Localization Techniques on a 0.15um CMOS Device: Charge Pump Failure Analysis

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Pan ◽  
Thomas Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Electrical Characterization ◽  
Charge Pump ◽  
Front Side ◽  
Pump Failure ◽  
Electrical Failure ◽  
Optical Proximity Correction ◽  
A Charge

Abstract In recent years, there have been many advances in the equipment and techniques used to isolate faults. There are many options available to the failure analyst. The available techniques fall into the categories of electrical, photonic, thermal and electron/ion beam [1]. Each technique has its advantages and its limitations. In this paper, we introduce a case of successful failure analysis using a combination of several fault localization techniques on a 0.15um CMOS device with seven layers of metal. It includes electrical failure mode characterization, front side photoemission, backside photoemission, Focused Ion Beam (FIB), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and liquid crystal. Electrical characterization along with backside photoemission proved most useful in this case as a poly short problem was found to be causing a charge pump failure. A specific type of layout, often referred to as a hammerhead layout, and the use of Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) contributed to the poly level shorts.

A Method to Enhance the Front-Side Lapping Process for Localisation of Sub-Surface Defect for Advanced Packages

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sze Yee Tan ◽  
Chiu Soon Wong ◽  
Chea Wee Lo ◽  
Cin Sheng Goh
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Surface Defect ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Assembly Process ◽  
Front Side ◽  
Root Cause ◽  
The Common ◽  
Thinning Process ◽  
Non Destructive

Abstract In the back-end assembly process, all of the packages will be tested prior to disposition to the customers in order to filter out any device with failure. For a reject unit with an unknown failure mechanism, it will be subjected to a comprehensive failure analysis (FA) to identify the root cause of the failure. Non-destructive verification, following by front-side decapsulation and internal physical inspection is the common way to visualise and identify the physical defect that usually causes the failure of a device during the back-end assembly process. For certain failures, visualization of the defect might not be straight forward after the decapsulation because the defect may be embedded or buried underneath a layer or wedge bond on the die. In this case, a more complicated FA analysis flow which comprises various precision techniques such as parallel lapping, hotspot localisation and focused-ion-beam (FIB) analyses will be needed to thin down the top layer/wedge bond for a precise localisation of the defect prior to precision analysis by FIB. However, the process to thin down the top layer/wedge bond with an exposed die of a partially decapsulated package is a tricky job as artefacts such as crack/scratches on die are likely to be introduced during the process of polishing. Also it is relatively difficult to control the thickness and levelling of the top layer/wedge bond during the thinning process. In this work, we developed a method that allows the analyst to re-cap the partially decapped package, and also to precisely measure and thin down the top layer to an accuracy of less than < 2um without the introduction of artefacts.

Pulse Laser Ablation Techniques for IC Package Substrate Modifications and Validation

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. Mulholland ◽  
Ahmed A. Helmy ◽  
Anthony V. Dao
Keyword(s):  
Integrated Circuits ◽  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Pulse Laser ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Back Side ◽  
Front Side ◽  
Local Approach ◽  
Ic Package ◽  
Level Analysis

Abstract Post silicon validation techniques specifically Focused Ion Beam (FIB) circuit editing and Failure Analysis (FA) require sample preparation on Integrated Circuits (IC). Although these preparation techniques are typically done globally across the encapsulated and silicon packaging materials, in some scenarios with tight mechanical or thermal boundary conditions, only a local approach can be attempted for the analysis. This local approach to access the underlying features, such as circuits, solder bumps, and electrical traces can be divided into two modification approaches. The back side approach is typically done for die level analysis by de-processing through encapsulated mold compound and silicon gaining access to the silicon transistor level. On the other hand, the front side approach is typically used for package level analysis by de-processing the ball grid array (BGA) and package substrate layers. Both of these local de-processing approaches can be done by using the conventional Laser Chemical Etching (LCE) platforms. The focus of this paper will be to investigate a front side modification approach to provide substrate material removal solutions. Process details and techniques will be discussed to gain access to metal signals for further failure analysis and debug. A pulse laser will be used at various processing stages to de-process IC package substrate materials.

Failure Analysis of Tungsten Stud Defect from the CMP Process

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Takagi ◽  
Y. Kohno ◽  
S. Nukii
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Electrical Characterization ◽  
Open Circuit ◽  
Physical Analysis ◽  
Metal Line ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Defect Isolation

Abstract This paper describes a failure analysis that effectively combined multiple analytic techniques to find the cause of I/O leakage in a flawed chip produced for an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) product. Internal probing was initially used for defect isolation and a Tungsten (W) stud open circuit flaw was isolated by electrical characterization with internal probing. SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy), TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy, and FE-AES (Field Emission Auger Electron Spectroscopy) analysis with FIB (Focused Ion Beam) preparation were used for physical analysis. Cross-sectional SEM and TEM observations showed a gap with foreign material (FM) between the bottom of the metal line and the top of the W stud, possibly from the W CMP (chemical mechanical polish) process. FE-AES is effective for the analysis of light materials and their chemical composition, so a flat milling FIB process was used to prepare a cross-section for FE-AES analysis of the FM and the interfaces of the open defect. The spectra showed that the FM was traceable to the W CMP process. From these analytical results and problem reproduction experiments in the W CMP process on the manufacturing line, the failure mechanism was identified.

Electrical Characterization of Different Failure Modes in Sub-100 nm Devices Using Nanoprobing Technique

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Hendarto ◽  
S.L. Toh ◽  
J. Sudijono ◽  
P.K. Tan ◽  
H. Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Electrical Characterization ◽  
Nickel Silicide ◽  
Fault Isolation ◽  
Technology Nodes ◽  
Scanning Electron

Abstract The scanning electron microscope (SEM) based nanoprobing technique has established itself as an indispensable failure analysis (FA) technique as technology nodes continue to shrink according to Moore's Law. Although it has its share of disadvantages, SEM-based nanoprobing is often preferred because of its advantages over other FA techniques such as focused ion beam in fault isolation. This paper presents the effectiveness of the nanoprobing technique in isolating nanoscale defects in three different cases in sub-100 nm devices: soft-fail defect caused by asymmetrical nickel silicide (NiSi) formation, hard-fail defect caused by abnormal NiSi formation leading to contact-poly short, and isolation of resistive contact in a large electrical test structure. Results suggest that the SEM based nanoprobing technique is particularly useful in identifying causes of soft-fails and plays a very important role in investigating the cause of hard-fails and improving device yield.

Automatic Determination of Optimal FIB Operations for Improved Circuit Probing and Fast Reconfiguration

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Desplats ◽  
Timothee Dargnies ◽  
Jean-Christophe Courrege ◽  
Philippe Perdu ◽  
Jean-Louis Noullet
Keyword(s):  
Integrated Circuit ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Semiconductor Devices ◽  
Front Side ◽  
Automatic Determination ◽  
Metal Line ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Metal Layers

Abstract Focused Ion Beam (FIB) tools are widely used for Integrated Circuit (IC) debug and repair. With the increasing density of recent semiconductor devices, FIB operations are increasingly challenged, requiring access through 4 or more metal layers to reach a metal line of interest. In some cases, accessibility from the front side, through these metal layers, is so limited that backside FIB operations appear to be the most appropriate approach. The questions to be resolved before starting frontside or backside FIB operations on a device are: 1. Is it do-able, are the metal lines accessible? 2. What is the optimal positioning (e.g. accessing a metal 2 line is much faster and easier than digging down to a metal 6 line)? (for the backside) 3. What risk, time and cost are involved in FIB operations? In this paper, we will present a new approach, which allows the FIB user or designer to calculate the optimal FIB operation for debug and IC repair. It automatically selects the fastest and easiest milling and deposition FIB operations.

Direct Plan View FIB Liftout for Near-Surface Defect Analysis in TEM

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max L. Lifson ◽  
Carla M. Chapman ◽  
D. Philip Pokrinchak ◽  
Phyllis J. Campbell ◽  
Greg S. Chrisman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Silicon Germanium ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Surface Defects ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Misfit Dislocations ◽  
Tem Analysis ◽  
Plan View ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Straightforward Method

Abstract Plan view TEM imaging is a powerful technique for failure analysis and semiconductor process characterization. Sample preparation for near-surface defects requires additional care, as the surface of the sample needs to be protected to avoid unintentionally induced damage. This paper demonstrates a straightforward method to create plan view samples in a dual beam focused ion beam (FIB) for TEM studies of near-surface defects, such as misfit dislocations in heteroepitaxial growths. Results show that misfit dislocations are easily imaged in bright-field TEM and STEM for silicon-germanium epitaxial growth. Since FIB tools are ubiquitous in semiconductor failure analysis labs today, the plan view method presented provides a quick to implement, fast, consistent, and straightforward method of generating samples for TEM analysis. While this technique has been optimized for near-surface defects, it can be used with any application requiring plan view TEM analysis.

Fast Turn-around Failure Analysis of Metal Interconnection Using FIB and LA ICP-MS

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zixiao Pan ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
Fuhe Li
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Inductively Coupled Plasma ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Detection Sensitivity ◽  
Chemical Contamination ◽  
Inductively Coupled ◽  
Minimal Sample ◽  
Icp Ms

Abstract This paper introduces our effort in failure analysis of a 200 nm thick metal interconnection on a glass substrate and covered with a passivation layer. Structural damage in localized areas of the metal interconnections was observed with the aid of focused ion beam (FIB) cross-sectioning. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (LA ICP-MS) was then applied to the problematic areas on the interconnection for chemical survey. LA ICP-MS showed direct evidence of localized chemical contamination, which has likely led to corrosion (or over-etching) of the metal interconnection and the assembly failure. Due to the high detection sensitivity of LA ICP-MS and its compatibility with insulating material analysis, minimal sample preparation is required. As a result, the combination of FIB and LA ICP-MS enabled successful meso-scale failure analysis with fast turnaround and reasonable cost.

Application of FIB Circuit Edit in Analysis of Memory Failure of SOI Devices

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. G. Song ◽  
S. K. Loh ◽  
X. H. Zheng ◽  
S.P. Neo ◽  
C. K. Oh
Keyword(s):  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Electrical Characterization ◽  
Silicon On Insulator ◽  
First Case ◽  
Edx Analyses ◽  
Memory Failure ◽  
Soi Devices ◽  
Voltage Contrast ◽  
Soi Technology

Abstract This article presents two cases to demonstrate the application of focused ion beam (FIB) circuit edit in analysis of memory failure of silicon on insulator (SOI) devices using XTEM and EDX analyses. The first case was a single bit failure of SRAM units manufactured with 90 nm technology in SOI wafer. The second case was the whole column failure with a single bit pass for a SRAM unit. From the results, it was concluded that FIB circuit edit and electrical characterization is a good methodology for further narrowing down the defective location of memory failure, especially for SOI technology, where contact-level passive voltage contrast is not suitable.

Logical-to-Physical Device Navigation using Place-and-Route Data as an Alternative to LVS

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Nicholson
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Traditional Methods ◽  
Navigation Data ◽  
Use Of Time ◽  
Place And Route ◽  
Physical Layout

Abstract Logical-to-physical device navigation for failure analysis is often used to drive physical probers and focused ion beam tools. Traditional methods of creating navigation data rely upon the use of time consuming Layout-versus-Schematic (LVS) based methods. By using existing place-and-route data, full cross-linked navigation between schematic and physical layout may be achieved in a fraction of the time that it takes for the LVS methods to be used. Place-and-route data offers significantly more information to the analyst than LVS based data.

Site-Specific Low Angle Plasma FIB Milling for Cross-Sectional Electrical Characterization

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan Zhang ◽  
Jane Y. Li ◽  
John Aguada ◽  
Howard Marks
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Electrical Characteristic ◽  
Preparation Method ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Grazing Angle ◽  
Electrical Characterization ◽  
Sample Preparation Method ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Site Specific

Abstract This paper introduces a novel sample preparation method using plasma focused ion-beam (pFIB) milling at low grazing angle. Efficient and high precision preparation of site-specific cross-sectional samples with minimal alternation of device parameters can be achieved with this method. It offers the capability of acquiring a range of electrical characteristic signals from specific sites on the cross-section of devices, including imaging of junctions, Fins in the FinFETs and electrical probing of interconnect metal traces.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document