De-Mobilizing a Mobilized Society
What impact does authoritarianism have on political mobilization? Despite high levels of mass mobilization in the past, Palestinian society today finds itself polarized and demobilized. Concurrently, the Palestinian Authority (PA) has gained control as a governing apparatus, and has become increasingly authoritarian in nature. But, the PA does not have complete control over the territories; its level of control varies based on the Oslo II/Interim Agreements of 1995. This variation in control (over a homogeneous population) allows us to isolate the effect of authoritarianism on mobilization patterns and social dynamics. Using an original dataset and a qualitative assessment of the PA's historical development, I find that mobilization has declined systematically in places where the Palestinian Authority has more direct control. Counter-intuitively, political mobilization today is actually more prevalent in areas under direct Israeli occupation. Findings suggest the PA has a direct role in this dynamic, using selective cooptation and repression. Overall, authoritarian strategies have inhibited social cohesion, and led to a decreased capacity for mobilization.