scholarly journals KEEFEKTIFAN MODEL TGT DAN JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PEMBELAJARANEKONOMI SMA NEGERI DI SLEMAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-137
Author(s):  
Agus Hariyanto ◽  
Darmiyati Zuchdi

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menguji: (1) keefektifan model Teams Games Tournament (TGT)  dan model  Jigsaw dengan pendekatan saintifik, (2)  membandingkan keefektifan model TGT  dan Jigsaw dengan pendekatan saintifik dalam pembelajaran ekonomi SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Sleman. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest postest non equivalent group design.  Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas X SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Sleman. Hasil penelitian sebagai berikut: 1) Model TGT dan Jigsaw dengan pendekatan saintifik efektif  meningkatkan hasil belajar ranah kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. 2) Ada perbedaan keefektifan signifikan antara model TGT dan Jigsaw. Model Jigsaw mempunyai jumlah indeks gain score ranah kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotoriklebih tinggi dibandingkan TGT. Model TGT mempunyai gain score lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Jigsaw untuk hasil belajar ranah kognitif. Model Jigsaw mempunyai gain score lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan TGT untuk hasil belajar ranah afektif. Model TGT dan Jigsaw menunjukkan gain score yang sama  untuk hasil belajar ranah psikomotorik.THE EFECTIVENESS OF THE TGT AND JIGSAW MODELS USING THESCIENTIFIK APPROACHIN ECONOMICS LEARNINGAT STATE SHSs IN SLEMAN AbstractThis study aims to test: (1) the effectiveness of the Teams Games Tournament (TGT)  and Jigsaw modelsusing  the scientific approach. (2) tocompare the effectiveness of the TGT and Jigsaw models using the scientific approach in economics learning at state SHSs in Sleman Regency. This was a quasi-experimental study pretest postest non equivalent group design employing the pretest-posttest design. The research population comprised Grade X students of state SHSs in Sleman Regency. The results of the study are as follows. 1) The TGT and the Jigsaw modelswhich are implemented using the scientific approach effectivelyimproves the learning outcome in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotoric domains. 2) There isa significant difference in terms of effectiveness between the two models. Jigsaw model is generates a higher gain score than TGT that was indicated by results of the sum of index gain score cognitive,  affective, and psychomotoric aspects learning outcomes. The TGT learning model generates a higher gain score than the Jigsaw for the cognitive domain. The Jigsaw model, however, produces a higher gain score than the TGT  for the affective domain. Compared to the Jigsaw model, the TGT learning model shows an equal gain score for the psychomotoric domain.

Author(s):  
Imanuel Alan Onibala ◽  
Parsaoran Tamba ◽  
Denny Maukkar

ABSTRAK. Media pendidikan sebagai salah satu sarana meningkatkan mutu pendidikan sangat penting dalam proses PBM. Penggunaan media pendidikan dapat memperbaiki PBM siswa yang pada gilirannya dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar yang dicapainya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) terhadap hasil siswa pada mata pelajaran Motor Bensin kelas XI di SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. Penelitian ini dikategorikan dalam penelitian Eksperimen Semu (quasi exsperimental). Desain penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah desain jenis pre-test dan post-test group design. Berdasarkan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai t hitung sebesar 4,4360 dan nilai t tabel 1,6772 artinya  nilai t hitung lebih besar dari t tabel maka signifikan. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada penggunaan model pembelajaran Kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization)  dan konvensional terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di SMK N 1 Motoling. Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar, Team Assisted Individualization.   ABSTRACT. Educational media as a means of improving the quality of education is very important in the PBM process. The use of educational media can improve students' PBM which in turn can improve the learning outcomes they achieve. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) cooperative learning model on student outcomes in the XI class of gasoline motorbike subjects at SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. This research is categorized as a quasi-experimental research. The research design used in this study was a pre-test and post-test group design. Based on the hypothesis test, the t value is 4.4360 and the t table value is 1.6772, which means that the t value is greater than the t table, so it is significant. These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the use of the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and conventional to the achievement of student learning outcomes at SMK N 1 Motoling. Keywods: Learning Outcomes, Team Assisted Individualization.


2022 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-57
Author(s):  
Imanuel Alan Onibala ◽  
I. Parsaoran Tamba ◽  
Denny Maukar

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) terhadap hasil siswa pada mata pelajaran Motor Bensin kelas XI di SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. Penelitian ini dikategorikan dalam penelitian Eksperimen Semu (quasi exsperimental). Desain penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah desain jenis pre-test dan post-test group design. Berdasarkan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai t hitung sebesar 4,4360 dan nilai t tabel 1,6772 artinya  nilai t hitung lebih besar dari t tabel maka signifikan. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada penggunaan model pembelajaran Kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization)  dan konvensional terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di SMK N 1 Motoling.     Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar, Team Assisted Individualization. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) cooperative learning model on student outcomes in the XI class of gasoline motorbike subjects at SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. This research is categorized as a quasi-experimental research. The research design used in this study was a pre-test and post-test group design. Based on the hypothesis test, the t value is 4.4360 and the t table value is 1.6772, which means that the t value is greater than the t table, so it is significant. These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the use of the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and conventional to the achievement of student learning outcomes at SMK N 1 Motoling.           Keywods: Learning Outcomes, Team Assisted Individualization.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 274
Author(s):  
Hani Wardah Latipah ◽  
Adman Adman

The Problem in this research is about the low of student learning outcomes of learners on the basic competence to identifying facilities and office environment in class X of Office Administration Program in SMK Negeri 3 Bandung. It was shown from the daily test score that are still under Minimum Mastery Criteria.The objective of this research is to measure students learning outcomes, using Mind Mapping model and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model so that it can be known which learning model improves learners' learning outcomes. It can be seen by the improvement of learning outcomes after the treatment which is analyzed based on N-Gain.The method used in this research is quasi experimental method and used the Nonequivalent Control Group Design.. The research subject were grade X of Office Administration program namely X Office Administration 1 as the experimental class and X Office Administration 4 as the control class.The results shows that the learners' learning outcomes are equivalent. The evidence is from the N-Gain results in the experimental class of 0.646 and the control class of 0.582 in the medium category. Based on normalized N-Gain and hypothesis test using different test (t-Test) proven that tcount < ttable is 1.236251286 <1.666293697. Hence, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference between using Mind Mapping learning model with the model of learning Numbered Head Together (NHT).Permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah rendahnnya hasil belajar peserta didik pada kompetensi dasar mengidentifikasikan fasilitas dan lingkungan kantor di kelas X program keahlian Administrasi Perkantoran SMKN 3 Bandung yang terlihat dari nilai ulangan harian yang masih dibawah KKM.Tujuan dilaksanakannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengukur hasil belajar peserta didik, dengan menggunakan model Mind Mapping dan model Numbered Head Together (NHT) sehingga dapat diketahui manakah model pembelajaran yang meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik. Hal ini dilihat dari peningkatan hasil pembelajaran setelah dilakukan treatment yang dianalisis berdasarkan N-Gain.Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen semu (quasi experiment) dengan desain Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Subjek penelitian ini yaitu kelas XAP1 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan XAP4 sebagai kelas kontrol.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hasil belajar peserta didik setara. Hal ini terbukti dari hasil N-Gain pada kelas eksperimen sebesar 0.646 dan pada kelas kontrol sebesar 0.582 yang berada pada kategori sedang. Berdasarkan N-Gain ternormalisasi dan uji hipotesis menggunakan uji beda (t-Test) yang terbukti bahwa thitung < ttabel yaitu 1.236251286 < 1.666293697. Sehingga, dapat disimpulkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping dengan model pembelajaran Numbered Head Together (NHT). 


Author(s):  
Sartika Sepriyani ◽  
Rayandra Asyhar ◽  
Asrial Asrial

The ability to solve problems is a skill that students need to have in dealing with various problems in life. This study aims to determine the effect of problem based learning models; cognitive styles and interaction between both factors on science learning outcomes of students in class VII of MTs 2 Tanjung Jabung Timur in academic year 2015/2016. This research was conducted with a quasi-experimental research method by applying a 2 × 2 factorial design. The study sample consisted of an experimental class of 30 students and a control class of 29 students. Data collection was conducted using two types of instruments, namely the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) to measure students cognitive styles and students' learning outcomes test in essay forms. The Problem Based Learning model affect the learning outcomes, there is significant difference in science learning outcomes between students who have Cognitive field dependent (FD) style that is taught by the Problem Based Learning model and students who have Cognitive FD style that is taught by conventional learning models. The results show that the value of the experimental class post-test is higher than that of the control class. In short, the experimental class with the application of the Problem Based Learning model in the learning process provides higher learning outcomes than that of the conventional models.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-118
Author(s):  
Galih Puji Mulyoto ◽  
Samsuri Samsuri

This study was aimed at determining the effect of applying a project citizen model with the scientific approach in learning PPKn the mastery of civic competencies. This study uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental research methods. Data collection technique were test, questionnaire and observation. Data were analyzed using t test and Gain Score. The results showed that there is significant influence implementation of the project citizen model with the scientific approach to learning PPKn the mastery of civic competencies compared using problem-based learning model with a scientific approach. It is shown results posttest control group and experiment to 7.182 2.000 ttabel. In every dimension of civic competencies also shows the results of a significant difference, namely: civic knowledge (to 6.088 2.000 ttable), civic skills (to 2,554 ttable 2.000), civic attitude (to 2,055 ttable 2.000). Analysis Gain score in the experimental class showed 0.38 results in the category of "moderate", while the control group showed 0.15 results in the category of "low".


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31
Author(s):  
Eka Putri Kartini Pasaribu ◽  
Samsidar Tanjung ◽  
Edidon Hutasuhut

This study aims to find out the use of inquiry learning models and conventional learning models in student IPS learning outcomes, to know the differences in IPS learning outcomes of students who have high learning independence with students who have low learning independence, and to know the interaction between the learning model and the independence of learning to the student's IPS learning outcomes. This research is a quasi-experimental study with the research population is all grade IV students as many as 60 students with samples are all grade IV students (A and B) who take IPS subjects. From the research, it was produced that the inquiry learning model is higher than the use of conventional learning model shown by Fcount = 3.86 > Ftable = 2.77 at a significant level a= 0.05. IPS learning outcomes of students who have higher learning independence than students who have low learning independence indicated by Fcount = 3.74 > Ftable = 2.77 at a significant level a= 0.05. There is an interaction between the learning model and the independence of learning to the student's IPS learning outcomes indicated by Fcount = 3.64 > Ftable = 2.77 at a significant level a= 0.05. The conclusion of this study shows that inquiry learning is better used for students who have high learning independence while conventional learning models are well used for students who have low learning independence in order to have interactions between learning models and self-reliance learning.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-80
Author(s):  
Filfiana Filda ◽  
Rulianto

The purpose of this study was (1) to find out whether applying the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model could increase the interest in studying Social History History in Grade VII.3 students of SMPN 7 Denpasar and (2) to find out whether the application of the Numbered type cooperative learning model Heads Together (NHT) can improve social studies history learning outcomes for Grade VII.3 students of SMPN 7 Denpasar. The method used in this research is the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning method with observation, interview, documentation, and questionnaire data collection. Research shows that student learning outcomes can be seen in Cycle I that the cognitive domain value of students is an average of 6.75 and 52.7% completeness, from the affective domain the value obtained by students is very good 27.7%, good 58.3% and enough 13.3%. While from the psychomotor domain, the scores obtained by students were very good 63.8%, good 27.7% and 8.3% sufficient. In Cycle II the value of the cognitive domain of students is an average of 80 and 100% completeness, from the affective domain the value obtained by students is very good 8.3%, 8.3% good, while from the psychomotor domain the value obtained by students is very good 94 , 4% and good 5.5%


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Imam Kisnanto ◽  
Muhamad Sholehhudin ◽  
Joko Setiyono

This research aims to determine whether the Quantum Learning model based on the Scientific approach can provide better learning outcomes rather than direct learning model. This research is a quasi experimental research with matching static group comparison design. The research instrument used to obtain data is in the form of documentation and test. The calculation of the hypothesis test the value of tcount > ttable where tcount = 1.83 and ttable = 1.68 at the significant level of 5% with dk=50. The conclusions from the analysis of the hypothesis test is that the Quantum Learning model based on Scientific approach provides better learning outcomes than students who were taught using direct learning models.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-155
Author(s):  
Yenni Hasnah ◽  
Pirman Ginting ◽  
Selamat Husni Hasibuan

This research aims to analyze the learning model's practice and its effect on increasing student activity and learning outcomes in listening subjects. This study employed quasi-experimental research with a non-equivalent control group design. The data were gained using observation and tests. It is analyzed by reflection and statistical test of SPPS. The results show that the application of the AMETTA learning model effectively develops student learning activities and outcomes. The result of hypothesis testing with sig. (2-tailed) was 0.033 (˂ 0.05) It indicates that Ho is rejected. Thus, there is a significant difference between the average student learning outcomes in the experimental and control classes. In other words, the application of AMETTA learning model has a significant effect on students’ learning outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ria Deswita ◽  
Yaya S Kusumah

This research is motivated by the importance of mathematical communication ability. Mathematical communication ability of students is still low. In order that this problem can be solved, a learning model that can enhance mathematical communication ability of students is required. In this research, CORE model learning with scientific approach was selected. This study aims to analyze the enhancement of mathematical communication ability. This research was a quasi-experimental with nonequivalent control group design. The population was students in eighth grade in one of the junior high schools in Jambi.  The sample consisted of two classes which were selected by purposive sampling. The instrument of this research is a test of mathematical communication ability. The data were analyzed by using Independent t-test. Based on the data analyzed, it is found that: The enhancement of mathematical communication ability of students who received the CORE learning model with scientific approach is better than the enhancement of students who received conventional learning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document