ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS OF STATE REGULATION OF BUSINESS ENTITIES DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

Author(s):  
Natalia Samoliuk

The article describes the essence of the concepts of «regulation», «state regulation», «state regulation of incomes». Also point and analyzed the main economic instruments of state regulation of the distribution of income between the fact-set of their production, including taxes. It made a comparison of tax instruments around the world. Priority areas for the economic regulation of income to determine.

2012 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Denis S. Ushakov

In the present conditions of the world economy development, the efficiency of traditional measures of governance is significantly reducing. The globalization, the formation of transnational networks of inputs and finished goods distribution, and the mobilization of capital and labor are limiting the regulatory competences of governments, and are threatening their existence as economical subjects. Under these conditions it requires upgrading to modernize the infrastructure and the principles of government regulation. The study takes a new paradigm of state economic regulation, based on the synchronization of interests of business, state, and society, and on the defining the principles of government participation in the global economic processes. As a tool for business consolidation and improving the efficiency of state regulation, the formation of e-government was considered. The paper characterizes the e-government as a new form of state regulation of economy. The factors of effective e-government implementation strategy were analyzed. The experience of digitalization of governmental functions in modern states, and the rates of asynchrony of development of electronic government in the world as they relate with the economic efficiency of modern states, were considered.


Author(s):  
Denis S. Ushakov

In the present conditions of the world economy development, the efficiency of traditional measures of governance is significantly reducing. The globalization, the formation of transnational networks of inputs and finished goods distribution, and the mobilization of capital and labor are limiting the regulatory competences of governments, and are threatening their existence as economical subjects. Under these conditions it requires upgrading to modernize the infrastructure and the principles of government regulation. The study takes a new paradigm of state economic regulation, based on the synchronization of interests of business, state, and society, and on the defining the principles of government participation in the global economic processes. As a tool for business consolidation and improving the efficiency of state regulation, the formation of e-government was considered. The paper characterizes the e-government as a new form of state regulation of economy. The factors of effective e-government implementation strategy were analyzed. The experience of digitalization of governmental functions in modern states, and the rates of asynchrony of development of electronic government in the world as they relate with the economic efficiency of modern states, were considered.


Author(s):  
Svitlana LUTKOVSKA ◽  
Valentyna KAZMYR

The research conducted in the article allowed to identify problems, explore strengths and weaknesses, consider threats and alternative opportunities and identify priority areas for development of the grain market of Ukraine. In particular, it is noted that the grain market is a complex economic system, which is significantly influenced by climatic factors, demand, supply, pricing, government regulation, efficiency of institutions, the existence of appropriate infrastructure, the intensity of competition of economic entities and more. At the macro level, the efficiency of the grain market is influenced by the following key factors: environmental (climate change); demographic (population growth); energy (growing cereals for biofuels); attractiveness of the grain market for TNCs and transnational grain traders; underdeveloped infrastructure of the grain market; lack of effective instruments of state regulation of supply and demand in the grain market; low level of credit security (high level of interest rates); imperfection of insurance protection; low efficiency of budget support for agricultural producers. Priority areas for the development of the grain market are: improvement of the regulatory framework for the functioning of the grain market; improvement of protection measures for grain market entities; optimization of land tenure and land use; introduction of effective insurance protection; modernization of material and technical base of business entities; creation of an information portal based on e-logistics and digitalization (monitoring, forecasting); development of the export potential of the grain market; ensuring equal economic conditions for all subjects of the grain market; improving state support; promotion of agrarian integration and cooperation; raising the competence level of managers and managers of business entities; diversification of grain use; introduction of new credit and investment collateral instruments; development of grain market infrastructure; introduction of e-logistics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 104-110
Author(s):  
T. I. MALASHENKO ◽  
◽  
A. Yu. STEPANOV ◽  

The article provides an overview of Russia's military-technical cooperation, the specifics of state regulation in the context of the world arms and military equipment market. Emphasis has been made on some regions (CIS, Africa, Latin America) where activities are intensified. The effectiveness of the existing system of military-technical cooperation of Russia and particular aspects of its functioning are evaluated.


2018 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Assouad ◽  
Lucas Chancel ◽  
Marc Morgan

This paper presents new findings about inequality dynamics in Brazil, India, the Middle East, and South Africa from the World Inequality Database (WID.world). We combine tax data, household surveys, and national accounts in a systematic manner to produce estimates of the distribution of income, using concepts coherent with macroeconomic national accounts. We document an extreme level of inequality in these regions, with top 10 percent income shares above 50 percent of national income. These societies are characterized by a dual social structure, with an extremely rich group at the top, whose income levels are broadly comparable to their counterparts in high-income countries, and a much poorer mass of the population below top groups. We discuss the diversity of regional contexts and highlight two explanations for the levels observed: the historical legacy of social segregation and modern economic institutions and policies.


2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 261-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Andersen ◽  
Anthony Heath ◽  
David Weakliem

AbstractThis paper examines the relationship between public support for wage differentials and actual income inequality using data from the World Values Surveys. The distribution of income is more equal in nations where public opinion is more egalitarian. There is some evidence that the opinions of people with higher incomes are more influential than those of people with low incomes. Although the estimated relationship is stronger in democracies, it is present even under non-democratic governments, and the hypothesis that effects are equal cannot be rejected. We consider the possibility of reciprocal causation by means of an instrumental variables analysis, which yields no evidence that income distribution affects opinion.


2021 ◽  
pp. 966-981
Author(s):  
Sergey Gennadyevich Kapkanshchikov

The article uses the methodology of systemic global analysis and the theory of systemic cycles of capital accumulation to argue that we are now at a turning point of the modern era in connection with the unfolding change in the dominant world economic order. Based on the methodological approach, within the framework of which there is a hegemonic country and the rest of the world, the forecast regarding the forthcoming multipolarity of the world economy is rejected. Various stages of capital and financial expansion with their inherent, respectively, dirigistic and liberal models of state regulation of the economy are compared to each other. A chronological overview of the Spanish-Genoese, Dutch, British, American and Asian accumulation cycles is presented. The patterns of their change in the course of the formation of new technological structures are revealed. The place of Russia in the process of natural evolution of world economic structures is also identified. The objective and subjective reasons for the longterm hegemony of the United States, as well as factors of the upcoming completion of the American cycle of capital accumulation in the foreseeable future, are revealed. The author outlines the tactics employed by the American authorities to counteract the objective hegemonic cycles. The reasons for the movement of the center of the world economy to the East Asian region are revealed, with the justification of the need for a natural inclusion of Russia in the functioning of the Asian world economic order.


2021 ◽  
pp. 42-49
Author(s):  
M.V. Dubrova

Development institutions are becoming the most important tools for regulating economic activity both in Russia and in the world, through the implementation of social projects, the accumulation of financial resources and their direction to the priority areas of state development. The purpose of the study is to study the financial results of state corporations, in particular development institutions, and their role in providing project financing. The proposed article provides an assessment of the profit of the state corporation «Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Activity» (GC «Vnesheconombank»), emphasizes the specifics of the state corporation as a non-profit organization, and provides recommendations for improving the efficiency of the financial activities of the GC «Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Activity».


Author(s):  
Anthony B. Atkinson ◽  
Andrea Brandolini

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-255
Author(s):  
Hryhorii M. Kalachyhin ◽  

The World Trade Organization (WTO) is one of the leading institutions involved in global economic regulation. Its purposes are to ensure multilateral cooperation on the liberalization of international trade, harmonize existing standards and requirements, and peacefully resolve trade disputes between countries. Since 11 December 2019, dispute resolution has been handicapped due to the consistent blocking of the appointment of members to the WTO Appellate Body (AB) by the United States. This has reduced the multilateral trading system’s (MTS) predictability and threatens its final decay. In this article, the fundamental and formal causes of the collapse are described, and its circumvention mechanisms and effectiveness are discussed. At the same time, an assessment is given of the possibility to overcome the collapse in 2021, considering the change of the U.S. president and other events. Special attention is paid to Russia’s position and its current and potential losses. Finally, the issue of dispute resolution through regional trade agreements is proposed for discussion. The fundamental reasons for the collapse were the shifting balance of power in the world order and the WTO’s inflexibility in adjusting the rulebook and its procedures. The main reasons for the U.S.’ dissatisfaction are objective but based on formalities; the blockage of the AB is an overreaction. Moreover, the U.S.’ position on this issue has not changed with the new president. As a result, there is abuse of the current situation as WTO members file appeals “into the void.” Existing tools to circumvent the collapse are partial and not yet popular among WTO members. Russia needs to resume the AB’s work to complete previously started high-profile disputes and to defend its interests in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document