Abstract
Rationale: Rituximab dosing in pediatric patients is derived from body surface area-based “standard” adult lymphoma regimens. PK data for rituximab in children are lacking.
Methods: We evaluated serum rituximab levels in a subset of 36 children and adolescents with severe cITP treated on a prospective phase I/II study. Patients received four weekly infusions, 375mg/m2/dose. Trough and 30-minute, 24- and 48-hour (hr) post-infusion levels were obtained with doses 1 and 4, and 7 days after dose 1. PK parameters were obtained separately for each patient at the 1-wk and 4-wk infusions by fitting a two-compartment model. Two-factor analysis of variance was employed to compare parameters between younger (2–9 years) and older (10–18 years) subjects and between responders and non-responders at the two infusion times.
Results: Fourteen patients had PK measurements at week 1 and eleven at week 4 (Table). The median initial volume of distribution (V1), for all patients, calculated by back-extrapolation to t0, approximated plasma volume, 53 mL/kg. Kinetics fit a two-component model, with relatively rapid initial half-time (exit) reflecting distribution out of plasma space, and equilibration representing slow return into the vascular pool. The drug elimination half-time was too slow to observe in these 7-day periods. Apparent half-time for initial redistribution from the plasma space was significantly longer for younger subjects at week 4 than at week 1 and than for older subjects at week 4 (Table). By comparison, in studies of 14 adults with lymphoma treated with rituximab at the same dosage regimen, the manufacturer reports mean serum half-time of 76 hrs (range, 31–153) at week 1 and 205 hrs (range, 84 – 407) at week 4. In this PK sub-study, we found no significant difference in kinetic parameters between the 5 responders (defined by sustained platelet count >50,000/mm3 at week 12) and 11 non-responders.
Conclusion: In this small number of pediatric patients with cITP treated with 4 weekly infusions of rituximab, the half-time was longer for younger subjects at week 4 than week 1 and than for older subjects at week 4. Trough levels at week 4 do not represent steady state because the elimination half-time is long. The reason for the difference between the two age cohorts is not readily apparent, but we propose that the shorter exit half-time in younger patients at week 1 compared to week 4 corresponds to a higher number of initially accessible CD20 binding sites (B cells) in young children.
PK parameters of rituximab distribution at weeks 1 and 4 Age (yr) Week 1 n Week4 n Median (min, max) Median (min, max) *Age x week interaction significant in two-way analysis of variance, p<0.015 V1 (mL/kg) All 53 (35–76) 14 54 (35–74) 11 2–9 54 (43–76) 7 62 (54–74) 4 10–18 52 (35–73) 7 49 (35–62) 7 Exit Half-time (hr) All 49 (16–83) 14 83 (25–193) 11 2–9 45 (31–55) 7 100 (83–193)* 4 10–18 57 (16–83) 7 57 (25–97) 7
The Difference in English Proficiency Between Tourism and Engineering Students of Two Asian Universities
