scholarly journals Analisis Butir Soal Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Matematika pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-68
Author(s):  
Anetha L. F. Tilaar ◽  
Hasriyanti Hasriyanti
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Mathematics Students ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Final Exam ◽  
School Year ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Distinguishing Features

Abstract The results of the initial interview, it was revealed that every time the final school exam was conducted, the questions tested had not been analyzed as a whole, so the quality of the questions was unknown. Therefore this study aims to analyze the odd semester final exam items in mathematics in SMP Negeri 4 Pineleng in the 2018/2019 school year in terms of reliability, validity, distinguishing features, level of difficulty and effectiveness of deceivers (specifically multiple choice questions). This type of research is a descriptive analysis with a quantitative approach. The number of subjects in this study were 97 students consisting of all VIII grade students of SMP Negeri 4 Pineleng in the 2018/2019 school year. The data collection technique used is documentation. The data is processed manually with the help of the excel program and uses the help of the Anatest Version 4 program specifically to analyze effectiveness. From the results of the analysis it can be concluded that the final semester exams for the mathematics students of SMP Negeri 4 Pineleng in the 2018/2019 school year: (1) Types of multiple choice questions, 5 questions or 16.67% have very good quality so they can be stored in the question bank for reuse , 15 questions or 50.00% still need to be revised and 10 questions or 33.33% have very poor quality so that they cannot be stored in the question bank. (2) The types of description questions, 2 questions or 40.00% have good quality, 2 questions or 40.00% need to be revised, 1 problem or 20.00% have bad quality.AbstrakHasil wanwancara awal, terungkap bahwa setiap pelaksanaan ujian akhir sekolah, soal yang diujikan belum dianalisis secara keseluruhan, sehingga kualitas soal tersebut tidak diketahui. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis butir soal ujian akhir semester ganjil mata pelajaran matematika SMP Negeri 4 Pineleng tahun ajaran 2018/2019 ditinjau dari reliabilitas, validitas, daya pembeda soal, tingkat kesukaran dan efektifitas pengecoh (khusus soal pilihan ganda). Jenis penelitian ini adalah analisis deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Jumlah subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 97 siswa terdiri dari seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 4 Pineleng tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah dokumentasi. Data diolah secara manual dengan bantuan program excel dan menggunakan bantuan program Anatest Versi 4 khusus untuk menganalisis efektifitas. Dari hasil analisis dapat disimpulkan bahwa ujian akhir semester ganjil mata pelajarn matematika SMP Negeri 4 Pineleng tahun ajaran 2018/2019 : (1) Jenis soal pilihan ganda, 5 soal atau 16.67% memiliki kualitas sangat baik sehingga dapta disimpan di bank soal untuk dapat digunakan kembali, 15 soal atau 50.00% masih perlu direvisi dan 10 soal atau 33.33% memiliki kualitas sangat tidak baik sehingga tidak dapat disimpan di bank soal. (2) Jenis soal uraian, 2 soal atau 40.00% memiliki kualitas baik, 2 soal atau 40.00% perlu direvisi, 1 soal atau 20,00% meiliki kualitas tidak baik. 

scholarly journals Analyzed Quality Question Type Multiple Choices Questions (MCQ) of Final Exam Even Semester on Biology Course Class XI SMA Negeri Se-Kecamatan IV Jurai Academic Year 2017/2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
Nadya Khairiyah Syafti ◽  
Rahmawati Darussyamsu ◽  
Ganda Hijrah Selaras ◽  
Syamsurizal Syamsurizal
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Question Type ◽  
Final Exam ◽  
School Year ◽  
Level Of Difficulty ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Distinguishing Features

Researcher conducted a study with the aim to determine the quality of items in terms of analysis: 1) reliability, 2) the validity of the content and empirical, 3) distinguishing features, 4) level of difficulty, and 5) the function of detractors. This research is a descriptive study. Based on the results of data analysis, the result for the review of aspects: 1)reliability packet A and B, belong to the category high,2)the validity of the content packet A & B, not fulfilling all criteriaand then validity empirically package A, 57.5% are invalid matter and packet B,65% are invalid matte, 3) the level of difficulty package A, 27 questions (67,5%) good category and 13 questions (32,5%) not good category while package B, 27 questions (67,5%) good category and 13 questions (32,5%) not good category. 4) different power packet A, obtained with different power values, namely 35 questions (87,5%) including good categories and 5 questions (12,5) which do not belong to the good category while package B, 29 questions (72,5%) is included in category and 11 questions (27,5%) which do not belong to category, 5) function options packet A, for options that are not qualified is 37% and the quality is 63% and packet B,for options that are not qualified is 31% and the quality is 69%. It can be concluded that the end of the semester exam subjects biology grade XI of the school year 2017/2018 in the se-kecamatan IV Jurai not meet both criteria.

scholarly journals MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (09) ◽  
pp. 1409-1414
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zafar Iqbal ◽  
Shumaila Irum ◽  
Muhammad Sohaib Yousaf
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Item Writing

Objectives: The main objective of this study was to judge the quality of MCQs interms of their cognition level and item writing flaws, developed by the faculty of a public sectormedical college. Setting: This study was conducted in Sheikh Zayed Medical College, RahimYar Khan. Duration with Dates: Data was collected between June 2014 to March 2015 andthis study was completed in July 2016. Sample Size: A sample of 500 MCQs collected from25 faculty members were included in the study. Study Design: Quantitative method. StudyType: Cross sectional descriptive analysis. Material and Methods: This quantitative study wasconducted in Sheikh Zayed Medical College Rahim Yar Khan over six months period after theapproval of the study proposal. Every faculty member is supposed to write 25 MCQs in order tobecome supervisor. I collected 500 multiple choice questions from 25 faculty members readyfor submission to CPSP. The quality of all MCQs was checked in terms of item writing flawsand cognition level by panel of experts. Results: Absolute terms were observed in 10(2%),vague terms in 15(3%), implausible distracters in 75(15%), extra detail in correct option 15(3%),unfocused stem 63(12.6%), grammatical clues 39(7.8%), logical clues 18(3.6%), word repeats19(3.8%), >then one correct answer 21(4.2%), unnecessary information in stem 37(7.4%),lost sequence in data 15(3%), all of above16(3.2%), none of above 12(2.4%) and negativestem 23(4.6%). Cognition level l (recall) was observed in 363(72.6%), level ll (interpretation) in115(23%) and level lll (problem solving) in 22(4.4%) items. Total 378(75.6%) flaws were identifiedand four commonest flaws were implausible distracter 75(15%), unfocused stem 63(12.6%),grammatical clues 39(7.8%) and unnecessary information in stem 37(7.4%). Conclusion: It isconcluded that assessment of medical students is very demanding and need of the time. A wellconstructed,peer-reviewed single best type MCQ is best one to complete this task becauseof cost effectiveness, better reliability and computerized marking. It is very important to startfaculty development program in order to decrease the number of item writing flaws and improvecognition level towards problem solving and application of knowledge.

scholarly journals Evaluation of One-Day Multiple-Choice Question Workshop for Anesthesiology Faculty Members

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parissa Sezari ◽  
Ardeshir Tajbakhsh ◽  
Nilofar Massoudi ◽  
Ali Arhami Dolatabadi ◽  
Soodeh Tabashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Training Courses ◽  
Knowledge And Attitude ◽  
Novice Educators ◽  
Quality Indexes

Background: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are used commonly to evaluate medical health students. Most novice educators tend to create poor quality, flawed, and low-cognitive-level questions. Therefore, there is a need for educating the assessors to maximize the quality of MCQs and evaluations. Objectives: The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of a one-day MCQ workshop on anesthesiology faculty members. Methods: Faculty members were invited to participate in a four-hour, one-day MCQ workshop. At the beginning of the workshop, the participants were questioned about their knowledge about MCQ quality indexes and also were asked about MCQ general principles (pre-test). Participants were again asked about the questions which they had in the pre-test as their post-test and were questioned about their expectations and the influence of this workshop. Results: The participants declared that their expectations were fulfilled (9.4 ± 0.6 out of 10), and the course was applicable (9.7 ± 0.7 out of 10). Before the workshop, only 12.5% of the participants know MCQ indicators. This rate increased to 41% after the workshop (P < 0.05). Also, they were questioned about Millman’s checklist for the MCQ examination. Participants’ correct answers were increased from 2.75 to 3.05 out of four (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Although previous participation in MCQ training courses did not demonstrate an increase in knowledge and attitude, it could be theorized that short-term repetition would yield better results.

scholarly journals The Quality Analysis of Final Examination Test in Biology Education Major

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Kurnia Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Education Program ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Biology Education ◽  
Quality Analysis ◽  
Final Exam ◽  
Study Program ◽  
School Year ◽  
High Knowledge ◽  
Academic Year

<p>The goal to be achieved in this study is to analyze the quality of the exam questions even semester 2015/2016 school year in Biology Education program. This research uses descriptive method. With the object of research about the exam semester even the academic year 2015/2016 in Biology Education program. Exam analyzed amounted to 14 subjects consisting of 81 questions. The instrument used is the documentation of the exam of the semester of the academic year 2015/2016. The data obtained were analyzed by descriptive analysis including data reduction, systematic data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The result of the research shows that the quality of the final exam of the semester of the academic year 2015/2016 in the Biology Education study program is obtained by the low level knowledge aspect of 81.48%, and the high knowledge aspect of 18.52%.</p>

scholarly journals The effectiveness of learning front roll gymnastics using Google Classroom at SMA N 2 Wonogiri, 2020/2021

PHEDHERAL ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Yusuf Adi Mahendra ◽  
Singgih Hendarto ◽  
Budhi Satyawan
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Average Value ◽  
School Year ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Academic Year

<em><span>The purpose of this study was to determine the level of effectiveness of learning front roll floor gymnastics using Google Classroom at SMA Negeri 2 Wonogiri in the academic year 2020/2021. This research uses descriptive quantitative research. <span>Sampling in</span> <span>this enelitianis the probability sampling is a sampling technique that</span> <span>provide equal opportunities for every member of the population. The poulation in this research is 7 PJOK teachers and 427 grade X students at SMA N 2 Wonogiri. Samples 5 PJOK teachers and students of X 211 class. </span>The data collection technique is done by taking a questionnaire or questionnaire. The data obtained is the transcript of the questionnaire results. Then the data used is the percentage descriptive analysis. Research on the effectiveness of learning front roll floor gymnastics using google classroom at SMA Negeri 2 Wonogiri for the 2020/2021 school year, the following conclusions are obtained: 1) From the point of view of students on factor 1, the conditions for e-learning have an average value of 39.05. Faktor 2, the quality of e-learning obtained an average of 39.79. Overall, the effectiveness of Google Classroom PJOK learning was obtained an average of 78.83. Of the 211 students, 74 students (35.07%) were categorized as moderate. 2) From the teacher's point of view on factor 1 The conditions of e-learning learning obtained an average value of 42.6. In factor 2, the quality of e-learning learning obtained an average of 46.8. Overall, the effectiveness of Google Classroom PJOK learning from the teacher's point of view obtained an average of 89.4. Of the 5 teachers, 3 teachers (60%) were categorized as moderate. Based on the results of data analysis and discussion of research that has been carried out regarding the effectiveness of learning front roll floor gymnastics using google classroom at SMA Negeri 2 Wonogiri in the academic year 2020/2021 it can be concluded that it is moderate. </span></em>

scholarly journals Analysis of Quality Tests Created by FKIP-UHAMKA Faculty for Middle Semester in Academic Year 2016-2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Sri Astuti ◽  
Acep Kusdiwelirawan ◽  
Siti Dahlia
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Test Structure ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Quality Test ◽  
Test Items ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Academic Year

This research is to analyse the quality of test for midterm examination Academic Year 2016-2017 of FKIP UHAMKA lectures. The aims of the research were to identify the quality of the test on compulsory institutional courses academic year 2016-2017 and to analyse the weakness point of the lectures in the making of quality test based on the analysis of the test for midterm examination academic year 2016-2017. The method that used in this research was descriptive analysis method through documentation as a data collection technique. Subjects of this research were semester plan document (RPS) and items test were arranged by lectures. The data that will be analysed are consist of 6 courses, including essay and multiple choice questions. The object of the research was the quality of the items test considered by a few aspects that were learning achievement of RPS, substance of items test, items test structure, and culture/grammar. The instrument for data collection were rubric and researcher which were as human instrument. Overall, the result of this research was the items test have quality with level moderate to good. Furthermore, the majority of items test have weakness related to the making of items test which were the decription of indicators: the learning achievements (such as attitude, general and particular skills) and score list on the items test.

CORRELATION OF DIFFICULTY INDEX AND DISCRIMINATING INDEX IN MEDICAL STUDENT’S ASSESSMENT.

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Bhoomika R. Chauhan ◽  
Jayesh Vaza ◽  
Girish R. Chauhan ◽  
Pradip R. Chauhan
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Item Difficulty ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Discriminating Power ◽  
Good Discriminator ◽  
Difficulty Index ◽  
The Relationship

Multiple choice questions are nowadays used in competitive examination and formative assessment to assess the student's eligibility and certification.Item analysis is the process of collecting,summarizing and using information from students' responses to assess the quality of test items.Goal of the study was to identify the relationship between the item difficulty index and item discriminating index in medical student's assessment. 400 final year medical students from various medical colleges responded 200 items constructed for the study.The responses were assessed and analysed for item difficulty index and item discriminating power. Item difficulty index an item discriminating power were analysed by statical methods to identify correlation.The discriminating power of the items with difficulty index in 40%-50% was the highest. Summary and Conclusion:Items with good difficulty index in range of 30%-70% are good discriminator.

scholarly journals THE APPLICATION-BASED ANALYSIS OF QUESTIONS ITEM QUALITY IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-148
Author(s):  
Rabiatul Adawiah
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Answer Sheet ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Civics Education ◽  
Level Of Difficulty

The activity of analyzing the items is one of the obligations for each teacher in an effort to improve the quality of the questions. However, for Civics Education teachers, this has never been done especially for questions created by the Subject Teachers' Consultation which are used for the end-semester assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of the questions based on distinguishing feature, level of difficulty, and effectiveness of the distractor. This study is an evaluation study of 50 items of  Civics Education Subject test in Banjarmasin, totaling 50 questions in the form of multiple choice questions at the end-semester test, academic year 2019/2020. The data collected are in the form of: (1) final exams question sheet, (2) question answer key sheet, and (3) students’ answer sheet. All data is obtained by documentation techniques. Data analysis uses the AnBuso version 8.0 application. The criteria for determining the quality of items are: (a) questions are considered good if the distinguishing feature is good/good enough, the level of difficulty is medium and all alternative answers are effective, (b) revision of alternative answers, if the distinguishing feature is good/good enough and the level of difficulty is medium, but the alternative there are ineffective answers, (c) good enough, if the distinguishing feature is good/good enough but the level of difficulty is easy/difficult, and (d) not good, if the distinguishing feature is not good.  The results of this study indicate that the questions used for the end-semester test at Junior High School in Banjarmasin are 50 % of poor quality.

scholarly journals Optimalisasi peran & fungsi manajemen kepala ruangan dalam supervisi dokumentasi asuhan keperawatan di rumah sakit x Jakarta

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 536-544
Author(s):  
Teresa Teresa ◽  
Tuti Afrianti ◽  
Tini Suminarti
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Nursing Documentation ◽  
Head Nurse

The role of a head nurse in optimizing of management function in supervision of nursing care documentation at X hospital in JakartaBackground: Nursing documentation is important thing that  is indicator quality of care. Since the nursing documentation is still a poor quality, it requires a supervision by the head nurse.Purpose: The head of nursing is responsible for the direction, organization and strategic planning collaborate with nursing staffs in ensuring the quality of nursing care to achieve accurate, effective and efficient documentation and to complete supervision.Method: A pilot project using questionnaire and observation methods was conducted at difference times on two hospital units in Jakarta.Results: The descriptive analysis results showed that among 18 nurses, 4 nurses believed that nursing documentation is an important, effective and clear way to  ease their job. Hence, supervision is continuity needed to support the improvement of health care quality. The innovative projects will be applied in health care.Conclusion:  Nursing documentation must show continuity and quality of  care nursing under the control and supervision of the head nurse and EMR is used as the instrument for documentation.Keywords :  The role; Head nurse; Management; Supervision; Nursing care; DocumentationPendahuluan: Dokumentasi asuhan keperawatan adalah hal yang penting karena menjadi indikator kualitas perawatan. Penerapan dokumentasi asuhan keperawatan saat ini belum optimal sehingga membutuhkan arahan dan supervisi dari Kepala Ruang/Kepala Unit.Tujuan: Tercapainya supervisi dan keberhasilan pelaksanaan dokumentasi asuhan keperawatan yang komprehensif, berkesinambungan, efektif dan  efisien.Metode: Metode pilot project di salah satu Rumah Sakit di Jakarta dengan pengambilan data melalui  observasi dan kuestioner. Instrumen diujikan pada dua ruangan dalam  waktu yang berbeda.Hasil: Analisis deskripsi pada  sejumlah 18 perawat, 4 orang menyatakan bermanfaat, penting dan mudah dalam penerapannya. Supervisi dilakukan untuk memberikan support terhadap kelangsungan pendokumentasian asuhan keperawatan yang berkesinambungan. Proyek inovasi akan ditindaklanjuti dan diaplikasikan dalam program kerja bidang pelayanan keperawatan.Simpulan: Asuhan keperawatan yang berkualitas memerlukan adanya supervisi. Sarannya penggunaan Instrumen Supervise Dokumentasi Asuhan Keperawatan akan disesuaikan dengan penggunaan pencatatan asuhan keperawatan Elektronic Medical Record/EMR

Experience Versus Potential of Multiple-Choice Tests in Marketing Courses

1979 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. McMillan
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Test Form ◽  
Multiple Choice Tests ◽  
Choice Tests ◽  
Classroom Evaluation ◽  
Quality Objective ◽  
Multiple Choice Items

Most educators agree that classroom evaluation practices need improvement. One way to improve testing is to use high-quality objective multiple-choice exams. Almost any understanding or ability which can be tested by another test form can also be tested by means of multiple-choice items. Based on a survey of 173 respondents, it appears that marketing teachers are disenchanted with multiple-choice questions and use them sparingly. Further, their limited use is largely in the introductory marketing course even though there are emerging pressures for universities to take a closer look at the quality of classroom evaluation at all levels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document