of stimulation (76% decrease). As type II AC is relatively insensitive to calcium regulation while sensitive to protein kinase C (PKC) signaling, these data provide further impetus for investigations of protein kinase A and PKC cross-talk signaling mechanisms in the regulation of gene expression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document