scholarly journals IMMUNOGENICITY AND SAFETY OF INACTIVATED SARS-COV-2 VACCINE (VERO CELL), BBIBP-CORV (SINOPHARM); AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY FROM PAKISTAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 2024-28
Author(s):  
Muhammad Farooq ◽  
Muhammad Fayyaz Malik ◽  
Ashfaq Hussain ◽  
Majid Latif ◽  
Muhammad Usman Rathore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vero Cell ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Seroconversion Rate ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Antibody Titers

Objective: To ascertain the immunogenicity and short-term safety of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell), BBIBPCorV (Sinopharm) in our setup. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital Sialkot Pakistan, from Feb to Apr 2021. Methodology: A total of 227 health care workers (HCWs) between 18 to 59 years of age were included in the study. Two doses of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell), BBIBP-CorV were administered to all individuals 21 days apart and they were monitored for any vaccine-related adverse reactions for 7 days after each dose. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in study subjects were detected in three samples i.e. before 1st dose of vaccine, 21 days after 1st dose and 14 days after 2nd dose by Elecsys Anti- SARS-CoV-2 S (Roche Diagnostics). Results: Mean age of individuals in the study was 36.70 ± 18.08 years and most individuals were in the 31-45 years age group. Fatigue and drowsiness were the most common adverse effects experienced by study subjects after 1st and 2nd dose of the vaccine followed by malaise and headache. Only 42 (39%) individuals developed positive neutralizing antibody titers in a sample taken 21 days after 1st dose while all individuals except one (99%) developed positive neutralizing antibody titers in a sample taken 2 weeks after 2nd vaccine dose. Conclusion: Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell), BBIBP-CorV is safe and well-tolerated with very few adverse reactions. Immunogenicity was well achieved as the seroconversion rate was 99% two weeks after 2nd dose of the vaccine.

scholarly journals DISAPPEARANCE OF ANTIBODIES IN COVID-19 MYTHS ORREALITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (Suppl-3) ◽  
pp. S530-33
Author(s):  
Maqbool Raza ◽  
Muhammed Ali Raza ◽  
De Emmal Asjad Cheema ◽  
Maham Asjad Cheema ◽  
Atif Rafique ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Level ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Assay Method ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Severity Of The Disease

Objective: To explore the disappearance of neutralizing antibodies from patients, their myths, and facts. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital Multan Pakistan, from Jul 2021 to Aug 2021. Methodology: A total of 100 blood samples were collected from 100 COVID-19 patients. These 100 patients were followed up for a period of 3 months. Antibodies were determined with the modified neutralization assay method and enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA). Results: The antibody level by NA and ELISA peaked on days 30-35 then decreased slightly. In multivariate analysis, patients aged 25-35, 36-56, and 57-84 years had a higher neutralizing antibody level than those aged 10-21 years. The patient with the worst clinical manifestation had a higher neutralizing antibody titer. In serum samples, IgG was undetectable at 18.3% and 11% and the geographical mean reciprocal titers dropped from 244 at 3-month period and neutralizing antibodies, the geographical mean reciprocal titers dropped from 874 at 3 months. Conclusion: All COVID-19 patients were seropositive and significantly neutralizing antibody response. Neutralizing antibody levels depend on the time after the onset of symptoms, age, and severity of the disease.

scholarly journals Durability of Response to a Third BNT162b2 Vaccine in Adults ≥60 Years

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noa Eliakim Raz ◽  
Amos Stemmer ◽  
Yaara Leibovici-Weissman ◽  
Asaf Ness ◽  
Muhammad Awwad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Younger Adults ◽  
The Third ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Level 2

BACKGROUND Age and frailty are strong predictors of COVID-19 mortality. After the second BNT162b2 dose, immunity wanes faster in older (≥65 years) versus younger adults. The durability of response after the third vaccine is unclear. METHODS This prospective cohort study included healthcare workers/family members ≥60 years who received a third BNT162b2 dose. Blood samples were drawn immediately before (T0), 10-19 (T1), and 74-103 (T2) days after the third dose. Antispike IgG titers were determined using a commercial assay, seropositivity was defined as ≥50 AU/mL. Neutralizing antibody titers were determined at T2. Adverse events, COVID-19 infections, and clinical frailty scale (CFS) levels were documented. RESULTS The analysis included 97 participants (median age, 70 years [IQR, 66-74], 61% women, 58% CFS level 2). IgG titers, which increased significantly from T0 to T1 (medians, 440 AU/mL [IQR, 294-923] and 25,429 [14,203-36,114] AU/mL, respectively; P<0.001), decreased significantly by T2, but all remained seropositive (median, 8,306 AU/mL [IQR, 4595-14,701], P<0.001 vs T1). In a multivariable analysis, only time from the first vaccine was significantly associated with lower IgG levels at T2 (P=0.004). At T2, 60 patients were evaluated for neutralizing antibodies; all were seropositive (median, 1,294 antibody titer [IQR, 848-2,072]). Neutralizing antibody and antispike IgG levels were correlated (R=0.6, P<0.001). No major adverse events or COVID-19 infections were reported. CONCLUSIONS Antispike IgG and neutralizing antibodies levels remain adequate 3 months after the third BNT162b2 vaccine in healthy adults ≥60 years, although the decline in IgG is concerning. A third vaccine dose in this population should be top priority.

scholarly journals Ad26.COV2.S protects Syrian hamsters against G614 spike variant SARS-CoV-2 and does not enhance respiratory disease

npj Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan E. M. van der Lubbe ◽  
Sietske K. Rosendahl Huber ◽  
Aneesh Vijayan ◽  
Liesbeth Dekking ◽  
Ella van Huizen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Disease ◽  
Syrian Hamster ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Syrian Hamsters ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Upper Respiratory

AbstractPreviously we have shown that a single dose of recombinant adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26) vaccine expressing a prefusion stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen (Ad26.COV2.S) is immunogenic and provides protection in Syrian hamster and non-human primate SARS-CoV-2 infection models. Here, we investigated the immunogenicity, protective efficacy, and potential for vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD) mediated by Ad26.COV2.S in a moderate disease Syrian hamster challenge model, using the currently most prevalent G614 spike SARS-CoV-2 variant. Vaccine doses of 1 × 109 and 1 × 1010 VP elicited substantial neutralizing antibodies titers and completely protected over 80% of SARS-CoV-2 inoculated Syrian hamsters from lung infection and pneumonia but not upper respiratory tract infection. A second vaccine dose further increased neutralizing antibody titers that was associated with decreased infectious viral load in the upper respiratory tract after SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Suboptimal non-protective immune responses elicited by low-dose A26.COV2.S vaccination did not exacerbate respiratory disease in SARS-CoV-2-inoculated Syrian hamsters with breakthrough infection. In addition, dosing down the vaccine allowed to establish that binding and neutralizing antibody titers correlate with lower respiratory tract protection probability. Overall, these preclinical data confirm efficacy of a one-dose vaccine regimen with Ad26.COV2.S in this G614 spike SARS-CoV-2 virus variant Syrian hamster model, show the added benefit of a second vaccine dose, and demonstrate that there are no signs of VAERD under conditions of suboptimal immunity.

scholarly journals Antibody Response to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Subjects with Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 422
Author(s):  
Federico Gobbi ◽  
Dora Buonfrate ◽  
Lucia Moro ◽  
Paola Rodari ◽  
Chiara Piubelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Natural Infection ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Immune Memory ◽  
Effective Response ◽  
Infected People ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Antibody Titers

Although antibody levels progressively decrease following SARS-CoV-2 infection, the immune memory persists for months. Thus, individuals who naturally contracted SARS-CoV-2 are expected to develop a more rapid and sustained response to COVID-19 vaccines than naïve individuals. In this study, we analyzed the dynamics of the antibody response to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in six healthcare workers who contracted SARS-CoV-2 in March 2020, in comparison to nine control subjects without a previous infection. The vaccine was well tolerated by both groups, with no significant difference in the frequency of vaccine-associated side effects, with the exception of local pain, which was more common in previously infected subjects. Overall, the titers of neutralizing antibodies were markedly higher in response to the vaccine than after natural infection. In all subjects with pre-existing immunity, a rapid increase in anti-spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibody titers was observed one week after the first dose, which seemed to act as a booster. Notably, in previously infected individuals, neutralizing antibody titers 7 days after the first vaccine dose were not significantly different from those observed in naïve subjects 7 days after the second vaccine dose. These results suggest that, in previously infected people, a single dose of the vaccine might be sufficient to induce an effective response.

scholarly journals Shedding of infectious SARS-CoV-2 by hospitalized COVID-19 patients in relation to serum antibody responses

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hedvig Glans ◽  
Sara Gredmark-Russ ◽  
Mikaela Olausson ◽  
Sara Falck-Jones ◽  
Renata Varnaite ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Serum Antibody ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Pcr Analysis ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Specific Igg

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a global pandemic. The understanding of the transmission and the duration of viral shedding in SARS-CoV-2 infection is still limited. Objectives To assess the timeframe and potential risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from hospitalized COVID-19 patients in relation to antibody response. Method We performed a cross-sectional study of 36 COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Karolinska University Hospital. Patients with more than 8 days of symptom duration were sampled from airways, for PCR analysis of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and in vitro culture of replicating virus. Serum SARS-CoV-2-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralizing antibodies titers were assessed by immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and microneutralization assay. Results SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in airway samples in 23 patients (symptom duration median 15 days, range 9–53 days), whereas 13 patients were SARS-CoV-2 RNA negative (symptom duration median 21 days, range 10–37 days). Replicating virus was detected in samples from 4 patients at 9–16 days. All but two patients had detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG in serum, and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies were detected in 33 out of 36 patients. Total SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG titers and neutralizing antibody titers were positively correlated. High levels of both total IgG and neutralizing antibody titers were observed in patients sampled later after symptom onset and in patients where replicating virus could not be detected. Conclusions Our data suggest that the presence of SARS-Cov-2 specific antibodies in serum may indicate a lower risk of shedding infectious SARS-CoV-2 by hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

scholarly journals BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Elicits High Titers of Neutralizing Antibodies to Both B.1 and P.1 Variants in Previously Infected and Uninfected Subjects

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 896
Author(s):  
Ilaria Vicenti ◽  
Francesca Gatti ◽  
Renzo Scaggiante ◽  
Adele Boccuto ◽  
Daniela Zago ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Workers ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Post Vaccination ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Cross Neutralization ◽  
Highly Correlated

We aimed to investigate neutralizing antibody titers (NtAbT) to the P.1 and B.1 SARS-CoV-2 variants in a cohort of healthy health care workers (HCW), including 20 previously infected individuals tested at baseline (BLinf, after a median of 298 days from diagnosis) and 21 days after receiving one vaccine dose (D1inf) and 15 uninfected subjects tested 21 days after the second-dose vaccination (D2uninf). All the subjects received BNT162b2 vaccination. D1inf NtAbT increased significantly with respect to BLinf against both B.1 and P.1 variants, with a fold-change significantly higher for P.1. D1inf NtAbT were significantly higher than D2uninf NtAbT, against B.1 and P.1. NtAbT against the two strains were highly correlated. P.1 NtAbT were significantly higher than B.1 NtAbT. This difference was significant for post-vaccination sera in infected and uninfected subjects. A single-dose BNT162b2 vaccination substantially boosted the NtAb response to both variants in the previously infected subjects. NtAb titers to B.1 and P.1 lineages were highly correlated, suggesting substantial cross-neutralization. Higher titers to the P.1 than to the B.1 strain were driven by the post-vaccination titers, highlighting that cross-neutralization can be enhanced by vaccination.

scholarly journals Cytokine and Chemokine Levels in COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tania S Bonny ◽  
Eshan U Patel ◽  
Xianming Zhu ◽  
Evan M Bloch ◽  
M Kate Grabowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Blood Donors ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cytokines And Chemokines ◽  
Plasma Cytokines ◽  
Inflammatory State ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Categorical Groups

Abstract Background The efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) is primarily ascribed as a source of neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. However, the composition of other immune components in CCP and their potential roles remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to describe the composition and concentrations of plasma cytokines and chemokines in eligible CCP donors. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 20 pre-pandemic healthy blood donors without SARS-CoV-2 infection and 140 eligible CCP donors with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Electrochemiluminescence detection based multiplexed sandwich immunoassays were used to quantify plasma cytokine and chemokine concentrations (n=35 analytes). A SARS-CoV-2 microneutralization assay was also performed. Differences in the percent detection and distribution of cytokine and chemokine concentrations were examined by categorical groups using Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, respectively. Results Among CCP donors (n=140), the median time since molecular diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 was 44 days(interquartile range=38-50) and 9%(n=12) were hospitalized due to COVID-19. Compared to healthy blood donor controls, CCP donors had significantly higher plasma levels of IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-15, IL-21 and MCP-1, but lower levels of IL-1RA, IL-8, IL-16, and VEGF-A(P&lt;0.0014). Significant differences were also observed in plasma levels of IL-8, IL-15 and IP-10 between CCP donors with low(&lt;40) vs. high(≥160) anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers(P&lt;0.0014). The median levels of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, IL-12/IL23p40, MDC were significantly higher among CCP donors who were hospitalized vs. non-hospitalized(P&lt;0.05). Conclusion Heterogeneity in cytokine and chemokine composition of CCP suggests there is a different inflammatory state among the CCP donors as compared to SARS-CoV-2 naïve, healthy blood donors.

scholarly journals Humoral serologic response to the BNT162b2 vaccine is abrogated in lymphoma patients within the first 12 months following treatment with anti-CD2O antibodies

Haematologica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronit Gurion ◽  
Uri Rozovski ◽  
Gilad Itchaki ◽  
Anat Gafter-Gvili ◽  
Chiya Leibovitch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Response ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Humoral Response ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Serologic Response ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Anti Cd20

Patients with lymphoma, especially those treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (MoAb), suffer high COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to assess the ability of lymphoma patients to generate a sufficient humoral response after two injections of BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine and to identify factors impacting the response. Antibody titers were measured with the SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott©) assay in blood samples drawn from lymphoma patients 4±2 weeks after the 2nd vaccine dose. The cutoff for a positive response was set at 50AU/ml. Positive serological responses were observed in 51% of the 162 patients enrolled in this cross-sectional study. In a multivariate analysis, an interval of

scholarly journals Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in a Large Cohort of Italian Police Officers

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (22) ◽  
pp. 12201
Author(s):  
Sergio Garbarino ◽  
Alexander Domnich ◽  
Elisabetta Costa ◽  
Irene Giberti ◽  
Stefano Mosca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Occupational Exposure ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Vaccination Campaign ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Influenza Like Illness ◽  
Nationally Representative

Certain professional categories are at a high occupational exposure to COVID-19. The aim of this survey was to quantify the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among police officers in Italy and identify its correlates. In this cross-sectional study, a nationally representative sample of State police employees was tested for IgG and IgM before the start of the National vaccination campaign. A total of 10,535 subjects (approximately 10% of the total workforce) participated in the study. The overall seroprevalence was 4.8% (95% CI: 4.4–5.3%). However, seropositivity was unevenly distributed across the country with a clear (p < 0.001) North–South gradient. In particular, the seroprevalence was 5.6 times higher in northern regions than in southern regions (9.0% vs 1.6%). Most (71.2%) seropositive subjects reported having no recent symptoms potentially attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Previous dysosmia, dysgeusia, and influenza-like illness symptoms were positive predictors of being seropositive. However, the prognostic value of dysosmia depended (p < 0.05) on both sex and prior influenza-like illness. The baseline seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in police employees is considerable. A significant risk of occupational exposure, frequent asymptomatic cases and the progressive waning of neutralizing antibodies suggest that the police workers should be considered among the job categories prioritized for the booster COVID-19 vaccine dose.

scholarly journals Neutralizing Antibody Response to Pseudotype SARS-CoV-2 Differs between mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines and by History of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harmony L. Tyner ◽  
Mark G. Thompson ◽  
Jefferey L. Burgess ◽  
Lauren Grant ◽  
Manjusha Gaglani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Messenger Rna ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Frontline Workers ◽  
History Of ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Background: Data on the development of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 after SARS-CoV-2 infection and after vaccination with messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines are limited. Methods: From a prospective cohort of 3,975 adult essential and frontline workers tested weekly from August, 2020 to March, 2021 for SARS-CoV-2 infection by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) assay irrespective of symptoms, 497 participants had sera drawn after infection (170), vaccination (327), and after both infection and vaccination (50 from the infection population). Serum was collected after infection and each vaccine dose. Serum-neutralizing antibody titers against USA-WA1/2020-spike pseudotype virus were determined by the 50% inhibitory dilution. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) and corresponding fold increases were calculated using t-tests and linear mixed effects models. Results: Among 170 unvaccinated participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 158 (93%) developed neutralizing antibodies (nAb) with a GMT of 1,003 (95% CI=766-1,315). Among 139 previously uninfected participants, 138 (99%) developed nAb after mRNA vaccine dose-2 with a GMT of 3,257 (95% CI = 2,596-4,052). GMT was higher among those receiving mRNA-1273 vaccine (GMT =4,698, 95%CI= 3,186-6,926) compared to BNT162b2 vaccine (GMT=2,309, 95%CI=1,825-2,919). Among 32 participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, GMT was 21,655 (95%CI=14,766-31,756) after mRNA vaccine dose-1, without further increase after dose-2. Conclusions: A single dose of mRNA vaccine after SARS-CoV-2 infection resulted in the highest observed nAb response. Two doses of mRNA vaccine in previously uninfected participants resulted in higher nAb to SARS-CoV-2 than after one dose of vaccine or SARS-CoV-2 infection alone. Neutralizing antibody response also differed by mRNA vaccine product.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document