scholarly journals Menakar Nilai Keadilan Penyelenggaraan Pilkada 2020 di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 493-514
Author(s):  
Supriyadi Supriyadi
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Approach ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Local Election ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Government ◽  
Regulation Approach ◽  
Regional Elections ◽  
Statutory Regulation

Pelaksanaan Pilkada serentak tahun 2020 kembali dilaksanakan setelah sebelumnya mengalami penundaan. Pemerintah memutuskan untuk melaksanakan Pilkada pada bulan Desember 2020, dengan mengeluarkan Perpu No. 2 Tahun 2020. Langkah yang diambil Pemerintah melahirkan pro dan kontra dikalangan masyarakat termasuk penye-lenggara, hal tersebut sangat rasional mengingat keadaan penyebaran Covid-19 masih terus mengalami peningkatan. Disadari atau tidak, kebijakan tersebut menguji eksistensi nilai mulia dari tujuan hukum yakni keadilan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan teori. Adapun hasil penelitian ialah: Pertama, Perppu No. 2 Tahun 2020 tidak mengatur terkait dengan metode dan pelaksanaan Pilkada saat pandemi melainkan hanya mengatur waktu pemungutan suara. Kedua, terdapat beberapa tahapan yang menyulitkan pemilih, penyelenggara dan peserta yakni tahapan pemuktahiran data, pencalonan bagi calon peraseorangan dan tidak adanya kampanye dalam bentuk rapat umum. Ketiga, mekanisme penanganan pelanggaran Pilkada tetap mengacu pada metode saat keadaan normal. Switching the Value of Handling Local Election 2020 in the Middle of Pandemi Covid-19  The implementation of the simultaneous regional elections in 2020 was held after previously experiencing delays. The government decided to carry out the Pilkada (electiosn) in December 2020, by issuing Perpu No. 2 of 2020. The steps taken by the Government resulted in pros and cons among the public, including the organizers, this is very rational considering the spread of Covid-19 pandemic is still increasing. Whether we realize it or not, this policy tests the existence of the noble value of the goal of law, namely justice. This research is a normative juridical study using a statutory regulation approach, a conceptual approach and a theoretical approach. The research shows, first, that Perppu No.2 / 2020 does not regulate the method and implementation of Pilkada during a pandemic but only regulates the timing of voting. Second, there are several stages that make it difficult for voters, organizers and participants, namely the stages of updating data, nominating individual candidates and the absence of a campaign in the form of a general meeting. Third, the mechanism for handling election violations still refers to the method during normal circumstances.

scholarly journals GANTI KERUGIAN PEMBEBASAN TANAH MILIK UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Basirah Mustarin
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Construction Projects ◽  
City Government ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Facilities ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
The City

AbstractRoad construction projects for public use, usually involve many locations of land owned by communities with ownership rights. The construction of public facilities made by the government prior to construction must carry out the stages of land acquisition as contained in Law No. 2 of 2012 concerning land acquisition for development in the public interest. The research method used is normative research by using the statutory approach and concept analysis approach. The results showed that the city government provided compensation for the location of land that would be affected by the construction of public facilities. The mechanism of land acquisition or land acquisition in the city is carried out by providing compensation to the value of the land price that will be released in an appropriate and fair manner based on article 9 paragraph (2) of Law Number 2 of 2012. Land issues so far are very relevant to be studied together and considered in depth in relation to policies in the field of land because at the level of policy implementation that has been shown so far has neglected the structural aspects of land tenure, which in turn caused various disputes. Keywords: Compensation, Land Acquisition, Property Rights, Public Interest.AbstrakProyek pembuatan jalan untuk kepentingan umum, biasanya melibatkan banyak lokasi tanah yang dimiliki oleh masyarakat yang berstatus hak milik.  Pembuatan sarana umum yang dibuat oleh pemerintah tersebut sebelum dibangun harus melakukan tahapan pembebasan lahan sebagaimana yang termuat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 tahun 2012 tentang pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif dengan melakukan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (Statute Approach) dan pendekatan analisis konsep (Conceptual Approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah kota memberikan ganti kerugian atas lokasi tanah yang akan terkena pembuatan sarana umum tersebut.  Mekanisme pembebasan tanah atau pengadaan tanah di kota dilakukan dengan memberikan ganti kerugian terhadap nilai harga tanah yang akan dibebaskan secara sesuai dan adil berdasarkan pasal 9 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012. Persoalan tanah selama ini sangat relevan dan dipertimbangkan secara mendalam dalam kaitannya dengan kebijakan dibidang pertanahan karena ditingkat implementasi kebijakan yang diperlihatkan selama ini telah mengabaikan aspek struktural penguasaan tanah yang pada akhirnya menimbulkan berbagai macam sengketa.Kata Kunci : Ganti Kerugian, Hak Milik, Kepentingan Umum, Pembebasan Tanah.

scholarly journals Tinjauan Hukum Islam Pada Edaran Pemerintah dan MUI Dalam Menyikapi Wabah Covid-19 Setelah Pemberlakuan New Normal

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 393
Author(s):  
Cholisa Rosanti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
New Normal ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
The World ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Government

This study discusses the Covid-19 virus that is spreading in the world and its handling from the government and MUI after the implementation of new normal according to Islamic law. The government implements a large-scale social restrictions system (PSBB) or social distancing to break the chain of the spread of the covid-19 virus. The government has implemented new normal rules. MUI has issued a notice numbered Kep-1188 / DP-MUI / V / 2020 concerning new normalcy that will be applied by the government such as reopening places of worshipaccording to the health protocol. Nevertheless, this circular is a pros and cons for some people. The purpose of this study is to help the public understand whether the government and MUI circulars in tackling the plague after applying the new normal according to the Shari'a or actually contrary to Islamic Sharia. The research method is the study of literature literature with a normative approach and historical approach. The results of the study showed that the rules imposed by the government and MUI in dealing with the outbreak of Covid-19 pacsa new normal did not disregard Islamic law.

Analisis Penegakan Kebiri Kimia Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Pada Anak Di bawah Umur

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imas Novita Juaningsih
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Chemical Castration ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
The Public ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Abstrak Country can be said to be a state if elements of the state have been fulfilled. One of the most fundamental elements is the existence of the people. The existence of the people means that there are people who live and become subjects of government and enforced rules. Without rules, the consequence is that there will be a large number of crimes that cannot be overcome. Therefore criminal law exists to optimize a regulation and implementation in the community. In the constitution of the Indonesian state, there has been guaranteed the rights of everyone from the right to life, the right not to be tortured, the right to religion and human rights that cannot be reduced in any case. But with Article 81 A paragraph (3) of Law No. 17 of 2016 concerning the second amendment to Law No. 3 of 2002 concerning Child Protection. In this article the phrase the addition of basic crimes especially chemical castration punishment becomes a problem that causes controversy among the public. So the government needs to reconsider with regard to Article a quo by using preventive and repressive measures to address these problems.  The theory that author use is Law Enforcement along with the principles of das sein and das sollen. With normative research methods that are descriptive, and through a conceptual approach. So the author recommend that the application of chemical castration and rehabilitation as a form of treatment oriented to protect perpetrators and sexual crimes. 

scholarly journals The Regional Head Elections (Pilkada) 2020 During Covid-19 Pandemic: A Projection

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Hizra Marisa ◽  
Ade Pornauli ◽  
Achmad Indra ◽  
Alya Aurora
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Virus Transmission ◽  
Reform Movement ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Third ◽  
Local Election ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The World ◽  
Election System ◽  
The Government

This study aims to find out a projection and how the development of elections during COVID-19 pandemic. The regional heads elections is one manifestation of the reform movement in 1998 which wants a change in state administration after being dominated by authoritarianism to become democratic. This election is known to the public as a venue for the election of regional heads who will serve or lead. Covid-19 pandemic is a virus transmission and causes an outbreak ove the world including Indonesia. A number of regions contributed to the 2020 elections. The regional head election system in 2020 is the third time held in Indonesia. The ballot is planned to be held simultaneously on September 2020. The total area that will carry out simultaneous regional head elections in 2020 is 270 regions with 9 provinces, 224 districts and 37 cities. The government regulation in lieu of law number 2/2020 on the local election was finally set by President Joko Widodopada on May 4th, 2020. The election which originally took place on September 23rd was finally postponed for 3 months, which became on December 2020. This step was criticized because it was considered ignoring COVID-19 pandemic.

scholarly journals Aksi Unjuk Rasa (dan Radikalisme) serta Penanganannya dalam Alam ”Demokrasi” di Indonesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 132
Author(s):  
Tri Pranadji
Keyword(s):  
New Order ◽  
Modern Democracy ◽  
Good Communication ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Government ◽  
Two Sides ◽  
Good Attitude

<strong>English</strong><br />Currently, almost every single ‘conflict’ in the society is followed by demonstration. It seems that the demonstration is a popular trend after the New Order era and more specifically such fenomenon has been reflected in the modern democracy life of the society.  Understanding about democracy is heavily depending on the eliteness maturity of someone (politic, economy, and government)  In the present ‘transitional situation’ and the absence of the ideal socio-culture-politic level, understanding about democracy will invite pros and cons among the concerned people. To express disagreement on certain public policies through demonstration could be accepted because it is in lione with “democracy”.  However, such protest along with anarchy actions and radicalism should create undesirable situation.affecting the public.  Traditionally, protest (by the people) which is responded wisely (by the government) has been long time exist within the old society (such as Java’s kingdom in the past, 16-19 century), long before the “westernization” of Indonesian community.  Coping with demonstration is no less than good attitude responses, and far from enemy impression.  Good communication and compromise based on respectful between the two sides will open an elegant solution and parallel with the constitution objectives. <br /><br />  <br /><strong>Indonesian</strong><br />Dewasa ini hampir setiap terjadi “perselisihan” di masyarakat diikuti dengan aksi unjuk rasa dari pihak yang merasa dikalahkan. Aksi unjuk rasa setelah tumbangnya Orde Baru seakan-akan telah menjadi hal yang trendy dan dinilai sebagai cerminan kehidupan peradaban masyarakat modern yang demokratis. Pemaknaan terhadap istilah demokrasi sangat tergantung pada kematangan elit (politik, ekonomi dan pemerintah) dalam memahami demokrasi. Dalam situasi “transisional” dan belum ditemukannya bentuk ideal tatanan sosio-budaya-politik sesuai amanat konstitusi pemaknaan terhadap istilah demokrasi akan mengundang pro dan kontra. Sebagai bagian dari ekpresi tidak setuju dan protes terhadap kebijakan publik, di satu sisi aksi unjuk rasa merupakan hal yang dapat diterima dan sejalan dengan tuntutan “demokrasi”; namun di sisi lain tidak jarang aksi ini diikuti dengan tindakan anarkhis dan radikalisme yang menimbulkan suasana mencekam di ruang publik. Aksi unjuk rasa secara santun (oleh rakyat) dan disikapi secara arif (oleh penguasa) telah dikenal dalam tatanan masyarakat tradisi (misalnya dalam masyarakat kerajaan di Jawa pada abad 16-19), jauh sebelum peradaban demokrasi barat (“westernisasi”) merasuki kehidupan masyarakat Indonesia. Penanganan aksi unjuk rasa yang baik adalah dengan dilandaskan pada sikap yang jauh dari saling bermusuhan, antara pengunjuk rasa dan sasaran atau yang menangani pengunjuk rasa. Melalui musyawarah yang dilandaskan pada sikap saling menghormati akan membuka jalan penyelesaian yang elegan (dan sejalan dengan tujuan konstitusi) terhadap aksi unjuk rasa.

scholarly journals Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah Ulayat Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda Nissa Hilal Liani ◽  
Atik Winanti
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
The State ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
The Government

AbstractLand is a natural wealth that is very important for humans and has an important function in development. In carrying out activities carried out by the government, namely land acquisition for the public interest, which has the aim of building public facilities for the benefit of the community. In carrying out land acquisition, ulayat land is often the target for alleged land acquisition. However, using ulayat land for land acquisition often creates problems. The purpose of this paper is to determine the control of indigenous peoples' rights in land acquisition and to determine the role of the state in providing compensation for land acquisition for development in the public interest. The research method used is juridical normative using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The result of this research is that the rights of customary law communities have been regulated constitutionally by the State, and the role of indigenous peoples is regulated in Law no. 71/2012. However, the fact is that during the land acquisition process, customary law communities are often not involved, the government should provide legal certainty and protection to the customary law community so that these problems do not harm the customary law community.Keyword: Land Procurement, Customary Law Communities, Customary Land. AbstrakTanah merupakan kekayaan alam yang sangat penting bagi manusia dan memiliki fungsi yang penting dalam pembangunan. Dalam melakukan kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah yaitu pengadaan tanah bagi kepentingan umum, yang mana memiliki tujuan untuk membangun fasilittas umum agar bermanfaat bagi masyarakat. Dalam melakukan pengadaan tanah, seringkali tanah ulayat dijadikan sasaran untuk diduganakan pengadaan tanah. Namun, dalam menggunakan tanah ulayat untuk pengadaan tanah tersebut seringkali menimbulkan masalah. Tujuan dari penulisan ini untuk mengetahui pengantutan mengenai hak-hak masyarakat adat dalam pengadaan tanah dan untuk mengetahui peran negara dalam pemberian ganti kerugian pada pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normative dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa hak masyarakat hukum adat telah diatur secara konstitutional oleh Negara, serta peran masyarakat hukum adat diatur didalam UU No. 71/2012. Namun pada faktanya saat proses pengadaan tanah, masyarakat hukum adat seringkali tidak dilibatkan, seharusnya pemerintah dalam pengadaan tanah memberikan kepastian serta perlindnungan hukum kepada masyarakat hukum adat agar permasalahan-permasalahan tersebut tidak merugikan masyarakat hukum adat.Kata Kunci: Pengadaan Tanah, Masyarakat adat, Tanah Ulayat

scholarly journals Government Discretion of the Regional Election Implementation During Covid-19 Pandemic Through Technology Utilitization

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-524
Author(s):  
Dani Habibi ◽  
Danang Ari Wibowo
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
The People ◽  
Election System ◽  
Right To Vote ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Regional Elections

The simultaneous regional elections held in 2020 in Indonesia encountered a problem. The constraints experienced are not due to a lack of supply materials for the elections or the absence of regulations on the regional elections, but to a condition experienced by the whole world, namely the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. This research is included in normative research with a statutory and conceptual approach. This research aims to formulate the discretion that the government must carry out so that simultaneous regional elections are still carried out as a form of legal protection for the people regarding the right to vote and be elected in simultaneous regional elections, namely elections electronically with the use of technology and then the authors analyse and reconstruct Law Number 6 of 2020 concerning the simultaneous regional elections to formulate rules regarding the existence of an electronic election system to minimize the occurrence of population mobilization.

scholarly journals Investasi Cryptocurrency Berdasarkan Peraturan Bappebti No. 5 Tahun 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 712
Author(s):  
Dewa Ayu Fera Nitha ◽  
I Ketut Westra
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Futures Trading ◽  
The Public ◽  
Asset Trading ◽  
Technological Developments ◽  
Digital Money ◽  
The Government ◽  
Physical Asset ◽  
Made In

Current technological developments have digital money or cryptocurrency which is currently being used as an investment by the world community. Seeing this, the government has now issued CoFTRA Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Technical Provisions for the Implementation of the Physical Asset Market in the Futures Exchange to ensure legal protection for investors and legal certainty in the event of a dispute. This study aims to analyze protection The law against Cryptocurrency Investors is reviewed based on Bappebti Regulation Number 5 of 2019 and analyzes the legal efforts made in the event of a dispute in cryptocurrency investment. The research method in this study uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study show that the Indonesian Government has accommodated the interests of crypto asset trading as well as a guideline and clarity for the public regarding the government's recognition of the presence of bitcoin and virtual currancy, namely through Bappebti Number 5 of 2019 and dispute disputes that occur between cryptocurrency investors and cryptocurrency marketplaces by way of non-litigation and arbitration through the Commodity Futures Trading Arbitration Board (BAKTI). Perkembangan teknologi saat ini telah terdapat uang digital atau cryptocurrency yang saat ini dijadikan sebagai investasi oleh masyrakat dunia. Melihat hal tersebut kini pemerintah telah mengeluarkan Peraturan Bappebti Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 Tentang tentang Ketentuan Tekhnis Penyelenggaraan Pasar Fisik Asset Kripto (Crypto Asset) di Bursa Berjangka untuk memastikan adanya perlindungan hukum bagi para investor dan kepastian hukum apabila terdapat sengketa. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa perlindungan Hukum terhadap Para Investor Cryptocurrency dikaji berdasarkan Peraturan Bappebti Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 serta menganalisa upaya Hukum yang dilakukan apabila terjadi sengketa dalam investasi cryptocurrency. Metode penelitian dalam studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil studi ini menunjukkan bahwa Pemerintah Indonesia telah mengakomodir kepentingan perdagangan kripto aset serta sebagai suatu pedoman dan kejelasan bagi masyarakat terkait pengakuan pemerintah terhadap kehadiran bitcoin dan virtual currancy yaitu melalui Bappebti Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 dan perselisihan sengketa yang terjadi antara investor cryptocurrency dengan marketplace cryptocurrency dapat diselesaikan dengan jalan non-litigasi dan abitrase melalui Badan Arbitrase Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi (BAKTI).

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM NON YUDISIAL TERHADAP PERBUATAN HUKUM PUBLIK OLEH PEMERINTAH

Yuridika ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Hari Sugiharto ◽  
Bagus Oktafian Abrianto
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Research Focus ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Case Investigation ◽  
Administrative Courts ◽  
The Government

The enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration had given the changes to the authority of the State Administrative Court. There are two mechanism of the case investigation in the State Administrative Court in providing legal protection against a lawsuit or petition filed by the public. The first mechanism is to file a lawsuit directly to the State Administrative Court. The second mechanism is to resolve internal disputes within the government before filing a lawsuit to the Administrative Courts. There are two mechanisms of the case investigation prove that the existence of discrimination for people who seek justice in the case investigation system in the State Administrative Court. This research focus on an issues first the nature of public legal action by the government in government administration and second Ratio legis non-judicial legal protection against public legal acts  by the government. The results which have to be achieved are to provide the prescription of essential truth. There are several problems approach used in this study, such as statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach.

scholarly journals Examining the Relocation of the Capital City of Indonesia Through the State Perspective in Political Economy

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-35
Author(s):  
Ana Sabhana Azmy
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
The State ◽  
Capital City ◽  
Access To Education ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Economic Equality ◽  
The Public ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

The government's decision to move the capital of the Republic of Indonesia from DKI Jakarta to Kalimantan has drawn pros and cons among the public. The government considers the relocation plan to provide comfort, welfare, access to education, health and fair and equitable participation. However, moving the capital city is not easy and must go through a well-planned plan. Using a literature study, this article attempts to review how the state positions itself in the relocation plan, and what are the implications for relocating the capital city in the context of economic development. The conclusion of this discourse is that the state is exercising its autonomy in the plan to move the capital city, or what Caporaso and Levine say as a free state. The government remains focused on relocation plans, although there are a number of people who disagree. The government also ensures that the implications of the capital relocation plan are positive for economic development in Indonesia. distribution of economic equality will occur in Indonesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document