scholarly journals Dakwah Gus Miftah dalam Bingkai Media Daring

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-152
Author(s):  
Putra Pujiantara
Keyword(s):  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Public ◽  
Qualitative Approaches

This article explores the mass media's framing of the preaching of Miftah Maulana Habiburrahman or better known as Gus Miftah who is considered different by the public because he preaches in a club and a nightclub. This has attracted the attention of several parties such as the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) and some politicians. The focus of this research is to uncover and compare Gus Miftah's coverage by Detik.com and JPNN.com in the framework of Robert N. Entman's framing analysis and qualitative approaches. The results of this study indicate that the two media are framing different news. Detik.com looks more neutral by presenting Gus Miftah's missionary journey and some pro and contra responses. Meanwhile, JPNN.com featured many parties who disagreed with Gus Miftah's preaching that was carried out in nightclubs.Tulisan ini meneroka pembingkaian media massa atas dakwah Miftah Maulana Habiburrahman atau yang lebih dikenal dengan sapaan Gus Miftah yang dianggap berbeda oleh khalayak karena berdakwah di sebuah klub dan tempat hiburan malam. Hal ini mengundang perhatian beberapa pihak seperti Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) dan beberapa kalangan politisi. Fokus penelitian ini menyingkap dan membandingkan pemberitaan Gus Miftah yang dilakukan oleh Detik.com  dan JPNN.com  dalam kerangka analisis framing Robert N. Entman dan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kedua media tersebut melakukan pembingkaian berita yang berbeda. Detik.com  terlihat lebih netral dengan menampilkan perjalanan dakwah Gus Miftah dan beberapa tanggapan yang pro dan yang kontra. Sementara itu, JPNN.com  banyak menampilkan pihak-pihak yang tidak setuju dengan dakwah gaya Gus Miftah yang dilakukan di tempat hiburan malam.

“Germany in ruins”. Framing new political movements in Germany in the Polish opinion-forming press

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-119
Author(s):  
Karol Franczak
Keyword(s):  
Social Life ◽  
Public Affairs ◽  
New Right ◽  
Political Movements ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Critical Perspective ◽  
Social Phenomena ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Media ◽  
Contemporary Media

Abstract One of the main goals of contemporary media, along with the experts and professionals, who speak in them, has been to explain complex issues and provide the audience with clear descriptions of social reality. This is mostly achieved by the production of ideologically useful interpretative schemes that facilitate understanding of the issues present on the media agenda. An important strategy of shaping the public opinion in the way in which public affairs and the activity of social life participants is framed. Analyses of such practices have been conducted for over thirty years within various research approaches collectively referred to as framing analysis. This research provides several arguments helping one to develop a more critical perspective on the representations of social phenomena dominant in the media and discourses of symbolic elites (e.g. opinion writers, academics, experts, journalists, politicians), along with the analyses of the origin of such phenomena, moral judgements and preferred "corrective policies". One of the phenomena defined by the media in Europe as the most important one for the past several years, is the so-called "New Right". The aim of the paper is to analyse the interpretative schemes used by the journalists of four Polish opinion-forming weeklies and to describe the activity of its German manifestation – the Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the Occident (Pegida) social movement and the Alternative for Germany party (AfD).

STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN DESA WISATA SENI & KERAJINAN KASONGAN, BANGUNJIWO, BANTUL, YOGYAKARTA

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 49-64
Author(s):  
Hani Ernawati ◽  
Sela Apriliyani Mahmudah
Keyword(s):  
Development Policy ◽  
Swot Analysis ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Community Support ◽  
Market Potential ◽  
Economic Potential ◽  
The Public ◽  
Qualitative Approaches ◽  
Tourism Product ◽  
Depth Interviews

This study discusses and examines the strengths and weaknesses and the opportunities and threats to formulate a strategy and program development in the Art Tourism Village of Kasongan bantul Yogyakarta. This study used quantitative and qualitative approaches. Data collected by observation, in-depth interviews, documentation and dissemination of questionnaires to 53 respondents consisting of bureaucrats, tourism businesses and community leaders, then analyzed by SWOT method. Based on the SWOT analysis obtained alternative strategies that can be applied is create quality art-tourism product. Tourism development policy must have the support from the private sector and the public. Community support depends on the condition variable resources of tourism areas, namely diversity, uniqueness, potential for conservation, economic potential, and market potential. These five variables are the basis for the establishment of community support. Keywords: art-tourism, tourism-village, strategy and development program

scholarly journals Framing Berita Media Online terhadap Efektivitas Kinerja Pemerintah dalam Menanggulangi Tingginya Kasus PHK di Masa Pandemi COVID–19

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
Tasya Fasa Anjani ◽  
Ika Novita ◽  
Shavira Amellia Damayanti ◽  
Saifuddin Zuhri
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Government Performance ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
News Framing ◽  
The Public ◽  
Negative Side ◽  
The Many

Abstrak. Terjadinya pandemi covid-19 telah banyak membawa perubahan secara global, kerugian dari berbagai sektor ikut dirasakan oleh masyarakat Indonesia khususnya dalam bidang tenaga kerja yang saat ini mengalami penurunan omset pada setiap perusahaan. Portal berita media online menjadi alat masyarakat untuk mengetahui informasi mengenai penyebaran wabah covid-19 terutama terkait dengan kinerja pemerintah dalam menangani lonjakan pengangguran yang saat ini sedang terjadi akibat banyaknya tindakan berupa pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeksripsikan framing berita media online terkait dengan efektivitas kinerja pemerintah dalam menanggulangi tingginya kasus PHK di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode analisis framing Robert M. Entman, dengan objek penelitian dari dua portal berita yang membahas kinerja pemerintah dalam menghadapi lonjakan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) pada Tirto.id dan CNN Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa baik Tirto.id maupun CNN Indonesia memperlihatkan sisi positif dan negatif dari masalah tersebut, namun yang cukup terlihat yaitu sisi negatif dari pernyataan dan juga kritik yang dimasukkan dalam isi beritanya sedangkan CNN Indonesia dalam mengemas berita mengenai masalah tersebut dari sisi pro dan kontra. Namun yang lebih terlihat yaitu sisi pro.Kata Kunci : Analisis Framing, Berita, Covid-19, Media online, PHK. ABSTRACT. The occurrence of the Covid-19 pandemic has brought many changes globally, losses from various sectors are also felt by the Indonesian people, especially in the field of labor, which is currently experiencing a decline in turnover at each company. Online media news portals are a tool for the public to find out information about the spread of the Covid-19 outbreak, especially related to the government's performance in dealing with the spike in unemployment that is currently happening due to the many actions in the form of layoffs (layoffs). The purpose of this study was to describe the online media news framing related to the effectiveness of government performance in overcoming the high number of layoffs in Indonesia. The research method used is the Robert M. Entman framing analysis method, with the object of research from two news portals that discuss the government's performance in dealing with a spike in layoffs (PHK) at Tirto.id and CNN Indonesia. The results show that both Tirto.id and CNN Indonesia show the positive and negative sides of the problem, but what is quite visible is the negative side of the statement and also the criticism that is included in the content of the news, while CNN Indonesia in packaging news about the problem from the pro and counter. But what is more visible is the pro side.Keywords: Framing Analysis, News, Covid-19, Online media, layoffs.

Communicating about raising the retirement age using frames and counterframes

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Vyncke ◽  
Baldwin Van Gorp
Keyword(s):  
Total Sample ◽  
Retirement Age ◽  
Meaning Of Work ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Existing Frames ◽  
Insight Into

Purpose This study discusses the frames that were used in the public debate about raising the retirement age in Belgium from 65 to 67 years. The purpose of this paper is to gain insight into the prevailing frames in order to develop counterframes that are less problematizing and can be used to bring more nuance to the debate. Design/methodology/approach An inductive framing analysis was conducted, using articles from Flemish newspapers and magazines, published in a two-year period (March 2013-March 2015). This sample was complemented by a convenience sample of texts by various stakeholders. The total sample consisted of 182 texts. Findings The analysis yielded four problematizing frames and six deproblematizing counterframes. They cover both the meaning of work for the individual, and the effect that working longer has on society. Practical implications The overview of the frames can be used as a tool to analyze existing communication, and to bring more nuance to future communication by introducing deproblematizing perspectives into the debate regarding the need to work for a longer period of time. Originality/value In addition to giving an overview of existing frames, the study also constructed alternatives which can be used to deproblematize the issue of having to work longer.

scholarly journals They Are Not My Problem: A Content and Framing Analysis of References to the Social Determinants of Health within Canadian News Media, 1993-2014

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey Lucyk
Keyword(s):  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
News Media ◽  
Public Support ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Social ◽  
Responsibility Of Government ◽  
Déterminants Sociaux

As public support is essential for implementing policies that act on the underlying social determinants of health (SDOH), it is important to consider how the public is exposed to this issue. This article explores how the SDOH have been represented in Canadian news media articles from 1993 to 2014. Of the 113 articles that explicitly included SDOH, housing (12.9%), income (10.5%), and poverty (9.3%) were most frequently reported. Over time, the reporting of SDOH increased, with peaks of coverage occurring at different times for different determinants (e.g., housing in 2005, income in 2009). A framing analysis revealed that the SDOH are presented in multiple ways: as an actionable issue and responsibility of government, a moral responsibility, and—problematically—as an issue that only affects disadvantaged groups.L’appui du public est essentiel pour mettre en œuvre des politiques portant sur les déterminants sociaux de la santé (DSS). Il est donc important de tenir compte de la manière dont on informe le public sur cette question. Cet article explore comment des articles parus dans des journaux canadiens ont représenté les DSS de 1993 à 2014. Dans les 113 articles se rapportant explicitement aux DSS, les trois thèmes suivants étaient prédominants : logement (12,9%), revenu (10,5%) et pauvreté (9,3%). Au fil du temps, le nombre d’articles sur les DSS a augmenté, atteignant des sommets à des moments différents pour des thèmes différents (par exemple, logement en 2005, revenu en 2009). Une analyse des cadres a montré que les médias représentent les DSS de manières diverses : en tant que question recevable et responsabilité du gouvernement, en tant que responsabilité morale et—de manière problématique—en tant que problème qui touche seulement les groupes défavorisés.

scholarly journals Understanding Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Implementing Deprescribing for Older People Living in Long-term Residential Care Homes: The STOPPING Study Protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystal Warmoth ◽  
Jo Day ◽  
Emma Cockcroft ◽  
Donald Nigel Reed ◽  
Lucy Pollock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Health Economy ◽  
The Public ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Qualitative Approaches

Abstract Background: Older people with multimorbidity often experience polypharmacy. Taking multiple medicines can be beneficial; however, some older adults are prescribed multiple medicines when they are unlikely to improve clinical outcomes and may lead to harm. Deprescribing means reducing or stopping prescription medicines which may no longer be providing benefit. While appropriate deprescribing may usually be safely undertaken, there is a lack of guidance about how to implement it in practice settings such as care homes. Implementing deprescribing in care homes is often challenging, due to differing concerns of residents, staff, clinicians, friends/family members and carers along with differences in care home structures. The STOPPING study will support the development of better deprescribing practice in care homes, considering different views and environments. This paper aims to introduce the research protocol. Methods: We will use qualitative approaches informed by the widely accepted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to aid analysis. To understand the barriers, facilitators and contextual factors influencing deprescribing in care homes, we will employ individual interviews with care home residents and family members, focus groups with care home staff and healthcare professionals, and observations from care homes. Then, we will examine acceptability, feasibility, and suitability of existing deprescribing approaches using cognitive interviews with care home staff and healthcare professionals. Lastly, we will use narrative synthesis to integrate findings and develop guidance for implementing a deprescribing approach for care homes.Discussion: This research will support the development of implementable approaches to deprescribing in care homes. The insights from this project will be shared with various stakeholders: care home residents, staff, pharmacists, general practitioners, nurses, and other health professionals, carers, researchers, and the public. This work will support deprescribing to be implemented effectively in care homes to benefit residents and the wider health economy.

scholarly journals News Framing Analysis of the Health Crisis of 2017 in Turkey

2019 ◽  
pp. 308-316
Keyword(s):  
Primary Source ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
News Frames ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
The Public ◽  
Preferred Frame ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Media ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Health Field

Crises pointing to a situation that creates confusion in normal living conditions have the potential to adversely affect people and societies. Health, which is one of the areas with high probability of crisis due to its structure, is a matter of concern to almost all members of society. The media, the primary source of the public in crisis situations, has an important role in defining and framing health problems. The news frames preferred by the media can affect public opinion about who will be responsible for the crisis, from whom to expect solution. In this study, which aims to show how the crises in the health field are reflected in the newspapers in the example of Turkey in 2017, news contents have been analyzed according to the news frames revealed Valkenburg et al. (1999). The study results show that the most preferred frame for health crisis news is the responsibility and the least preferred frame is the economic frame.

scholarly journals Indonesia COVID-19 Task Force Statement Framing in September – November 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-160
Author(s):  
Mutiara Nabila
Keyword(s):  
Social Construction ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Public Understanding ◽  
Press Statement ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Negative Number ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Press ◽  
Who Standards

This study aims at examining how Indonesia COVID-19 Task Force, as the government's right hand man, uses Framing Theory in the press statement contents, to convince the public that the handling of COVID-19 in Indonesia has been good enough. The analysis was carried out on the content of the COVID-19 Task Force press statement from September to November 2020 when there were spikes in COVID-19 cases during that period. This research uses the social construction paradigm, to find out what kind of news framing is being carried out by the COVID-19 Handling Task Force related to news about the COVID-19 case through Murray Edelman's framing analysis. By using Murray Edelman's framing analysis, this study tries to reveal the framing of the press release of the COVID-19 Handling Task Force to form a direct public understanding that the handling of COVID-19 in Indonesia is well. The results of the analysis showed that the positive COVID-19 handling task force used a categorization framing with the titles of press statements, the majority of which only mentioned about the recovery of COVID-19 patients, such as: The Number of COVID-19 Patients Continues to Increase to 429,807 People; COVID-19 Testing Results Show 86% Confirmed Negative; Number of Testing Week Third of November Approaches WHO Standards.

scholarly journals Polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang Konsep Islam Nusantara: Sebuah Analisis Framing Media Online

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-36
Author(s):  
Zanniro Sururi Hsb
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Media Framing ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Public ◽  
News Reports

This study explores the Indonesian Ulema Council’s polemic coverage about the concept of Islam Nusantara through online media framing analysis. To look at online media framing, I use qualitative methods with Robert N. Etnman’s framing study that examines two things: selecting issues and the emphasis or promotion of certain aspects. The analysis contained four concepts: defining problems, diagnosing causes, making a moral judgment, and treatment recommendations. The results showed that three online media gave rise to a variety of news reports. Detiknews.com brings up news about scholars’ polemic in the Indonesian Ulema Council area behind Islam Nusantara’s concept eight times, CNNIndonesia.com five times, and Kompas.com three times. Interpretations of the three online media have different attitudes. Detiknews.com in framing can not be said to be neutral, but there has been a bit of a splash of neutrality by displaying statements as a bit of a counterparty, although dominated by pre-party views. CNNIndonesia.com is more impressed to provoke the public to respond to the construction of reality in framing because many use the election diction provocative title. Kompas.com is more neutral compared to Detiknews.com and CNNIndonesia.com. Kompas media tends to use the principle of cover both sides, and the news is more in the form of articles or public opinion.Studi ini mencoba untuk mengeksplorasi pemberitaan polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang konsep Islam Nusantara melalui analisis framing media online. Untuk melihat framing media online, penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan analisis framing Robert N. Etnman yang mengkaji dua hal, yaitu seleksi isu dan penekanan atau penonjolan aspek-aspek tertentu. Analisis tersebut terdapat empat konsep, yaitu define problems (pendefenisian masalah), diagnose causes (memperkirakan penyebab masalah), make moral judgement (membuat pilihan moral), dan treatment recommendation (menekankan penyelesaian). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa tiga media online memunculkan vitur berita yang beragam. Detiknews.com memunculkan berita tentang polemik ulama di kawasan MUI dibalik konsep “Islam Nusantara sebanyak 8 kali”, CNNIndonesia.com sebanyak 5 kali, dan Kompas.com sebanyak 3 kali. Interpretasi dari ketiga media online tersebut memiliki sikap berbeda-beda. Detiknews.com dalam melakukan framing belum bisa dikatakan netral, akan tetapi sudah ada sedikit percikan kenetralan dengan menampilkan pernyataan sekelumit pihak kontra walaupun didominasi pernyataan pihak yang pro. CNNIndonesia.com lebih terkesan memprovokasi masyarakat untuk menanggapi konstruksi realitas yang di framing karena banyak menggunakan pemilihan diksi judul yang provokatif. Kompas.com lebih netral dibandingkan dengan Detiknews.com dan CNNIndonesia.com. Media Kompas cenderung menggunakan prinsip cover both side dan pemberitaannya lebih banyak berbentuk artikel ataupun opini masyarakat.

scholarly journals BINGKAI MEDIA TERHADAP BERITA KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAH DI PANDEMI COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukma Alam
Keyword(s):  
Health Sector ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Crucial Issue ◽  
The Public ◽  
Economic Problems ◽  
Government Communication ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
The Government ◽  
Selection Of

ABSTRAK Keberhasilan penanganan Covid-19 di suatu negara salah satunya tercermin dari kemampuan pemerintah dalam berkomunikasi ke masyarakat. Di Indonesia, isu komunikasi pemerintah merupakan topik yang sedang hangat dibincangkan bukan hanya dilihat dari sektor kesehatan saja tetapi juga mengandung kosekuensi politik dan ekonomi sangat besar. Pemberitaan tentang komunikasi pemerintah di pandemi Covid-19 menjadi sorotan publik. Sebab, komunikasi pemerintah tidak berjalan maksimal, cenderung tidak merespons dan abai terhadap virus corona. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui untuk mengetahui pembingkaian (framing) komunikasi pemerintah dalam berita detik.com, kompas.com dan kumparan.com dan untuk mengetahui penonjolan dan seleksi isu dalam berita komunikasi pemerintah di pandemi Covid-19 yang dilakukan detik.com, kompas.com dan kumparan.com. Metode yang digunakan penelitian ini adalah analisis framing Robert M. Entman. Hasil penelitian ini adalah ditemukan perbedaan pembingkaian dalam berita yang dimunculkan oleh detik.com membingkai komunikasi pemerintah sebagai permasalahan serius, kompas.com membingkai komunikasi pemerintah sebagai isu krusial dan kumparan.com membingkai isu komunikasi pemerintah dari aspek politik. Sementara dari aspek seleksi isu, detik.com lebih kepada permasalahan yang berdampak langsung terhadap masyarakat, kompas.com lebih kepada permasalahan komunikasi pemerintah dan kumparan.com lebih kepada permasalahan juru bicara. Kemudian aspek penonjolan, detik.com cenderung menonjolkan diksi berkonotasi dan narasumber kritis, kompas.com lebih menonjolkan kritikan membangun dan kumparan.com cenderung menyudutkan pemerintah.   Kata Kunci: Framing, Berita Komunikasi Pemerintah, Covid-19   ABSTRACT One of the successful handling of Covid-19 in one country is the government's ability to communicate with the public. In Indonesia, the issue of government communication is a hot topic discussed not only from the health sector but also contains enormous political and economic problems. The news about government communications in Covid-19 pandemic became the public spotlight. Therefore, government communication is not running optimally and ignores corona virus. This research aims to study to find out the framing of government communication in detik.com, kompas.com and kumparan.com news and to study the highlighting and selection of issues in government communication news in Covid-19 pandemic conducted detik.com, kompas.com and kumparan.com. The method used in this research is Robert M. Entman's framing analysis. The results of this study are finding framing in the news that was raised by detik.com framing government communication as serious, kompas.com framing government communication as a crucial issue and kumparan.com framing government communication issues in political terms. While from the aspect of issue selection, detik.com is more a challenge that is directly related to the community, kompas.com is more about the problem of government communication and kumparan.com Criticism builds and kumparan.com further corners the government.   Keywords: Framing, Government Communication News, Covid-19

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document