URBOECOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE STRATEGY OF TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIA: PROBLEMS OF STATE REGULATION

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
State Regulation ◽  
Territorial Development

scholarly journals INSTITUTIONAL PRECONDITIONS FOR DIVERSIFICATION ENSURING OF THE NATURAL RECREATIONAL RESOURCES AND TERRITORIES USE

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olha Golikova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Support ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Territorial Development ◽  
Economic Interests ◽  
Economic Relations ◽  
Fixed Assets ◽  
State And Local ◽  
Business Entities ◽  
Recreational Resources ◽  
Environmental Interests

The need to diversify the use of natural recreational resources and territories is a national issue of environmental management at the national and regional entities. This is especially true for unique natural areas and objects. The paper analyzes the current state and identifies trends in the development of recreational and tourist sphere of Ukraine. The analysis of normative-legal and organizational support of processes of of natural resources and territories use is carried out. It is established that a separate part of the main factors of production (facilities and fixed assets involved in the provision of health services) are privately owned by business entities, as natural recreational resources are owned by the state and local executive authorities. This situation is due to the need to reconcile socio-economic and environmental interests. The need to improve the permitting system for assessing natural resource potential, in particular natural recreational resources, as a tool for state regulation of economic relations on forms and property rights to natural recreational and involvement of socio-economic interests of territorial development and recreational tourism.

MIGRATION PROCESSES IN RUSSIA: ANALYSIS OF TRENDS AND MECHANISMS OF STATE REGULATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (4) ◽  
pp. 117-122
Author(s):  
YU.S. AITOVA ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Migration Policy ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Human Migration ◽  
Rural Settlements ◽  
Territorial Development ◽  
Essential Point ◽  
General Government ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
High Level

Today, the human migration is one of the most important factors in the socio-economic territorial development. This process requires considerable attention on the part of federal, regional and municipal general government. The main trends that characterize migration in Russia at the present time is a population tightening and a high level of its concentration in the European part of the country, a significant outflow of population from towns, small cities, as well as rural settlements, migration inflow to large and highly developed territories, an increase in the socio-economic development polarization in territories, etc. These problems are also considered in the Concept of the State Migration Policy in the Russian Federation for 2019-2025. At the same time, despite the adoption of the Concept several issues remain unresolved, such as the lack of state attention to internal Russian migration, the definition of specific needs of the region and municipalities, as well as the lack of a quantitative assessment of targets, etc. It is necessary to clarify the main directions and mechanisms for implementing Russia's migration policy. It is promising to consider population migration from the point of view of meeting the various interests and needs of the main participants in this process - a person, business, territory (locality, region, country), in our opinion. An essential point in the development of such a mechanism is an adequate and scientifically based description of the characteristics of each agent., It is necessary to develop a set of proposals for improving the migration policy and measures for its implementation to achieve a balance of interests of these agents.

scholarly journals Spatial socio-economic heterogeneity of rural areas in the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
Vol 222 ◽  
pp. 06022
Author(s):  
Irina Turgel ◽  
Alexander Pobedin ◽  
Larissa Bozhko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Spatial Differentiation ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Ministry Of Education ◽  
Territorial Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Industrial Regions ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Degree Of Differentiation

Implementation of objectives set out in the Strategy for sustainable development of rural territories of the Russian Federation until 2030 requires solving the problems of spatial differentiation among rural territories in different regions of Russia. The article analyzes the level of differentiation using a set of socio-economic indicators of rural areas. The coefficient of variation was used as an indicator of the degree of spatial differentiation. In the course of analysis, the authors identified significant disparities in territorial development for most of the considered indicators, and particularly acute differences were found in economic parameters, including the volume of investment at the expense of the municipal budget. It is revealed that the degree of differentiation between rural territories is influenced not so much by economic development success as by the level of urbanization in the region. The empirical basis of the analysis is research results conducted within the framework of the research project “Improving the policy of state regulation of accelerated clustering of industrial regions” (AP05133531), carried out under grant funding from the Ministry of education and science of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES IN THE SYSTEM OF STATE SOCIO-ECONOMIC REGULATION

2021 ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Natalia V. Bondarenko
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Regional Development ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
General Level ◽  
Economic Regulation ◽  
Territorial Development ◽  
Resource Base ◽  
Role Of The State

The article substantiates the need to study the issues of strategic planning the development of the territories of the Russian Federation in modern economic conditions. The role of state regulation in solving the issues of rationalization in financial resources distribution to create optimum conditions to form the socio-economic environment of regional development is determined. The resource base of regional development is studied. The main problems affecting the formation of the system for regional development strategic planning are identified. Currently, the legislative and regulatory framework for strategic planning and forecasting available in Russia is mainly descriptive, which is a serious obstacle for the formation of a unified territorial development scheme. The problems presented in the article show that in this situation, the task of optimizing the system of centralized regions management advances to the forefront. It is the strategic vision of the formation of the national economic complex in the development of the state that will optimize this system. The most effective directions for the strategic development of Russian regions, forming the general level of state development are proposed. Despite the already established system of relatively independent planning regions' development by the regions themselves, the role of the state in the final determining the direction of socio-economic development in general remains unchanged. It is the state that chooses the methods of regulation. Solving these tasks will enable the state to form and control the system of strategic planning for the development of regions and the state as a whole as efficiently as possible.

scholarly journals Organizational and economic mechanism of management of agro-industrial enterprises integration

2019 ◽  
pp. 46-53
Author(s):  
Alona Piven
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Organization ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Territorial Development ◽  
Economic Market ◽  
Financial Investment ◽  
Economic Mechanism ◽  
Industrial Enterprises ◽  
Complex Development ◽  
Agroindustrial Complex

Introduction. The urgency of the vertically integrated structures analysis of agroindustrial production is condi-tioned by the need to ensure the food security of the state, create export potential, and ensure the enterprises competitiveness and structural modernization of production. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the content and essence of the organizational and economic mechanism for managing the integration of agricultural enterprises. Results. The promotion factors of agroindustrial complex development are determined. The directions for develop-ing domestic relations in various integration forms are provided. The geographical features of territorial development of rural space in Ukraine are considered. The decisive factors for the spatial organization of the countryside are identified. The main goals of the strategy of agroindustrial complex development are defined. The features of clusters are distinguished inherent in complex economic systems: polycentricity, that is the presence of a number of leading organizations implementing the idea of balanced management of the cluster entities development; co-directional development is the only vector of cluster entities development; adequate display of synergistic effect on the basis of increasing the integrity degree according to the emergence law. The efficiency factors of the clustering processes of the agro-industrial complex are determined: institutional, tech-nical-economic, production-economic, market conditions, economic-geographical, financial-investment, agrarian policy and scientific and technical. The circumstances of the need for in-depth development of a complex problem of improving the inter-sectoral exchange system of the region agro-industrial complex subjects have been identified. The structure of key fac-tors that determine the equivalence level of interbranch exchange in the agroindustrial complex is provided, which includes: resource support, efficiency of interbranch exchange, factors of the intraeconomic environment, structural-institutional, or-ganizational and managerial, state regulation. Keywords: integration, agro-industrial production, cluster, factor, equivalence of interbranch exchange.

scholarly journals Management of sustainable development of the regions of Kazakhstan: problems and solutions

2021 ◽  
Vol 295 ◽  
pp. 01006
Author(s):  
Zulfiya Magrupova ◽  
Gaukhar Koshebaeva ◽  
Gulnara Abzalbek
Keyword(s):  
Regional Development ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Territorial Development ◽  
National Interests ◽  
State Program ◽  
Problems And Solutions ◽  
Technology Parks ◽  
The Republic

The study presents the results of the implementation of the State Program for the Development of the Regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2020. In the face of modern challenges, it becomes critically important to increase the self-sufficiency of the economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the basis of regional development. In order to comply with and take into account national interests, it will be important to launch the adopted State Program for the Development of Regions by 2025. State regulation of territorial development is aimed at disclosing the industrial potential of individual regions and territories of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Taking into account the processes of regionalization taking place in the economy, the prerequisites for the formation of a regional structure of industrial production are considered in the work. The results of the implementation of the State Program for 2015-2019 were considered and problematic issues requiring changes in regional policy were formulated. Based on the analysis, the authors presented a new approach to regional development, which will ensure macroeconomic stability based on high-tech industries (technology parks), educational and research clusters (corporations, universities and laboratories). To increase the efficiency of management of the territorial development of the Republic, systemic measures are

scholarly journals Estimation of structural and regional differentiation of municipal budgets under financial decentralization (case for Ukraine)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 29-40
Author(s):  
Yevgen Kuzkin
Keyword(s):  
Regional Differences ◽  
State Power ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Local Economy ◽  
Regional Differentiation ◽  
Territorial Development ◽  
Structural Differentiation ◽  
Methodical Approach ◽  
Different Levels

Obligatory consideration of peculiarities of the territorial development and regional differences in municipal budgets development is a prerequisite for ensuring the success of reforms aimed at decentralizing state power in the financial sphere and for developing the mechanism of inter-budget relations. The purpose of the study is to substantiate theoretically and develop a methodical approach to the differences between regions in terms of structural and regional differentiation of municipal budgets under state power decentralization. The article proposes a methodical approach to identifying the needs and substantiating measures for financial decentralization. The approach is based on considering the structural and regional differentiation and using statistical and cluster analyses to identify special aspects of the municipal budgets creation at different levels. The following regularities of changes in structural and regional differentiation of municipal budgets in the context of reforming the inter-budgetary relations and financial decentralization are determined: the changes in the state regulation of the local economy and finances usually boost an increase in the manifestations of differentiation; strengthening the negative influence of endogenous and exogenous risks on the increased disproportions in the socio-economic environment of regions while preserving the features of extensive management in the economic system; increasing imbalances and disparities in the structural differentiation of municipal budgets is usually due to the excessive centralization of public finances, while the intensive reforms aimed at decentralizing municipal budgets can increase the growth risks.

scholarly journals The role of self-government in improving the quality of life of rural residents

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 172-179
Author(s):  
Sh. M. Каntаrbаyеvа ◽  
◽  
S. T. Zhumasheva ◽  
Zh. B. Smagulova ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Rural Population ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Well Being ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Territorial Development ◽  
Rural Residents

The aim is to show the main directions of strategic reforms that contribute to improving the well-being of the rural population, modernizing public administration and balanced territorial development. Methods - economic and statistical, assessment, comparative analysis. Results - it was revealed that despite the respondents' satisfaction with the quality of life in the countryside, the existing problems in rural areas are associated with insufficient use of production and intellectual potential, competitive advantages of the agricultural sector of the republic. The article discusses the need to improve the methods of State regulation and self-government based on the involvement of rural residents in these processes. This will make it possible to form a national model of positive socio-economic dynamics, taking into account historical experience, traditions and foreign practice. In the context of this, the arguments for increasing the responsibility of the institution of State self-government in making decisions on the effective development of the territory seem relevant. The authors note the need for the participation of the rural population in formation of the budget, lobbying for social and other projects which are necessary for specific administrative-territorial units. The necessity of active use of digital technologies in business and social movement in the conditions of quarantine and postcovid regimes has been justified. Conclusions - improving the efficiency of self-government bodies is a complex, complex task that requires the concentration of efforts of many structures. It is necessary to introduce digital technologies to create infrastructure in rural areas in order to ensure social security and improve quality of life of the population.

Eurasian "Theory of Economy Management" as an Organic Part of the Russian Economic School

2003 ◽  
pp. 95-110
Author(s):  
M. Voeykov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Soviet Economy ◽  
The Other ◽  
Large Share ◽  
Organic Part ◽  
Two Sides ◽  
Enterprise Activity

The original version of "the theory of economy management", developed in the 1920s by Russian economists-emigrants who called themselves "Eurasians" (N. Trubetskoy, P. Savitskiy, etc.) is analyzed in the article. They considered this theory to be the basis of the original Russia's way of economic development. The Eurasian theory of economy management focuses on two sides of enterprise activity: managerial as well as social and moral. The Eurasians accepted the Soviet economy with the large share of state regulation as the initial step of development. On the other hand they paid much attention to the private sector activity. Eurasians developed a theoretical model of the mixed economy which can be attributed as the Russian economic school.

World Economic Crisis and Scenarios of Post-crisis Development: Marxist Analysis

2009 ◽  
pp. 119-132
Author(s):  
A. Buzgalin ◽  
A. Kolganov
Keyword(s):  
State Regulation ◽  
Marxist Theory ◽  
Financial Capital ◽  
Late Capitalism ◽  
World Crisis ◽  
Social Interests ◽  
Marxist Analysis ◽  
World Economic ◽  
First World ◽  
World Economic Crisis

Implications of the modern Marxist theory create the opportunity to show the inevitability, the reasons and the main features of the first world crisis of the XXI century. It has been generated by deregulation of economy, which caused the ‘classical’ crisis of overproduction, and by the new contradictions of late capitalism, in particular, by persistent over-accumulation of capital and by the excessive development of the transactional sector, of the fictitious financial capital and its isolation from the real sector. Marxist analysis of social interests and contradictions shows that anti-crisis measures require not only increasing of state regulation, but also determining on behalf of whom and in the interests of what social groups this regulation will be realized. The authors propose to do this on behalf of the financial capital and in the interests of citizens, but also formulate the neoconservative scenario of post-crisis development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document