scholarly journals HUBUNGAN ANTARA KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL, KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR DAN KREATIVITAS BELAJAR DENGAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-83
Author(s):  
Ni Komang Hita Wulandari ◽  
Kadek Rahayu Puspadewi ◽  
Putu Ledyari Noviyanti

This correlational research aims to determine the relationship between emotional intelligence, independent learning and learning creativity with the mathematics learning outcomes of grade VII students of SMP Negeri 1 Blahbatuh. Data collection was carried out by means of questionnaires and tests. The sample used is a number of 80 people who are determined by the cluter random sampling technique. Hypothesis test used is simple and multiple regression with a significance level of 0.05. The results of this study indicate that there is a significant relationship between emotional intelligence and mathematics learning outcomes, the relative contribution is 46%. There is a significant relationship between independent learning and mathematics learning outcomes, the relative contribution is 39%. There is a significant relationship between creativity and mathematics learning outcomes, the relative contribution is 64%. There is an influence between emotional intelligence, independent learning and learning creativity with mathematics learning outcomes of students with a relative contribution of 62%.

Aksioma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18
Author(s):  
Fitrianti Fitrianti ◽  
Bakri Mallo ◽  
Linawati Linawati

Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan antara kecerdasan emosional dengan prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 8 Palu. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 8 Palu yang terdiri dari 5 kelas. Sampel penelitian diperoleh dengan menggunakan teknik random sampling, jumlah siswa yang menjadi sampel sebanyak 44 orang. Pengumpulan data menggunakan dua instrumen yaitu, kuisioner kecerdasan emosional dan dokumentasi prestasi belajar dari nilai rapor. Hasil analisis data dengan menggunakan uji korelasi product moment diperoleh nilai korelasi r = 0,417. Nilai rtabel = 0,297 untuk N = 44 dengan taraf signifikansi 5%. Nilai rhitung (0,417) > rtabel (0,297) maka diputuskan menerima hipotesis alternatif (H1) dan menolak hipotesis awal (H0). Artinya terdapat hubungan yang positif dan signifikan antara kecerdasan emosional dengan prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 8 Palu. Kata kunci: Kecerdasan Emosional dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between emotional intelligence with mathematics learning achievement of VIII grade students at SMP Negeri 8 Palu. The population of this study is all students of VIII grade at SMP Negeri 8 Palu consisting of 5 classes. The sample was obtained by using random sampling technique. The total number of the sample was 44 students. The data collection used two instruments, namely, emotional intelligence questionnaire and documentation of learning achievement from the report card. The results of data analysis using product moment correlation test obtained correlation value r = 0.417. Value of rtable = 0,297 for N = 44 with significance level 5%. The value of rcount (0.417)> rtable (0.297) then decided to accept the alternative hypothesis (H1) and reject the initial hypothesis (H0). This means there is a positive and significant relationship between emotional intelligence and mathematics learning achievement of VIII grade students at SMP Negeri 8 Palu. Keywords: Emotional Intelligence and Mathematics Learning Achievement


2022 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 499-515
Author(s):  
Siti Hajar Utami ◽  
Maemunah Sa'diyah

This study aims to describe the relationship between emotional intelligence and adaptability in online learning in class VII at SMPN 1 Bogor City. The method used in this research is a quantitative method with a correlation approach. The sample in this study was 25% of the total population of 288 (72 respondents) using simple random sampling technique. This data collection technique uses a questionnaire (questionnaire). Emotional intelligence using a questionnaire with the results of the validity test of 15 statement items, there are 14 statements that are proven valid and the reliability test results of the coefficient of 0.750 are declared reliable. While the ability to adapt in online learning using a questionnaire with the results of a valid test of 15 statements proved valid and a reliability test result of 0.762 was declared reliable. Prerequisite test is done by normality test and linearity test. Data analysis used the analyze correlate-bivariate technique on SPSS 26 with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that there was a positive and significant relationship between emotional intelligence and adaptability in online learning as indicated by the r-count value of 0.623 which means it has a strong correlation. And r-count is greater than r-table (0.623 > 0.232), then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. And the two variables also have a significant relationship because the significant value (p-value) is 0.000 <0.05, then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Keyword: Emotional Intelligence, Adaptability, Online Learning


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Maskuroh Maskuroh

The low learning outcomes of mathematics are not appropriate thought of learning models in the classroom. Therefore, the NHT and TPS learning models can be applied to improve the learning of outcomes of the student. This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes using the NHT learning model with the TPS learning model. The sampling technique is used as a random sampling cluster with 2 groups of experiments for the first experimental group  (classroom view of TPS model) and the second experimental group (classes of NHT modeling). The instrument of this research uses the test of mathematics learning result. The hypothesis test is used  T-Test. The conclusion of research that are differences in the outcomes of the two learning models (NHT and TPS) on learning outcomes, based on the marginal mean of the TPS learning model is better learning outcomes than the NHT learning model. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
I Putu Budiariawan

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1)mendeskripsikan dan menjelaskan hubungan antara motivasi belajar dengan hasil belajar kimia siswa. (2) mengetahui dan menjelaskan besarnya koefisien korelasi antara motivasi belajar dengan hasil belajar kimia siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI MIPA di SMA Negeri 2 Negara tahun pelajaran 2017/2018 dan sampel penelitian berjumlah 72 orang dengan menggunakan teknik cluster sampling. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan instrumen penelitian berupa kuesioner motivasi belajar yang terdiri dari 20 pernyataan positif dan 15 pernyataan negatif dan data hasil belajar siswamenggunakan nilai UAS siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa(1) terdapat hubungan yang positif dan signifikan antara motivasi belajar siswa pada pembelajaran kimia dengan hasil belajar kimia siswa. (2) Besarnya koefisien korelasi yang diperoleh yaitu sebesar 0,391, yang berarti r hitung yang diperoleh lebih besar dibandingkan dengan r tabel yang telah ditentukan pada taraf signifikansi 5% yaitu 0,229, sehingga Hipotesis Nol (H0) dalam penelitian ini dapat ditolak.Berdasarkan hasil pemaparan diatas, dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang positif dan signifikan antara motivasi belajar pada mata pelajaran kimia dengan hasil belajar kimia siswa. Kata kunci: Hasil Belajar, Motivasi Belajar, Pelajaran Kimia AbstractThis study aims to: (1) describe and explain the relationship between learning motivation and student chemistry learning outcomes. (2) knowing and explaining the magnitude of the correlation coefficient between learning motivation and student chemistry learning outcomes. This study uses a quantitative approach. The population of this study was all students of class XI MIPA in SMA Negeri 2 Negara the academic year 2017/2018 and the study sample amounted to 72 people using the cluster sampling technique. The data were collected using the research instrument in the form of a learning motivation questionnaire consisting of 20 positive statements and 15 negative statements and student learning outcomes data using the student UAS value. The results showed that (1) there was a positive and significant relationship between students' learning motivation in chemistry learning and student chemistry learning outcomes. (2) The magnitude of the correlation coefficient obtained is equal to 0.391, which means that the calculated r is greater than the r table that has been determined at the 5% significance level of 0.229, so the Zero Hypothesis (H0) in this study can be rejected. Based on the results of the explanation above, it can be concluded that there is a positive and significant relationship between motivation to learn on chemistry subjects and student chemistry learning outcomes. Keywords: Chemistry Learning,Learning Outcomes, Learning Motivation


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (01) ◽  
pp. 61-74
Author(s):  
Ayu Ramdhayani ◽  
Habib Husnial Pardi ◽  
Mauliddin Mauliddin

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in effectiveness between the participatory model and the discovery learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes of students at SMPN 21 Mataram on the subject of circles. This research is an experimental research type with the static group pretest-posttest desaign design. The sample in this study were students of class VIII SMPN 21 Mataram. The sampling technique in this research is purposive sampling with circle material. The research data collection process used interview, observation, and test instruments. From the research results, the participatory model of learning outcomes obtained an average pretest score of 58.68 and an average posttest score of 73.32. While the discovery learning model of learning outcomes obtained an average pretest score of 58.86 and an average posttest score of 73.91. The results of the hypothesis test of learning outcomes found that the sig. (2-tailed) 0.821. Because the sig value> 0.05, meaning that H0 is accepted and H1 is rejected, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference in effectiveness between the participatory model and the discovery learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes of grade VIII students of SMPN 21 Mataram


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Purwaka Atmaja ◽  
Joharman Joharman ◽  
Ratna Hidayah

<p><strong>Abstract</strong><strong>.</strong> <strong>Correlation Between</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Learning Environment at School</strong><strong> and </strong><strong> Mathematics Learning Outcomes for the Fourth Grade Student of Elementary Schools in Kebumen Sub-District in Academic Year of 201</strong><strong>9</strong><strong>/20</strong><strong>20.</strong><strong><em> </em></strong><em>The research aims to examine positive correlation between</em><em> learning environment at school </em><em>and mathematics learning outcomes and to determine the contribution</em><em> learning environment at school </em><em>toward mathematics learning outcomes for the fourth grade students of elementary schools in </em><em>Kebumen s</em><em>ub</em><em>-</em><em>district in academic year of 201</em><em>9</em><em>/20</em><em>20</em><em>. The research is a quantitative research with correlation method. The samples are obtained by cluster random sampling with Statistical Product and Serice Solution (SPSS) application. The samples are 349 students in twelve elementary schools in Kebumen Sub-District. The data collection techniques include questionnaire and test. Data analysis uses pearson product-moment correlation test with significance level 0.05 and adjusted R square. The correlation test finds sig = 0,000 (sig &lt; 0,05). It means that there is positive and significant correlation between</em><em> learning environment at school</em><em> and mathematics learning outcomes. It shows the better learning environment </em><em>at </em><em>school, the higher mathematics learning outcomes. </em><em>Learning environment at school</em><em> contributes mathematic learning outcomes by </em><em>13,1</em><em>%</em><em> and the remaining 86.9% is influenced by other factors</em><em>. </em>The results of this study are in accordance with existing theories and are also supported by relevant research.</p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong><em> learning environment at school, mathematics learning outcomes</em>


Author(s):  
Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽  
Budiyono Budiyono ◽  
Dewi Retno Sari S

<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>:  <em>Jigsaw</em>, NHT, interpersonal intelligence</p>


KadikmA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Khoirotul Mahmudah ◽  
Didik Sugeng Pambudi ◽  
Ervin Oktavianingtyas ◽  
Nurcholif Diah Sri Lestari ◽  
Randi Pratama Murtikusuma

The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between study habits and mathematics learning outcomes, the correlation between learning motivation and mathematics learning outcomes, and the correlation between learning habits and motivation to learn mathematics outcomes during online learning. The total population is 185 students and the sample size is 123 students with the sampling technique using the Slovin formula approach. Hypothesis testing using multiple regression analysis techniques, Pearson Correlation test, F test, and a coefficient of determination of 5%. Learning habits and motivation are measured by a questionnaire that has been declared valid by the validator and has been tested for validity and reliability on 60 respondents outside the research subject. Data collection to measure learning habits and motivation is done by distributing questionnaires, while for student achievement it is obtained from documentation of math scores. The results showed that: there was a positive and significant correlation between study habits and students' mathematics learning outcomes. The correlation between the two is moderately correlated; there is a positive and significant correlation between learning motivation and student outcomes in mathematics. The correlation between the two is strongly correlated; there is a positive and significant correlation between study habits and learning motivation with students' mathematics learning outcomes. The correlation between the two is strongly correlated. The contribution of study habits and learning motivation simultaneously to mathematics learning outcomes is 30.7%, while 69.3% is influenced by other factors not examined by the researchers in this study.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Azwar Anwar

This study aims to determine the distribution of student geometry levels based on Van Hiele's theory and find out the differences in students' mathematics learning outcomes in grade VII junior high school. The sampling technique is probability sampling and a sample of 182 students is obtained. Data collection techniques used were Van Hiele level geometry tests and test results. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and anova with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that only 170 students were included in the Van Hiele geometry level, namely 62 students were at level 0, 97 students were at level 1, 5 students were at level 2, and as many as 6 students are at level 3. In the inferential analysis based on analysis of variance (two-way anova) concludes that for learning outcomes based on Van Hiele level geometry obtained Fcount = 13.793 > Ftable = 9.28 means H0 is rejected means that there are differences in mathematics learning outcomes based on Van Hiele geometry level.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui distribusi level geometri siswa berdasarkan teori Van Hiele dan mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa di kelas VII SMP. Menggunakan teknik probability sampling dan diperoleh sampel sebanyak 182 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes level geometri Van Hiele dan tes hasil belajar. Analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan anova dengan taraf signifikansi sebesar 5%. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa dari 182 sampel, hanya 170 siswa yang termasuk dalam level geometri Van Hiele yaitu 62 siswa berada pada level 0, sebanyak 97 siswa pada level 1, sebanyak 5 siswa pada level 2, dan  6 siswa pada level 3. Analisis anova dua arah diperoleh Fhitung = 13,793 > Ftabel = 9,28 berarti H0  ditolak yang artinya terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar matematika berdasarkan level geometri Van Hiele.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinta Dwi Handayani

<p>The purpose of this research is to know the effect of applying the TGT (Team Games Tournament) cooperative method through a medium of puzzle on the mathematics learning outcomes. The method used is an experimental method. The sampling is conducted using a simple random sampling technique, with samples of 40 students consisting of 20 students of an experimental class and 20 students of a control class. The analysis to test the research hypothesis is performed using the mean difference test (t-test), with the results of the hypothesis test showing that there is the effect of applying the TGT (Team Games Tournament) cooperative method through a medium of puzzle on the mathematics learning outcomes.<em></em></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document