Chalmers’s Subscript Gambit, the Importance of Topics, and Lack of Control
This chapter discusses Chalmers’s view about how to deal with verbal disputes, and its relation to the Austerity Framework. According to Chalmers’s subscript gambit, when we suspect that a philosophical term is the subject of a verbal dispute, we ought to ban the use of the word, and replace it with two or more new words which express the different meanings, and investigate whether any substantial dispute remains. Although Chalmers’s method of elimination is helpful, the chapter argues that it does not give us an account of conceptual engineering, because it does not provide a theory of topics, and assumes that we are in control of the meaning of our words.
2019 ◽
Vol 2
(1)
◽
pp. 24
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
1959 ◽
Vol 53
(2)
◽
pp. 321-331
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2020 ◽
Vol 50
(5)
◽
pp. 594-605
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):