scholarly journals Successful Treatment of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia by Multidisciplinary Therapy with Radiation to Intracranial Fibromyxoid Tumor

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Mariangela Massaccesi ◽  
Francesco Miccichè ◽  
Mario Rigante ◽  
Gianluigi Petrone ◽  
Elisabetta Lepre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Paraneoplastic Syndrome ◽  
Bone Fractures ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Rare Condition ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Current Standard

Background. Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome caused by protein fibroblast-growth-factor-23 (FGF-23) secreting tumors. Complete tumor resection is the current standard of care for TIO; however, some patients may develop tumor recurrence. Due to the rarity of this paraneoplastic syndrome, the role of radiotherapy is unclear. This case is worth reporting because it adds to our knowledge some insights about the potential role of radiotherapy in this rare condition. Case Presentation. After multidisciplinary consultation, in July 2015, postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy was offered to a 52-year-old man with a multiple recurrent ossifying fibromyxoid tumor in the right frontal sinus causing TIO. The patient had a history of multiple bone fractures and pain since more than 20 years. The tumor had been removed in 2003 for the first time. Subsequent endoscopic resections of the tumor had been performed for recurrences of TIO in May 2012, October 2013, and July 2015. Starting from October 2015, external beam radiotherapy was delivered with a volumetric modulated arc technique to the tumor bed with a daily dose of 2 Gy up to a total dose of 60 Gy. After five years from treatment, the patient is free from local tumor relapse, TIO progression, and radiation-induced side effects. Conclusions. Radiotherapy may provide long-term TIO remission and tumor control, thus being a treatment option in cases where surgery is unfeasible or unsuccessful.

scholarly journals The Role of Minimal Access Surgery in the Treatment of Spinal Metastatic Tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 79S-87S
Author(s):  
Ori Barzilai ◽  
Mark H. Bilsky ◽  
Ilya Laufer
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Minimal Access Surgery ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Spinal Instability ◽  
Minimal Access ◽  
Access Surgery ◽  
Percutaneous Stabilization

Study Design: Literature review. Objective: To provide an overview of the recent advances in minimal access surgery (MAS) for spinal metastases. Methods: Literature review. Results: Experience gained from MAS in the trauma, degenerative and deformity settings has paved the road for MAS techniques for spinal cancer. Current MAS techniques for the treatment of spinal metastases include percutaneous instrumentation, mini-open approaches for decompression and tumor resection with or without tubular/expandable retractors and thoracoscopy/endoscopy. Cancer care requires a multidisciplinary effort and adherence to treatment algorithms facilitates decision making, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Specific algorithms exist to help guide decisions for MAS for extradural spinal metastases. One major paradigm shift has been the implementation of percutaneous stabilization for treatment of neoplastic spinal instability. Percutaneous stabilization can be enhanced with cement augmentation for increased durability and pain palliation. Unlike osteoporotic fractures, kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are known to be effective therapies for symptomatic pathologic compression fractures as supported by high level evidence. The integration of systemic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases has eliminated the need for aggressive tumor resection allowing implementation of MAS epidural tumor decompression via tubular or expandable retractors and preliminary data exist regarding laser interstitial thermal therapy and radiofrequency ablation for tumor control. Neuronavigation and robotic systems offer increased precision, facilitating the role of MAS for spinal metastases. Conclusions: MAS has a significant role in the treatment of spinal metastases. This review highlights the current utilization of minimally invasive surgical strategies for treatment of spinal metastases.

scholarly journals Towards Personalization in the Curative Treatment of Gastric Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid E. Slagter ◽  
Marieke A. Vollebergh ◽  
Edwin P. M. Jansen ◽  
Johanna W. van Sandick ◽  
Annemieke Cats ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Common Cancer ◽  
Resectable Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and has a high mortality rate. In the last decades, treatment strategy has shifted from an exclusive surgical approach to a multidisciplinary strategy. Treatment options for patients with resectable gastric cancer as recommended by different worldwide guidelines, include perioperative chemotherapy, pre- or postoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy. Although gastric cancer is a heterogeneous disease with respect to patient-, tumor-, and molecular characteristics, the current standard of care is still according to a one-size-fits-all approach. In this review, we discuss the background of the different treatment strategies in resectable gastric cancer including the current standard, the specific role of radiotherapy, and describe the current areas of research and potential strategies for personalization of therapy.

scholarly journals Radiotherapy of glioblastoma 15 years after the landmark Stupp’s trial: more controversies than standards?

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Kazda ◽  
Adam Dziacky ◽  
Petr Burkon ◽  
Petr Pospisil ◽  
Marek Slavik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Brain Tumor ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Integrated Boost ◽  
Hippocampal Sparing ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Personalized Approach

Abstract Background The current standard of care of glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, has remained unchanged for over a decade. Nevertheless, some improvements in patient outcomes have occurred as a consequence of modern surgery, improved radiotherapy and up-to-date management of toxicity. Patients from control arms (receiving standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide) of recent clinical trials achieve better outcomes compared to the median survival of 14.6 months reported in Stupp’s landmark clinical trial in 2005. The approach to radiotherapy that emerged from Stupp’s trial, which continues to be a basis for the current standard of care, is no longer applicable and there is a need to develop updated guidelines for radiotherapy within the daily clinical practice that address or at least acknowledge existing controversies in the planning of radiotherapy. The goal of this review is to provoke critical thinking about potentially controversial aspects in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma, including among others the issue of target definitions, simultaneously integrated boost technique, and hippocampal sparing. Conclusions In conjunction with new treatment approaches such as tumor-treating fields (TTF) and immunotherapy, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy will be further defined. The personalized approach in daily radiotherapy practice is enabled with modern radiotherapy systems.

scholarly journals Radiomics for the Diagnosis and Differentiation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 505
Author(s):  
Jorge D. Machicado ◽  
Eugene J. Koay ◽  
Somashekar G. Krishna
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Quantitative Imaging ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Cystic Lesions ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Small Sample Sizes ◽  
Insight Into

Radiomics, also known as quantitative imaging or texture analysis, involves extracting a large number of features traditionally unmeasured in conventional radiological cross-sectional images and converting them into mathematical models. This review describes this approach and its use in the evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). This discipline has the potential of more accurately assessing, classifying, risk stratifying, and guiding the management of PCLs. Existing studies have provided important insight into the role of radiomics in managing PCLs. Although these studies are limited by the use of retrospective design, single center data, and small sample sizes, radiomic features in combination with clinical data appear to be superior to the current standard of care in differentiating cyst type and in identifying mucinous PCLs with high-grade dysplasia. Combining radiomic features with other novel endoscopic diagnostics, including cyst fluid molecular analysis and confocal endomicroscopy, can potentially optimize the predictive accuracy of these models. There is a need for multicenter prospective studies to elucidate the role of radiomics in the management of PCLs.

Adjuvant Treatments for Localized Advanced Gastric Cancer: Differences among Geographic Regions

2012 ◽  
pp. e31-e34
Author(s):  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Changhoon Yoo
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
The West ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Group B ◽  
Leukemia Group ◽  
Postoperative Chemoradiation

Overview: After much debate, adjuvant therapy has become the standard of care worldwide for resected localized gastric cancer. However, geographic differences exist in standard adjuvant treatments: postoperative chemoradiation in North America, perioperative chemotherapy in the United Kingdom, and postoperative chemotherapy in East Asia. Now that D2 gastrectomy has been recognized as the optimal surgery for localized gastric cancer in the West as well as in Asia, the standard adjuvant treatments used in the West may need to be reconsidered. One of the most important issues in adjuvant therapy for localized gastric cancer is how to improve the clinical outcomes of current standard treatments. Recent Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) and AMC studies suggest that simply intensifying chemotherapy by adding more agents or prolonging treatment duration is insufficient. However, new strategies like early initiation of chemotherapy and/or intraperitoneal chemotherapy may further improve the current standard adjuvant therapy. In the era of targeted therapy, the role of biologic agents for gastric cancer should also be explored in the adjuvant setting. With a deeper understanding of the molecular biology of gastric cancer, adjuvant therapy for patients with localized gastric cancer can be optimized and individualized.

scholarly journals Radiotherapy in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Rare Tumors ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 111-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christin A. Knowlton ◽  
Luther W. Brady ◽  
Rebecca C. Heintzelman
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Mesenchymal Tumors ◽  
Palliative Setting ◽  
Term Response

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are uncommon mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Up to one-third of GISTs are malignant with a high rate of metastasis. Surgical resection is the mainstay of care for patients with resectable disease. Imatinib mesylate, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the current standard of care for GISTs that cannot be completely resected or in cases of metastatic GIST. Although often overlooked, radiation therapy is a viable option for select patients with GIST. We report the case of a patient with unresectable GIST who was treated with local radiotherapy and achieved long-term response. We also present a review of the literature regarding the use of radiotherapy in the treatment of GIST. GIST has been shown to be a radiosensitive tumor. Radiotherapy can offer long-term local control and should be considered in the adjuvant or palliative setting. The role of radiotherapy delivered concurrently with imatinib in the treatment of GIST may warrant further investigation.

scholarly journals Needleless Ablation of Osteoid Osteoma and Osteoblastoma: The Emergent Role of MRgFUS

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Flavia Cobianchi Bellisari ◽  
Pierpaolo Palumbo ◽  
Carlo Masciocchi ◽  
Carmine Zoccali ◽  
Antonio Barile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Osteoid Osteoma ◽  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Ultrasound Surgery ◽  
Focused Ultrasound Surgery ◽  
Poor Tolerance ◽  
Microscopic Features ◽  
Technical Details

Osteoblastoma (OB) and osteoid osteoma (OO) are benign bone-forming tumors, with nearly identical basic microscopic features. The main difference is dimension (OO has usually a nidus measuring <2 cm in diameter). In addition, OB is biologically more active than OO, with a tendency to grow in size. Historically, treatments have included surgical resection and analgesics, although invasiveness and poor tolerance have led to the current standard of care moving toward interventional radiology, where radiofrequency ablation (RFA) represents the most diffuse technique. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) has recently emerged as another innovative alternative treatment, providing tumor ablation through a needleless and ionizing radiation-free modality. In addition, this technique has the ability to guarantee a very precise and controlled increase in temperature, delivering small amounts of energy that can accurately destroy only the lesion, avoiding healthy surrounding tissues. The present review focuses on MRgFUS as the less invasive, safe, effective, and durable treatment option for the management of osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma, including a description of technical details, indications and outcomes.

scholarly journals Monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance and smoldering myeloma

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-202
Author(s):  
Artur Jurczyszyn ◽  
Ruth Hutch ◽  
Anna Waszczuk-Gajda ◽  
Anna Suska ◽  
Katarzyna Krzanowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Malignant Plasma Cell ◽  
Plasma Cell Disorder ◽  
Smoldering Myeloma ◽  
Cell Disorder ◽  
Undetermined Significance

AbstractMonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a clonal plasma cell disorder implicated as a precursor of multiple myeloma (MM), while smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder without evidence of a myeloma-defining event(s) (MDE). This is a review article of both disorders outlining their current definition and management according to the current standard of care. We focus on the pathogenesis of MM and the role of MGUS and SMM in the development of active MM. MGUS is a benign disorder and, subsequently, is followed by observation. In contrast, for SMM, although the current standard of care is “watch and wait”, this paper will explore the circumstances in which treatment should be considered to prevent MDE.

Establishing the Standard of Care for Patients with Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma

2012 ◽  
pp. 112-117
Author(s):  
Mark R. Gilbert
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Beam Radiation

Overview: The current standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes maximal safe tumor resection followed by concurrent external-beam radiation with daily low-dose temozolomide followed by 6 to 12 months of adjuvant temozolomide, typically by using a cycle of 5 consecutive days out of 28. Efforts to improve on these results from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) trial using either dose-dense chemotherapy strategies or combinations with signal transduction modulators have, to date, been unsuccessful. Two large international randomized trials examining the efficacy of adding bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic agent, to the standard treatment have been completed, with expectations of results within in the next 2 years. For recurrent glioblastoma, there are no firmly established standards of care. Although intracavitary insertion of carmustine-impregnated polymers has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), this strategy is not widely used. Bevacizumab has been FDA approved for recurrent glioblastoma, but no randomized trial has clearly demonstrated a survival benefit. Alternative dosing schedules of temozolomide (i.e., metronomic) has modest activity even in patients with prior temozolomide exposure. Clinical trials testing small-molecule signal transduction modulators have been disappointing, although most report a small response rate, suggesting that molecularly definable tumor subpopulations may help guide treatment decisions. Successful implementation of marker-based treatment would lead to personalized care and the creation of individualized standards of care.

scholarly journals Immunotherapy Strategies for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3525
Author(s):  
Junaid Arshad ◽  
Philippos A. Costa ◽  
Priscila Barreto-Coelho ◽  
Brianna Nicole Valdes ◽  
Jonathan C. Trent
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Molecular Alterations

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal soft tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract. The management of locally advanced or metastatic unresectable GIST involves detecting KIT, PDGFR, or other molecular alterations targeted by imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The role of immunotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas is growing fast due to multiple clinical and pre-clinical studies with no current standard of care. The potential therapies include cytokine-based therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-KIT monoclonal antibodies, bi-specific monoclonal antibodies, and cell-based therapies. Here we provide a comprehensive review of the immunotherapeutic strategies for GIST.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document