scholarly journals POLITIK HUKUM PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN TERHADAP ANAK LUAR NIKAH

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-126
Author(s):  
Muammar Rachman
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Research Problem ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Status

The formation of the 1974 Marriage Law is based on Islamic Law, which became a problem when the Constitutional Court gave a decision on the judicial review of the Marriage Law with a decision that was considered by the public that the decision was against Islamic law. The research problem in this article is, How is the Politics of Law in the Reform of Legislation in the Post-Constitutional Court Ruling on Marriage related to the status of children outside of marriage? Does the Constitutional Court Decision No 46 / PUU-VII / 2010 contradict Islamic law?The research approach used in this research is normative juridical. The results of the study indicate that children who are born must receive legal protection. If this is not the case, then the children who are born outside of marriage will suffer losses. The relationship between the child and the father does not only occur because of a legal marriage, but can also be based on evidence of a blood relationship between the child and the boy as the father. This is because birth is a legal result of a legal relationship in which there are reciprocal rights and obligations between the child, mother and father. This decision refers, because there is a relationship that is carried out without any legal conditions for marriage, both religiously and in a state, so that it does not cause harm which implies a child who has not done anything wrong. In conclusion, the Constitutional Court granted the renewal of the norm in article 43 of the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974, which is to provide constitutional rights for children born out of wedlock whether born from a legally valid marriage or not. The decision of the Constitutional Court related to the addition of article 43 paragraph (1) of this marriage law is still in the spirit of Islam as the struggle of Muslims to be able to apply their religious values in this law is not only legally religiously or nationally. Abstrak Pembentukan Undang-Undang (UU) Perkawinan Tahun 1974 berdasarkan Hukum Islam, menjadi permasalahan saat Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) memutuskan judicial review atas UU perkawinan, bagi masyarakat bertentangan dengan hukum Islam. Permasalahan penelitian ini,  Bagaimana Politik Hukum dalam Pembaharuan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam UU Perkawinan Pasca Putusan MK terkait dengan status anak diluar nikah? Apakah Putusan MK No 46/PUU-VII/2010 bertentangan dengan hukum Islam? Pendekatan penelitian ini yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menguraikan, anak yang lahir harus mendapat perlindungan hukum. Jika tidak, yang dirugikan adalah anak yang dilahirkan diluar perkawinan. hubungan anak dengan bapak tidak semata-mata terjadi karena adanya sebuah perkawinan yang sah, tapi berdasar pembuktian adanya hubungan darah antara anak dan laki-laki sebagai bapak. Hal ini karena kelahiran adalah akibat hukum dari hubungan hukum yang terdapat hak dan kewajiban secara timbal balik. Putusan ini mengacu, sebab adanya hubungan yang dilakukan tanpa adanya syarat pernikahan yang sah, baik secara agamadan negara, sehingga tidak menimbulkan kerugian yang berimplikasi pada anak yang tidak melakukan kesalahan. Pembaharuan norma dalam pasal 43 UU  Perkawinan No. 1 Tahun 1974, memberikan hak konstitusional  anak yang dilahirkan di luar nikah baik yang lahir dari pernikahan yang sah secara agama atau tidak. Putusan MK terkait penambahan pasal 43 ayat (1) UU perkawinan masih bernafaskan Islam sesuai perjuangan ummat Islam untuk dapat menjalankan nilai-nilai agamanya dalam UU ini hannya tidak sah secara agama  dan Negara.

scholarly journals KAWIN BEDA AGAMA DAN PERLINDUNGAN HAM : STUDI KRITIS ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG PERNIKAHAN NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 DAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yedi Purwanto
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Community Leaders ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Interfaith Marriage ◽  
Public Discussion ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Core ◽  
The People ◽  
Core Problem

The polemic of Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974 is back into hot issue to be discussed. It reminds to the public discussion in a long history and the dynamics of the appearance of this laws. This time, the spotlight is article 2, paragraph 1 of the Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974 which contains "Marriage is legitimate, if it is done according to the laws of each religion and the belief it". Against with the decision, any parties asked a judicial review to the Constitutional Court (MK) for the article. This paper wants to give exposure of reactions of the people who are doing legal efforts with the proposal, as well as how to find the best solution for its completion. The core problem in this paper is to be appointed about whether or not may interfaith marriage. Referring to the Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974 and the 1945 Constitution, this paper will describe how the views of classical scholars, ulama (Muslim jurists), community leaders, officials and legal experts in the country explain about marriage in different religion.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUMTERHADAP KEDUDUKAN JANDACERAI MATI MENURUT HUKUM ISLAM, UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN DAN HUKUM NASRANI YANG BERBASIS NILAI KEADILAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Amri P Sihotang ◽  
Doddy Kridasaksana ◽  
A.Heru Nuswanto
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Equal Rights ◽  
Know How ◽  
Patriarchal Culture ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Status ◽  
Political Economic

<p>Posisi perempuan di mata hukum saat ini belum mendapatkan tempat yang menguntungkan. Walaupun perempuan sudah mempunyai status sosial yang cukup mulia, tetapi mereka masih perlu mendapatkan pemahaman yang lebih tentang sosial, politik dan hukum.Keadaan ini juga sangat berpengaruh terhadap kaum perempuan yang menuntut pelepasan diri dari nilai-nilai hukum yang bersifat diskriminatif antara, peran, hak, dan kewenangan kaum lelaki dibanding dengan kaum perempuan. Mereka berpendapat bahwa hukum  itu tidak memberi peran hak dan derajat yang sama antara pria dengan perempuan dalam kehidupan, sosial budaya, politik,ekonomi dan juga dalam kehidupan rumah tangga serta harta perkawinan dan warisan.Berpijak dari yang telah diuraikan penelitian iniakan mengkaji bagaimanakah  Kedudukan Janda  Cerai Mati  pada masyarakat bagaimanakah Perlindungan HukumTerhadapKedudukanJanda  Cerai MatiMenurut Hukum Islam, Undang-Undang Perkawinan, danHukum Nasrani yang BerbasisNilaiKeadilan.TujuanPenelitianUntuk mengetahui bagaimana kedudukan Janda cerai mati pada Masyarakat danUntuk mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan hokum terhadap janda cerai mati menurut hukum Islam, Undang-Undang Perkawinan, danHukum Nasrani yang Berbasis Keadian.Metode pendekatan yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif. Kedudukan janda cerai mati disebagian masyarakat masih dipandang cenderung negatif. Budaya Patriarki yang dianut dalam masyarakat seakan mengakibatkan posisi janda ditempatkan dalam posisi rendah dibandingkan dengan mereka yang bersuami. Perlindungan hukum terhadap kedudukan janda memiliki konsep yang berbeda-beda.</p><p> </p><p>Position woman in the eyes of the previous law are currently favorable for Places Not to get. Although Women Already have Social Status Sufficient noble, but they Still Need to get a greater understanding of the social, political and singer hukum.Keadaan Also very influential Against Women Yang demanded the Company Company Yourself From Values That law is discriminatory BETWEEN, Role, rights, and authority of men compared to women. They argue that the role of the law WAS NOT Giving equal rights and degrees The man BETWEEN THE Women hearts of life, social, cultural, political, economic and domestic life hearts Also And Marriage And warisan.Berpijak treasure of which has been described iniakan study examines how the Status Widow Divorced dead ON 'community how divorce MatiMenurut HukumTerhadapKedudukanJanda Protection of Islamic Law, Marriage Law, Christian danHukum The BerbasisNilaiKeadilan.TujuanPenelitianUntuk know how to position ON society widow die divorce danUntuk know how legal protection against divorcee die * According to Islamic law, the Marriage Act, The Christian danHukum Keadian.Metode based Research approach The Singer Was used hearts normative method. Position divorcee die disebagian 'society is still seen tend to be negative. The patriarchal culture embraced hearts' As if society resulted POSITION POSITION hearts widow placed more low compared to those who get married. Legal protection against notch widow has different concept.</p>

scholarly journals UPAYA PENGADILAN DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ANAK LUAR NIKAH BERDASARKAN SILA KE-5 PANCASILA

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Dzanurusyamsyi Dzanurusyamsyi
Keyword(s):  
Child Protection ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Illegitimate Child ◽  
The Law

In accordance with the Marriage Law Article 43 paragraph (1) and Article 100 Compilation of Islamic Law, that child out of wedlock obtain a civil relationship with her mother and her mother’s family. The provisions of article 43 paragraph (1) that the Court’s decision the Constitution of No. 046/PUU-VIII/2010 amended with the new norm, that “children born out of wedlock have links civil with her mother and her mother’s family as well as with men as a father to proven by science and technology and/ or other evidence under the law have blood relations, including civil relations with his father’s family’’ provisions of the new norm is still debatable and the pros and cons in the community that have not been finalized. Therefore, it is necessary to do research on: How Construction illegitimate child protection today; factors that affect the construction of the legal protection of a child out of wedlock is not justice at this time. This study used a qualitative approach with sosiolegal research. Factors that affect the protection of children out of wedlock is not justice due to several factors: -First; Factors Differing perceptions Ulama’ and Judges of children out of wedlock and protection against him; Factors Court decision is very diverse/ varied against illegitimate child protection issues; Factors diversity of perceptions on Registration of Population Administration in Indonesia. Then the provisions of the Marriage Law Article 43 paragraph (1)which has judicial review by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 046/PUU-VIII/2010 and Article 100 of the Compilation of Islamic Law must be reconstructed with the editor of a new article as follows: “a child born out of wedlock has relations civil with her mother and her mother’s family as well as with men as a father who can be proved by science and technology and/ or other evidence under the law have blood relation to the determination/ instruction judge and the Court’s decision, the Muslim Religious Court andbesides Islam in the District Court, including a civil relationship with his family “and there should be an affirmation form of additional chapters in the Marriage Law Article 43 with the editorial article as follows; “If it turns out according to a court ruling that the children who sought their origin was proven seedlings men and women and was born in/ from the marriage valid, then the child becomes legitimate child and have a relationship of civil full and relationships biological children with both parents and get inheritance rights.

Extradition, Human Rights, and the Public Order – The “Extradition to India” – Decision of the FCC

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 1241-1254
Author(s):  
Rainer Nickel
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Relations ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Status ◽  
Federal Constitutional

The status and range of human rights in international relations is a politically delicate and legally contested topic. In a recent decision the Federal Constitutional Court was forced to concretize the relation between international human rights obligations, domestic constitutional rights laid down in the Grundgesetz and international duties following from extradition contracts between the Federal Republic and other UN member states. More precisely, in the “Extradition to India”-case the FCC had to deal with the crucial question of human rights adjudication: can an accused be handed over to a country where the police force is accused of “using torture as a regular instrument during the interrogation of apprehended persons” and whose correctional institutions are described as “keeping prisoners and detainees in custody under conditions which resemble a cruel, inhuman and humiliating treatment or punishment”?

scholarly journals Safeguarding Women’s Constitutional Rights in the Judicial Reviews of Marriage Law on the Minimum Married Age Limit

MAZAHIB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamidin Hamidin ◽  
Alfitri Alfitri
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Minimum Age ◽  
Age Limit ◽  
The Difference

The Constitutional Court seems inconsistent when examining the same norms but in a different decision related to the constitutionality of the minimum married age limit for women. In the 2014 decision, the Court rejected the petition, while in the 2017 decision, the Court accepted it. This paper analyzes the considerations of constitutional judges in deciding the case to understand whether women’s constitutional rights have been protected in both decisions. Using the case and statutory approach, this article concludes that the 2014 decision rejecting the petition to increase the minimum married age limit for women does not fulfill women’s constitutional rights. Sixteen years old as the minimum age limit for women and nineteen years for men is discriminatory and deprives girls’ rights to health and education. The judges’ consideration in the 2017 decision, which granted the petition, was that determining the minimum married age limit is a legal policy. Still, if the policy contradicts the 1945 Constitution, citizens can challenge its constitutionality. The Marriage Law is a past product, so it needs to be adapted to developments and the 1945 Constitution’s norms. The difference in the Constitutional Court’s decisions on testing the same norms is due to different interpretations and efforts to protect the constitutional rights of citizens.Keywords: Women’s constitutional rights, judicial review, minimum married age limit

scholarly journals Konstitusionalitas Norma Sanksi Pidana sebagai Ultimum Remedium dalam Pembentukan Perundang-undangan

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 872
Author(s):  
Titis Anindyajati ◽  
Irfan Nur Rachman ◽  
Anak Agung Dian Onita
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Public Security ◽  
The Political ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Effective Solution ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

Intentionally, criminal sanction was seen as an effective solution for the problem of crimes. On the other hand, criminal sanctions also pose as an implementation of state responsibility in maintaining public security, order and legal protection of its citizens. In the development of Indonesian legal system, most of the laws enacted by the state have included criminal sanction in its substance. Therefore, there is a shift in the political law (legal policy) regarding the application of criminal sanctions, which intentionally pose as a last resort (ultimum remedium) has shifted towards first resort (primum remedium). The inclusion of criminal sanctions in the legislation as primum remedium might result on the violation of the constitutional rights of Indonesian citizens. In addition, there is an emergence of numbers in applications  of judicial review on the laws regarding the criminal sanctions issues. This research focuses to examine and determine about the position of criminal sanction norms in the law and about the deliberation and reasoning of the Constitutional Court in reconstructing the structure of criminal sanctions in law from primum remedium toward ultimum remedium. The research showed that most of the laws enacted from 2003 through 2014 have adapted the norms of criminal sanctions as primum remedium. This can be seen in the construction of the criminal forfeiture clause, where in the contrary, the concept of punishment states that criminal sanctions should be positioned as ultimum remedium. In the meantime, the Constitutional Court as the protector of citizens’ constitutional rights and protection of human rights  has  a very important role in  restoring the  position of  criminal  sanctions  as ultimum remedium. This, by example, was set forth in the Constitutional Court decision 4/PUU-V/2007 on June 19, 2007 regarding the review of Law No.29/2004 on the Medical Practices.

scholarly journals Konstitusionalitas dan Legalitas Norma dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mahrus Ali
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Status ◽  
Lower Courts ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Republic

The Constitutionality of norms are inseparable with the model of judicial review of laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. It can be see  from the reviews of abstract and concrete norms by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The review of conrete norms in the decision of judicial review basically does not constitute authority of the Constitutional Court. Theoretically, norms review should be starting from abstract norms as the implications of the Constitutional Court authority. In order to review the constitutionality of laws, norms and abstract norms should be interpreted by the Constitutional Court. While concrete norms focuse more on the implementation or application of the norm itself. The application of norms cannot be separated from the legality of the norms, while constitutionality of norms is related to its coherence with with the Constitution. If the basis of norms review is the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia then abstract norms  should be the main subject matter to be reviewed. Otherwise, when concrete norms are the subject matters to be reviewed, then the implementation    of the norms that have been applied in concrete cases. This research is using normative juridical method with case approach in which 15 (fifteen) verdicts of the Constitutional Court of Republic of Indonesia over the period of 2003-2013 in judicial review of laws against the 1945 Constitution are analyzed. The focus is on the ratio decidendi of the Constitutional Court judges in determining the constitutionality     of norms. The result of this research shows that, the Constitutional Court, in the judicial review of laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia does not separate abstract norms and concrete norms dichotomously. In an attempt to protect the constitutional rights of citizens, the absence of legal remedies that can be further pursued by the  applicant,  as  well  as  to  provide  legal  certainty, the Constitutional Court, granted, in its decision,  the review of concrete norms.  Even though the Constitutional Court remains firm in satting that it is a concrete norms,  the applicant’s petition is granted in part which is concerning the review  the abstract norms only. Whereas, with respect to the verdict of the constitutional court that rejected the review of concrete norms, it is because the review is not on the constitutionality of norms but the application of the norms and also concerns     a petition for an interlocutory decision which is irrelevant to the subject matter of the case. The review of concrete norms in a rejecting ruling is a form of prudence   by the Constitutional Court in order not to prosecute the matters which constitute the authority the other judicial bodies, namely the Supreme Court and the lower courts. As for the ruling which declared a petition inadmissible, the Constitutional Court stated that the applicant has no legal standing and the Constitutional Court does not have the authority to test these norms. In the future the Constitutional Court needs to affirm the status of norms before further examining in depth the petition filed. In addition, the Constitutional Court should be conferred with the authority to hear constitutional complaint and constitutional question in order to create the harmonization of interpretation based on the Constitution.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 69/PUU-XIII/2015 PADA PEMBUATAN PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Nyoman Mas Aryani
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Mixed Marriage ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
The Third ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
The Status ◽  
Separate Property ◽  
Legal Consequences

Law Number 1 Year 1974  on Marriage, embraces the principle of  separate property where except husband and wife determine otherwise by making a marriage agreement before or at the time of marriage is held. In the middle of 2015, Ike Farida, a lawyer who performs a mixed marriage, filed a petition for judicial review to the Constitutional Court because he felt his  constitutional  rights were injured  by the  enactment  of  Law Number  5  of  1960  on Basic Agrarian Law, namely Article 21 paragraph (1), (3), Article 36 paragraph (1); and Article 29 paragraph (1), (3), (4) and Article 35 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law. The Constitutional Court through Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015, in particular on the verdict stating: “At the time or before the marriage takes place or during the marriage bond, the two parties to mutual consent may  submit a written agreement  authorized by the marriage registry officer, after which the contents also apply to the third party caught “. This poses a problem where it will be difficult to know the existence of a third party related to the making of a marriage agreement. The conclusion is that the Constitutional Court Decision does not regulate the legal consequences of marriage agreement after marriage to the status of property but implicitly regulate the legal effect on a third party

scholarly journals Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU/XIII/2015 Tentang Perjanjian Perkawinan Terhadap Tujuan Perkawinan

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Moh. Faizur Rohman
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Marriage Contract ◽  
Property Loss ◽  
Happy Family ◽  
Islamic Marriage

Abstract: this article discusses changes brought by the ruling of Constitutional Court No. 69/PUU/XIII/2015 which reviewed Marriage Law No. 1/1974, article 29 on pre nuptial agreement.  The article previously stated that such an agreement must be done prior or at the eve of marriage contract was signed. The Constitutional Court  decided upon a petition that nuptial agreement may be done prior the marriage or during the marriage. The implication of this reuling by Constitutional Court is the additional legal protection regime that women can have in marriage against misfortunes such as domestic violence and property loss. In doing so, married couples will be focused on the realization of islamic marriage of everlasting, peaceful and happy family.  Abstrak: Salah satu tujuan utama pernikahan adalah terbentuknya keluarga yang bahagia, kekal, penuh kasih sayang di antara suami istri. Namun di luar itu berkemungkinan terjadi permasalahan dalam perkawinan, sehingga butuh diadakan sebuah perjanjian perkawinan. Dalam Undang-Undang Perkawinan Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 pasal 29 ayat (1) disebutkan bahwa perjanjian perkawinan harus diadakan saat atau sebelum perkawinan dilaksanakan. Hal ini dapat mengganggu konsentrasi pasangan terhadap tujuan utama perkawinan. Ditetapkannya putusan MK Nomor 69/PUU/XIII/2015, menjadikan frasa “pada waktu atau sebelum perkawinan dilangsungkan” dalam pasal 29 ayat (1) dimaknai dengan “pada waktu, sebelum dilangsungkan atau selama dalam ikatan perkawinan”. Jadi, perjanjian perkawinan yang semula harus diadakan sebelum atau saat perkawinan dilangsungkan, sekarang boleh diadakan setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan selama dalam ikatan perkawinan. Implikasi dari hal ini adalah adanya perlindungan hukum lebih, terutama bagi perempuan agar tidak menjadi korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, menjamin perlindungan terhadap hak milik atau hak guna bangunan suatu harta, pasangan juga lebih fokus terhadap tujuan utama perkawinan yakni membentuk keluarga yang bahagia, kekal, penuh kasih sayang bersama pasangan.

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Anak yang Dilahirkan dalam Kawin Hamil

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
R. Tetuko Aryo Wibowo ◽  
Thohir Luth
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Illegitimate Child ◽  
The Status ◽  
Legal Consequences

This study aimed to explore deeply about the legal consequences of children born as a result of married by accident. The method used is formative juridical with the main reference Article 53 Compilation of Islamic Law, Article 250 of the Civil Code, Article 42 of the Marriage Law, and the Al-Qur’an namely Surat Al Isra ‘verse 32. The results of the study indicate that based on Compilation of Islamic Law, Article 250 of the Civil Code, and Article 42 of the Marriage Law, the legal status of a child resulting from a married by accident is a legitimate child, so it has the descent, inheritance rights, and guardianship rights of both parents. However, based on the Qur’an and the opinion of jumhur ulama, the legal status of a child resulting from the married by accident depends on the length of birth from the time of marriage. If more than six months old, the child’s status is legitimate so that he is entitled to both parents. If it is less than six months, then the status is an illegitimate child, so that he is only entitled to his mother from the descent, guardianship rights, and inheritance rights.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document