scholarly journals Roadmap for the Development of Competition in Science and Higher Education as a Tool to Eliminate Barriers to the Growth of Competitiveness of Russian Science on Global Markets

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 4-8
Author(s):  
S.V. Maksimov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Impact ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Global Markets ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Russian Scientific ◽  
Economic Coercion ◽  
Science And Education ◽  
The Government ◽  
Scientific Results ◽  
Commercial Organizations

The issues of the negative impact of monopolization of global intellectual property markets on the practice of competition between Russian scientific and educational organizations and the competitiveness of Russian science and education are considered. The problem of “office slavery” of Russian scientists and its negative impact on budgetary financing of science are formulated. To eliminate these barriers, it was proposed to adopt in the form of an act of the Government of Russia a Roadmap for the development of competition in science and education, the draft of which was prepared with the participation of the author by a working group of the FAS Russia and the Russian Academy of Sciences. The Roadmap proposes to abandon the practice of economic coercion of Russian scientists to publish the first scientific results obtained primarily in foreign journals, indexed, first, in the WoS. At the same time, it was proposed to create based on Scientific Electronic Library eLIBRARY.RU (based on an agreement or reorganization) an open international abstract database of scientific data with the allocation of national segments of the participating states. The conditions for the formation, financing, operation and use of the resources of this base are proposed to be determined by an open intergovernmental agreement of the Russian Federation. To overcome the negative impact of the monopolization of global markets for scientific results by a narrow circle of commercial organizations, the author proposes to adopt the Declaration, and then the UN Convention on the Protection and Use of Scientific Results (Science Convention).

scholarly journals Reform of a Russian science as an institutional constructing

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-64
Author(s):  
Mikhail F. Chernysh
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Human Potential ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Social Sciences And Humanities ◽  
Global Science ◽  
Russian Scientific ◽  
Negative Role ◽  
Science And Education ◽  
Methodological Aspects

The article analyzes theoretical and methodological aspects of the ongoing reforms of the Russian science. The reforms are based on a set of ideas (myths) whose implementation was supposed to raise the effectiveness of the Russian science, form its new institutional structure, similar to the structure of science in more developed countries. The “sacral” mytholodical component of the reforms had no foundation in the traditional practices that had been shaped by the Russian scientific community in its long history. The reforms took no heed of the specific separation of science and education that had historically emerged in Russia helping to concentrate scientific assets in the most promising directions and most effective institutions. The myth of the “global science” stressing intermingling and interaction of scientific projects across the world played its negative role. The universalist project of reforms did not reflect on the basic differences between the “natural sciences” and “sciences of the spirit”. The “sacral” perception of the Western science as an ideal mechanism of selection boosting scientific achievement led to performance measurement indicators thatignored the interests of sciences and researchers in social sciences and humanities. The ongoing reforms are fraught with developments that can weaken the Russian science and its human potential, downgrade its research agenda.

scholarly journals The Review Of Changes In The Russian Science And Technology Legislation From April To September 2019

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-195
Author(s):  
Milena G. Vok
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Global Market ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Investment Fund ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Genetic Technologies ◽  
Science And Education ◽  
The Government ◽  
And Control

This article reviews Russian legislation in the science and innovation field adopted from April to September 2019. It is divided into the following topics: •science, technology and innovation policies; •integration of science and education; •intellectual property in science and innovation. Presented documents have been passed in the form of federal laws and subordinate acts, particularly, in the form of presidential decrees, government resolutions and ministerial decrees. The most important decisions include the abolition of territorial restrictions and restrictions on areas of activity for residents of the Skolkovo center by the Federal Law No. 298-FZ of 02.08.2019, which should help increase the number of project participants, as well as the development of high-tech enterprises in the regions; the approval of the Federal Research Program for Genetic Technologies Development by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 479 of 22.04.2019, which is aimed at accelerating the development of genetic technologies in the country, including genetic editing technologies, and the foundation of scientific and technological groundwork for medicine, agriculture and industry, and also improving measures for the prevention of biological emergencies and control in this area. Special attention should be given to the singing of the agreement between The Government of Russian Federation and The Russian Direct Investment Fund regarding the development of artificial intelligence technologies. The purpose of the agreement is to help Russian companies specializing in this field enter international markets and also for Russian Federation to achieve one of the leading positions in the global market in this field.

scholarly journals The review of changes in the Russian science and technology legislation from January to April 2020

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-245
Author(s):  
Milena G. Vok
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Energy Use ◽  
Policy Integration ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Technical Program ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Science And Education ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

This article reviews Russian legislation in the science and innovation field adopted from January to April 2020. It is divided into the following topics: science, technology and innovation policies; industrial policy; integration of science and education; intellectual property in science and innovation.The noteworthy documents are Federal Law No. 123-FZ of 24.04.2020, according to which it is planned to introduce an experimental legal regime in Moscow for five years related to the development and implementation of artificial intelligence technologies, and the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 270 of on 04.16.2020, according to which the Government of the Russian Federation was instructed to approve a comprehensive program “Development of equipment, technologies and scientific research in the field of atomic energy use in the Russian Federation for the period until 2024”. Also, an important regulation is the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 287 of 16.03.2020, which approved the Federal Scientific and Technical Program for the Development of Synchrotron and Neutron Research and Research Infrastructure for 2017-2027.Most of the documents have been adopted in order to implement the provisions of existing regulatory legal acts or make changes to them. They have been passed in the form of federal laws and subordinate acts, particularly, in the form of presidential decrees, government resolutions and ministerial decrees.

RESEARCH OF SCIENTIFIC DATA IN THE FIELD OF UNMANNED AVIATION SYSTEMS BASED ON PUBLICATION ACTIVITY IN THE RUSSIAN SCIENTIFIC CITATION INDEX

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (26) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
D. D. Zverev ◽  
◽  
A. S. Kostin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Citation Index ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Unmanned Aircraft ◽  
Unmanned Aircraft Systems ◽  
Publication Activity ◽  
Unmanned Aerial Systems ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Russian Scientific ◽  
Russian Science Citation Index ◽  
Aerial Systems

The article presents an analysis of publication activity in the field of unmanned aircraft systems based on the Russian Science Citation Index. This area is one of the growth points of FutureSkills competencies, therefore, the study of scientometric parameters is extremely relevant. The main publication centers, universities and institutes and scientific articles that have the highest citations and citations were obtained as the research objectives. The paper presents a retrospective analysis of the intensity of publication and presents the authors and titles of articles with the highest citations. Additionally, the main areas of application of quadcopters are considered. Key words: aeronet, unmanned aerial systems, quadrocopters, analysis of publications, research centers.

scholarly journals Key problems of the development of the scientific and technological sphere of Russia

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 88-95
Author(s):  
Vladimir Rakin
Keyword(s):  
Innovative Development ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Intellectual Activity ◽  
The Real ◽  
Western Model ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Science And Education ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Forms

There is no alternative to Russian science in the innovative development of the Russian economy. Without discussing the obvious role of science in the development of defense technologies to protect the country’s borders, under the conditions of sanctions, which inevitably hamper the development of the Russian economy, the reform of science is necessary. The main direction seems to be the creation of a full-fledged applied branch of science with a variety of organizational and legal forms. On this path, the role of education is high. A cardinal mistake in the reform of education was made with the adoption of the Western model of combining education and science. It should be taken into account that fundamental science and education represent different spheres of intellectual activity. But applied science and education are closely linked, if only for the reason that students’ interests in attractive specialties are dictated by the real prospects of the future profession used in Russian industry. The personnel policy of the Government is closely connected with the innovative development of Russia. The bureaucratic power vertical created in the country is not conducive to the entry of professionals in this or that field of knowledge into the circle of top managers. Therefore, the executive energy of managers responsible for scientific innovations is aimed exclusively at achieving the goals of formal competition with other powers, contributing little to the real scientific and technological progress in our country.

scholarly journals «WHITHER, THEN, ARE YOU SPEEDING, O RUSSIA OF MINE?» : WHAT DO SCIENTISTS THINK ABOUT THE NEW SYSTEM OF THEIR LABOR EVALUATION IN RUSSIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitrii Vasil'evich Karelin ◽  
Mikhail V. Glagolev ◽  
Aleksandr F. Sabrekov
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Journals ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Discussion Paper ◽  
Work Effectiveness ◽  
Russian Scientific ◽  
The Government ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Female Scientists ◽  
The Impact

This discussion paper is timed to the implementation of a new ranking system for assessing the scientific activities of RAS institutes in Russian Federation. Just as the scientific community was divided into supporters and opponents of this system, in the same way, enemies and followers of this system appeared in the editorial board of our journal. The positions of the first were voiced by D.V. Karelin, second - M.V. Glagolev. A.F. Sabrekov made an attempt to compare the declared arguments and formulate the outcome of the discussion. The article discusses the issues of the funding sufficiency for Russian science, the contribution of Russian scientists to the total number of publications around the world, the salaries of scientists and funding for research through grants, the work of various systems for evaluating the work of scientists adopted both in universities and academic institutions, the impact of this systems for the development of Russian scientific journals, the functioning of the modern scientific process, etc. Various administrative solutions of the accumulated problems are proposed by both sides in the discussion. Particular examples illustrate how the effectiveness of scientists actually varies and how the activity of female scientists differs from male scientists in Russia. It is concluded that the entire architecture of the system, including the managing of scientific journals, and the distribution policy of salaries and grants, and the work effectiveness assessment both for institutions and individual scientists, should be self-consistent. Multidirectional changes in the elements of the system separate from each other lead to disappointment of scientists in the government policy and Russian science at all, and, as a result, the emigration of talented young scientists.

Problems of Science and Its Effectiveness

2011 ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Varshavsky
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Public Management ◽  
External Factors ◽  
Education Sector ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Russian Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Scientific Results ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Academic Sector

The article considers current problems of Russia´s science. Special attention is paid to external factors that negatively influence its effectiveness including considerable lag in public management sector. The issues of opposing higher education sector to the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are also discussed. A number of indicators of the Russian science and its academic sector effectiveness are presented. The expediency of comparing scientific results with R&D expenditures is shown. The problems connected with using bibliometric methods are discussed. Special attention is paid to the necessity of preserving and further developing Russian science including RAS.

Advisory in Ukraine: history, achievements, prospects

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Verhunov ◽  
О. Bielova
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Education ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Information Support ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Advisory Services ◽  
Agricultural Knowledge ◽  
Current State ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Science And Education ◽  
The Government

The current state and problems of agricultural advisory organization in Ukraine on the basis of historical analysis of the evolution of the formation and development of agricultural knowledge and information in the world and in modern Ukraine, the involvement of peasants in the active use of innovative solutions in agricultural production, storage and processing of agricultural products was highlighted. The basic principles of the organization of agricultural advisory activity, features of interaction of advisory services with agrarian business, the government, a science and education were formulated. Forms of scientific-consulting and information support of the processes of transfer of innovative technologies in agro-industrial production were given. Ways to improve the organization of agricultural advisory activities in Ukraine using the potential of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine were proposed. The edition is recommended for specialists of agricultural advisory services, scientists, teachers and students of agricultural education institutions, participants of the system of training and retraining of personnel of the agro-industrial complex of Ukraine.

Analysis of Impacts Malaysia's Territorial Limitation (Lockdown) Policy on Indonesia-Malaysia Border Area, Sanggau District

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-156
Author(s):  
Ira Patriani
Keyword(s):  
Social Issues ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Border Area ◽  
Border Areas ◽  
The Government ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Virus Spreading ◽  
Kinship Ties ◽  
Collection Methods

Border areas, is one of affected area on COVID_19 this present. Many of people cn not go out as usually, adding almost each country has to implement their territorial limitation (lockdown policy) to minimalize this virus spreading. One of Malaysia State, where very close and get direct border with Indonesia. This research took place at Sanggau District, Entikong, Gun Tembawang Village.The research approach used is qualitative, using data collection methods in the form of interviews, observations, and documentation supported by interviews with the theoretical approach to the negative and positive aspects on policy implementation. Research results, The results stated that the lockdown activities of Malaysia which were affected by the corona virus outbreak needed to be carried out in an effort to minimize the spread of the virus outbreak. Although of course it has a negative impact on the country's economic structure, social issues and other sector. In implementing this lockdown, there is a need for cooperation between the government and the community as well as an agreement with neighboring countries in terms of the mobility of residents closest to each other's territory on exemptions in order to realize social welfare and public health without limiting the origin of the state, religion, community and profession. Especially in border areas where mobility and kinship ties have always been closer than in other regions. Keywords: Border area, lockdown policy, covid_19

On the Major Differences between the Banking Systems of the EAEU States

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-406
Author(s):  
T. E. Chekanova
Keyword(s):  
Financial Stability ◽  
Systems Approach ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Member States ◽  
Banking Systems ◽  
Significant Negative Impact ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government ◽  
Major Factors

The presented study examines the problems of integration of the national banking systems of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).Aim. The study aims to examine the major differences in various aspects of functioning of banking systems in the EAEU member states in terms of their impact on integration processes.Tasks. The author identifies the most prominent features of the banking systems of the EAEU states; reveals the depth of the existing differences through a comparative analysis of various indicators of national banking systems; outlines ways of overcoming integration problems associated with differences in the banking sectors of the Union states.Methods. This study is based on universal general scientific methods and elements of comparative, functional, and economic analysis within the framework of a systems approach. The author uses regulatory documents and banking reports of the EAEU states, statistical and analytical materials of the Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC), and data of Moody’s international rating agency.Results. The study identifies a number of aspects that contain the major differences in the functioning of banking systems in the EAEU member states; highlights the disproportions in the scale, level of development, financial stability, and risks of the banking spheres of the Union states; comparatively analyzes the proportion of banking and non-banking structures in the system and the share of the government and non-resident companies in the capital of banks; marks the difference in the pricing of banking services; determines differences in the existing approaches to banking regulation and the established standards; analyzes the major differences in the legislative acts of the central banks and governments of the EAEU member states and in the terms and definitions used. According to the results of the study, the major factors hindering the development of integration processes between the banking systems of the EAEU states are identified.Conclusions. The existing differences between the banking systems of the EAEU countries are diverse and multifaceted. The author states that the aspects addressed in this study have a significant negative impact on the further development of integration processes, describing the major directions and actions of the member states aimed at minimizing the exiting differences, which are required to facilitate the convergence of the states and the transition towards a common financial market.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document