scholarly journals Molecular and Cellular Basis of Autosomal Recessive Primary Microcephaly

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marine Barbelanne ◽  
William Y. Tsang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Autosomal Recessive ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Disorder ◽  
Primary Microcephaly ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Early Brain Development ◽  
Cycle Regulation ◽  
Autosomal Recessive Primary Microcephaly

Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) is a rare hereditary neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a marked reduction in brain size and intellectual disability. MCPH is genetically heterogeneous and can exhibit additional clinical features that overlap with related disorders including Seckel syndrome, Meier-Gorlin syndrome, and microcephalic osteodysplastic dwarfism. In this review, we discuss the key proteins mutated in MCPH. To date, MCPH-causing mutations have been identified in twelve different genes, many of which encode proteins that are involved in cell cycle regulation or are present at the centrosome, an organelle crucial for mitotic spindle assembly and cell division. We highlight recent findings on MCPH proteins with regard to their role in cell cycle progression, centrosome function, and early brain development.

scholarly journals Phosphorylation of RCC1 on Serine 11 Facilitates G1/S Transition in HPV E7-Expressing Cells

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 995
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Hou ◽  
Lijun Qiao ◽  
Ruijuan Liu ◽  
Xuechao Han ◽  
Weifang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Hpv E7 ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Persistent infection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) plays a causal role in cervical cancer. Regulator of chromosome condensation 1 (RCC1) is a critical cell cycle regulator, which undergoes a few post-translational modifications including phosphorylation. Here, we showed that serine 11 (S11) of RCC1 was phosphorylated in HPV E7-expressing cells. However, S11 phosphorylation was not up-regulated by CDK1 in E7-expressing cells; instead, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway promoted S11 phosphorylation. Knockdown of AKT or inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway down-regulated phosphorylation of RCC1 S11. Furthermore, S11 phosphorylation occurred throughout the cell cycle, and reached its peak during the mitosis phase. Our previous data proved that RCC1 was necessary for the G1/S cell cycle progression, and in the present study we showed that the RCC1 mutant, in which S11 was mutated to alanine (S11A) to mimic non-phosphorylation status, lost the ability to facilitate G1/S transition in E7-expressing cells. Moreover, RCC1 S11 was phosphorylated by the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in HPV-positive cervical cancer SiHa and HeLa cells. We conclude that S11 of RCC1 is phosphorylated by the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and phosphorylation of RCC1 S11 facilitates the abrogation of G1 checkpoint in HPV E7-expressing cells. In short, our study explores a new role of RCC1 S11 phosphorylation in cell cycle regulation.

Pyk2 and FAK differentially regulate progression of the cell cycle

2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (17) ◽  
pp. 3063-3072 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zhao ◽  
C. Zheng ◽  
J. Guan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Expression System ◽  
Chimeric Protein ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Erk Activation ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Cycle Regulation

We have previously identified FAK and its associated signaling pathways as a mediator of cell cycle progression by integrins. In this report, we have analyzed the potential role and mechanism of Pyk2, a tyrosine kinase closely related to FAK, in cell cycle regulation by using tetracycline-regulated expression system as well as chimeric molecules. We have found that induction of Pyk2 inhibited G(1) to S phase transition whereas comparable induction of FAK expression accelerated it. Furthermore, expression of a chimeric protein containing Pyk2 N-terminal and kinase domain and FAK C-terminal domain (PFhy1) increased cell cycle progression as FAK. Conversely, the complementary chimeric molecule containing FAK N-terminal and kinase domain and Pyk2 C-terminal domain (FPhy2) inhibited cell cycle progression to an even greater extent than Pyk2. Biochemical analyses indicated that Pyk2 and FPhy2 stimulated JNK activation whereas FAK or PFhy1 had little effect on it, suggesting that differential activation of JNK by Pyk2 may contribute to its inhibition of cell cycle progression. In addition, Pyk2 and FPhy2 to a greater extent also inhibited Erk activation in cell adhesion whereas FAK and PFhy1 stimulated it, suggesting a role for Erk activation in mediating differential regulation of cell cycle by Pyk2 and FAK. A role for Erk and JNK pathways in mediating the cell cycle regulation by FAK and Pyk2 was also confirmed by using chemical inhibitors for these pathways. Finally, we showed that while FAK and PFhy1 were present in focal contacts, Pyk2 and FPhy2 were localized in the cytoplasm. Interestingly, both Pyk2 and FPhy2 (to a greater extent) were tyrosine phosphorylated and associated with Src and Fyn. This suggested that they may inhibit Erk activation in an analogous manner as the mislocalized FAK mutant (Δ)C14 described previously by competing with endogenous FAK for binding signaling molecules such as Src and Fyn. This model is further supported by an inhibition of endogenous FAK association with active Src by Pyk2 and FPhy2 and a partial rescue by FAK of Pyk2-mediated cell cycle inhibition.

scholarly journals Regulation of Steroid Hormone Receptors and Coregulators during the Cell Cycle Highlights Potential Novel Function in Addition to Roles as Transcription Factors

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. nrs.14001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingfeng Zheng ◽  
Leigh C. Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Steroid Receptors ◽  
Steroid Hormone ◽  
Steroid Hormone Receptors ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Cell cycle progression is tightly controlled by several kinase families including Cyclin-Dependent Kinases, Polo-Like Kinases, and Aurora Kinases. A large amount of data show that steroid hormone receptors and various components of the cell cycle, including cell cycle regulated kinases, interact, and this often results in altered transcriptional activity of the receptor. Furthermore, steroid hormones, through their receptors, can also regulate the transcriptional expression of genes that are required for cell cycle regulation. However, emerging data suggest that steroid hormone receptors may have roles in cell cycle progression independent of their transcriptional activity. The following is a review of how steroid receptors and their coregulators can regulate or be regulated by the cell cycle machinery, with a particular focus on roles independent of transcription in G2/M.

scholarly journals Structure of the human TIMP-3 gene and its cell cycle-regulated promoter

1995 ◽  
Vol 311 (2) ◽  
pp. 549-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Wick ◽  
R Härönen ◽  
D Mumberg ◽  
C Bürger ◽  
B R Olsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Alternative Polyadenylation ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Physiological Processes ◽  
Cycle Regulation

The gene encoding tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 (TIMP-3) is regulated during development, mitogenic stimulation and normal cell cycle progression. The TIMP-3 gene is structurally altered or deregulated in certain diseases of the eye and in tumour cells. A detailed knowledge of the TIMP-3 gene and its regulatory elements is therefore of paramount importance to understand its role in development, cell cycle progression and disease. In this study, we present the complete structure of the human TIMP-3 gene. We show that TIMP-3 is a TATA-less gene, which initiates transcription at one major site, is composed of five exons and four introns spanning a region of approximately 30 kb, and gives rise to three distinct mRNAs, presumably due to the usage of alternative polyadenylation signals. Using somatic cell hybrids the TIMP-3 locus was mapped to chromosomal location 22q13.1 We also show that the TIMP-3 5′ flanking region is sufficient to confer both high basal level expression in growing cells and cell cycle regulation in serum-stimulated cells. While the first 112 bases of the promoter, which harbour multiple Sp1 sites, were found to suffice for high basal level activity, the adjacent region spanning positions -463 and -112 was found to be a major determinant of serum inducibility. These results provide an important basis for further investigations addressing the role of TIMP-3 in physiological processes and pathological conditions.

Abstract W P198: Sphingomyelin Synthases Regulate Neuronal Cell Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Umadevi V Wesley ◽  
Daniel Tremmel ◽  
Robert Dempsey
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Neuronal Cell ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cerebral Artery Occlusion

Introduction: The molecular mechanisms of cerebral ischemia damage and protection are not completely understood, but a number of reports implicate the contribution of lipid metabolism and cell-cycle regulating proteins in stroke out come. We have previously shown that tricyclodecan-9-yl-xanthogenate (D609) resulted in increased ceramide levels after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). We hypothesized that D609 induced cell cycle arrest probably by inhibiting sphingomyelin synthase (SMS). In this study, we examined the direct effects of SMS on cell cycle progression and proliferation of neuroblast cells. Methods: Ischemia was induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and reperfusion. Expression levels were measured by western blot analysis, RT-PCR, and Immunofluorescence staining. SMS1 and 2 expressions were silenced by stable transfection with SMS1/2-targeted shRNA. Cell cycle analysis was performed using Flow cytometry. Data were analyzed using MODFIT cell cycle analysis program. Cell proliferation rate was measured by MTT assay. Results: We have identified that the expression of SMS1is significantly up-regulated in the ischemic hemisphere following MCAO. Neuro-2a cells transfected with SMS specific ShRNA acquired more neuronal like phenotype and exhibited decreased proliferation rate. Also, silencing of both SMS1 and 2 induced cell-cycle arrest as shown by significantly increased percentage of cells in G0/G1 and decreased proportion of cells in S-phase as compared to control cells. This was accompanied by up-regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitors p21 and decreased levels of phophorylated AKT levels. Furthermore, loss of SMS inhibited the migratory potential of Neuro 2a cells. Summary: Up-regulation of SMS under ischemic/reperfusion conditions suggests that this enzyme potentially contributes to cell cycle regulation and may contribute to maintaining neuronal cell population. Further studies may open up a new direction for identifying the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle regulation and protection following ischemic stroke

scholarly journals Babam2 Regulates Cell Cycle Progression and Pluripotency in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells as Revealed by Induced DNA Damage

Biomedicines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
Cheuk Yiu Tenny Chung ◽  
Paulisally Hau Yi Lo ◽  
Kenneth Ka Ho Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Gamma Irradiation ◽  
Cellular Senescence ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Regulation

BRISC and BRCA1-A complex member 2 (Babam2) plays an essential role in promoting cell cycle progression and preventing cellular senescence. Babam2-deficient fibroblasts show proliferation defect and premature senescence compared with their wild-type (WT) counterpart. Pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) are known to have unlimited cell proliferation and self-renewal capability without entering cellular senescence. Therefore, studying the role of Babam2 in ESCs would enable us to understand the mechanism of Babam2 in cellular aging, cell cycle regulation, and pluripotency in ESCs. For this study, we generated Babam2 knockout (Babam2−/−) mESCs to investigate the function of Babam2 in mESCs. We demonstrated that the loss of Babam2 in mESCs leads to abnormal G1 phase retention in response to DNA damage induced by gamma irradiation or doxorubicin treatments. Key cell cycle regulators, CDC25A and CDK2, were found to be degraded in Babam2−/− mESCs following gamma irradiation. In addition, Babam2−/− mESCs expressed p53 strongly and significantly longer than in control mESCs, where p53 inhibited Nanog expression and G1/S cell cycle progression. The combined effects significantly reduced developmental pluripotency in Babam2−/− mESCs. In summary, Babam2 maintains cell cycle regulation and pluripotency in mESCs in response to induced DNA damage.

scholarly journals Regulation of KAT6 Acetyltransferases and Their Roles in Cell Cycle Progression, Stem Cell Maintenance, and Human Disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (14) ◽  
pp. 1900-1907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu Huang ◽  
Susan M. Abmayr ◽  
Jerry L. Workman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferase ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Stem Cell Maintenance ◽  
Lysine Acetyltransferase ◽  
Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Maintenance

The lysine acetyltransferase 6 (KAT6) histone acetyltransferase (HAT) complexes are highly conserved from yeast to higher organisms. They acetylate histone H3 and other nonhistone substrates and are involved in cell cycle regulation and stem cell maintenance. In addition, the human KAT6 HATs are recurrently mutated in leukemia and solid tumors. Therefore, it is important to understand the mechanisms underlying the regulation of KAT6 HATs and their roles in cell cycle progression. In this minireview, we summarize the identification and analysis of the KAT6 complexes and discuss the regulatory mechanisms governing their enzymatic activities and substrate specificities. We further focus on the roles of KAT6 HATs in regulating cell proliferation and stem cell maintenance and review recent insights that aid in understanding their involvement in human diseases.

The direct and indirect effects of corticosterone and primary adipose tissue on MCF7 breast cancer cell cycle progression

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaniv Shpilberg ◽  
Michael K. Connor ◽  
Michael C. Riddell
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Indirect Effects ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Direct And Indirect Effects ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Regulation

AbstractBreast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Glucocorticoids (GCs) have the potential to directly affect breast cancer or indirectly via changes to the tumor growth microenvironment a breast cancer is exposed to. The role of GCs in breast cancer progression by direct and indirect means are not fully understood.To study the direct and indirect effects of GCs on breast cancer cell cycle regulation.MCF7 breast cancer cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of corticosterone (CORT) to investigate the direct effects. In addition, MCF7 cells were cultured in conditioned media (CM) from primary adipose tissue excised from CORT-supplemented lean and obese male rats.CORT alone resulted in dose-dependent increases in p27 and hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (Rb) which was accompanied by a reduction in the number of cells in S-phase. CM prepared from adipose tissue overrode these direct CORT effects, suggesting that the tumor growth microenvironment created in the CM dominates MCF7 cell cycle regulation.The direct inhibitory effects of CORT on cancer cell cycle progression are largely limited by the hormone’s effects on adipose tissue biology.

scholarly journals Dynamic SUMO modification regulates mitotic chromosome assembly and cell cycle progression in Caenorhabditis elegans

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Pelisch ◽  
Remi Sonneville ◽  
Ehsan Pourkarimi ◽  
Ana Agostinho ◽  
J. Julian Blow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Sumo Protease ◽  
Sumo Conjugation ◽  
Centromeric Protein ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Abstract The small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO), initially characterized as a suppressor of a mutation in the gene encoding the centromeric protein MIF2, is involved in many aspects of cell cycle regulation. The dynamics of conjugation and deconjugation and the role of SUMO during the cell cycle remain unexplored. Here we used Caenorhabditis elegans to establish the contribution of SUMO to a timely and accurate cell division. Chromatin-associated SUMO conjugates increase during metaphase but decrease rapidly during anaphase. Accumulation of SUMO conjugates on the metaphase plate and proper chromosome alignment depend on the SUMO E2 conjugating enzyme UBC-9 and SUMO E3 ligase PIASGEI-17. Deconjugation is achieved by the SUMO protease ULP-4 and is crucial for correct progression through the cell cycle. Moreover, ULP-4 is necessary for Aurora BAIR-2 extraction from chromatin and relocation to the spindle mid-zone. Our results show that dynamic SUMO conjugation plays a role in cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Tell the Difference Between Mitosis and Meiosis: Interplay Between Chromosomes, Cytoskeleton, and Cell Cycle Regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masamitsu Sato ◽  
Yasutaka Kakui ◽  
Mika Toya
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
The Past ◽  
Recent Advancement ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Cycle Regulation ◽  
Mitosis And Meiosis

Meiosis is a specialized style of cell division conserved in eukaryotes, particularly designed for the production of gametes. A huge number of studies to date have demonstrated how chromosomes behave and how meiotic events are controlled. Yeast substantially contributed to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of meiosis in the past decades. Recently, evidence began to accumulate to draw a perspective landscape showing that chromosomes and microtubules are mutually influenced: microtubules regulate chromosomes, whereas chromosomes also regulate microtubule behaviors. Here we focus on lessons from recent advancement in genetical and cytological studies of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, revealing how chromosomes, cytoskeleton, and cell cycle progression are organized and particularly how these are differentiated in mitosis and meiosis. These studies illuminate that meiosis is strategically designed to fulfill two missions: faithful segregation of genetic materials and production of genetic diversity in descendants through elaboration by meiosis-specific factors in collaboration with general factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document