scholarly journals PEMBELAJARAN TAKE AND GIVE DALAM UPAYA MENGEMBANGKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-188
Author(s):  
Irena Puji Luritawaty

AbstrakLatar belakang penelitian ini yaitu permasalahan masih rendahnya kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis pada mahasiswa. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui efektifitas pembelajaran take and give dalam upaya mengembangkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis pada mahasiswa. Adapun populasi dalam penelitian ini yaitu mahasiswa tingkat III pada salah satu perguruan tinggi swasta di kabupaten Garut, dengan sampel yaitu mahasiswa tingkat IIIA dan IIIB. Instrumen dalam penelitian ini yaitu berupa tes kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dalam bentuk pretest dan posttest. Analisis data yang dilakukan terhadap hasil pretest dan posttest yaitu diawali dengan uji normalitas, kemudian uji homogenitas dan uji-t. Hasil penelitian ini secara garis besar menunjukan bahwa terdapat perbedaan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis antara mahasiswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran take and give dan yang memperoleh pembelajaran ceramah biasa, dimana mahasiswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran take and give memperoleh hasil akhir kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis yang lebih baik daripada yang memperoleh pembelajaran ceramah biasa. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran take and give dapat secara efektif mengembangkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis. AbstractThe background of this research is the problem is still the low ability of understanding mathematical concepts in the students. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of learning take and give in an effort to develop the ability to understand mathematical concepts in students. The population in this study are third-grade students at one private college in Garut district, with a sample of students IIIA and IIIB. Instruments in this research is a test of ability to comprehend mathematical concepts in the form of pretest and posttest. Analysis of data conducted on the pretest and posttest results is started with the normality test, then homogeneity test and t-test. The results of this study broadly indicate that there is a difference in the ability of understanding mathematical concepts between students who receive learning take and give and who get the ordinary lecture learning, where students who get learning take and give gain the end of the ability of understanding the concept of mathematical better than those who obtained ordinary lecture lessons. This suggests that take and give learning can effectively develop the ability to understand mathematical concepts.

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-132
Author(s):  
Beni Junedi ◽  
Dona Marta Ayu

Abstract. The purpouse of this study is to know the understanding of the mathematical concepts of students with the application of REACT learning strategies better than the understanding of mathematical concepts of convensional learning students. This type of research is Quasi Exsperiment with Randomized Subjects Posttest Only Control Group Design. Population of students of class VIII SMP Negeri 3 Pasir Penyu. Sampling is done by Random Sampling. The classes selected to be the experimental class are class VIII4 and the control class is class VIII3. Data collection techniques used test instrument understanding students’ math concepts. The technique of data analysis using t-test as hypothesis test, with pre- requirement test is normality test and homogeneity test. Based on the calculation of the dip- t test taritmethic =2,113 and 𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 =2,005, because 𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐>𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 so it can be concluded that 𝐻𝑎 accepted means the hypothesis proposed in accepted researcth that is the understanding of mathematical concepts by applying REACT’s strategy of learning is better than the understanding of mathematical concepts of students using convensional learning class VIII SMP Negeri 3 Pasir Penyu.Keywords: Relating, Exsperiencing, Applying, Cooperating and Transfering (REACT), understanding concepts.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-228
Author(s):  
Reni Nuraeni

AbstrakMatematika merupakan ilmu abstrak, untuk mempelajarinya diperlukan kemampuan yang memadai. Salah satunya memiliki kemampuan untuk mengkomunikasikannya dalam bentuk ide, simbol, maupun bahasa matematika. Selain itu, komunikasi merupakan bagian yang sangat penting dalam matematika. Untuk mengembangkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis diterapkan pembelajaran Group Investigation. Pembelajaran ini menekankan pada keaktifan mahasiswa ketika pembelajaran. Populasi dalam penelitian ini yaitu mahasiswa di salah satu perguruan tinggi swasta di Garut, dengan sampel dua kelas mahasiswa tingkat II yaitu kelas B sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas C sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa tes kemampuan komunikasi matematis, yang digunakan pada pretest dan posttest. Analisis data pada hasil pretest diawali dengan uji normalitas kemudian uji Mann Whitney. Sedangkan analisis data pada hasil posttest diawali dengan uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, kemudian uji t. Secara garis besar, hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan komunikasi matematis mahasiswa yang mendapatkan pembelajaran Group Investigation lebih baik daripada mahasiswa yang mendapatkan pembelajaran konvensional. AbstractMathematics is an abstract science, to learn it required adequate capability. One of which has the ability to communicate it in the form of ideas, symbols, and math language. Besides, communication is a very important part in mathematics. To develop mathematical communication abilities applied Group Investigations learning. This lesson emphasizes student activeness. Population in this research were students in one private college in Garut, with sample of two classes of students of grade two that is class B as experiment class and C as control class. The instrument used in this research is a test of mathematical communication ability, used in pretest and posttest. Data analysis on pretest result begins with normality test then Mann Whitney test. While data analysis on posttest result begins with normality test, homogeneity test, and t test. In general, the results of this study indicate that the mathematical communication skills of students who get Group Investigation learning better than students who get conventional learning.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-48
Author(s):  
Helma Mustika ◽  
Endang Sutriana

Abstract. The purpose of this research is to know the understanding of mathematical concepts of students with the use of conceptual attainment model is better than the understanding of students' mathematical concepts with conventional learning. This research is quasi experimental research. The research design used was randomized subjects posttest only control group design. By selecting a Class VIII-2 sample as an experimental class and class VIII-1 as a control class of analytical techniques using the t-test as a hypothesis test, the prerequisite test is a normality test and homogeneity test. Based on the hypothesis test, t-test, obtained the price tarithmetic = 3.073 and price ttable = -1.997 at the real level of 0.05. Because tarithmetic > ttable, so Ha accepted and H0 rejected. So it can be concluded that the ability to understand the concept of mathematics students using conceptual learning model attainment better than the ability to understand the concept of mathematics students using conventional learning model.Keywords: Concept Attainment, Understanding of Concept


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-182
Author(s):  
Linda Indiyarti Putri ◽  
Nurwidiyanto Nurwidiyanto ◽  
Alfiana Rohmah

The development of a fraction textbook with an Ethnomathematics approach for the third-grade student of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI) has an urgency to be implemented in fulfilling the alternative needs for learning mathematics textually and realistically. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of fraction material textbooks with an ethnomathematics approach in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. The population of the study was the third-grade students of MI Roudlotul Huda of Sekaran Gunungpati. The development model is carried out using the concept of development research according to Borg and Gall's 4D model. The sample of this study is using simple random sampling. Product trials were carried out in two class groups, namely IIIA as the experimental class and III B as the control class. The method of obtaining data used questionnaires, tests, and documentation. Then, the early step analysis of the data used the homogeneity and normality test. Furthermore, the data were analyzed using independent samples t-test and paired samples t-test. The product validation analysis results based on the material aspects state that the fraction textbooks with an ethnomathematics approach are suitable to use with a percentage of 75.8% and 75.8% from the material aspect. Meanwhile, response to textbook products in the attractive category obtained a percentage of 89%.


Author(s):  
Riswana Maulidah ◽  
Rarasaning Satianingsih ◽  
Via Yustitia

Counting skills are an important aspect in learning mathematics. Lack of varied use of media counting in learning, makes students experience boredom in the teaching and learning process. Flash card media is one of the media used to encourage creativity and improve student understanding such as math skills. This study aims to determine whether the average numeracy skills of third grade students in material operations taught by using flash card media is better than students who do not use media at SDN Kebondalem Mojosari, academic year 2019/2020. This research is a quantitative study of experimental design quasi type. Design used is the Posttest-Only Control Design. The study population was all students of SDN Kebondalem Mojosari. Samples were taken by simple random sampling technique so that the class III-A (experimental class) and III-B (control class). Data collection techniques used were tests with instruments consisting of 15 items. Data analysis techniques using the normality test, homogeneity test, balance test, and t test with SPSS 16 assisted. The results showed that the average numeracy skills of third grade students in material operations taught by using flash card media were significantly better than students who did not use media.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubaitun Rubaitun

This study aims to determine whether the improvement of students' mathematical problem solving skills that get the learning of Model-Eliciting Activities is better than students who get regular learning. Method in this research is experiment and research design pretest and postest in experiment and control class. The population in this study were all students of MTs Kota Cimahi. School samples were taken at random, and obtained by MTs Negeri Kota Cimahi. Then the sample is selected two class VIII at random class. The experimental class uses Model-Eliciting Activities, while the control class uses ordinary learning. The hypothesis in this research is the improvement of student solving abilities of MTs students in Cimahi whose learning using Model-Eliciting Activities is better than using ordinary learning. Research data obtained through the instrument of posttest mathematical problem solving ability. The posttest data is processed by normality test, homogeneity test, and two average difference test using SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solution) software version 16.0 for Windows. The results showed that the improvement of problem solving ability of MTs students in Cimahi whose learning using Model-Eliciting Activities was better than those using ordinary learning.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-89
Author(s):  
Yuli Mulyawati ◽  
Resyi A Ghani

This research using comparative methods. The purpose of this research is to compare the learning outcomes of learning IPS by using Media Monopoly and Media Powerpoint . This research was conducted at SDN Katulampa 1 in Bogor City Class VA, and VB in August odd semester 2019/2020. The analysis technique used is the analysis prerequisite test which includes a normality test, a homogeneity test, then a research hypothesis is carried out using the t test. The results empirically n shows that there perbendingan learning outcomes in Media Monopoly seen in the average score - average N-Gain 8 5 de ngan mastery learning outcomes 92 %, while the average score - average N-Gain on Media Power Point that is equal to 75 with the thoroughness of the results belaja r 86 %. ) . And the results of testing the hypothesis states that H o rejected and H a accepted because t arithmetic (1.67469)> t table (1.67469). Based on the above results, it can be concluded that there is a comparison of the results of learning by using Media Monopoly and Media Power Point , and Media efektif is Media Monopoly.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-156
Author(s):  
Yusna Hannum ◽  
Absharini Kardena

This study aimed to find out the effect of using indirect corrective feedback to eliminate grammatical errors in students' writing. This research was conducted at SMKN 1 Padang Panjang because most of students still encounter problems in mastering writing text especially grammatical aspect. Most of the students' writing was founded many of grammatical error. Then, the students still did not get the appropriate feedback of the teacher toward their errors. And, the teacher also did not give the spesific feedback or treatment to help the students in reducing the error. This research used pre-experiment research. The researcher used one-group pretest posttest design. To determine sample, the researcher used purposive sampling technique. The data got from the pre-test and post-test in experiment class. To analyze the data, the resercher used the normality test and homogeneity test by using SPSS Statistics20 and to test the hypothesis the researcher used t-test formula and consulted the result into t-table with level of significant a=0.05. From the result and accounting the post-test of experiment class,it was founded that using indirect corrective feedback in eliminate grammatical error had better result than without indirect coreective feedback. It can be seen by comparing the t-obtained (2) that higher than the t-table (1.706).


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syaifullah Syaifullah

This study is about the use of comic in teaching a descriptive text becausemost of the students at the seventh grade of SMPN 3 Pekanbaru got some problem incomprehending the text. The main objective of this study was to find out whether thestudents taught reading a descriptive text using comic strips achieve better than thosewho do not taught reading using comic strips at the seventh grade students of SMPN3 Pekanbaru. The design of the research was experimental study. The researcher gavetry-out test to analyze validity and reliability of each item. Some test was used toanalyze the data that obtained from the pre-and post-test. They were normality test,Homogeneity test, and t-test. It was showed that the mean of experimental score washigher than the mean of control class (74.51>64.75). The test of hypothesis using ttestformula showed the value of the Asym Sig (2-tailed) 0.000 < 0.05. The nullhypothesis was rejected. Then, the criteria value of N-gain pre-test and post testexperimental class was middle. In conclusion, students who taught reading adescriptive text with comic strips achieved better than students who did not taughtwithout comic strips.


Alotrop ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weny Shintia ◽  
Amrul Bahar ◽  
Rina Elvia

This study aimed to compare the chemistry learning outcomes of students with using word square model learning and scramble model learning in grade X MAN 2 Kota Bengkulu on the subject of chemistry compound nomenclature. This was quasy experimental research and held in March to May 2018. Population in this study is the entire class X MIA in MAN 2 Kota Bengkulu  2017/2018  academic   year,  amounting  to  149  students.  Sample  is  class  X  MIA  1  and  class  X  MIA  3.        The sample of the research is class X MIA 1 with 32 students and class X MIA 3 with 33 students. Data analysis used normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test (t test). Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for The Social Science (SPSS) version 16.Improvement student’s learning outcomes in this research was taken from difference assess of pretest and posttest. At experiment class of I average value improvement  of student’s learning outcomes was 50.32. while at experiment  class of II, average value improvement of student’s learning outcomes was 44.4 . through some statistic test, there was t-test (? = 0.05) which done test the hypothesis to obtained the test result was t value = 2.174 and t tabel = 1.998. The result of data analysis showed that were significant differences in student learning outcomes between the class which implemented word square model learning and the class which implemented scramble model learning. Student learning outcomes that apply the word square model of learning better than student learning outcomes that apply the scramble model of learning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document