Utilization of Management of Writing Scientific in the Learning Process in Higher Education

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Anoesyirwan Moeins ◽  
Sudaryono Sudaryono ◽  
Alfiah Khoirunisa

In a scientific work, it is closely related to a writing management. Writing which is a writing activity is inseparable in the learning process. Writing can also be used as a management communication tool in conveying information. There are 4 (four) written communication elements as media tools. But recently a new paradigm has begun to develop that a management of scientific work does not have to be based on scientific research, but also a study of a problem that is analyzed professionally by experts. With the method of description using 5 (five) principles in the management of scientific writing to solve problems. So writing management is needed in compiling scientific papers in order to create good work by following the development of the industrial era 4.0. Thus, the task of intellectuals and intellectuals is not only able to read, but also must be able to manage writing about scientific writings and master the procedures for preparing scientific works. Utilization of Management of Writing Scientific Writing in the Learning Process in Higher Education. Keywords: management of scientific work, management of writing, scientific work.

Author(s):  
Andi Anto Patak ◽  
Muhammad Tahir

<span>People who plagiarize have a complex problem. Plagiarism could be by accident, by mistake, or on purpose. This research aims at exploring the reasons for plagiarizing and the significance of citing and referencing using Mendeley to avoid plagiarism. Four Indonesian Mendeley Advisors were interviewed online using convenient sampling technique. This study revealed that reasons for plagiarizing are time restriction, laziness, and busy. The significance of citing and referencing using Mendeley to avoid plagiarism are (1) confirm, justify, and claim the issue conveyed in scientific work; (2) highlight a particular idea; (3) criticize or approve the premise of others, and (4) build argument. Mendeley usage acquaintance for scientific writing is expected to be practical tools for avoiding plagiarism and promote academic honesty in the setting of higher education. However, the role of supervisor is crucial to provide useful feedback for their students’ writing to help students avoid plagiarism. Besides, university should create comfortable academic environment by providing free seminar and workshop on academic writing to educate students avoid plagiarism.</span>


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Binti Muflikah ◽  
Swidarto Swidarto ◽  
Vica Ananta Kusuma

Scientific writing plays a crucial role in determining the quality of students and universities. So far, the ability of students to establish scientific works is varied. Some students can produce scientific work in an APIK (Asli, Penting, Ilmiah, Konsisten) way which means Original, Important, Scientific, and Consistent), as well as in a "SMART" (Specific, Manageable, Acceptable, Realistic and Time-bound) way. However, some of them also encounter difficulties so they need assistance on a collaborative based scientific writing through Online Research Clinic (ORC) approach. Collaborative-based mentoring can build collegiality and collaboration among tutors, students, and UPBJJ-UT managers. Effective mentoring requires an ORC approach. An online research clinic is a place designed to help students who have difficulty writing scientific papers through clinical methods, starting from problem identification, diagnosis, prognosis, synthesis, treatment, reflection using internet / online network media such as website, email, WhatsApp, telegram, Google classroom, webinars, zoom and so on. Online Research Clinic is a solution to solve students' difficulties in writing scientific papers. The existence of ORC is an innovation to create independent learning in the digital era due to its flexibility and easy accessibility at all times both face-to-face and online. Besides, it is also used by tutors and managers to collaborate in providing consultation services to students. This study aims to analyze and synthesize the management model of scientific work mentoring with a proper online clinical research approach for UPJJB-UT Semarang students. The research method uses Research and Development. Data obtained from the results of scientific work mentoring, needs analysis, testing, and model validation. Data collection techniques use questionnaires, interviews, documentation studies, observation, and FGD. The validity test uses model validation from experts and practitioners. The qualitative descriptive analysis uses data displays, data reduction, data verification, and conclusion. The results of the study conclude that the mentoring management model implemented so far was categorized as sufficient, still theoretical, and not practical yet. ORC assistance model is very important and needed because it is practical, effective, and efficient. The ORC mentoring model is very feasible so that it can be implemented to improve the quality of students in producing scientific papers for fulfilling assignments, requirements for completing study program, and scientific publications.


GeoEco ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Norsidi Norsidi

<p>This study aims to determine the ability of high school (SMA) geography subject teachers in scientific writing in Ketapang Regency. This type of research is survey research which is included in the quantitative category. Therefore, this study uses a sample of one population and uses a questionnaire as an instrument of data collection. The subjects of this study were high school (E) / equivalent level geography subject teachers in Ketapang Regency, which numbered 18 people. Analyzing data is based on the calculation of the percentage of results of filling out questionnaires by respondents. Based on the results of research on the ability of high school level (Geography) subject teachers in scientific writing in Ketapang Regency with the following indicators: 1) the teacher's understanding in making scientific papers has an overall average of 2.5 which is categorized as good; 2) the routine activities that geography subject teachers have done in developing their competencies have an overall average of 2.5 categorized as good; 3) teacher constraints in making scientific papers have an average of 2.38 categorized as less.</p><p>Teacher's Ability, Writing Scientific Work</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Triyanto Triyanto ◽  
Nodi Marefanda ◽  
Arfriani Maifizar ◽  
Nurkhalis Nurkhalis ◽  
Akmal Saputra ◽  
...  

The existence and quality of higher education nowadays can be influenced by the high and low levels of scientific work owned by lecturers and students. This scientific work becomes very important in the existence and quality of tertiary institutions because it's ranking at the national and international level is calculated on the ownership of the scientific work. So it is not surprising that BAN-PT as an external quality assurance institution which also has the task of assessing the accreditation of higher education also includes its assessment on this matter. Thus higher education that is technically operational at the study program level also pressures lecturers and students to be productive, which is to produce as much scientific work as possible. Even some lecturers provide requirements for students to write a scientific paper when they want to propose a thesis session. However, the number of scientific works owned by lecturers and students will not mean anything when not published in a journal that uses an open journal system. This emphasis lies in the open journal system, where the meaning will be far different from online journals. In general, not many students understand how to submit scientific papers in the form of articles to the open journal system there are still many lecturers who do not understand the process in the open journal system. For this reason, knowledge transfer in the form of technical training to submit articles in the online journal system is carried out. The main goal is to provide knowledge and insight into submitting articles. The results of the activity show the progress of understanding and knowledge, this is proven by simulations through the application of OJS version 2 which is used for the training process by the participants.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60
Author(s):  
Rizkariani Sulaiman ◽  
M. Muhajir

The purpose of this study was to determine the students’ difficulties in writing scientific papers at the English Language Education, Universitas Muslim Indonesia and to find out the needs and learning objectives of the students. The sample was consisted of 44 English Education students registered at the UMI Faculty of Literature during the 2018/2019 academic year. To examine this problem, the study was conducted in a descriptive quantitative design. The instrument used in this study was questionnaires. Research questions consist of: 1) what are the difficulties faced by English Education major students in academic / scientific writing? 2) what are the common errors of English Education students in writing scientific papers? 3) what teaching approach can facilitate success in scientific writing? Based on the results of the study, the difficulties faced in the process of writing scientific papers were related to aspects of grammar (31%), scientific writing style / rules (24%), vocabulary, spelling and coherence (11%), writing arrangement (7%) and punctuation (5%); Three common errors that occur in writing scientific papers namely spelling (29.2%), use of capital letters (17, 75%), and punctuation (15.27%). The approaches needed by the teachers to strengthen and help students to improve their scientific writing referred to reviewing writing such as the level of words, sentences, paragraphs, and grammar, making outlines, applying three steps in the writing process such as planning, writing and revision, and understanding the formal and informal styles as well as oral and written forms so as to be able to avoid words and phrases that were not needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-74
Author(s):  
Firman Khaidir

This aims of this research are to investigate teachers’ problems related to the career development and to find out the benefits of training for the development of teachers’ career. This research utilized qualitative method. It was conducted at SMA Negeri 8 Batanghari Regency. The research subjects were from 59 teachers. Data collection instruments consisted of observation and interview. All data were analysed descriptively. The results of this study are: Teachers already understand the writing of scientific papers which is a major obstacle in managing promotions. This effort was made in accordance with the needs of teachers in terms of knowing the guidelines for writing scientific papers which so far have not been in line with the supervisors of the Batanghari District Education Office. In addition, the obstacle faced is the motivation of teachers to conduct CAR in each learning process that can be used as scientific writing material so that it can be published in the form of a journal with ISBN / ISSN standards. So that credit numbers are met for teachers to take the promotions.


2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-44
Author(s):  
Andrey Vyacheslavovich Svatyev

ABSTRACT In didactics of higher education institution’s scientists reveal the forms of learning process organisation and the forms of teaching students through the ways of the interaction between the teacher and their students when solving didactic tasks. They are revealed by means of different ways of activity management, communication, interpersonal relations. The content of education, educational technologies, styles, principles, methods and teaching aids etc. are realized in them. The analysis of the Ukrainian studies and publications of the decade (A. M. Aleksyuk, Y. Y. Bolyubash, A. A. Vasilyuk, V. I. Bondar, V. A. Semichenko and others) gives reasons to state that unfortunately we observe the substitution of two notions: the form of organization and the form of teaching, as well as narrowing the notion “teaching of students”.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-130
Author(s):  
Baehaqi Baehaqi

[Bahasa]: Masalah dalam dunia pendidikan hususnya dalam pendidkan pormal, khususnya di Madrasah Aliyah Miftahul Ishlah adalah kegiatan pendidikan masih terpasung dalam persoalan didaktika atau persoalan peroses pembelajaran. Akibatnya, esensi pendidikan yaitu pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan menjadi terabaikan. Kegiatan pengabdian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan profesioalisme guru sehingga mutu pendidikan meningkat. Kegiatan ini sekaligus sebagai sarana mendekatkan lembaga pendidikan tinggi dalam hal ini Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) mataram dengan masyarakat. Hal ini merupakan salah satu unsur dari Tri Darma perguruan tinggi, sehingga perguruan tinggi dapat memberdayakan masyarakat dan mempersiapkan generasi yang berkualitas dalam tataran pengetahuan, agama, dan moral. Metode yang digunakan dalam kegiatan pengabdian ini adalah Participatory Action Research (PAR) yang bertujuan untuk melibatkan para guru sebagai peserta aktif pelatihan sehingga dapat mendorong tumbuhnya minat mereka dalam menulis karya ilmiah setelah selesai pelatihan. Hasil dari pelatihan ini adalah tumbuhnya minat guru dalam menulis karya ilmiah dan tersusunnya sebuah karya tulis ilmiah berupa buku sederhana. Kata Kunci: pengembangan, minat dan potensi, karya tulis ilmiah [English]: The problem in the formal education, especially in the Madrasah Aliyah Miftahul Ishlah is that educational activities are still attached to inactic problems or learning process problems. As a result, the essence of education, namely the development of science, was neglected. This community service program aims to develop teacher professionalism so that the quality of education increases. This program is also a means of bringing higher education institutions closer together in this case the Mataram State Islamic University (UIN) with the community. It is one of the elements of higher education mandate, so that universities can empower the community and prepare a generation at the level of knowledge, religion and morals. The method used is Participatory Action Research (PAR), which aims to involve the teachers as active participants in the training so that they can encourage the growth of their interest in writing scientific work after the training is finished. The results of this training were the growing interest of teachers in writing scientific papers and the compilation of a scientific paper in the form of a simple book. Keywords: development, interest and potential, scientific papers


Author(s):  
Lira Hayu Afdetis Mana

This research is motivated by the difficulties of students in determining the topic of scientific writing, difficulties in conveying ideas and limitations of references. This study aims to develop a learning model for writing scientific papers using the guided inquiry method. This type of research is development research. This study uses a 4-D development research design. The results of this study are as follows: (1) the material for writing scientific papers is difficult because students do not understand the concept of Scientific Writing. (2) in developing scientific work students do not yet know the systematics of scientific writing and students often make ineffective sentences (3) students really need freedom in determining writing topics and ideas (4) most students need the concept of learning to write scientific papers, (5) most students need lecturer guidance in their writing, (6) most students need systematic scientific work concepts, (7) most students need lots of references to write scientific papers. Based on the analysis of student needs, it is necessary to develop a Guided Inquiry-Based Scientific Writing Textbook that provides opportunities for students to find their own concept of learning to write scientific papers. Through Guided Inquiry, students are trained to think critically with teacher guidance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Sri Lestari Handayani ◽  
Trie Utari Dewi

ABSTRAK Kegiatan pengabdian ini dilatarbelakangi permasalahan mitra yang diidentifikasi meliputi 1) Umumnya para guru merasa enggan  untuk mengurus kenaikan pangkat/golongan karena persyaratan yang dirasa berat; 2) Kebanyakan guru stagnan pada pangkat/golongan IVa; 3) Guru kurang paham cara membuat karya ilmiah yang sesuai dengan standar; dan 4) Guru tidak tahu bagaimana cara mempublikasikan karya ilmiah. Adapun solusi yang ditawarkan ialah memberikan pelatihan penulisan karya tulis ilmiah bagi guru-guru SDN Kebon Pala 11, 12, dan 13 Pagi Jakarta Timur. Target luaran pengabdian ini berupa jasa pelatihan berupa informasi bagi guru-guru SDN Kebon Pala 11, 12, dan 13 Pagi terkait penulisan karya tulis ilmiah dan publikasi artikel ilmiah. Melalui kegiatan pengabdian yang telah dilakukan memiliki tiga hal yang ditingkatkan yaitu (1) memperdalam pengetahuan guru tentang karya tulis ilmiah, (2) mengenalkan dan menggalakkan kegiatan menulis artikel ilmiah di jurnal untuk meningkatkan kompetensi profesionalisme guru dan (3) memotivasi guru-guru untuk mulai mempublikasikan karya tulis ilmiah berupa artikel ilmiah di jurnal. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode ceramah, diskusi, dan tanya jawab. Hasil dari pelaksanaan kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini yaitu memberikan pemahaman tentang karya tulis ilmiah, alasan mengapa guru harus membuat karya ilmiah, konsep karya tulis ilmiah, dan proses menulis karya ilmiah. Selanjutnya para guru mendapatkan materi tentang cara mempublikasikan karya tulis ilmiah beserta tahapan-tahapannya. Lalu peserta diminta untuk membuat karya ilmiah sebagai tindak lanjut untuk kegiatan pengabdian berikutnya.Kata Kunci: guru sekolah dasar; penulisan karya ilmiah; profesionalisme guru. ABSTRACK This devotion activity is motivated by partner problems identified including 1) Generally the teachers feel reluctant to take care of promotion / class because the requirements are considered heavy; 2) Most teachers are stagnant in rank IVa; 3) The teacher does not understand how to make scientific work in accordance with the standards; and 4) The teacher does not know how to publish scientific work. The solution offered is to provide training in writing scientific papers for teachers at SDN Kebon Pala 11, 12 and 13 in East Jakarta. The target of this devotion output is training services in the form of information for teachers of Kebon Pala Elementary School 11, 12 and 13 in the morning related to scientific writing and publication of scientific articles. Through the devotion activities that have been carried out, three things have been improved, that is (1) deepening the teacher's knowledge of scientific papers, (2) introducing and promoting the activities of writing scientific articles in journals to improve teacher professional competence and (3) motivating teachers to start publish scientific papers in the form of scientific articles in journals. The method used is the method of lecture, discussion, and question and answer. The results of the implementation of community devotion activities are to provide an understanding of scientific writing, the reason why the teacher must make scientific work, the concept of scientific writing, and the process of writing scientific papers. Next the teachers get material about how to publish scientific papers along with the stages. Then participants are asked to make scientific work as a follow-up to their next devotion activities.Keywords: primary school teachers; teacher professionalism; writing scientific work.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document