scholarly journals The Position of the Qanun Jinayat as a Forum for the Implementation of Sharia in Aceh in the Indonesian Constitution

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 689
Author(s):  
Mohd Din ◽  
Al Yasa' Abubakar
Keyword(s):  
Legal History ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
East Indies ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Primary Reference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government ◽  
History Approach ◽  
Analytical Tools ◽  
Special Rights

The purpose of this paper is to describe the position of the Qanun Jinayat as a forum for the implementation of Sharia in Aceh within the framework of the Indonesian constitution. It is considered essential because the implementation of Sharia is conducted based on the UUPA (Law on Governing of Aceh). However, its implementation is often misunderstood, causing the implementation of Sharia to face many challenges from various parties, including the government's official institutions. This article is written to answer the main problem: the alignment of regulations, qanuns, with other laws and regulations. This study is normative legal research using a legal history approach. The analytical tools used are the theory of leveling norms and asymmetric decentralization. The study results show that the Sharia qanuns in Aceh, especially the Qanun Jinayat, have a different position from the regional regulations in other provinces in Indonesia. The difference lies in the special right of the Government of Aceh as a region with asymmetrical decentralization to make its regulations which at a certain level are permitted to be inconsistent with the laws on higher hierarchy. However, it must still align with the basic norms as the primary reference. The existence of special rights for Aceh is considered natural because of its long history, mainly when it is associated with the development of criminal law in Indonesia, which until now still uses the KUHP inherited from the Dutch East Indies. This specificity is a legal order regarding autonomous or special regions.

scholarly journals Identifying ‘Illat through Munasabah in Islamic Law: A Perspective of Imam Al-Ghazali

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 598
Author(s):  
Khairuddin Hasballah ◽  
Andi Darna ◽  
Wardana Said ◽  
Hajarul Akbar ◽  
Ihdi Karim Makinara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Legal History ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Analytical Tool ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
History Approach ◽  
The Way

This study discusses the way in determining ‘illat through the munasabah method proposed by Imam al-Ghazali in the perspective of Islamic law. The study focuses on two main problems: the identification of ‘illat through munasabah and the legal formulation to utilize hikmat to obtain ‘illat according to al-Ghazali. This normative legal research used a legal history approach as an analytical tool to examine the Islamic scholars’ thoughts on concepts, theories and ways of doing istinbath. The study concluded that according to al-Ghazali there are three kinds of munasabah in determining ‘illat, consisting of munasib mu’atstsir, munasab mula’im, and munasib gharib. In munasib mu’atstsir, there is no issue found in seeking ‘illat because the ‘illat is understood directly from the nash or ijma’. Therefore, munasabah is no longer needed in the determining ‘illat. Here, the munasabah method focuses on munasib mula’im and munasib gharib in identifying ‘illat. Munasib mula’im seeks for the genus ‘illat, an ‘illat drawn from every event that has been predetermined by the nash, by examining the same hikmah in each of the events. Such hikmah is then used as the genus ‘illat which will later be applied as qiyas for other events that have been legally stipulated by the nash. On the other hand, munasib gharib seeks for the species ‘illat, an ‘illat obtained from an event that has been predetermined by the nash, with no comparison found in other events. ‘Illat determined from munasib gharib is also hikmah, having no concrete nature. In the perspective of legal history, this method of seeking ‘illat is inseparable from kalam and philosophy as was the development of the Islamic sciences at the time. As such, this had also affected al-Ghazali’s mastery in Islamic law as well as in other Islamic disciplines. 

scholarly journals Perbandingan Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Verwaltungsgerecht sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Rakyat

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Dani Habibi
Keyword(s):  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Court System ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Comparison Approach ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government

Permasalahan hukum yang akan dibahas dalam tulisan ini mengenai gambaran sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Jerman dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Jerman pada hakikatnya sama dengan sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Sistem tersebut dapat dilihat dari adanya jenjang sistem peradilan mulai dari tingkat pertama, tingkat banding, dan tingkat akhir atau kasasi. Selain itu akan diulas berkaitan dengan proses peradilan, dasar-dasar dilakukannya gugatan yang diajukan terhadap pemerintah serta cara pelaksanaan proses peradilan tata usaha negara di masing-masing negara. Metode penelitian adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan perbandingan hukum. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara baik di Indonesia maupun di Jerman serta mengetahui perbedaam sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara baik di Indonesia maupun di Jerman serta melakukan suatu pembaruan sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia sebagai bentuk suatu perlindungan hukum kepada rakyat A Comparative Law of Administrative Court and Verwaltungsrecht as a Form of Legal Protection to People Legal issues that will be discussed in this paper regarding the description of the Germany Administrative Court system and the Indonesia Administrative Court system. Generally, There are similarities between the Administrative Court system in Germany and in Indonesia. It can be seen from the level of the justice system starting from the first level, the appeal level and the final level or cassation. In addition, this paper will review the judicial process, the basics of lawsuit against the government and how to implement the state administrative court processes in each country. The research method is normative legal research with legislation and legal comparison approach. The purpose of this research is to find out the Administrative Court System and to know the difference between the Administrative Courts System both in Indonesia and in Germany and also to reform the Administrative Court system in Indonesia as a form of legal protection for people.

scholarly journals Implementation of marriage itsbat in Aceh

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-134
Author(s):  
Aulia Mubarak ◽  
M. Adli ◽  
Iman Jauhari
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Socialization ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Government ◽  
Positive Impacts ◽  
Legal Force

This paper describes the process of marriage itsbat in Aceh and its approval factors despite its non-compliance with the applicable provisions. From the study results, it is known that the judge determining marriage itsbat prioritized benefit (maslahah) for the litigants. Its approval is considered to have more positive impacts, both for the litigants and their children. When it is granted, their marriage has had legal force and is recognized by the state, with the result that the litigants and their children have the same rights as those who register their marriage. This study used empirical legal research method obtained by conducting interviews. For further suggestion, it is expected that the government give legal socialization to increase public awareness of the importance of marriage registration

scholarly journals Implementasi Hukum Pasal 35 Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2004 dalam Program Recognised Seasonal Employment

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Lukas Banu
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Know How ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government ◽  
Minimum Education ◽  
Real Action

Indonesia regulations are ensuring that work as the human right for all people and therefore the state is expected to protect it. The workers have same right and opportunity without discrimination to create the income for them and their families. One of the real action of the government in protecting the workers is making and applying the Act Number 39/2004 on Placement and Protection of Indonesian Workers. The purpose of this research is to know how Article 35 of Act Number 39/2004 would be implemented in particular for Indonesian workers who work under Recognised Seasonal Employment New Zealand scheme. The research is very important to be done to find the difference between the regulation which made by Indonesian government on a category of minimum education that determined by law for the candidate of Indonesian workers and the implementation of that regulation. The researcher is using normative legal research with statute approach and fact approach. The fact approach is adjusted with the process of recruitment, sending and placement of Indonesian workers in New Zealand. The result of research is showing that even though the Article 35 of Act Number 39/2004 requires the Junior High School as the minimum education but in reality, the Indonesian workers who work under RSE New Zealand scheme are not in accordance with it where some of them only have Elementary School background. Peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia menjamin bahwa bekerja merupakan hak asasi setiap manusia dan oleh karena itu maka negara diharapkan hadir untuk memastikan hak tersebut dijamin dan dilindungi. Setiap tenaga kerja memiliki hak dan kesempatan yang sama tanpa adanya diskriminasi agar dapat memperoleh penghasilan yang layak yang akan digunakan untuk pekerja serta keluarganya. Bentuk nyata yang dilakukan oleh negara terhadap tenaga kerja Indonesia adalah dengan adanya Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penempatan dan Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana implementasi hukum Pasal 35 UU No.39 Tahun 2004 khususnya bagi TKI yang bekerja dibawah program Recognised Seasonal Employment New Zealand. Penelitian ini sangat penting dilakukan untuk menemukan perbedaan antara aturan yang dibuat oleh pemerintah tentang kategori pendidikan minimum yang ditentukan dalam Undang-Undang bagi calon TKI dengan penerapan di lapangan. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan serta pendekatan fakta. Pendekatan fakta di lapangan disesuaikan dengan proses yang terjadi dalam perekrutan yang dilakukan serta pengiriman dan penempatan TKI itu sendiri di negara New Zealand. Hasil yang diperoleh dalam penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Pasal 35 Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2004 mensyaratkan pendidikan menimum SMP bagi calon TKI akan tetapi kenyataannya para TKI yang terlibat dalam program RSE New Zealand tidak sesuai di mana mereka ada juga yang memiliki pendidikan Sekolah Dasar. Fakta ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Undang-Undang tersebut terkesan membatasi namun sesungguhnya nilai yang terkandung di dalamnya justru sesuai di mana bekerja merupakan hak asasi manusia yang wajib dijunjung tinggi, dihormati dan di jamin penegakannya.

scholarly journals Aturan Pembebasan Narapidana dengan Program Asimilasi dan Integrasi di Tengah Wabah Covid-19 di Tinjau Dari Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Ham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020

INICIO LEGIS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-182
Author(s):  
Halim Dimas Ferdiansyah ◽  
Syamsul Fatoni
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government ◽  
Release Program ◽  
The Right ◽  
Occupancy Rates

ABSTRAKDasar pertimbangan dikeluarkannya Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 tentang Persyaratan Pemberian Hak Asimilasi dan Integrasi bagi Narapidana dan Anak dalam rangka pencegahan dan penanggulangan penyebaran COVID-19. dengan banyaknya tingkat hunian di penjara, hal ini telah menimbulkan kekhawatiran bagi pemerintah. Namun, terpidana yang dibebaskan mengulangi kejahatannya lagi dan menimbulkan kecemasan publik. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan antara Permenkumham Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 dengan Permenkumham Nomor 20 Tahun 2020 dan kesesuaian prinsip pembinaan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1995 tentang pemasyarakatan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan pemberian hak asimilasi dan integrasi narapidana dalam Permenkumham Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 diberikan sesuai dengan persyaratan substantif dan administratif secara lengkap. Namun dalam Permenkuham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 terdapat beberapa perbedaan dalam hal pemberian hak asimilasi dan integrasi, baik persyaratan substantif maupun administratif, sehingga Permenkumham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 memudahkan narapidana mendapatkan hak asimilasi dan integrasi. serta pelaksanaan ketentuan pemberian asimilasi dan integrasi dalam Permenkumham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 tidak sesuai dengan prinsip pembinaan dalam undang-undang pemasyarakatan. Ketidaksesuaian tersebut dikarenakan adanya narapidana yang kembali melakukan tindak pidana, hal ini menunjukkan kegagalan dalam melakukan pembinaan terhadap narapidana. Pasalnya, program pembebasan hanya berfokus pada pencegahan penularan COVID-19 di lapas Kata kunci: asimilasi, integrasi, narapidana, perbedaan dan kesesuaian Permenkumham ABSTRACTThe basis for the consideration of the issuance of Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 10 of 2020 concerning the Requirements for Granting Assimilation and Integration Rights for Prisoners and Children in the context of preventing and overcoming the spread of COVID-19. with many occupancy rates in prisons, it caused a concern of the government. However, the convict who was released repeated the crime again and caused public anxiety. The purpose of this research was to find out the difference between Permenkumham (Regulation of the minister of Law and human righs) Number 3 of 2018 and Permenkumham Number 20 of 2020 and the suitability of the principles of development with Law Number 12 of 1995 concerning correctionalism. The method used in this research was a type of normative legal research using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicated that the differences in the provision of assimilation rights and integration of prisoners in Permenkumham No.3 of 2018 were given in accordance with the complete substantive and administrative requirements. However, in Permenkuham No.10 of 2020 there are several differences in terms of granting assimilation and integration rights, both substantive and administrative requirements, so that Permenkumham No.10 of 2020 made it easier for inmates to get the right of assimilation and integration. and the implementation of the provisions for assimilation and integration in Permenkumham No.10 of 2020 is not in accordance with the principles of guidance in the correctional law. This mismatch was due to the presence of prisoners who had returned to committing criminal acts, this indicated a failure to provide guidance to prisoners. This was because the release program only focuses on preventing transmisfsion of COVID-19 in prisons. Keywords: Assimilation, Integration, Prisoners, Differences and suitability of Permenkumham

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen atas Informasi Harga pada Produk Minuman

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-141
Author(s):  
M Syahrul Bahri ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
External Factors ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Internal Factors ◽  
The World ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government

Drinking is one of the main needs of humans in the world that must be fulfilled for activity. Every human being must meet his needs, especially drinks, whether in quantity or in terms of the health of the drink. Therefore, the State must provide security for its people without exception whether it is related to supervision or regulating its circulation. This study aims to explain the legal protection for consumers for information on the price of beverage products listed on the packaging and to explain the resolution efforts regarding the difference between the price on the packaging and the selling price paid. This research used normative legal research, with a juridical approach through the hermenutic method. The data used were secondary and primary data which were analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research showed that the government has provided consumer protection for the provision of accurate information by means of obligations imposed by business actors as well as prohibitions that cannot be violated. The responsibility of business actors to resolve disputes can be pursued through channels outside the court as well as through court channels. The factors that influence the occurrence of a product that is nominally different from the price on the packaging consist of internal factors and external factors. If there is a difference in price on the package and at the time of payment, the cheapest fee will be paid.

scholarly journals Pretrial on SP3 Corruption Case in the Perspective of Victim Justice

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1439-1446
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Corruption Case ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
The Government ◽  
The 1960S

Corruption in Indonesia has spread like a virus since the 1960s that is harming the nation’s economy as well as victims of these crimes. Although the government tried to eradicate such crimes i.e. law enforcement, the issue still exists. The normative legal research method is used in the current study. The statute approach is utilized to review the termination of investigations as the basis for pre-trial submission by third parties for which data was collected by library research. To analyse the data, researchers examined the obtained materials to process it further. Results state that there is still a significant gap between law enforcement officials and people suffering from these corruption cases. The pre-trial complaint mechanism is not effective so far thus leaving ambiguity in victims’ minds. Based on study results, we, therefore, recommend that some serious and clear eradication mechanism should be introduced by law enforcement agencies to reduce corruption in Indonesia as well as victims should be given special consideration in the whole justice process.

Capaian pembangunan manusia: analisis komparatif Provinsi Banten, Jawa Barat dan DKI Jakarta

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriwati Adriwati
Keyword(s):  
Human Development ◽  
Human Development Index ◽  
Human Population ◽  
Provincial Government ◽  
Healthy Life ◽  
Development Index ◽  
Long Life ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government ◽  
Development Paradigm

Human development is a development paradigm that puts human (population) as the focus and final target of all development activities, namely the achievement of control over resources (income to achieve decent living), improvement of health status (long life and healthy life) and improve education. To see the success rate of human development, UNDP publishes an indicator of Human Development Index (HDI). This study discusses the achievements of human development that have been pursued by the government. The problem analyzed in this research is the difference of human development achievement in some provincial government in Indonesia. This paper aims to compare the achievements of human development in some provincial governments seen from the achievement of human development index of each province. Research location in Banten Province, West Java and DKI Jakarta.Keywords:Human Development Index, Human Development Achievement

Tanggung Jawab Hukum Penilai Publik terhadap Laporan Penilaian Kegiatan Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum (Studi Atas Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik Toto Suharto)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gagah Yaumiyya Riyoprakoso ◽  
AM Hasan Ali ◽  
Fitriyani Zein
Keyword(s):  
Future Development ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
Conducting Research ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Systematic Explanation

This study is based on the legal responsibility of the assessment of public appraisal reports they make in land procurement activities for development in the public interest. Public assessment is obliged to always be accountable for their assessment. The type of research found in this thesis is a type of normative legal research with the right-hand of the statue approach and case approach. Normative legal research is a study that provides systematic explanation of rules governing a certain legal category, analyzing the relationship between regulations explaining areas of difficulty and possibly predicting future development. . After conducting research, researchers found that one of the causes that made the dispute was a lack of communication conducted between the Government and the landlord. In deliberation which should be the place where the parties find the meeting point between the parties on the magnitude of the damages that will be given, in the field is often used only for the delivery of the assessment of the compensation that has been done.

Konsep Pemerintahan Religius dan Demokrasi Menurut Abdul Karim Soroush dan Ayatullah Khomeini

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 438-473
Author(s):  
M. Heri Fadoil
Keyword(s):  
Religious System ◽  
Islamic Jurisprudence ◽  
Ayatollah Khomeini ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Abstract: Abdul Karim Soroush judges that religious rule is incorrect assessment of the application of Islamic jurisprudence. In a religious society, Islamic jurisprudence obtains the right to govern. It is, of course, necessary to establish a kind of Islamic jurisprudence-based religious rule. Soroush firmly rejects it because such interpretation is too narrow. As for democracy, Soroush argues that the system used is not necessarily equal to that of the Western. On the contrary, Ayatollah Khomeini’s thoughts on religious rule are reflected in the so called wilayat al-faqih. It is a religious scholar-based government. Democracy, according to him, is the values of Islam itself, which is able to represent the level of a system to bring to the country’s progress. Principally, there are some similarities between the ideas of Ayatollah Khomeini and those of Abdul Karim Soroush in term of religiosity. They assume that it is able to sustain the religious system of government. The difference between both lies on the application of religiosity itself. Ayatollah Khomeini applies the concept of a religious scholar-based government, while Abdul Karim Soroush rejects the institutionalization of religion in the government or state.Keywords: Governance, democracy, Abdul Karim Soroush, Ayatollah Khomeini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document