scholarly journals CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS OF DAYAK TOMUN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE MANAGEMENT LAND RIGHTS: A CASE STUDY OF LAMANDAU, CENTRAL KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 530-536
Author(s):  
Achmadi ◽  
Khudzaifah Dimyati ◽  
Absori ◽  
Arief Budiono

Purpose of the study: This research aimed at highlighting the cultural implications in the context of the Dayak Tomun community in maintaining the management of land rights based on the customary in Lamandau, Indonesia. Methodology: This study used a quantitative doctrinal research method to look at the macro problems in legislation products and a qualitative non-doctrinal research method to look at the problems conceptualized at the level of microanalysis as a symbolic reality. Main Findings: This research revealed that the cultural approach perspective of the local indigenous people had an important role in the management of land rights. This study discovered the procedures for managing the people's customary land rights, which were simple and based on the local wisdom of the local community, which implied a philosophical meaning of belom behadat (living in traditions, obeying customs), human nature in protecting the realm from destruction. Applications of this study: The findings of this study may be useful for the government in Indonesia since the findings reveal information as regards the management of land rights viewed from not only the rules and laws, but also a form of behavior, actions, and actual and potential human interactions that will be patterned in the management of land rights of Dayak Tomun indigenous people. The cultural implications of the Dayak Tomun indigenous people in managing local land rights based on local wisdom are sacred. Novelty: Indigenous people's background has management procedures, which can be seen from the characteristics of traditional lands, such as the presence of planting and family tree. Meanwhile, the term in the management of land rights is a hereditary habit and contains legal values ​​derived from beliefs (religion), customs, and social culture.

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurniawan

<p align="center"><strong><em>A</em></strong><strong><em>b</em></strong><strong><em>s</em></strong><strong><em>t</em></strong><strong><em>r</em></strong><strong><em>a</em></strong><strong><em>c</em></strong><strong><em>t</em></strong></p><p><em>T</em><em>his study aims to explain the existence of indigenous people and traditional institutions in Aceh in the administration the Aceh’s special autonomy. In addition, it explains the duties, functions and authority of traditional institutions in Aceh nowadays. This study is normative legal research. This study examines library materials that acquired through literature study. The technical/ approach used is the statute ap- proach, by using deductive analysis. The results of the study indicate that the existence indigenous people and traditional institutions in Aceh have shown their role in local community life in Aceh. This is caused by the community in Aceh has fulfilled the requirements of indigenous people as stated by the applicable law. The existence of traditional institutions in Aceh essentially has the function and role as a vehicle for public participation in the administration of the Government of Aceh provincial level and the Regency/municipality level in the area of   security, peace, harmony, and public order. In addition, those traditional institutions also have some number of authorities as mandated by Article 4 Qanun Aceh No. 10 of 2008 concerning traditional Institution.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Indigenous </em><em>P</em><em>eople, Traditional Institution, Aceh’s Special Autonomy</em></p><p align="center"><strong>A</strong><strong>b</strong><strong>s</strong><strong>t</strong><strong>ra</strong><strong>k</strong></p><p><em>Pen</em><em>e</em><em>li</em><em>t</em><em>ia</em><em>n </em><em>in</em><em>i bertujuan menjelaskan eksistensi (kedudukan) masyarakat hukum adat dan lembaga-lembaga adat di Aceh dalam penyelenggaraan Keistimewaan dan Otonomi Khusus Aceh. Selain itu, menjelaskan tugas, fungsi, dan wewenang lembaga-lembaga adat yang ada di Aceh saat ini. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif (legal research). Kajian ini menelaah bahan pustaka yang diperoleh melalui studi pustaka.  pendekatan yang digunakan ialah pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach), dengan menggunakan penalaran deduktif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa keberadaan (eksistensi) masyarakat hukum adat dan kelembagaan adat di Aceh telah menunjukkan kiprahnya dalam tata kehidupan masyarakat di Aceh. Hal tersebut disebabkan oleh karena masyarakat hukum di Aceh telah memenuhi syarat-syarat masyarakat hukum adat sebagaimana yang disebutkan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Keberadaan lembaga-lembaga adat di Aceh hakikatnya memiliki fungsi dan peran sebagai wahana partisipasi masyarakat dalam penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Aceh dan Pemerintahan Kabupaten/Kota di bidang keamanan, ketenteraman, kerukunan, dan ketertiban masyarakat. Selain itu,  lembaga-lembaga adat tersebut juga memiliki sejumlah kewenangan sebagaimana yang diamanatkan Pasal 4 Qanun Aceh Nomor 10 Tahun 2008 tentang Lembaga Adat.</em></p><p><strong>Kata kunci: </strong>Masyarakat Hukum Adat, Lembaga Adat, Otonomi Khusus Aceh.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-183
Author(s):  
Melatul Aliyah ◽  
Fifik Wiryani ◽  
Isdian Anggraeny

This study aims to find out all procedures for the transfer of rights to ex-customary land that have not been certified along with the requirements that must be completed to register the transfer of rights to ex-customary land that has not been certified as well as to find out the problems faced by the people of Ambit Village related to the registration of the transfer of rights to land. former customs and solutions for their solutions. The research method used is field research with an empirical juridical approach that is based on field research and interviews and is adapted to legal conditions. The results of the study can be concluded that the registration of the transfer of rights to former customary land that has not been certified in Ambit Village has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of the government regulation of land registration No. 24 of 1997. There are several problems that arise in the process of registering the transfer of rights to former customary land that has not been certified, such as land parcels that are still in dispute and there is no proof of SPPT PBB payment from the previous owner. It can be concluded that the community must follow the procedure and register their land with complete required documents and pay taxes on time. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui seluruh prosedur peralihan hak atas tanah bekas adat yang belum bersertifikat beserta persyaratan-persyaratan yang harus dilengkapi untuk mendaftarkan peralihan hak atas tanah bekas adat yang belum bersertifikat serta mengetahui permasalahan yang dihadapi oleh masyarakat Desa Ambit terkait dengan pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah bekas adat beserta solusi penyelesaiannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian lapangan dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris yang didasarkan pada penelitian lapangan dan wawancara serta disesuaikan dengan keadaan hukum. Hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa Pelaksanaan pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah bekas adat yang belum bersertifikat di Desa Ambit telah dilaksanakan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan pemerintah pendaftaran tanah No. 24 Tahun 1997. Terdapat beberapa permasalahan yang timbul dalam proses pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah bekas adat yang belum bersertifikat seperti bidang tanah masih dalam keadaan sengketa serta tidak ada bukti pembayaran SPPT PBB dari pemilik sebelumnya. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa masyarakat harus mengikuti prosedur dan mandaftarkan tanahnya dengan dokumen persyaratan lengkap serta membayar pajak tepat waktu.


Law Review ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Jeremy Aidianto Naibaho ◽  
Bambang Daru Nugroho ◽  
Yusuf Saepul Zamil

<p><em><span class="fontstyle0"><strong>Abstract</strong><br /></span></em></p><p><em><span class="fontstyle1">Nationalization of a Dutch-owned plantation company, NV Deli Maatschappij, was an attempt by the government to improve national economic situation. However, during the process, communal land which was concessioned to the plantation, was also nationalized and not given compensation by the government which resulted the indigenous people of Deli Sultanate losing their customary land. The former plantation land was converted to Cultivation Rights and handed over to the State Plantation Company This problem led to a prolonged conflict over ownership of the former estate. The purpose of this study is to determine the validity of the nationalization process carried out by Indonesian government on the existence of indigenous peoples’ customary land rights and obtain  settlement of customary land rights of indigenous peoples as the impact on nationalization. Furthermore, this research is normative legal research (library research) with a statutory approach (statue approach).<br /></span></em></p><p><span class="fontstyle0"><strong><em>Keywords: Nationalization, Communal Land, Compensation</em></strong><br /></span></p><p><span class="fontstyle3"><br /></span></p><p><span class="fontstyle3"><strong>Abstrak</strong><br /></span></p><p><span class="fontstyle4">Proses nasionalisasi Perusahaan Perkebunan milik Belanda, yaitu NV Deli </span><span class="fontstyle1">Maatschappij </span><span class="fontstyle4">adalah upaya pemerintah untuk memperbaiki perekonomian Negara. Namun dalam pelaksanaannya tanah ulayat yang dikonsesikan kepada perkebunan juga ikut ternasionalisasi dan tidak diberikan ganti kerugian oleh pemerintah yang berakibat Masyarakat Adat Kesultanan Deli kehilangan tanah ulayatnya. Tanah bekas perkebunan diubah menjadi Hak Guna Usaha dan diserahkan kepada Perusahaan Perkebunan Negara. Hal ini menimbulkan<br />konflik berkepanjangan tentang kepemilikan tanah bekas perkebunan tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif (</span><em><span class="fontstyle1">library research</span></em><span class="fontstyle4">) dengan pendekatan undang-undang (</span><em><span class="fontstyle1">statue approach</span></em><span class="fontstyle4">). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai keabsahan proses nasionalisasi yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Indonesia terhadap eksistensi hak ulayat Masyarakat Adat dan memperoleh penyelesaian sengketa tanah ulayat Masyarakat Adat sebagai dampak atas<br />nasionalisasi.<br /></span></p><p><strong><span class="fontstyle3">Kata Kunci: Nasionalisasi, Tanah Ulayat, Ganti Rugi</span> </strong></p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
MEKI HERLON ◽  
FAJAR RESTUHADI ◽  
ROZA YULIDA

One of the government effort in accelerated development is believed to be done with maximum natural resource management, sustainable, and without any conflict. This 2800 ha of land conflict happened between rural citizen in sub regency Tapung Hulu and PTPN V Kebun Sei Kencana. The aim of this research is to find out information about social network and land conflict in rural communities in Senama Nenek vilage. This research is done within November 2015 until March 2016. Research method is using survey method and research sample for community leaders (12 people by census) and ordinary citizen (113 people by Snow Ball). The data that needed is primary and secondary data, the analysis used SPSS and UciNet program. The result showed that there are 12 actors involved in this conflict which are : 8 actors that maintain customary land (Ishk, Myya, Mkwr, Frds, Abms, Ahyn, dan Tmsn) and 4 actors uphold interests of the company (Abcn, Sprn, Sjls, dan Srdi).


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Ricca Gideon ◽  
Eva Dolorosa ◽  
Josua Parulian Hutajulu

The Desa Makmur Peduli Api (DMPA) Program is a form of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) from PT. Finnantara Intiga. This program aims to empower the local community in a productive economic sector which focuses on increasing the local people's income. The various DMPA programs that have been prepared are fish farming, cattle farming, rice, and corn farming. Based on the results of the study and agreement with the local community, the DMPA program focuses on corn farming. The purpose of this study was to determine a strategy to improve the performance of corn farming. The research method uses descriptive methods with SWOT analysis tools to determine strategic alternatives and QSPM analysis to select strategic priorities. The respondents consisted of 4 key informants and 18 regular informants for SWOT analysis and 4 experts for QSPM analysis. The result of the SWOT analysis is WO (Weakness - Opportunity) strategy with 4 alternative strategies. Based on the results of the QSPM analysis, the priority strategy is for the company have to collaborate with the government to train farmers routinely.


Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Priska Irvine Loupatty ◽  
Julius Sembiring ◽  
Ahmad Nashih Luthfi

Abstract: Land registration through PTSL activities is conducted for all parcels of land throughout Indonesia. However, there are some ohoi in Southeast Maluku regency that refuse the registration of land which has been implemented through PTSL in recent years, whereas almost all of ohoi in Southeast Maluku Regency has already done land registration. This study aims to determine the implementation of PTSL in Ohoi Ngabub and Ohoi Sathean, the reason the Ohoi Sathean indigenous people accepted PTSL activities and the Ohoi Ngabub indigenous people rejected PTSL activities, and the land law system that applies in both ohoi. The research method used is qualitative with a sociolegal approach. The results showed that PTSL-UKM activities carried out in 2017 at Ohoi Sathean received good responses from the Ohoi Government and indigenous people of Ohoi Sathean, while the Ohoi Ngabub government refused to do PTSL activities. This is due to the local land law system that applies in both ohois. The local land law system that applies in Ohoi Sathean is individual land ownership, whereas the local land law system that applies in Ohoi Ngabub is joint land ownership. Keywords: customary land, communal rights, PTSL, indigenous peoples of Kei Intisari: Pendaftaran tanah melalui kegiatan PTSL dilakukan untuk seluruh bidang tanah di seluruh wilayah Indonesia. Akan tetapi terdapat beberapa ohoi (desa) di Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara yang menolak dilaksanakannya pendaftaran tanah melalui PTSL, sedangkan hampir seluruh ohoi sudah dilakukan pendaftaran tanah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan PTSL di Ohoi Ngabub dan Ohoi Sathean, alasan masyarakat adat Ohoi Sathean menerima kegiatan PTSL dan masyarakat adat Ohoi Ngabub menolak kegiatan PTSL, dan sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di kedua ohoi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu kualitatif dengan pendekatan sosiolegal. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kegiatan PTSLUKM yang dilaksanakan pada tahun 2017 lalu di Ohoi Sathean mendapatkan tanggapan yang baik dari perangkat ohoi dan masyarakat adat Ohoi Sathean sedangkan perangkat Ohoi Ngabub menolak untuk dilakukan kegiatan PTSL. Hal ini disebabkan oleh sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di kedua ohoi. Sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di Ohoi Sathean yaitu kepemilikan tanah secara individual, sedangkan sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di Ohoi Ngabub yaitu kepemilikan tanah secara bersama. Kata kunci: tanah adat, hak komunal, PTSL, masyarakat adat kei


Author(s):  
M. Syuib ◽  
Sarah Diana Aulia

In order to guarantee legal certainty for land rights holders, the Government is conducting land registration program throughout Indonesia territory. The program has put an obligation to the land rights holder to register their land. The purpose of land registration is, to provide evidence for the ownership of land. The implementation mechanism of the program in regulated in the Permen ATR/BPN Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL). The presence of the Permen is, in order to prevent land disputes in the community by accelerating land registration. Sub-district of Ingin Jaya, which is located in the Aceh Besar district, is one of the areas where PTSL activities are carried out. Currently, there is a large area of land in the Aceh Besar district has not been certified yet, it may cause legal uncertainty for land owner and such condition can potentially lead to land dispute. One of the indicators to claim this, are by taking land dispute cases as put on trial in the Jantho Court which has reached 32 cases from 2014 until 2019. This study aims to find out how the implementation of PTSL and its barrier in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar. The research method is an empirical juridical research; it works by conducting observations, interviews, and documentation. The result found that the implementation of PTSL in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar, is in accordance with Permen ATR/BPN No. 6 of 2018. However, in the ground, it is found that there are a number of obstacles which affect the successful of the PTSL program both internally and externally. Therefore, synergy and cooperation with all parties are needed so that the PTSL program in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya can be implemented successfully in order to provide legal certainty for land rights holders, so that the land dispute can be prevented as early as possible.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-119
Author(s):  
Happy Trizna Wijaya

Since September 24, 1960 Law No. 5/1960 was stipulated regarding Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles or often referred to as the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), adopting legal unification and based on customary law. Customary land law is original law, has a unique characteristic, where individual rights to land are personal rights but in it contain togetherness. Land controlled by customary law communities is known as ulayat rights. Although customary law is the basis of the LoGA, problems with ownership rights to customary land often occur due to unclear land boundaries and customary land tenure by the government without any release of land. The results of this study revealed that the procedure for controlling customary land by the local government through the mechanism of land acquisition as stipulated in Permendagri No. 15 of 1975 provides more opportunities for the Government to control land rights, while the owner / holder of land rights has a very weak position because many rights to land are neglected so that it violates the human rights of land rights holders. With the issuance of Presidential Decree No. 55 of 1993 concerning Land Procurement for the Implementation of Development for the Public Interest in lieu of Permendagri No. 15 of 1975, which provides a protection to holders of land rights to be able to defend their rights. This is also the case with Perpres No. 36 of 2005 Jo Perpres No. 65 of 2006 issued as a substitute for Presidential Decree No. 55 of 1993, far more provide protection to the community to defend their rights, while the government is increasingly limited in obtaining land. So Perpres No. 65 of 2006 provides a guarantee of legal certainty to holders of land rights to be able to defend their rights.Sejak 24 September 1960 ditetapkan Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria atau sering disebut Undang-undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA), menganut unifikasi hukum dan berdasarkan hukum adat. Hukum tanah adat merupakan hukum asli, mempunyai sifat yang khas, dimana hak-hak perorangan atas tanah merupakan hak pribadi akan tetapi didalamnya mengandung unsur kebersamaan. Tanah-tanah yang dikuasai oleh masyarakat hukum adat dikenal dengan sebutan hak ulayat. Walaupun hukum adat merupakan dasar dari UUPA tetapi permasalahan terhadap hak kepemilikan atas tanah adat seringkali terjadi karena penentuan batas tanah hak ulayat yang tidak jelas, maupun karena penguasaan hak atas tanah adat oleh pemerintah tanpa ada pelepasan tanah. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa Prosedur penguasaan tanah ulayat oleh Pemda melalui mekanisme pembebasan tanah yang tertuang dalam Permendagri No. 15 Tahun 1975 lebih memberikan kesempatan kepada pihak Pemerintah untuk menguasai hak atas tanah, sedangkan pemilik/pemegang hak atas tanah mempunyai kedudukan yang sangat lemah karena banyak hak atas tanah yang diabaikan sehingga sangat melanggar hak asasi pemegang hak atas tanah. Dengan diterbitkannya Kepres No. 55 Tahun 1993 mengenai Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum sebagai pengganti Permendagri No. 15 Tahun 1975, yang memberikan suatu perlindungan kepada pemegang hak atas tanah untuk dapat mempertahankan haknya. Begitu juga halnya dengan Perpres No. 36 Tahun 2005 Jo Perpres No. 65 Tahun 2006 yang dikeluarkan sebagai pengganti Kepres No. 55 Tahun 1993, jauh lebih memberikan perlindungan kepada pihak masyarakat untuk membela haknya, sedangkan pihak pemerintah semakin terbatas dalam memperoleh tanah. Sehingga Perpres No. 65 Tahun 2006 memberikan suatu jaminan kepastian hukum kepada pemegang hak atas tanah untuk dapat mempertahankan haknya.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (25) ◽  
pp. 69-84
Author(s):  
Jhon A Mebri

Land has a very important meaning in human life, because most of human life depends on the land. There is a close correlation between man and the land and there is no human in this world who does not need the land. The land is not only understood as an economic resource, but for others it sees the land as sacred and one of the indigenous peoples of Papua must preserve. So with the government policy to allocate land for public interest often conflict with the interest of indigenous people of Papua. Related to the procurement of land is regulated in Law No. 2 of 2012 on Land Procurement for Development for Public Interest. The focus of this research is how to recognize and regulate land rights of indigenous and tribal peoples for the public interest in Papua and how are the legal effects on customary land rights for indigenous and tribal peoples in Papua? By using normative research methods it can be concluded that the recognition and regulation of indigenous peoples' rights to land as customary rights in accordance with the provisions of the Basic Agrarian Law, the Law on Special Autonomy and Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages, is recognized Of its existence and use in accordance with applicable provisions in indigenous and tribal peoples. However, in practice it is often not in accordance with the provisions in force in Indonesia, so as not to provide justice and legal certainty.The legal consequences of customary law community land acquisition for public interest are the form of indemnity for indigenous and tribal peoples through the agreed mechanism and the transfer of land rights of customary law community to the government.


Author(s):  
Ramon Hurdawaty ◽  
Vanessa Mikha Elsa ◽  
Dewi Ayu Kusumaningrum

This research aims to determine the role played by local communities in developing tourism on the island of Siau and also to find out how the government moves local people in the tourism sector. The research method used is qualitative research with descriptive methods. The data collection technique used interviews with several informants to the local community, members of the Sitaro Nature Lovers Community (KOMPAS), the Chairperson of the DPC Sitaro Indonesian Tourism Association and to the government, namely the Head of the Tourism and Culture Office of Siau Regency, Tagulandang Biaro (Sitaro). From the results of the research, there is participation by local communities in tourism on Siau Island in the form of selling food near tourist objects, maintaining tourist objects and maintaining cleanliness. The local community is also involved in the development of tourism on Siau Island. The government's role in mobilizing local communities to help in the tourism sector is still not optimal because there are still tourist objects that have not been optimally managed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document