scholarly journals Protocol for #iBeatCRC: a community-based intervention to increase early-onset colorectal cancer awareness using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e048959
Author(s):  
Charles R Rogers ◽  
Ellen Brooks ◽  
Karen Curtin ◽  
Mary A De Vera ◽  
Fares Qeadan ◽  
...  

IntroductionTh last two decades have seen a twofold increase in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence among individuals under the recommended screening age of 50 years. Although the origin of this early-onset CRC (EOCRC) spike remains unknown, prior studies have reported that EOCRC harbours a distinct molecular and clinical phenotype in younger individuals. The sharp increase in EOCRC incidence rates may be attributable to a complex interplay of factors, including race; lifestyle; and ecological, sociodemographic and geographical factors. However, more research that address psychosocial experiences and accounts for lifestyle-related behaviours before, during and after an EOCRC diagnosis are warranted. This study aims to develop and pilot test a theory-driven, community-based intervention to increase awareness of EOCRC, reduce its associated risk factors and improve early detection among adults aged 18–49 years.Methods and analysisGuided by the Behaviour Change Wheel, we will use a multistage mixed-methods study design. We will pilot a sequential mixed-methods intervention study as follows: (1) First, we will analyse linked quantitative data from the Utah Cancer Registry and National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry, linked to state-wide demographic and vital records in the Utah Population Database to identify EOCRC hotspots in Utah by examining the EOCRC incidence and survival variance explained by personal and county-level factors. (2) Next, we will conduct one-on-one interviews with 20 EOCRC survivors residing in EOCRC hotspots to ascertain psychosocial and lifestyle challenges that accompany an EOCRC diagnosis. (3) Finally, we will consider existing evidence-based approaches, our integrated results (quantitative +qualitative) and community action board input to design a community-based intervention to increase EOCRC awareness that can feasibly be delivered by means of outdoor mass media, and via social media. We will pilot the multicomponent media campaign with a quasiexperimental design among 17 EOCRC hotspot residents and 17 EOCRC ‘coldspot’ residents.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained from the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (IRB_00138357). Signed informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to any data collection. Study results will be disseminated through CRC community blogs, targeted infographics, conference presentations at national and international professional conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals. Final intervention-specific data will be available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.Trial registration numberNCT04715074.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15113-e15113
Author(s):  
Silvia Marsoni ◽  
Federica Zanardi ◽  
Fabio Iannelli ◽  
Elisa Salviato ◽  
Francesco Ferrari ◽  
...  

e15113 Background: Despite a reduction of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) incidence in western countries in the past decades, Early-Onset CRCs (EO-CRC, patients diagnosed with CRC ≤ 40 years old) incidence has increased. Although frequently occurring in the context of familial syndromes, EO-CRCs are mainly sporadic cases and phenotipically enriched for distal localisation and advanced stage at diagnosis. Whether EO-sporadic CRCs pathogenesis differs from that of normal-onset (NO) CRC and how this might impact incidence rates is currently unknown. This had prompted us to ask if, at the genetic level, “traces” of peculiar pathogenic processes could be identified in EO-specific (or -enriched) genetic signatures (GS). Methods: The mutational signatures of 424 TCGA CRC patient samples (19 EO and 405 ≥ 50 years at diagnosis) were analyzed and the similarity between each mutational profile and COSMIC GS was calculated using Bioconductor R package Mutational Patterns (doi: 10.1186/s13073-018-0539-0). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the samples according to similarity to GS was performed in single cohort and pooled analysis. Association between age and individual GS was assessed through grouped and linear correlation analysis. Results: EO-CRC patients were grouped in three main clusters: Cluster1 exposing a major similarity with GS10 (associated with defects in polymerase proofreading activity), Cluster2 showing stronger similarities with GS6 (associated with mismatch repair deficiency), and GS1 (associated with 5-MeC deamination) and Cluster3 presenting similarity with multiple GSs, such as 3 (associated with homologous recombination deficiency) and 5 (pathogenesis unknown). Overall this clustering was maintained when EO-CRC samples were pooled with NO CRC. Grouped and correlation analysis revealed no significant association between age and individual GSs, including GS1 (associated with age). Conclusions: These preliminary analyses show that the relative contribution of known GS is similar in EO and NO cohorts of patients. Possible enrichment for EO-CRC in specific signature clusters will be analysed on a wider sample series.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1458-1468
Author(s):  
Grace Tillyard ◽  
Gerty Surena ◽  
Jean Ronald Cornely ◽  
Max Joseph Mondestin ◽  
Dorothy Senatus ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1647-1655
Author(s):  
Andreana N. Holowatyj ◽  
Aishatu Suleiman Maude ◽  
Halimatu Sadiya Musa ◽  
Ahmed Adamu ◽  
Sani Ibrahim ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates are increasing among individuals < 50 years of age (early-onset CRC) globally with causes unknown. Racial/ethnic disparities in early-onset CRC have also grown more pronounced, because Black individuals have higher early-onset CRC incidence and poorer survival compared with White individuals. We describe the prevalence and burden of early-onset CRC among Africans in Nigeria and African Americans (AAs) in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified Black individuals diagnosed with a first primary CRC ages 18 to 49 years between 1989 and 2017 at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital in Zaria, Nigeria (Nigerians), and in the United States (AAs) using the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute’s SEER program of cancer registries. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate clinical and demographic differences between Nigerians and AAs with early-onset CRC, adjusted for age, sex, tumor site, and histology. RESULTS A total of 5,019 Black individuals were diagnosed with early-onset CRC over the study period (379 Nigerians; 4,640 AAs). Overall, approximately one third of young Black patients were diagnosed with rectal tumors (35.8%). Nigerian individuals with early-onset CRC were eight-fold more likely to be diagnosed with rectal tumors (odds ratio [OR], 8.14; 95% CI, 6.23 to 10.62; P < .0001) and more likely to be diagnosed at younger ages (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.89; P < .0001) compared with young African Americans in adjusted models. CONCLUSION Compared with AA individuals diagnosed with early-onset CRC, Nigerian individuals harbor distinct features of early-onset CRC. Additional investigation of the histopathologic and biologic heterogeneity of early-onset CRCs among Black individuals is critical for understanding racial disparities in susceptibility and outcomes, which may have implications for tailored early-onset CRC prevention, detection, and treatment strategies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. CRC34
Author(s):  
Laura Brockway-Lunardi ◽  
Stefanie Nelson ◽  
Arun R Pandiri ◽  
James V Tricoli ◽  
Asad Umar ◽  
...  

The incidence rates of sporadic early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) are increasing rapidly in the USA and globally. Birth cohort analyses strongly suggest that changes in early life exposures to known or unknown risk factors for CRC may be driving EO disease, but the etiology of EO-CRC remains poorly understood. To address the alarming rise in sporadic EO-CRC, the National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences convened a virtual meeting that featured presentations and critical discussions from EO-CRC experts that examined emerging evidence on potential EO-CRC risk factors, mechanisms and translational opportunities in screening and treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mesnad Alyabsi ◽  
Mohammed Algarni ◽  
Kanan Alshammari

Early-onset (&lt;50 years old) colorectal cancer (CRC) has been increasing worldwide and is associated with poor outcomes. Over 85% of the Saudi population are &lt;50 years old, which put them at heightened risk of early-onset CRC. No study assessed the trends in CRC incidence rates among the Saudis. The Joinpoint Regression software by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was used to estimate the magnitude and direction of CRC incidence trends by age and gender. The annual percentage change (APC) and the average annual percentage change (AAPC) between 2001 and 2016 were computed. In a sensitivity analysis, we also assessed trends using various age groups. Between 2001 and 2016, the early-onset CRC incidence (per 105) increased from 1.32 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.54) to 2.02 (95% CI: 1.83, 2.22) with AAPC (2.6, 95% CI: -0.4, 5.7). At same period, the late-onset incidence increased from 3.54 (95% CI: 3.10, 3.97) to 9.14 (95% CI: 8.62, 9.66) with AAPC (6.1, 95% CI: 3.5, 8.8). Among early-onset CRC patients, age 40–49 has the highest rates and women in this age group has higher rate than men. Our national data showed a gradual increase in CRC incidence rates, which reflect the global concern of early-onset CRC. Further research is needed to understand the etiology of early-onset CRC. Primary health care providers must be alerted about the increasing rate of early-onset CRC. To reduce the future burden of the disease, initiating CRC screening before age 50 is warranted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holli A. Loomans-Kropp ◽  
Asad Umar

Background. Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality has been declining in the U.S. Despite success in reducing CRC incidence, incidence of early-onset CRC has increased markedly. In this study, we identified age-related disparities in CRC incidence and mortality, and investigated differences in anatomical distribution of colon cancers between populations. Methods. CRC trends were evaluated using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Data from 1980–2016 for individuals under age 50 and 50 years and older. Rates and ratios were calculated using SEER∗Stat. Regression analyses were calculated using Joinpoint. Results. Increased CRC incidence among individuals under age 50 was observed. Among individuals under age 50, incidence-based mortality (IBM) stabilized, while incidence and IBM decreased for individuals aged 50 years and older. Normalized trends indicated increased rectal cancer incidence for individuals under age 50, particularly among individuals aged 30–39. Similar incidence of proximal and distal colon cancers in individuals under age 50 was observed, while colon cancers in individuals aged 50 and older were primarily distal. Conclusions. We found age-related disparities in CRC incidence and IBM between individuals under age 50 and age 50 years and older. Increasing incidence rates of rectal cancer substantially accounts for this disparity among individuals under age 50. The escalating trends of early-onset CRC warrant investigation into the factors leading to the population-level trends.


Gut ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 2179-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L Siegel ◽  
Lindsey A Torre ◽  
Isabelle Soerjomataram ◽  
Richard B Hayes ◽  
Freddie Bray ◽  
...  

ObjectiveEarly-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the USA despite rapid declines in older ages. Similar patterns are reported in Australia and Canada, but a comprehensive global analysis of contemporary data is lacking.DesignWe extracted long-term data from Cancer Incidence in Five Continents and supplemental sources to report on worldwide CRC incidence rates and trends by age (20–49 years and ≥50 years) through diagnosis year 2012 or beyond (Australia, Finland, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, USA).ResultsDuring 2008–2012, age-standardised CRC incidence rates in adults <50 ranged from 3.5 per 100 000 (95% CI 3.2 to 3.9) in India (Chennai) to 12.9 (95% CI 12.6 to 13.3) in Korea. During the most recent decade of available data, incidence in adults <50 was stable in 14 of 36 countries; declined in Austria, Italy and Lithuania; and increased in 19 countries, nine of which had stable or declining trends in older adults (Australia, Canada, Denmark, Germany, New Zealand, Slovenia, Sweden, UK and USA). In Cyprus, Netherlands and Norway, inclines in incidence in young adults were twice as rapid as those in older adults (eg, Norway average annual per cent change (AAPC), 1.9 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.5) vs 0.5 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.7)). Among most high-income countries with long-term data, the uptick in early-onset disease began in the mid-1990s. The steepest increases in young adults were in Korea (AAPC, 4.2 (95% CI 3.4 to 5.0)) and New Zealand (AAPC, 4.0 (95% CI 2.1 to 6.0)).ConclusionCRC incidence increased exclusively in young adults in nine high-income countries spanning three continents, potentially signalling changes in early-life exposures that influence large bowel carcinogenesis.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e030000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R Rogers ◽  
Kola Okuyemi ◽  
Electra D Paskett ◽  
Roland J Thorpe ◽  
Tiana N Rogers ◽  
...  

IntroductionColorectal cancer (CRC) is preventable, as screening leads to the identification and removal of precancerous polyps. African-American men consistently have the highest CRC mortality rates, and their CRC-screening uptake remains low for complex reasons. Culture-specific masculinity barriers to care may contribute to the low uptake among African-American men. Examining these barriers to care is vital as CRC screening may challenge cultural role expectations of African-American men, whose tendency is to delay help-seeking medical care. Barbershops provide a pathway for reaching African-American men with masculinity barriers to care who are not regularly receiving healthcare services and CRC screening. This study aims to develop and pilot test a theory-driven, culture-specific, barbershop-based intervention targeting masculinity barriers to care and CRC-screening uptake among African-American men ages 45–75.Methods and analysisGuided by the theory of planned behaviour and the behaviour change wheel, we will use a multistage mixed-methods study design, beginning with an exploratory sequential approach to validate items for subsequent use in a pilot mixed-methods intervention. First, we will collect and analyse qualitative data from focus groups, cognitive interviews and expert item review to validate and test a culture-specific Masculinity Barriers to Care Scale (MBCS) among African-American men. Next, we will administer the MBCS to our target population as an online quantitative survey and evaluate the association between scores and CRC-screening uptake. Then, we will consider existing evidence-based approaches, our integrated results (qualitative +quantitative), and community input to design a culture-specific, behavioural intervention aimed at increasing CRC-screening uptake among African-American men and feasible for barbershop delivery. We will test the peer intervention in a pilot study with a two-arm cluster randomised design (six barbershops, randomised by site) to reduce contamination and account for barbershop culture differences. Our primary outcomes for the pilot are recruitment, sample size estimation, preliminary efficacy and acceptability.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained from the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (00113679), who will also be responsible for receiving communication updates regarding important protocol modifications. To ensure confidentiality, data dispersed to project team members will be blinded of any identifying participant information. Study results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, community dialogue sessions, and presentations at conferences.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT03733197(Pre-results);https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03733197


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document