scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM POSING TIPE WITHIN SOLUTION POSING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 13 KOTA BENGKULU

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-85
Author(s):  
Padilah Ulfah ◽  
Effie Efrida Muchlis ◽  
Della Maulidiya

AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran problem posing tipe within solution posing terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan populasi seluruh peserta didik kelas VIII SMPN 13 Kota Bengkulu Semester Genap Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Sampel diperoleh kelas VIII E sebagai kelas eksperimen dengan peserta didik yang berjumlah 34 peserta didik yang mendapat perlakuan model pembelajaran problem posing tipe within solution posing dan kelas VIII D sebagai kelas kontrol dengan peserta didik yang berjumlah 34 peserta didik yang mendapat perlakuan model pembelajaran ekspositori. Nilai rata-rata hasil posttest kelas eksperimen 66,41 dan rata-rata posttest kelas kontrol adalah 56,82. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data menggunakan uji-t dengan taraf nyata (?) = 10% diperoleh nilai , sehingga . Oleh karena itu, dapat disimpulkan bahwa ada pengaruh model pembelajaran problem posing tipe within solution posing terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa di kelas VIII SMP Negeri 13 Kota Bengkulu.Kata Kunci : Model pembelajaran problem posing tipe within solution posing, pembelajaran ekspositori, hasil belajar peserta didik. AbstractThis research has purpose for knowing effect problem posing type within solution posing learning models to learning results. This study is a quasi-experimental research with the population was all of the grade  VIII students of   SMPN 13 Bengkulu academic year 2017/2018. Sample that choosed is student class VIII E as a experiment group with and student class VIII D as a control group. Average value of learning achievements of students in the experiment group 66,41 andcontrol group 56,82. Based on the results of data analysis obtained value  with ? = 10%, so that . Therefore, can be concluded that there is an influence of problem posing type within solution posing learning models against the results of learning mathematics students in grade VIII SMP 13 Bengkulu City.Keywords : problem posing type within solution posing learning models, ekspositori learning, results of mathematics learning of students.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-204
Author(s):  
Hesti Wulandari ◽  
Hanifah Hanifah ◽  
Syafdi Maizora

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan hasil belajar matematika peserta didik kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Kota Bengkulu dengan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif (Descriptive Research). Sampel diambil dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling, sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VIII F SMP Negeri 2 Kota Bengkulu Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018 yang berjumlah 34 orang peserta didik. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini adalah lembar tes dan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) pada materi lingkaran. Berdasarkan hasil deskriptif hasil belajar matematika peserta didik menggunakan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning menunjukkan bahwa hasil belajar peserta didik menjadi lebih meningkat. Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan rata-rata hasil nilai LKPD menggunakan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning yaitu 89,63 dan rata-rata nilai tes yaitu 84,56.Kata Kunci : Deskriptif, Hasil Belajar Belajar, Problem Based LearningABSTRACTThe aim of this research was to describe the results of learning mathematics students VIII grade SMP Negeri 2 Kota Bengkulu with Problem Based Learning (PBL) learning model. This research was a descriptive research (Descriptive Research). The sample was taken by using purposive sampling technique, the sample of this research was the students of class VIII F SMP Negeri 2 Kota Bengkulu academic year 2017/2018 with 34 students. The instruments that used for data collection in this research were test sheet and Student Worksheet on the circle material. Based on the results of descriptive mathematics learning outcomes of students using Problem Based Learning the learning outcomes of students were more increased. This research was done by avarage value of LKPD using Problem Based Learning is 89,63 and the avarage test score 84,56. Keywords: Descriptive, Learning Outcomes Learning, Problem Based Learning


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
Prihastini Oktasari Putri

This study aims to determine whether using napier rods can improve student mathematics learning outcomes. The method used in this study is quasi-experimental. The type of research isor Classroom Action ResearchClassroom Action Research (CAR)(CAR). The sample in this study were all students of class IV SD 2 Wadasmalang in the 2018 academic year 2018 as many as 24 students. The instrument used in this study was a student achievement test. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the use of napier rod props can improve student learning outcomes in mathematics class IV at SD Negeri 2 Wadasmalang. This can be shown at the end of the cycle test results turned out to be obtained a significant increase in value, meaning that the process of learning mathematics by using the napier rod props the average value of the class has increased with the results on pre-cycle of 51.67; the first cycle was 66.67 and the second cycle was 78.89. With the percentage of completeness in pre-cycle of 25%, the first cycle of 66.67% and the second cycle of 83.34%.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-482
Author(s):  
Meta Yulia Sari ◽  
Erlina Prihatnani

AbstrakPentingnya kemampuan pemecahan masalah dalam pembelajaran matematika belum diikuti dengan pencapaian yang baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menerapkan model pembelajaran Problem Solving dan Problem Posing serta menguji ada tidaknya perbedaan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dari kedua model tersebut. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada kelas X salah satu SMA Negeri di Salatiga dengan materi trigonometri. Sampel sebanyak 53 siswa, terbagi dalam dua kelompok eksperimen. Penelitian ekperimen semu ini menggunakan desain randomaized control group pretest-postest design, dengan instrumen berbentuk tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan lembar observasi. Analisis data menggunakan kovariansi pada taraf signifikan 𝛼 = 5% dengan kemampuan awal sebagai variabel kovarian. Hasil uji hipotesis menyimpulkan bahwa dengan mengontrol kemampuan awal siswa didapat bahwa siswa yang melaksanakan model pembelajaran Problem Posing secara signifikan memiliki kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika yang lebih baik dibandingkan siswa yang melaksanakan model pembelajaran Problem Solving. Hasil ini menunjukkan pembelajaran hendaknya tidak hanya melatih siswa menyelesaikan masalah tetapi juga mengkonstruksi permasalahan. Differences in problem-solving abilities from the application of problem-solving and problem-posing in high school studentsAbstractThe importance of problem-solving abilities in mathematics learning has not been automatically followed by good achievement. This study aims to apply Problem Solving and Problem Posing learning models and to test whether there are differences in the problem-solving abilities of the two learning models. This research was conducted in class X mathematics learning at one of the public high schools in Salatiga on Trigonometry material. This quasi-experimental study used a randomized control group pretest-posttest design, with instruments in the form of problem-solving ability tests and observation sheets. The data analysis used was the covariance test at the significant level α = 5% with the initial ability as a covariate variable. The results of hypothesis testing with covariance analysis concluded that by controlling students' initial abilities it was found that there were significant differences in mathematical problem-solving abilities between the application of the two models. Students who carry out the Problem Posing learning model significantly have better mathematical problem-solving abilities than students who carry out the Problem-Solving learning model. These results indicate that learning should not only train students to solve problems but also construct problems.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-58
Author(s):  
Nisda Putri

To be able to learn something well, we need to hear, see, ask questions about it, and discuss it with others. Not only that, teachers need to "do", which describe something in their own way, showing for example, tried to practice skills and tasks that require  What Knowledge they have earned. The problems to be examined in this study are: a How improve mathematics learning outcomes by using the game in class IX SMP Negeri 2 P Ainan academic year 2014-2015? b. The steps made in improving learning outcomes math class IX students? The results showed that study using the game in class IX SMPN 2 Painan, on learning of Mathematics, encourage student learning activities to teach well so spur students to obtain satisfactory academic achievement. Of the 10 observed activities, 7 of them are classified into medium category and 3 of them fall into the less category. The three activities gradually increase in each cycle, the three activities are preparing places, materials and tools by 25.93%, expressing the idea of ​​11.11% and reading the rules of the game and books of 29.63% and each Has increased, become Preparing places, materials and tools of 55.56%, revealed the idea of ​​66.67% and for the activity of reading the rules of the game and books increased by 74.04%. Achievement learn student mathematics obtained grade average value in cycle I equal to 69,62 increase become 73,51 in cycle II. The percentage of students who reached the completeness standard also increased in the first cycle of 88.88% (Category Good), increased to 100% (Category Special Category) in cycle II. Thus the game method can improve the activity and achievement of learning mathematics students SMPN 2 Painan Lesson Year 2014/2015. Student journals are known by the use of game methods to make learning more fun, learning less tense but still concentrating. Students more quickly understand the concept of geometry and measurement by appreciating the role played.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Halidayana Nasution ◽  
Mukhtar .

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran problem posing dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran  ekspositori, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika  siswa yang memiliki kreativitas tinggi dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki kreativitas rendah, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan kreativitas terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan a = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa : (1) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran problem posing lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki kreativitas tinggi lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki kreativitas rendah, (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan kreativitas terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, kreativitas terhadap hasil  belajar  matematika   Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) The difference in the results of students' mathematics learning taught by learning strategy problem posing with the results of students' mathematics learning taught by instructional strategies expository, (2) The difference in the results of students' mathematics learning which have high creativity with learning outcomes math students who have low creativity, (3) the interaction between learning strategy and creativity to mathematics learning outcomes. The research method using quasi-experimental research design 2 x 2 factorial ANOVA Analysis using two lines at significant level a = 0.05. The results showed that: (1) the results of students' mathematics learning taught by learning strategy problem posing higher than the learning outcomes of students who are taught by instructional strategies expository, (2) the results of learning mathematics students who have high creativity is higher than student learning outcomes have low creativity, (3) there is interaction between learning strategy and creativity to mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategy, creativity towards mathematics learning outcomes


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
S. Supratman ◽  
Sri Wulandari Muhlis

The formulation of the problem in this research are: (1) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by SAVI learning model?, (2) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by NHT learning model?, (3) Is the result of learning mathematics of students who taught with SAVI learning model is higher than students taught by NHT learning model. The purpose of this study are: (1) To know how the results of learning mathematics students after teaching with SAVI learning model, (2) To find out how the results of learning mathematics students after being taught with NHT learning model, (3) To determine whether the results of learning mathematics students taught by SAVI learning models higher than students taught by NHT learning models. Type of research using experimental method. The population in this study is all students of class X spread in 11 parallel classes with the number of 310 people. Sampling was done by using cluster random sampling technique. In this research as a sample taken 2 classes from the entire population that is class X A3 as experiment class 1 using SAVI learning model and class X A1 as experiment class 2 using NHT learning model. From result of data analysis obtained that: (1) result of student learning taught by using SAVI learning model which consist of 25 students show minimum value 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 80,36, with standard deviation 9,10; (2) student learning outcomes taught using NHT learning model consisting of 25 students showing minimum score 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 79,62, with standard deviation 10,512; (3) result of t-test analysis using independent sample t-test obtained tcount = 0,302 at = 0,05 with degrees of freedom (dk) = 48 obtained t table = 2,011. Because t <t table then Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught with the SAVI model was not higher than the students taught by the NHT model.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
Dodik Mulyono ◽  
Lucy Asri Purwasi ◽  
Agusman Riyadi

This study aims to determine the completeness of the results of learning mathematics Class VIII SMP Negeri 8 Lubuklinggau. Having applied guided discovery method. The research method used in this research is a quasi experiment with population class VIII 191 students and as a sample is class VIII F 32 students are taken at random. Data collecting is done by the test technique in the form of essay.Data problem is analyzed using t-test . Based on the results of data analysis on tarap belief α = 0.05 can be concluded that the results of students studying class VIII SMP Negeri 8 Lubuklinggau Academic Year 2016/2017 after the average value of the final test of 81.27 and the percentage of complete students reached 82.14% Keywords: Guided Discovery, Learning Outcomes, Mathematics


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoviani Minarti Rauf ◽  
Benedictus Kusmanto

This study aims to describe the process of learning with Problem Based Instruction (PBI) model in order to increase interest and learning outcomes of students of class VII B SMP Taman Dewasa Ibu Pawijayatan Yogyakarta in the even semester of the academic year 2016/2017. The research method used in this research is Classroom Action Research. The results showed that the interest and results of learning mathematics students with the model of learning Problem Based instruction (PBI) has increased. The average value of cycle I 65.8 and the average value of cycle II 72.6. While the percentage of interest for the cycle I 80% and percentage interest rate for cycle II 87%.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurdalilah Nurdalilah

This study aims to find out (1) students 'learning outcomes of mathematics taught with different strategies, (2) students' mathematics learning outcomes taught by traditional algorithms, (3) Are there different effects of counting strategies on results learn mathematics students on integer operation material. This research is a quantitative research with kind of quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all third grade students of Public Elementary School 114349. The sample in this study was class III-1 as an experimental class with a total of 30 students and class III-2 as a control class with a total of 30 students. The findings in this study indicate that classes taught by using different strategies have an average value of 31.970 and the classes taught by algorithm have an average value of 28,5758. The results of hypothesis testing show that t count&gt; t table is 2.925&gt; 2.0018 with the conclusion that students' mathematics learning outcomes are taught with different strategies better than those taught with traditional algorithms on integer operation material in Public Elementary School No. 114349 Academic Year 2016/2017


Eksponen ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-79
Author(s):  
Venty Meilasari

This research aimed to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning outcomes, GI model or direct learning model, (2) which one providing better mathematics learning outcomes, the high, medium or low learning independence students, (3) interaction between learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes. This research used the quasi-experimental research method with 2×3 factorial design. The population were all students of the 8 th class of SMP Negeri 6 Surakarta on academic year 2015/2016. The sample was taken using purposive sampling. The instruments used were learning independence questionnaire and mathematics learning outcomes test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research were as follow. (1) GI model provided better mathematics outcomes than direct learning model. (2) The high learning independence student had better mathematics learning outcomes than medium and low learning independence students, and the medium had as good as low learning independence students. (3) there was no interaction between learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document