Do irinotecan (IRI) dose reductions driven by UGT1A1*28 genotyping prevent IRI-related severe neutropenia? A real-world study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16116-e16116
Author(s):  
Nicola Personeni ◽  
Rossana Mineri ◽  
Angelica Michelini ◽  
Silvia Bozzarelli ◽  
Tiziana Pressiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

e16116 Background: IRI is widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers. Consistent with current guidelines, UGT1A1 genotyping may drive IRI dose reductions, but the usefulness of this approach is still unclear. We assessed potential clinical variables that may predict grade ≥3 neutropenia and more specifically the upfront genotyping of UGT1A1 polymorphisms associated with IRI toxicity, according to predefined IRI dose reductions. Methods: We genotyped UGT1A1*28 polymorphisms in 247 patients with metastic colorectal, gastric and pancreatic cancers who received second or third-line IRI-based chemotherapy in clinical practice at a single academic center. Concomitant DPYD sequencing was undertaken in 179 patients receiving also fluoropyrimidines. We compared the incidence of severe neutropenia with full-dose IRI in UGT1A1 6/6 and 6/7 carriers, and in UGT1A1 7/7 carriers who underwent initial IRI dose reductions by at least 30%. Results: The incidence of UGT1A1 7/7, 6/7, 6/6 genotypes was 11.3%, 51.4%, and 37.2%, respectively. IRI dose reductions were significantly more frequent with UGT1A 7/7 and 6/7 genotypes (odds ratio [OR] = 9.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.3-21.7), and combination chemotherapy (OR = 3.8; 95%CI: 1.3 – 11.1). Other clinical parameters, including sex, cancer type, baseline neutrophils levels, performance status were not significantly associated with IRI dose reductions. Despite initial IRI reductions driven by the UGT1A1 panel, patients with UGT1A1 7/7 genotype had an increased, albeit non-significant, risk of grade ≥3 neutropenia, compared to patients with UGT1A1 6/6 and 6/7 genotypes who received full dose IRI (incidence: 39% versus 21%; OR = 2.4; 95%CI: 0.85 – 7.03). Conclusions: UGT1A1 testing is a determinant of IRI dose reductions, however this strategy does not reduce the burden of grade ≥3 neutropenia in UGT1A1 7/7 carriers. Further studies beyond the UGT1A1*28 genotype are needed to fully understand the increased risk of neutropenia in patients candidate to IRI-based chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Chamberlain ◽  
Sheima Farag ◽  
Constance Williams-Sharkey ◽  
Cecilia Collingwood ◽  
Lucia Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Background Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as third line treatment for metastatic GIST. Dose limiting toxicities are frequently seen and many patients require dose reductions. This study aimed to evaluate regorafenib toxicities and their management in a real-world GIST population. Methods Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 50 patients with GIST treated with regorafenib at our centre between March 2013 and September 2018. Results Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8–14.4 months]. Median overall survival (OS) from start of regorafenib to death or last follow up was 15.7 months (IQR 9.2–28.4 months). Baseline median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on starting regorafenib was 1. The main reason for discontinuing regorafenib was progressive disease (PD) (31/50 [62%]) rather than toxicity (10/50 [20%]). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 23/50 (46%) patients; palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was most frequently seen (9/50 (18%)). Two patients died whilst on treatment with regorafenib from multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis (4%). Dose reductions were required in 19/50 patients (38%) and 8/50 (16%) patients started regorafenib at a lower dose band than the recommended dose (160 mg) due to comorbidities or concern over a higher individual risk of toxicity. Conclusion Although PD was the main reason for discontinuing treatment, toxicity management and dosing of regorafenib remains critical. Median duration of treatment was longer compared to previous studies suggesting a durable clinical benefit with regorafenib with rigorous toxicity management.

Model-based analysis to support dose selection of pevonedistat (PEV) combined with azacitidine (AZA) in patients (pts) with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7042-7042
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Zhou ◽  
Diane R. Mould ◽  
Dan Zhao ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Lionel Adès ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Disease Type ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Population Pharmacokinetic ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Dose Reductions

7042 Background: PEV+AZA has been studied in higher-risk MDS/CMML and AML, with encouraging efficacy and an acceptable safety profile without added myelosuppression. This pooled analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of PEV exposure on safety and efficacy. Methods: Data from three studies (NCT01814826, NCT02782468 and NCT02610777) were used in the PEV exposure–safety analyses, including ≥ grade 3 neutropenia (NEU3), febrile neutropenia (FN), ≥ grade 3 thrombocytopenia, ≥ grade 3 alanine aminotransferase elevation, ≥ grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation and ≥ grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE3), in pts with higher-risk MDS/CMML and AML who received PEV+AZA. Data from NCT02610777 were used for exposure–efficacy analyses, including overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), complete response (CR) and CR+partial response (PR), in pts with higher-risk MDS/CMML who received PEV+AZA. The exposure metrics for individual pts were derived from a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model with pooled data from eight phase 1/2 studies. PEV exposure–safety relationships for the toxicity endpoints, exposure–CR and exposure–CR+PR, were estimated by logistic regression. Age, sex, race, baseline Eastern Cooperate Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status score and disease type were evaluated as covariates. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to evaluate the PEV exposure–survival for higher-risk MDS/CMML, with age, sex, baseline ECOG PS score, Revised International Prognostic Scoring System score (IPSS-R) and disease type as potential covariates. Results: In total, 135 pts (median age, 74 years; male, 64%; Caucasian, 82%) and 41 pts (median age, 74 years; male, 76%; Caucasian, 90%; median IPSS-R, 5.5) were included in PEV exposure–safety and exposure–efficacy analyses, respectively. PEV exposure was significantly related to the incidence of NEU3 ( p = 0.003), FN ( p = 0.02) and TEAE3 ( p = 0.02), supporting PEV dose reductions for pts with treatment-related toxicities. Relationships between PEV exposures and CR, CR+PR, EFS or OS indicated consistent clinical benefit across ranges of PEV exposure following a starting dose of 20 mg/m2. Conclusions: The association between exposure and safety supports PEV dose reductions for pts with treatment-related toxicities. The exposure–efficacy analyses indicated consistent clinical benefit across ranges of PEV exposure following a starting dose of 20 mg/m2. These results support a favorable benefit–risk profile of the 20 mg/m2 PEV dose on days 1, 3 and 5 in combination with AZA 75 mg/m2 for 7 days in 28-day cycles. Clinical trial information: NCT01814826 , NCT02782468 , NCT02610777.

European Post-Approval Safety Study (PASS) of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Safety, Including SPM, in a Large Cohort of Patients Treated with Lenalidomide, Thalidomide, and Bortezomib

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3331-3331
Author(s):  
Barbara Gamberi ◽  
Miguel Hernandez ◽  
Christian Berthou ◽  
Eleni Tholouli ◽  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Noninterventional Study ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Background: EU PASS is an observational, noninterventional study designed to investigate the safety of lenalidomide (LEN) and other agents in the treatment of RRMM in a real-world setting. Aims:To assess the incidence of adverse events (AEs) of special interest, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, venous thromboembolism (VTE), peripheral neuropathy (PN), and second primary malignancies (SPMs) in RRMM patients (pts) treated with LEN and other antimyeloma therapies according to current clinical practice. Methods: Pts with RRMM who were commencing LEN treatment were enrolled at the investigator's discretion into a LEN cohort (LEN + dexamethasone, the approved combination for the treatment of RRMM); pts who received ≥ 1 prior therapy and were commencing a non-LEN-based therapy were enrolled into a background cohort (all other treatments, including novel agents). Thromboprophylaxis was per local standard practice. AEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3). SPMs were defined using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terms under the category Neoplasms SOC. Following protocol amendment in 2011, assessments for SPMs were to be conducted up to 36 mos after treatment discontinuation. Results: As of June 2016, 3632 pts across 269 institutions in 17 European countries were included in the safety population. Of those, 59.2% received LEN (n = 2151), 32.7% received bortezomib (BORT; n = 1188), 3.8% received thalidomide (THAL; n = 137), and 4.3% received other therapies (n = 156). The majority of pts had discontinued from treatment (97.9%; n = 3556); of the 2.1% (n = 76) ongoing pts, 66 are treated with LEN, 6 with BORT, 0 with THAL, and 4 with other substances. Baseline characteristics were similar across the cohorts. Median age was 70 yrs (range, 25-95 yrs) and 54.0% were male. Of 2985 pts with available ECOG data, 2865 (96.0%) had good performance status (ECOG score 0-2), and the remaining 4.0% had an ECOG score of 3/4. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range, 1-6) but was higher in the LEN cohort (2; range, 1-6) than in the BORT (1; range, 1-6) and THAL (1; range, 1-5) cohorts; the proportion of pts with only 1 prior treatment was also lower in the LEN cohort (44.3%), whereas BORT was 70.8% and THAL 56.2%. Overall, 50.7% of pts (n = 1842) had grade 3/4 AEs. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 17.1%, 3.5%, and 4.4% of pts in the LEN, BORT, and THAL cohorts, respectively, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 9.2%, 7.3%, and 3.6%. The incidence rate of SPM was 3.63 per 100 pt-yrs, with 3.18 per 100 pt-yrs in the LEN cohort, 5.23 per 100 pt-yrs in the BORT cohort, 2.73 per 100 pt-yrs in THAL, and 6.48 per 100 pt-yrs in others. AEs of interest of all grades are listed in Table 1. The median duration on study treatment was 6.6 mos (range, 0.1-81.6 mos) for LEN, 4.1 mos (range, 0-63.6 mos) for BORT, and 4.6 mos (range, 0.2-36.9 mos) for THAL. Treatment discontinuation rate due to AEs was similar in each cohort (22.1% in the LEN, 20.0% in the BORT, and 21.2% in the THAL cohorts). In the LEN cohort, dose reductions occurred in 38.1% of pts, with a median time to first dose reduction due to AEs of 12.4 weeks. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to dose reductions were similar across cohorts, with 23.7% in the LEN cohort, 21.4% in the BORT cohort, and 17.5% in the THAL cohort. Conclusions: Results of this noninterventional study in RRMM show that AEs were similar across cohorts except for higher rates of neutropenia and lower rates of PN with LEN compared with THAL or BORT. Higher rates of neutropenia did not translate into increased febrile neutropenia. Infections, independent from neutrophil counts, occurred in all cohorts, but few pts developed serious infections such as pneumonia. VTEs as well as myocardial infarctions were low throughout all cohorts. The occurrence of SPMs was generally low and comparable between cohorts. LEN was generally well tolerated. Disclosures Tholouli: Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; MSD: Speakers Bureau; Giles: Speakers Bureau. Hájek:Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Minnema:Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Jansen Cilag: Consultancy. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Frost Andersen:Celgene: Research Funding. Waage:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis, Amgen, Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Crotty:BMS, Takeda, Novartis, Janssen, Roche: Honoraria. Kueenburg:Celgene International Sarl: Consultancy, Honoraria. Di Micco:Celgene: Employment. Bacon:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

A phase 1 study of daily oral perifosine (P) with every 3-week paclitaxel (T)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13134-13134 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. F. Goggins ◽  
J. J. Nemunaitis ◽  
R. Shiffman ◽  
R. Birch ◽  
D. H. Berdeaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
State Level ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

13134 Background: Perifosine is a novel alkylphospholipid that has been shown to affect multiple signal transduction pathways including Akt, MAPK and JNK (Kondapaka, Mol. Canc. Ther 2: 1093–1103. 2003). Treatment with a taxane initially activates Akt, and persistent activation increases resistance to the drug (Vanderweele, Mol. Canc. Ther. 3: 1605–13, 2004). Methods: Twelve patients (pts) were enrolled on this study. T was given at a dose of 175 mg/m2 on day 8 (after 7 days of perifosine) of a 21 day cycle; this was to obtain a steady state level of P at the tumor before exposure to T. The intent of the protocol was to determine if full dose P could be delivered with 50 mg of perifosine given orally 1, 2 or 3 times a day on days 1–14 of each cycle. Results: Disease sites included lung 3, thyroid 3, breast 1, esophagus 1 and other 4, Median age was 66 (range 45 - 83); 6 pts were male and median ECOG performance status was 1 (range 0–2). All pts had received prior chemotherapy (median 2 regimens); 3 had prior treatment with a taxane. Three pts were entered at each dose level and the cohort expanded to 6 pts if 2 or more pts experienced a grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (DLT) during cycle 1. A dose level was toxic if 4 or more pts experienced a DLT during cycle 1. A total of 30 cycles and a median of 2 cycles (range 1–11) per patient were delivered. There were no grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities. Full dose T was given in all treatment cycles. P dose reductions were required in 6% of cycles (50 mg - 7%, 100 mg - 0%, 150 mg - 7%). One patient missed one dose due to nausea and one pt was stopped due to diarrhea. The grade 3 toxicities for each cohort are given in the table below. The elevated glucose value was 321. Nine pts were evaluable for response; two pts with thyroid cancer had stable disease by the RECIST criteria for 9 and 10+ months. Conclusions: In this study the usual single agent doses of P (150 mg daily) & T (175 mg/m2 q 3 weeks) were given together without increasing the toxicities that would be expected from using each drug alone. Phase II studies are warranted to define activity of the combination. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Baby-step chemotherapy as a way to deliver chemotherapy in poor PS small cell lung cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17500-e17500
Author(s):  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Vijay Patil ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Vamshi Muddu ◽  
Kumar Prabhash
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Low Dose Chemotherapy

e17500 Background: Majority of patients with SCLC present with advanced stage and poor ECOG performance status. Hence delivery of adequate dose of chemotherapy is compromised. We hypothesized that initial low-dose chemotherapy might improve PS and enable administration of standard-dose chemotherapy, thus extending benefit of chemotherapy to otherwise ineligible patients. Methods: 30 patients with ECOG performance status 2-4 received low-dose chemotherapy consisting of either single agent carboplatin at AUC 2 or an abbreviated course of platinum-etoposide. Patients whose PS improved got full-dose chemotherapy with the standard regimen of platinum-etoposide. Demographic details, toxicity, time to progression and overall survival were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors associated with TTP and OS. Results: Median age was 58 years with male predominance. The PS was IV in 9, III in 20 and II in 1 patient. Extensive-stage and limited-stage disease was seen in 24 and 6 patients respectively.15 patients received single-agent carboplatin, 10 patients abbreviated cisplatin-etoposide, 1 patient each cyclophosphamide and cisplatin-etoposide and 3 patients refused chemotherapy. Major grade 3-4 toxicity was mucositis in 1, loose motions in 1 and hyponatremia in 4 patients. There was no grade 3- 4 haematological toxicity. The median number of dose-reduced cycles was 1 and 3 patients received more than 2 cycles. 22 patients were eligible and willing for full-dose chemotherapy. The median time to start of full-dose chemotherapy was 11.5 days (4-26 days). The median number of cycles of standard-dose chemotherapy was 5 (1-6) with 16 completing planned schedule. Grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia in 50%, febrile neutropenia in 25%, loose motions in 25% and hyponatremia in 40%. The overall TTP and OS was 182 days and 263 days respectively. Presence of SIADH (p = 0.02) and completion of standard treatment (p = 0.001) had a positive impact on TTP while completion of treatment (p = 0.01) and normal LDH (p = 0.03) had a positive impact on OS. Conclusions: Low-dose chemotherapy is well-tolerated and might help in extending the benefit of standard-dose chemotherapy to otherwise ineligible patients.

Use of a multi-drug regimen gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, cisplatin bevacizumab, docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (GFIP/BDC) for heavily pretreated epithelial ovarian (EOC), Fallopian tube (FT) and primary peritoneal (PP) cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17073-e17073
Author(s):  
Melissa Schwartz ◽  
Samantha Cohen ◽  
Peter Remsen Dottino ◽  
Ann Marie Beddoe
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Drug Regimen ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytotoxic Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

e17073 Background: Despite initial response rates to standard platinum-based chemotherapy for EOC/FT/PP, the majority of patients relapse. The purpose of this study was to describe response and tolerability of GFIP/BDC, a modification of the G-FLIP regimen (Bruckner et al), in patients with persistent or recurrent EOC/FT/PP. Treatment consisted of a 2-day combination of gemcitabine 300mg, 5-fluorouracil 500mg/m2, irinotecan 20-30mg/m2, cisplatin 20mg/m2, bevacizumab 4mg/kg, docetaxel 20mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 20mg/m2 administered every 14 days. Methods: A retrospective descriptive analysis of 20 patients from a single academic institution who received combination GFIP/BDC therapy from January 1, 2011 to August 31, 2016 for persistent or recurrent EOC/FT/PP. Toxicities were retrospectively graded using CTCAE v4.0. Results: Twenty patients were identified with a median age 57.5 years (range 32-71). 85% of patients were non-Hispanic white, 90% had cancer of high-grade serous histology, and all had a GOG performance status of 0-1. Patients had received a median of 3 prior regimens and 95% were platinum-resistant. Median number of cycles administered was 9 (range 3-48) and patients remained on treatment for a median of 5.1 months (range 1.5-24). Thirteen patients (65%) experienced a clinical response (1 complete, 12 partial) with a median duration of 5 months (range 1.5-20). Eight patients (45%) survived progression free for at least 6 months. Grade 3 adverse events were hematologic (5), constitutional (3), gastrointestinal (3), neurologic (2), and vascular (1). Grade 4 adverse events included severe neutropenia (1) and anaphylaxis (1). Thirteen patients (65%) experienced at least one grade 3/4 adverse event. Patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression 65% (13), toxicity 20% (4), patient preference 10% (2), and one patient (5%) is currently on treatment. Conclusions: Selected EOC/FT/PP patients who have failed multiple lines of conventional cytotoxic treatment may benefit from GFIP/BDC. Toxicity might be a limiting factor for administration.

Cisplatin (Cis)/etoposide (VP16) compared to cis/irinotecan (CPT11) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (E-SCLC): Pharmacogenomic (PG) and comparative toxicity analysis of JCOG 9511 and SWOG 0124

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7524-7524 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lara ◽  
M. Redman ◽  
H. Lenz ◽  
M. Gordon ◽  
T. Shibata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
North American ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Toxicity Analysis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Performance

7524 Introduction: J9511 demonstrated a significant survival benefit for Cis/CPT11 over Cis/VP16 in Japanese patients (pts) with E-SCLC (Noda, et al. NEJM 2002). S0124 is the confirmatory North American phase III trial (accrual completed) using the identical J9511 protocol. We hypothesized that toxicities would differ between North American & Japanese pts due in part to differences in the distribution of genetic polymorphisms involved in chemotherapy metabolism. Methods: Toxicity data were compared among 706 pts enrolled in J9511 & S0124 receiving common treatment using a logistic model adjusted for age, sex, and performance status (PS). Select polymorphisms of the UGT1A1, ABCB1, & OATP genes in genomic DNA were evaluated in 142 pts in S0124 only (67 Cis/CPT11; 75 Cis/VP16). Associations between toxicity & genotype within each arm were assessed using logistic regression. Results: Pt demographics for J9511 & S0124 respectively: Mean age − 61 & 62 years; Male sex − 131 (86%) & 315 (57%); PS 0 − 19 (13%) & 173 (31%); PS>0 − 133 (87%) & 372 (68%). Comparative toxicities (≥ grade 3) are summarized ( table ). PG analysis in S0124 pts: ABCB1 (C3435T) T/T was associated with an increased risk of CPT11 grade 3+ diarrhea (p=0.04) versus C/C and C/T. UGT1A1 (G3156A) A/A was associated with increased risk of CPT11 neutropenia (p=0.009) & leukopenia (p=0.05). UGT1A1*28 TA7, typically associated with increased CPT11 toxicity, was seen in only 4 pts (2 Cis/CPT11; 2 Cis/VP16); thus no correlation was done. No gene tested was associated with VP16 toxicity. Conclusions: Significant differences in treatment-related myelosuppression exist between J9511 and S0124 pt populations. Certain polymorphisms in genes involved in CPT11 metabolism are significantly associated with CPT11 toxicities in S0124. Additional analyses are ongoing. These results support the hypothesis that toxicities may be associated with distribution of genetic polymorphisms. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]

Tolerability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in elderly (older than age 65) patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 296-296
Author(s):  
D. Niedersuess-Beke ◽  
B. Gruenberger ◽  
T. Puntus ◽  
W. Bauer ◽  
M. Lamche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Palliative Radiotherapy ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Muscle Invasive

296 Background: Urothelial cancer (UC) is a common tumor with a peak in the seventh decade. Locally advanced disease has a significant risk for developing metastases. Neoadjuvant, platinum-containing, combination chemotherapy improves survival over radical cystectomy (RC). Chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) shows equivalent efficacy with less toxicity to methotrexate-vinblastine-doxorubicin- cisplatin (MVAC) in metastatic setting. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 23 elderly pts (8 female, 15 male) with a median age of 72 years, WHO performance status 0/1, with muscle invasive UC who received neoadjuvant GC (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 and cisplatin 70 mg/m2, day 2 q28) for 3 cycles between 2006 and 2010 prior to RC. Assessments included toxicity of GC, pathologic response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 21 (91.3%) out of 23 pts finished intended chemotherapy. Two refused chemotherapy due to personal reasons. According to CTCAE guidelines 43.5% developed grade 3 hematologic toxicities; 13% developed grade 4 thrombopenia. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included nausea in 2 patients. In 2 (8.7%) pts grade 4 thromboembolic events occurred. There was no treatment related febrile neutropenia or death. 15 (71.4%) of the pts underwent RC. 5 (23.8%) pts refused RC due to personal reasons. 1 of them agreed second look TURB. 1 patient underwent palliative radiotherapy due to progression of disease. Out of the 16 pts 43.75% achieved pathological response (18.75% pT0 stage and 25% pT1 stage). 56.25% had muscle invasive UC. 18.75% of them nodal positive disease. All 7 pts achieving < pT2 pathologic stage remained progression-free at a median follow up of 16 months. Pts > pT2 stage had a median PFS of 14 months. Median OS was not reached yet. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant GC is a well tolerated regiment in elderly pts and it seems to be less toxic than MVAC. Prophylactic anticoagulation during treatment should be considered. Although pathologic response is lower than in previously published retrospective data we recommend neoadjuvant treatment with GC in elderly pts. [Table: see text]

Treatment outcome and safety of docetaxel as the third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer after progression or after failure of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI-based sequential chemotherapy.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 133-133
Author(s):  
I. Hwang ◽  
J. Kang ◽  
B. Park ◽  
S. Park ◽  
M. Jang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
The Third ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

133 Background: We performed multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the activity and the safety of a docetaxel as the third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients who had undergone oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and irinotecan (FOLFIRI)-based chemotherapy regimens. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with AGC previously treated were eligible for this study. Patients received docetaxel 30 mg/m2 +/- cisplatin 30 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 or docetaxel 60 mg/m2 +/- cisplatin 60 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks until disease progression, and responses were assessed after every two cycles according to RECIST criteria and toxicity was evaluated by NCI-CTC. Results: Thirty-two out of 38 patients were evaluable for response. A total of 95.1 cycles of chemotherapy (median 2, range 0.5–7) were administered. Relative dose intensities of docetaxel and cisplatin were 93.4% and 87.8%, respectively. The overall response rate was 15.6% and the disease control rate was 50%. With a median follow-up duration of 3.1 months (range 0.3-14.3 months), 36 patients had disease progression, and 34 patients had died at the time of analysis. The median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.3–2.3 months). The median overall survival was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.3–3.9 months). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in thirteen patients (38.3%), febrile neutropenia in four patients (11.7%). and thrombocytopenia in one patient (2.9%). Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neuropathy in three patients (8.8%) and mucositis in two patients (5.9%). There were three treatment-related deaths (8.8%) caused by infection associated with neutropenia. Conclusions: Salvage docetaxel chemotherapy in AGC patients failed in oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based treatment is not recommend routinely. However, selected patients with good performance status and sufficient albumin levels may have derived some survival benefits from salvage chemotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Factors associated with acute toxicity during chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 734-734
Author(s):  
Pooja Monpara ◽  
Scott Rice ◽  
Talha Shaikh ◽  
Jeffrey M. Farma ◽  
Elin R. Sigurdson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Acute Toxicity ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

734 Background: Acute toxicity may be a factor interfering with receipt of chemoradiation (CRT) therapy for rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and treatment factors associated with increased acute toxicity in patients receiving CRT therapy for rectal cancer. Methods: We identified patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with CRT between 2006-2014 at an NCI-designated cancer center. Patients with metastatic disease or missing treatment information were excluded. Acute toxicity information including weight loss, pain, fatigue, constipation, diarrhea, anorexia, and performance status was extracted from weekly on treatment visit notes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess predictors of grade 3+ toxicity using covariates significant on univariable analysis. Results: A total of 148 patients were included with a median age of 59 (range 29-99). The majority of patients were male (55%) and received 5-FU based chemotherapy (82%). During CRT, 35 (24%) patients experienced at least one grade 3+ toxicity: 13 (9%) patients experienced grade 3+ fatigue, 1 (1%) experienced grade 3+ constipation, 11 (7%) experienced grade 3+ diarrhea, 14 (10%) experienced grade 3+ pain, and 11 (7%) experienced grade 3+ anorexia. Eight (5.4%) patients had an ECOG performance status > 3 and 28 (19%) patients had weight loss > 5 lbs during CRT. On multivariable analysis, increased distance from the anal verge (OR 0.78 95% CI 0.636-0.998) was associated with a decreased risk for grade 3+ pain and age > 75 was associated with an increased risk of grade 3+ anorexia (OR 6.07 95% CI 1.067-34.56). Clinical T4 disease was associated with an increased risk of weight loss > 5 lbs (OR 0.17 95% CI 0.100-0.446). On multivariable analysis, there were no factors associated with grade 3+ fatigue, diarrhea, or constipation. There were no factors associated with a decline in performance status to > 3 while on treatment. Conclusions: Our results suggest that rectal cancer patients who are older, have more advanced disease, or with low lying tumors may be at an increased risk for treatment-related toxicity. Identifying predictors of toxicity may allow for tailored interventions to minimize toxicity for these patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document