Extra-abdominal fibromatosis: Can aggressive management be avoided in a subgroup of patients?
10077 Background: The objective was to evaluate the impact of surgery as first-line treatment on event -free survival (EFS) of primary aggressive fibromatosis. Methods: Treatments were categorized into: surgery with or without radiotherapy and non surgical strategies with systemic treatment alone or wait and see policy. Event-free survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The sex ratio was 39 males/73 females. The median age at the time of the first diagnosis was 30 years. The median size of the primary was 60 mm. Eighty-nine patients (79.5%) had initial resection of their primary tumor followed by postoperative radiotherapy in 13 cases. Twenty-three patients (20.5%) did not undergo surgery but received systemic treatment or watch and wait policy. Median follow-up was 76 months. Three years EFS was 49%. In the univariate analysis, patients with microscopically complete surgery had a similar outcome to that of patients in the non-surgery group (65% vs 68% for 3-yr EFS respectively). Gender, age, tumor size, treatment period and strategy (surgery versus no surgery) were not statistically significant. Quality of resection according to margins and the tumor site were the only prognostic factors. There was a significant correlation between the tumor site and the quality of surgery (p= 0.0002). Tumor site was the only prognostic factor that remained in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Surgical removal as initial treatment was not found to influence the outcome. A subset of patients could be managed with a non aggressive policy. When surgery is finally necessary, it should be performed with the aim of achieving negative margins. Predictive biological factors influencing tumor evolution have to be defined No significant financial relationships to disclose.