scholarly journals THE DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT MODEL ON COLLABORATIVE-BASED STUDENTS' SCIENTIFIC WRITING MENTORING THROUGH AN ONLINE RESEARCH CLINIC APPROACH AT UPBJJ-UT SEMARANG

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Binti Muflikah ◽  
Swidarto Swidarto ◽  
Vica Ananta Kusuma

Scientific writing plays a crucial role in determining the quality of students and universities. So far, the ability of students to establish scientific works is varied. Some students can produce scientific work in an APIK (Asli, Penting, Ilmiah, Konsisten) way which means Original, Important, Scientific, and Consistent), as well as in a "SMART" (Specific, Manageable, Acceptable, Realistic and Time-bound) way. However, some of them also encounter difficulties so they need assistance on a collaborative based scientific writing through Online Research Clinic (ORC) approach. Collaborative-based mentoring can build collegiality and collaboration among tutors, students, and UPBJJ-UT managers. Effective mentoring requires an ORC approach. An online research clinic is a place designed to help students who have difficulty writing scientific papers through clinical methods, starting from problem identification, diagnosis, prognosis, synthesis, treatment, reflection using internet / online network media such as website, email, WhatsApp, telegram, Google classroom, webinars, zoom and so on. Online Research Clinic is a solution to solve students' difficulties in writing scientific papers. The existence of ORC is an innovation to create independent learning in the digital era due to its flexibility and easy accessibility at all times both face-to-face and online. Besides, it is also used by tutors and managers to collaborate in providing consultation services to students. This study aims to analyze and synthesize the management model of scientific work mentoring with a proper online clinical research approach for UPJJB-UT Semarang students. The research method uses Research and Development. Data obtained from the results of scientific work mentoring, needs analysis, testing, and model validation. Data collection techniques use questionnaires, interviews, documentation studies, observation, and FGD. The validity test uses model validation from experts and practitioners. The qualitative descriptive analysis uses data displays, data reduction, data verification, and conclusion. The results of the study conclude that the mentoring management model implemented so far was categorized as sufficient, still theoretical, and not practical yet. ORC assistance model is very important and needed because it is practical, effective, and efficient. The ORC mentoring model is very feasible so that it can be implemented to improve the quality of students in producing scientific papers for fulfilling assignments, requirements for completing study program, and scientific publications.

PAMBUDI ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Akhmad Sruji Bahtiar ◽  
Abdul Wafi

The movement let's build a madrasa (GERAMM) is a madrasa innovation program to improve quality towards a great and dignified madrasa. Among the GERAMM programs, one of them is the Madrasah Literacy Movement (GELEM) program with the aim of generating literacy activities in madrasah with the main target of teachers, principals, supervisors and students. The problem in this service is how to improve the quality of teachers in the field of writing scientific papers especially writing (a) research proposals, (b) reports of research results, and (c) scientific publications. The method used in this service is a workshop in which it is conducted with lectures, discussions and questions and answers. The results of the workshop were able to improve the ability of teachers in the field of scientific papers by 31% from the initial value before the workshop. The contribution of this service is to realize literacy programs in madrasas by equipping teachers with scientific writing skills, the GERAMM program is able to boost madrasa innovation towards superior madrasas.


Educatio ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50
Author(s):  
Nurul Septiana ◽  

This study aims to (1) know the Student’s Comprehension in scientific papers, (2) to know the problem of the scientific work of the students and (3) to know some factors become the node in the paper the scientific work. The method in this research is qualitative descriptive. Techniques used in data collection is by documentation, interviews, and questionnaires. The results of this study are (1) The understanding of the students in scientific writing is 75% or the category is good enough, (2) The difficulties of students in Comprehension of scientific paper thesis proposal is being developed again, added problem, preparing hypothesis, data analysis, preparation of research design, and description of instrument that will be used in the research, (3) factors that become solution in writing scientific papers, among others, the conclusion of learning resources; the quality of negative thesis guidance is: misconceptions between supervisors with researchers, other busy lecturers, too many revisions in the proposal, and the replacement of mentors; and peer environments are: a sense of friends who have not made a thesis and hard to divide the time for working while studying.


GeoEco ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Norsidi Norsidi

<p>This study aims to determine the ability of high school (SMA) geography subject teachers in scientific writing in Ketapang Regency. This type of research is survey research which is included in the quantitative category. Therefore, this study uses a sample of one population and uses a questionnaire as an instrument of data collection. The subjects of this study were high school (E) / equivalent level geography subject teachers in Ketapang Regency, which numbered 18 people. Analyzing data is based on the calculation of the percentage of results of filling out questionnaires by respondents. Based on the results of research on the ability of high school level (Geography) subject teachers in scientific writing in Ketapang Regency with the following indicators: 1) the teacher's understanding in making scientific papers has an overall average of 2.5 which is categorized as good; 2) the routine activities that geography subject teachers have done in developing their competencies have an overall average of 2.5 categorized as good; 3) teacher constraints in making scientific papers have an average of 2.38 categorized as less.</p><p>Teacher's Ability, Writing Scientific Work</p>


ALQALAM ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 449
Author(s):  
Abd Wahid

This study tried to find an answer about the position of Sheikh Abdullah al - Asyi in terms of the authenticity of the Hadith. Can be formulated in more detail in the following questions: How does the quality of the hadith contained in the book Shifa' al-Qulub of Sheikh Abdullah al-Asyi?; How methods hadith mention in the book of Shifa' al -Qulub ; How is discussion authority of hadith in the Shifa' al-Qulub? According to the study authors, it can be concluded that: With regard to the quality of the hadith contained in this work, as far as the research that has been done, it can be said that there are several categories of hadith, there is a shahih, hasan and dha'if. The hadiths mention methods contained in the book Shifa' al-Qulub, in terms of the language used is the language Malay. While the script used is Arabic Jawi (jawi writing). In the hadith mention also, the author of this book does not mention the hadith texts in Arabic, both sanad and matan. In addition, the author also does not mention the source of the hadith collection of original sources. Based on the author's own admission, he does not mention the Arabic text, not to mention sanad and matan, and just take the intent or understanding of tradition alone. This, according to the author is to facilitate the readers, not boring and not spend a long time. Can also be explained, following the usual standards of scientific work today, it can be concluded that the reference to the Hadith without mentioning the sanad and matan, and sources, according to researchers in terms of scientific standards to be used as a less credible source or scientific references in scientific papers in present. Key words: Abdullah al-Asyi, Hadith, Authenticity


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-185
Author(s):  
V. Ya. Gelman

The effectiveness of research teams and scientists is largely estimated by their publication activity. One indicator of the quality of scientific work is the absence of plagiarism. The purpose of this paper was to consider the problems that arise with the formal-mechanistic approach to the detection of plagiarism in scientific papers. The questions of the correlation of meaning and plagiarism; quoting your own work; quoting and inaccurate quoting; the use of generally accepted expressions, laws, definitions; the need to refine anti-plagiarism systems are considered. It is shown that due to the fact that anti-plagiarism systems do not analyze the meaning of the text, “overdiagnosis” occurs. As a result of an uncritical approach to the conclusions of such systems, the writing of scientific papers becomes more complicated. The necessity of developing more accurate criteria for determining what is plagiarized in scientific papers is noted. Some suggestions were made to reduce the shortcomings of the formal approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Frans Paillin Rumbi ◽  
Yohanes Krismantyo Susanta ◽  
Daniel Fajar Panuntun

AbstrakBudaya menulis karya ilmiah di Indonesia memiliki tren yang positif.  Pada Tahun 2018, Indonesia menempati urutan ke-2 negara di ASEAN  yang memiliki jumlah publikasi terindeks scopus.  Publikasi karya ilmiah ini menentukan kualitas akademisi dalam mengembangkan ilmunya. Berdasarkan tren ini IAKN Toraja perlu secara aktif untuk mengambil bagian dalam meningkatkan publikasi karya ilmiah nasional.Tujuan dari pengabdian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan publikasi karya ilmiah IAKN Toraja. Metode pengabdian dengan menggunakan pembelajaran aktif, kreatif, dan inovatif dengan prinsip kolaborasi antara dosen dan mahasiswa dalam menulis karya ilmiah. Hasil dari pengabdian ini adalah abstrak naskah penelitian yang siap diteruskan untuk  menjadi artikel ilmiah. Artikel ilmiah yang sudah selesai dilakukan proses submisi ke open journal system  yang tersebar di seluruh Indonesia. Kata kunci: Karya Ilmiah, Penulisan, IAKN Toraja, AbstractCultural write scientific articles in Indonesia have a positive trend. In 2018, Indonesia ranked the second country in ASEAN, which has some Scopus indexed publications. The publication of this scientific work determines the quality of academics in developing their knowledge. Based on this trend, IAKN Toraja needs to actively take part in increasing the publication of national scientific works. This dedication aims to increase the publication of scientific works of IAKN Toraja. The dedication method uses active, creative, and innovative learning with the principle of collaboration between lecturers and students in writing scientific papers. The results of this dedication are abstracts of research texts that are ready to be forwarded to become scientific articles. Scientific articles that have been completed then submitted to the open journal system throughout Indonesia Keywords : Scientific Article, Writing, IAKN Toraja.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Triyanto Triyanto ◽  
Nodi Marefanda ◽  
Arfriani Maifizar ◽  
Nurkhalis Nurkhalis ◽  
Akmal Saputra ◽  
...  

The existence and quality of higher education nowadays can be influenced by the high and low levels of scientific work owned by lecturers and students. This scientific work becomes very important in the existence and quality of tertiary institutions because it's ranking at the national and international level is calculated on the ownership of the scientific work. So it is not surprising that BAN-PT as an external quality assurance institution which also has the task of assessing the accreditation of higher education also includes its assessment on this matter. Thus higher education that is technically operational at the study program level also pressures lecturers and students to be productive, which is to produce as much scientific work as possible. Even some lecturers provide requirements for students to write a scientific paper when they want to propose a thesis session. However, the number of scientific works owned by lecturers and students will not mean anything when not published in a journal that uses an open journal system. This emphasis lies in the open journal system, where the meaning will be far different from online journals. In general, not many students understand how to submit scientific papers in the form of articles to the open journal system there are still many lecturers who do not understand the process in the open journal system. For this reason, knowledge transfer in the form of technical training to submit articles in the online journal system is carried out. The main goal is to provide knowledge and insight into submitting articles. The results of the activity show the progress of understanding and knowledge, this is proven by simulations through the application of OJS version 2 which is used for the training process by the participants.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Anoesyirwan Moeins ◽  
Sudaryono Sudaryono ◽  
Alfiah Khoirunisa

In a scientific work, it is closely related to a writing management. Writing which is a writing activity is inseparable in the learning process. Writing can also be used as a management communication tool in conveying information. There are 4 (four) written communication elements as media tools. But recently a new paradigm has begun to develop that a management of scientific work does not have to be based on scientific research, but also a study of a problem that is analyzed professionally by experts. With the method of description using 5 (five) principles in the management of scientific writing to solve problems. So writing management is needed in compiling scientific papers in order to create good work by following the development of the industrial era 4.0. Thus, the task of intellectuals and intellectuals is not only able to read, but also must be able to manage writing about scientific writings and master the procedures for preparing scientific works. Utilization of Management of Writing Scientific Writing in the Learning Process in Higher Education. Keywords: management of scientific work, management of writing, scientific work.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Try Wulandari ◽  
Emilda Emilda ◽  
Shafiera Lazuarni

Abstract: Writing is an activity to express ideas or ideas that are in someone's mind. everyone must have an idea or idea, but not everyone is able to write down these ideas. some even think that writing requires a high educational background. students, for example, because they are deemed to have taken higher education and are accused of writing from assignments given by the lecturer. The low number of writers in Indonesia means that scientific publications in Indonesia are still inadequate. In 2019, Indonesia succeeded in publishing the most scientific papers when compared to other ASEAN countries such as Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand. However, this figure is still insufficient, so that efforts are needed to increase the number and quality of good research writing. This activity aims to help make it happen. The target of this activity is students, both from public and private universities in Palembang City. The methods used in this PkM activity were material presentation, practical assistance, and discussion together. Based on the results of the questionnaire answers from 36 participants, the majority of participants agreed that this activity provided new knowledge and information in the topic of research writing. In addition, most of the participants also found this training interesting and made them excited to write a good research. So it can be concluded that the majority of students are not proficient in using Mendeley and Grammarly software and feel that both software can make writing their research easier.   Keywords: grammarly; mendeley; research; training; writingAbstrak: Menulis merupakan suatu kegiatan untuk mengungkapkan gagasan atau gagasan yang ada di benak seseorang. setiap orang pasti punya ide atau ide, tapi tidak semua orang mampu menuliskan ide-ide tersebut. bahkan ada yang beranggapan bahwa menulis membutuhkan latar belakang pendidikan yang tinggi. mahasiswa, misalnya, karena dianggap telah menempuh pendidikan tinggi dan dituduh menulis dari tugas-tugas yang diberikan dosen. Rendahnya jumlah penulis di Indonesia membuat publikasi ilmiah di Indonesia masih kurang mencukupi. Pada tahun 2019, Indonesia berhasil menerbitkan karya ilmiah terbanyak jika dibandingkan dengan negara ASEAN lainnya seperti Singapura, Malaysia, dan Thailand. Namun angka tersebut masih belum mencukupi, sehingga diperlukan upaya untuk meningkatkan jumlah dan kualitas penulisan penelitian yang baik. Kegiatan ini bertujuan untuk membantu mewujudkannya. Sasaran kegiatan ini adalah para mahasiswa, baik dari perguruan tinggi negeri maupun perguruan tinggi swasta di Kota Palembang. Metode yang digunakan dalam kegiatan PkM ini adalah Pelatihan. Berdasarkan hasil jawaban kuisioner dari 36 peserta, mayoritas peserta sepakat bahwa kegiatan ini memberikan pengetahuan dan informasi baru dalam topik penulisan penelitian. Selain itu, sebagian besar peserta juga menganggap pelatihan ini menarik dan membuat mereka bersemangat untuk menulis penelitian dengan baik. Maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa mayoritas mahasiswa belum mahir menggunakan software Mendeley dan Grammarly dan merasakan bahwa kedua software tersebut dapat mempermudah penulisan riset mereka.Kata kunci: grammarly; mendeley; pelatihan; penulisan; riset


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60
Author(s):  
Rizkariani Sulaiman ◽  
M. Muhajir

The purpose of this study was to determine the students’ difficulties in writing scientific papers at the English Language Education, Universitas Muslim Indonesia and to find out the needs and learning objectives of the students. The sample was consisted of 44 English Education students registered at the UMI Faculty of Literature during the 2018/2019 academic year. To examine this problem, the study was conducted in a descriptive quantitative design. The instrument used in this study was questionnaires. Research questions consist of: 1) what are the difficulties faced by English Education major students in academic / scientific writing? 2) what are the common errors of English Education students in writing scientific papers? 3) what teaching approach can facilitate success in scientific writing? Based on the results of the study, the difficulties faced in the process of writing scientific papers were related to aspects of grammar (31%), scientific writing style / rules (24%), vocabulary, spelling and coherence (11%), writing arrangement (7%) and punctuation (5%); Three common errors that occur in writing scientific papers namely spelling (29.2%), use of capital letters (17, 75%), and punctuation (15.27%). The approaches needed by the teachers to strengthen and help students to improve their scientific writing referred to reviewing writing such as the level of words, sentences, paragraphs, and grammar, making outlines, applying three steps in the writing process such as planning, writing and revision, and understanding the formal and informal styles as well as oral and written forms so as to be able to avoid words and phrases that were not needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document