Modern Kostroma onomasticon, materials and researches (through the pages of Gromov works collections)

Neophilology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 90-100
Author(s):  
Nina S. Gantsovskaya ◽  
Tatiyna V. Gorlova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Language ◽  
State University ◽  
Essential Point ◽  
Documentary Sources ◽  
Condensed Form ◽  
Rural And Urban ◽  
Ancient Times ◽  
Draw Conclusion ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
The Russian Language

We study the Kostroma onomasticon, which has been formed since ancient times and is characterized by the predominance of Slavic features, along with a significant number of substrate toponyms and anthroponyms-borrowings mediated by the Russian language. An essential point in revealing the uniqueness of the Kostroma onomasticon is the consideration of the areal features of the western and eastern Kostroma patois, formed as a result of the peculiarities of the ancient Slavic settlement of the region. Similar researches of the toponymy and anthroponymy of the Kostroma Region in the most condensed form are concentrated in a series of scientific works collections published under the auspices of the Institute of Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences and Kostroma State University and dedicated to the memory of the Kostroma regional historian A.V. Gromov (Gromov works collections). On their pages, rural and urban geographical names of the Kostroma Region are analyzed, as well as local anthroponyms on the basis of living patois, documentary sources and works of fiction in terms of their historical, geographical, modal, functional-stylistic and typological features. We reveal their place in relation to the corresponding phenomena of different strata of the Russian language, their axiological role in relation to the opposing means of an elitist (officially recognized) nature. We draw conclusion about the persistence of the original features of the Kostroma onomasticon and its value for describing the originality of the lexical system of Kostroma patois as part of Slavia.

scholarly journals Results of the international project on publishing the works of Gertsel’ Shklyar

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-268
Author(s):  
Galina D. Neganova ◽  
Veranika N. Kurcova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Language ◽  
International Project ◽  
State University ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Pedagogic Institute ◽  
Language And Literature ◽  
Card Index ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
The Russian Language ◽  
Russian Dictionary

At late December 2017, in pursuance of the previously concluded international agreement on cooperation between Kostroma State University and the Centre for Research of Belarusian Culture, Language and Literature of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, a three-year work plan was approved. It included a project aimed at systematisation, scientific interpretation and preparation for publication of the heritage of Gertsel Shklyar, a talented linguist who, in the mid-20th century, contributed a lot to Belarusian linguistics, Russian linguistics, hebraistics. In the course of the project, previously unknown facts of Gertsel’ Shklyar’s biography, summary of the results of his scientific activities during his work at the Belarusian Academy of Sciences (the 1930s) and Kostroma Pedagogic Institute (the 1940s–60s) were disclosed. The linguistic scientist worked actively in the field of Belarusian studies – he participated in the compilation of the Belarusian-Russian and Russian-Belarusian dictionaries, studied Polonisms in the Belarusian language, worked on amending the existing Belarusian-language spelling, on the creation of university textbooks on the modern Belarusian language. Together with Sof’ya Rokhkind, he created the USSR’s first “Yiddish-Russian Dictionary (Jewish-Russian Dictionary)ˮ. Research in the field of the Russian language was mainly dialectological. Gertsel’ Shklyar laid the foundations for the card index of Kostroma regional dictionary. The article examines the results of the international project, highlights the events dedicated to the presentation of the book of selected works by Gertsel’ Shklyar.

Root with Alternation of -ravn-/-rovn- (From Materials of the Academic Description of Russian Spelling)

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 90-96
Author(s):  
E. V. Arutiunova ◽  
E. V. Beshenkova ◽  
O. E. Ivanova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Language ◽  
Study Guides ◽  
Russian Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
The Given ◽  
First Time ◽  
The Russian Language

The study investigates the rule of spelling the root -ravn-/-rovn- and is considered to be a fragment of the academic description of Russian spelling, which is currently being under investigation at the Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The authors clarify the meanings that determine the spelling of the unstressed root, supplement the lists of exceptions, denote words with meanings not corresponding to the given values-criteria, and, for the first time in linguistics, investigate the words that can be correlated with different values-criteria, that is, they have double motivation. The rule codifies the spelling of words that have double motivation and fluctuate in usus, dictionaries, study guides and reference books. Spelling recommendations for these words correspond to the current linguistic norm and were approved by the Spelling Commission of the Russian Academy of Sciences in 2019. The linguistic commentary to the rule contains the most significant etymological facts concerning the root -ravn-/-rovn- and summarises the scientific and methodological attempts to figure out the distribution of vocabulary with root -ravn-/-rovn- based on the meanings selected in the spelling rules. In the paper it is shown that the instability in spelling of various verbs with the root -ravn-/-rovn- in modern writing and dictionaries is determined by the double motivation of words, as well as contradictory recommendations and gaps in the rules.

scholarly journals Литературные источники сказок вепса Ф. С. Смирнова (1863-1938)

2019 ◽  
pp. 196-203
Author(s):  
Анастасия Сергеевна Лызлова
Keyword(s):  
Fairy Tales ◽  
18Th Century ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Research Center ◽  
Literary Works ◽  
Russian Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Archival Collection ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
The Russian Language

Статья посвящена репертуару вепсского сказочника Филиппа Семеновича Смирнова (1863 - 1938), тексты которого были зафиксированы в 1935-1936 гг. преимущественно на русском языке, и позднее составили отдельную архивную коллекцию русскоязычного фольклорного фонда Научного архива Карельского научного центра РАН. Основная часть сказок вошла в опубликованный в 1941 г. в Петрозаводске сборник «Вепсские сказки», подготовленный к изданию Г. Е. Власьевым. Ф. С. Смирнов, будучи грамотным человеком, пополнял свой репертуар за счет различных литературных произведений: многие тексты, записанные от него, восходят к сказкам А. С. Пушкина, П. П. Ершова, Х. К. Андерсена, лубочным сказкам, а также переводным рыцарским романам и повестям XVIII в. The article is devoted to the repertoire of the Vepsian taleteller Filipp Semenovich Smirnov (1863 - 1938), whose texts were recorded in 1935 - 1936 mainly in Russian and later made up a separate archival collection of the Russian-language folklore fund of the Scientific Archives of the Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Most of the tales were included in the collection "Vepsian tales", published in 1941 in Petrozavodsk and compiled by G. E. Vlasyev. F. S. Smirnov, being a literate person, replenished his repertoire with various literary works: many of the texts recorded from him go back to the tales of A. S. Pushkin, P. P. Ershov, Kh. K. Andersen, cheap popular (luboc) fairy tales, translated knightly novels and stories of the 18th century.

scholarly journals Принципы построения русско-польского словаря разговорной речи

2018 ◽  
Vol 165 ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
Dorota Drużyłowska
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
International Project ◽  
State University ◽  
Colloquial Language ◽  
Initial Work ◽  
The University ◽  
Colloquial Speech ◽  
Crucial Part ◽  
The Russian Language

Principles of Formation of the Russian-Polish Dictionary of Colloquial LanguageThis paper is the result of the initial work on a project aimed to develop Russian-Polish dictionary of colloquial language.The work on the dictionary started in 2015 as part of an international project run by the Centre of the Russian Language at the Institute of Slavic Studies at The University of Wroclaw, as well as the State University of St. Petersburg. Both lecturers and the graduate and post-graduate students formed the lexicographical group.The main purpose of the article is to define the meaning of colloquial language in every­day communication, regarding the changes that have occurred in recent decades at the lexical and phraseological level of the language. The author also presents and analyses the variety of this level of the Russian language. Moreover, the objective factors to develop Russian-Polish dictionary of colloquial speech are named. The crucial part of the article is devoted to the presentation of the microstructure of the dictionary. The author presents exemplary dictionary entries and discusses their particular elements.Zasady budowy rosyjsko-polskiego słownika języka potocznegoNiniejszy artykuł jest wynikiem wstępnej realizacji międzynarodowego projektu leksykograficznego zmierzającego do opracowania rosyjsko-polskiego słownika mowy potocznej.Pracę nad słownikiem rozpoczęto w 2015 roku w ramach międzynarodowego projektu Cen­trum Języka Rosyjskiego Instytutu Filologii Słowiańskiej Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego oraz Pań­stwowego Uniwersytetu w Petersburgu. W skład zespołu leksykograficznego weszli zarówno wy­kładowcy, jak i doktoranci oraz studenci IFS.Celem artykułu jest przede wszystkim określenie miejsca języka potocznego w codziennej ko­munikacji, zwrócenie uwagi na zmiany, jakie zaszły w ostatnich dziesięcioleciach na płaszczyźnie leksykalnej i frazeologicznej tej odmiany języka, i omówienie obiektywnych czynników przema­wiających za podjęciem pracy nad wspomnianym słownikiem.Drugą część artykułu poświęcono prezentacji wybranych artykułów hasłowych.

scholarly journals An Experimental Study of the Lingual Consciousness of Ukrainians and Russians (Dynamic Aspect)

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-110
Author(s):  
Діана Терехова
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Ethnic Group ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Scientific Investigations ◽  
Group Members ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
The Russian Language ◽  
Russian Dictionary

The study of the lingual consciousness of various ethnic group representatives does not lose its topicality in psycholinguistic investigation for decades. During the period of the formation and development of psycholinguistics, scholars have gained considerable experience in holding associative experiments, the results of which are reflected in associative dictionaries and individual scientific investigations. This material is valuable in several aspects of the investigation in particular as an object of the study of the lingual consciousness of the certain language speakers for  the duration of the experiment; in the comparable aspect for the identification of common and distinguishing features in the lingual consciousness of the representatives of different ethnic groups as well as to find out the changes in the lingual consciousness of a certain ethnic group members according to the experimental data received at a certain time interval etc. The article focuses on revealing the dynamics in the lingual consciousness of the representatives of the two East Slavic peoples. The experimental data were drawn both from lexicographic psycholinguistic works and from author’s experimental studies held in 2000 and 2012 representing the changes in the corresponding fragments of the world image in Ukrainians and Russians. References Жайворонок В. В. Знаки української етнокультури: Словник-довідник / В. В. Жайворонок. К.: Довіра, 2006. Марковина И. Ю., Данилова Е. В. Специфика языкового сознания русских и американцев: опыт построения «ассоциативного гештальта» текстов оригинала и перевода // Языковое сознание и образ мира / Отв. ред. Н. В. Уфим­цева. М.: Институт языкознания РАН, 2000. С. 116-132. Степанов Ю. С. Константы: Словарь русской культуры: Изд. 2-е, испр. и доп. М.: Академический Проект, 2001. References (translated and transliterated) Zhaivoronok, V. V. (2006) Znaky Ukrayinckoyi Etnokultury: Slovnyk-Dovidnyk [Signs of the Ukrainian Ethnoculture: Dictionary-Reference Book]. Kyiv: Dovira. Markovina, I. U., Danilova, E. V. (2000) Spetsifika jazykovogo soznaniya russkih i amerikantsev: opit postrojenija “assotsiativnogo geshtalta” tekstov originala i perevoda [The peculiarity of the lingual consciousness of Russians and Americans: the experience of constructing an “associative gestalt” of the original and translation texts]. In: Yazykovoye Soznaniye i Obraz Mira, (pp. 116-132) .N. Ufimtseva, Ed. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Stepanov, Yu. S. (2001). Konstanty: Slovar Russkoy Kultury: 2nd edition [Constants: Dictionary of the Russian Culture]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt. Джерела Бутенко Н. П. Словник асоціативних норм української мови. Львів: Вища школа, 1979. Ожегов С., Шведова Н. Толковый словарь русского языка. Режим доступа: https://classes.ru/all-russian/russian-dictionary-Ozhegov-term-10012.htm САС – Славянский ассоциативный словарь: русский, белорусский, болгарский, ук­ра­инский / Н. В. Уфимцева, Г. А. Черкасова, Ю. Н. Караулов, Е.Ф. Тарасов. М., 2004. САНРЯ – Словарь ассоциативных норм русского языка / Под ред. А. А. Леонтьева. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1977. Словник української мови: Академічний тлумачний словник (1970-1980). Т. 3. С. 557. Sources Butenko, N. P. (1979). Slovnyk Asotsiatyvnykh Norm Ukrayinckoyi Movy [Dictionary of the Associative Norms of the Ukrainian language]. Lviv: Vyshcha Shkola. Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language. (1970-1980). Vol. 3, P. 557. Ozhegov, S., Shvedova, N. The Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language. Retrieved from: https://classes.ru/all-russian/russian-dictionary-Ozhegov-term-10012.htm Slavyanskiy Assotsiativnyi Slovar: Russkiy, Belorusskiy, Bolgarskiy, Ukrainskiy (2004) [Slavic Associative Dictionary: Russian, Belorusian, Bulgarian, Ukrainian]. N. Ufimtseva, G. Cher­kasova, Yu. Karaulov, Ye. Tarasov, (Eds). Moscow. Slovar Assocziativnyh Norm Russkogo Yazyka (1977). [Dictionary of Associative Norms of the Russian Language]. A. A. Leontyev, Ed. Moscow: Moscow University.

scholarly journals Еміль Балецький - дослідник закарпатських українських говорів (другий етап наукової діяльності) До 100-річчя від дня народження

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26
Author(s):  
ЄЛИЗАВЕТА БАРАНЬ
Keyword(s):  
Assistant Professor ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
State University ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Slavonic Language ◽  
History Of ◽  
University Of Budapest ◽  
The University ◽  
The Russian Language

Emil Baleczky (his pseudonyms: E. Latorchanin, O. Vyshchak, and his cryptonym: E. A.) is one of the most prominent personalities in the history of Ukrainian studies in Hungary in the twentieth century. His main scientific interests include Transcarpathian dialectology and historical lexicology of the Ukrainian language. The second stage of the scientist's professional carrier is connected with the University of Budapest, where in 1951, Emil Baleczky was appointed head of the Department of the Russian Language at the Institute of Foreign Languages, and at the same time assistant professor of the Russian Institute at the University. Among the scientific interests of Emil Baleczky was the investigation of lexical units commonly used in Transcarpathia, first of all, in terms of their etymology. Among the achievements of the researcher, special attention must be paid to Emil Baleczky's attempt to determine the origin of some borrowed words, including those originally Slavic, which are common in the Carpathian Ukrainian dialects. Emil Baleczky performed a deep etymological and lingual-geographical analysis of the word урик, урюк, орек in the Ukrainian language, that of the word дюг widespread in Precarpathian Ukrainian, Polish, and Slovakian dialects, and also that of the noun kert in Transcarpathian Ukrainian dialects. The author devoted a separate paper to the study of the origin of dialecticisms like фотляк, csulka ~ csurka, бôшн’ак, булґар’, валах, ґириґ, тôўт, and циганин, investigated the etymology of the terms of national dishes widespread in Carpathian Ukrainian dialects, in particular of the token бáник. He considered the role of the Old Church Slavonic language in the history of the Carpathian Ukrainian dialects. According to his contemporaries, it is known that Emil Baleczky did not maintain official connections with the Soviet Transcarpathians but was surprisingly well-informed about the scientific processes in his native land. He analyzed the works contained in the two editions of the Dialectological Collection of Uzhgorod State University. In addition to examining the issues raised, Baleczky complemented, specified, and sometimes criticized the achievements of his colleagues, which indicates his deep knowledge of Transcarpathian Ukrainian dialectology. Thus, we can state that Emil Baleczky's works testify the high professionalism of the author, his profound knowledge in the field of synchronic and diachronic dialectology. The love of Transcarpathian dialects inspired the researcher to study them thoroughly as well as to present the research results to the general public of Slavists. The main area of Emil Baleczky's scientific interest until the end of his life was Ukrainian linguistics, particularly Transcarpathian Ukrainian dialectology. The aim of this paper is to present the Emil Baleczky's achievements in the field of Transcarpathian Ukrainian dialectology, focusing on the period from 1957 to 1979.

scholarly journals TO THE 35th ANNIVERSARY OF SIGNING A COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN LEON UNIVERSITY AND VORONEZH STATE UNIVERSITY

2021 ◽  
pp. 122-126
Author(s):  
В.В. Корнева ◽  
И.Е. Шигина
Keyword(s):  
International Education ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
State University ◽  
Cooperation Agreement ◽  
Current State ◽  
History Of ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
The University ◽  
The Russian Language

Статья посвящена 35-летию подписания договора между Леонским и Воронежским государственным университетами. В ней содержатся краткий экскурс в историю подписания договора и современное состояние международного академического сотрудничества двух университетов в области преподавания русского языка. Дается обзор материалов, использовавшихся преподавателями ВГУ при обучении испанских студентов РКИ, а также краткое описание организации учебного процесса по русскому языку в Леонском университете. Особое внимание уделяется описанию апробации в Леонском университете интерактивного учебника для испаноговорящих «Ruso Comunicativo», созданного коллективом Института международного образования ВГУ. The article is dedicated to the 35th anniversary of the signing of the Agreement between Leon University and Voronezh State University. It contains a brief excursion into the history of the signing of the Agreement and the current state of international academic cooperation between the two universities in the field of teaching the Russian language. An overview of the materials used by VSU teachers in teaching Spanish students Russian as a foreign language is given, as well as a brief description of the organization of the educational process in the Russian language at the University of León. Particular attention is paid to the story about the testing at the University of León of the interactive textbook for Spanish-speaking students «Ruso Comunicativo», created by the team of the Institute of International Education of Voronezh State University.

scholarly journals Profesor Iryda Grek-Pabisowa (1932–2021)

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Ostrówka ◽  
Mirosław Jankowiak
Keyword(s):  
Russian Language ◽  
Deputy Director ◽  
Important Research ◽  
Language And Culture ◽  
Old Believers ◽  
The North ◽  
Research Areas ◽  
North Eastern ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
The Russian Language

Professor Iryda Grek-Pabisowa (1932–2021)This article presents the profile of Iryda Grek-Pabisowa, a renowned linguist, associated with the Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences for sixty years. She was a long-serving head of North Borderland Polish, and the deputy director of the Institute for two terms (1996–2003). She was a pioneer of research on the language and culture of Old Believers in Poland, and the language of Poles in Belarus and Lithuania. The most important research areas on which she focused were dialectology and lexicography: the study and description of the subdialects of Old Believers living in Poland (e.g. A Dictionary of the Dialect of Old Believers Living in Poland), the Russian language (e.g. The Great Russian-Polish Dictionary) and North Borderland Polish (7 monographs and A Dictionary of the Spoken Polish of the North-Eastern Borderland). She is the author or co-author of about 160 articles, 11 monographs and 7 dictionaries. In 1974–2003 she was associated with the journal Acta Baltico-Slavica, initially as its secretary and then editor-in-chief.  Profesor Iryda Grek-Pabisowa (1932–2021) Opracowanie przedstawia sylwetkę Irydy Grek-Pabisowej, znanej językoznawczyni przez 60 lat związanej z Instytutem Slawistyki Polskiej Akademii Nauk. Przez wiele lat kierowała Pracownią Polszczyzny Północnokresowej. Przez dwie kadencje pełniła funkcję wicedyrektorki ds. naukowych w IS PAN (1996–2003). Była prekursorką badań języka i kultury staroobrzędowców w Polsce oraz języka Polaków na Białorusi i Litwie. Do najważniejszych kierunków badawczych należały dialektologia i leksykografia: badanie i opis gwar staroobrzędowców mieszkających w Polsce (m.in. Słownik gwary starowierców mieszkających w Polsce), język rosyjski (m.in. Wielki słownik rosyjsko-polski) oraz polszczyzna północnokresowa (7 monografii oraz Słownik mówionej polszczyzny północnokresowej). Jest autorką lub współautorką około 160 artykułów, 11 monografii i 7 słowników. W latach 1974–2003 była związana z rocznikiem „Acta Baltico-Slavica”, początkowo jako sekretarz, a następnie jako redaktor naczelna.

scholarly journals Dialectal vocabulary of labour activities of the people residing on the banks of the Nepryadva River

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
N. A. Krasovskaya ◽  
L. V. Kilmamatova
Keyword(s):  
Animal Husbandry ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Professional Discourse ◽  
The People ◽  
Ancient Times ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Professional Occupation ◽  
The Russian Language ◽  
Empirical Material ◽  
Poultry Farming

The main goal of this article is to draw readers' attention to the dialectal vocabulary, which belongs to the thematic group of labour. Dialectal vocabulary is most often associated with historical facts, it reflects the traditional worldview of a person, his/her system of values. The article considers lexical units that were recorded on a territory rich in its historical and cultural past. This article is devoted to the analysis of dialectal vocabulary, reflecting labour activity and professional occupation of people living in the basin of the upper reaches of the Nepryadva River. Since ancient times, the population of this region was engaged in various activities and crafts. The thematic group “Labour activity” comprises a whole complex of subgroups that have repeatedly become the subject of consideration by linguists. In the framework of the article, the authors focus on the lexical empirical material that exists in the Tula group of dialects. They analyze a particular part of lexis that reflects important areas of human activity, such as field cultivation, gardening, horticulture, animal husbandry, poultry farming. As a result of the study, it is concluded that the dialectal vocabulary of the specified thematic group is a system, and the selected empirical material makes it possible to see the identity in the dialects of the studied settlements and certain differences. It should be emphasized that, despite the persistent tendency to leveling, dialectal lexical units related to the thematic group of labour continue to exist in modern dialects of the Russian language. The considered lexical units and samples of dialectal professional discourse require further scientific consideration.

L. V. Scherba – a Theoretician and Practitioner of Russian Lexicography

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-101
Author(s):  
E. G. Stukova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Language ◽  
Saint Petersburg ◽  
Archival Documents ◽  
History Of ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
High Level ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
The Russian Language ◽  
Very High ◽  
Made In

The article analyses some aspects of lexicographic activity of L. V. Scherba: it examines his contribution into the development of the theory of lexicography, gives a survey of the dictionaries compiled with his participation in the 1920s–30s of the XX century, introduces to the scientific community some little-known facts of his lexicographic activity of the period. In addition to a general scientific overview of special literature and the analysis of his «Dictionary of the Russian Language», the article presents facts of the archival documents from Saint Petersburg branch of the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The article deals with such unknown or little-known facts as L. V. Schera’s personal participation in the 1920s–30s in a number of lexicographic projects in Moscow and Leningrad: he took part in the compilation of «Lenin’s» dictionary of the Russian language, made in Moscow, A. S. Griboyedov’s «Woe from Wit» dictionary. A special page in the history of L. V. Scherba’s lexicographic activity became his work as a member of the Dictionary commission of the Academy of Sciences, his being an editor of a number of issues of the «Dictionary of the Russian Language» under the general edition of A. A. Shahmatov, and also compilation of the IX volume of the «Dictionary of the Russian Language» edited by N. S. Derzhavin. The article gives a brief analysis of the materials of the only published first issue («И – Идеализироваться») of this volume. The article summarizes important and topical for the theory of lexicography L. V. Sherba’s observations and statements resulting from his considerable practical dictionary making work. The article gives a brief account of concrete lexicographic material testifying for a very high level of the scientist’s lexicographic work.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document