PELAKSANAAN IZIN USAHA SECARA ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI UPAYA PENINGKATAN INVESTASI DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-116
Author(s):  
Syifa Al Huzni ◽  
Yoghi Arief Susanto

Abstract: The implementation of electronic business licensing with the aim of encouraging and increasing investment in Indonesia. However, the entire process is still not managed online and the sharing of data that has not been integrated between agencies allows the licensing process to still exist and have long obstacles. This study aims to explain the implementation of business providing services in Indonesia according to Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 concerning Electronic Business Licensing Services and explain the obstacles to investment licensing in Indonesia based on PP No. 24 of 2018 concerning electronic licensing services with legal certainty. This research uses a descriptive-analytical method with a normative juridical approach. This study explains that investment licensing in Indonesia has not gone well because there are still obstacles such as aspects of regulation, system, and management. So this does not provide legal certainty guarantees to investors who will carry out investment activities in Indonesia. It is hoped that this research will provide a solution to the problem of investment and investment licensing in Indonesia.Abstrak: Penyelenggaraan perizinan berusaha secara elektronik oleh pemerintah dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mempercepat dan meningkatkan penanaman modal di Indonesia. Namun seluruh proses masih belum diurus secara online dan data sharing yang belum terintegrasi antar instansi mengakibatkan proses perizinan masih menemui hambatan dan birokrasi yang panjang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan implementasi layanan pemberian izin berusaha di Indonesia menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2018 tentang Pelayanan Perizinan Berusaha Secara Elektronik, dan menjelaskan hambatan perizinan investasi di Indonesia berdasarkan PP No. 24 tahun 2018 tentang pelayanan perizinan berusaha secara elektronik hubungannya dengan asas kepastian hukum. Pada penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan implementasi perizinan investasi di Indonesia belum berjalan baik, karena masih terdapat hambatan-hambatan seperti aspek regulasi, sistem, dan tata laksana. Sehingga hal tersebut belum memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum kepada investor yang akan melakukan aktivitas investasi di Indonesia. Diharapkan melalui penelitian ini dapat memberikan solusi terhadap masalah perizinan investasi dan penanaman modal di Indonesia. 

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
Cheri Bayuni Budjang

Buying and selling is a way to transfer land rights according to the provisions in Article 37 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration which must include the deed of the Land Deed Making Official to register the right of land rights (behind the name) to the Land Office to create legal certainty and minimize the risks that occur in the future. However, in everyday life there is still a lot of buying and selling land that is not based on the laws and regulations that apply, namely only by using receipts and trust in each other. This is certainly very detrimental to both parties in the transfer of rights (behind the name), especially if the other party is not known to exist like the Case in Decision Number 42 / Pdt.G / 2010 / PN.Mtp


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 251524592092800
Author(s):  
Erin M. Buchanan ◽  
Sarah E. Crain ◽  
Ari L. Cunningham ◽  
Hannah R. Johnson ◽  
Hannah Stash ◽  
...  

As researchers embrace open and transparent data sharing, they will need to provide information about their data that effectively helps others understand their data sets’ contents. Without proper documentation, data stored in online repositories such as OSF will often be rendered unfindable and unreadable by other researchers and indexing search engines. Data dictionaries and codebooks provide a wealth of information about variables, data collection, and other important facets of a data set. This information, called metadata, provides key insights into how the data might be further used in research and facilitates search-engine indexing to reach a broader audience of interested parties. This Tutorial first explains terminology and standards relevant to data dictionaries and codebooks. Accompanying information on OSF presents a guided workflow of the entire process from source data (e.g., survey answers on Qualtrics) to an openly shared data set accompanied by a data dictionary or codebook that follows an agreed-upon standard. Finally, we discuss freely available Web applications to assist this process of ensuring that psychology data are findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Bagus Gede Ari Rama Bagus Gede Ari Rama ◽  
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan

Audiobook access for people with disabilities is very important. Access is the convenience that people get from a service. This study aims to analyze the legal certainty and legal protection of audiobook copyright access for blind people with disabilities. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and comparative approach. This research found that access to audiobooks' works has been regulated in the Marrakech Treaty, Copyright Act Number 28 of 2014 and Government Regulation Number 27 of 2019. Akses karya cipta audiobook bagi disabilitas sangat penting. Aksesibilitas merupakan kemudahan yang didapat oleh orang terhadap suatu layanan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum serta perlindungan hukum akses karya cipta audiobook bagi disabilitas tuna netra. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan komparatif. Dalam penelitian ini menemukan bahwa akses karya cipta audiobook telah diatur dalam Traktat Marrakesh, UUHC 2014 serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 2019.


Author(s):  
Wensy F.I. Rompas

ABSTRAKPajak Restoran adalah pajak atas pelayanan restoran. Pemugutan Pajak Restoran di Indonesia saat ini didasarkan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 34 Tahun 2000 yang merupakan peubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 1997 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah dan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 65 Tahun 2001 tentang Pajak Daerah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui prosedur pelaksanaan pemungutan pajak restoran di Kabupaten Minahasa dan mengetahui kontribusi pajak restoran  terhadap pendapatan Asli Daerah di Kabupaten Minahasa. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah  data kuantitatif  berupa data pajak Restoran di Dinas Pengelola Keuangan, Aset dan Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Minahasa. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis deskripsi. yaitu untuk menggambarkan menganalisis hasil dari penelitian yang telah dilakukan. Penelitian menunjukan bahwa prosedur pelaksanaan pemungutan pajak telah berjalan baik dan mudah untuk dipahami serta bukti potong pembayaran dapat diberikan kepada wajib pajak. Tetapi setiap terjadi perubahan peraturan, petugas pemungut pajak dalam hal ini pemerintah daerah terlambat dalam mensosialisaikannya kepada wajib pajak. Sehingga masih ada wajib pajak belum membayarkan pajaknya. Kontribusi pajak restoran terhadap pendapatan asli daerah dapat dikatakan cukup baik walaupun setiap tahunnya mengalami penurunan. Walaupun demikian secara keseluruhan sudah mencapai target yang sudah ditetapkan.Kata kunci : Pemungutan Pajak Restoran dan Pendapatan Asli Daerah.ABSTRAKRestaurant Tax is a tax on restaurant services. Restaurant Tax Collection in Indonesia at this time is based on Law No. 34 of 2000 which is the amendment to Law No. 18 Year 1997 on Regional Taxes and Levies and Government Regulation No. 65 of 2001 on Local Taxes. This study aims to determine the procedure for collection of the tax in Minahasa restaurant and know the tax contribution to earnings original local restaurant in Minahasa. The data used in this research is quantitative data in the form of tax data in the Office business Restaurants Finance, Asset and Revenue Minahasa District. The analytical method used is descriptive analysis. namely to describe analyze the results of the research that has been done. Research shows that the procedure of implementation of tax collection has been going well and easy to understand as well as pieces of evidence of payment can be given to the taxpayer. But any changes in regulations, tax collector officer in this case the local government late in mensosialisaikannya to the taxpayer. So there is still a taxpayer has not paid the tax. Restaurant tax contributions to local revenues can be quite good although each year has decreased. Nevertheless, on the whole has reached the targets set.Keywords: Tax Collection Restaurant and Local Revenue.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Ivandi Setiawan ◽  
Rasji .

PPAT is a public official authorized to make authentic deeds concerning certain legal acts concerning the right to land or the Property Right of the Flats Unit. Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 is the latest regulation made by the government to regulate provisions on PPAT. in Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 in Article 12 paragraph one explained that the scope of work area of PPAT is expanded into one province where in the previous regulation that is government regulation number 37 year 1998 explained that the scope of work of PPAT is only limited to district only. but the fact is now the government regulation number 24 of 2016 has not been applied efficiently, especially in terms of the scope of work of PPAT, it happens because of several factors that hamper causing the loss of effectiveness in Article 12 Paragraph one of Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 . it is of course also contrary to the legal certainty that the public should have legal certainty with the enactment of the government regulation number 24 of 2016 by the government then the regulation should be applicable in the scope of the working area of PPAT should be applicable in practice in the community. contrary to lex posterior derogate legi priori principle which explains that in the same rules the new rules can replace the old rules. the approach used in this study using the approach of law.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Andi Pratono ◽  
Tjempaka Tjempaka

Indonesia is the law of state or law state, as a law state country, Indonesia must have 3(three) important element such as legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Those main elements represent all the law state. In community, people everyday acts always relate to legal act, such as contract, buying or selling object that promised. To ensure those legal act have the ability perfect proof power, those legal act poured in the form of deed. In buying and selling land, a deed of sale and purchase must be made in front authorized official like land deed officer. However land deed officer as public official do make mistake on duty, with the result that party at a disadvantage. Party that loss because of mistake land deed officer, do ask for responsibility by suing the land deed officer to compensate the losses. Land deed officer in carrying out their duties must apply the precautionary principle so as to minimize any mistakes in making the deed. Author is using normative legal research methods, supported by a data which is theory and interviews some expert in land deed officer and Code of Ethics. The legal consequences to the land deed officer due the legal acts are against the law, which is a sanction will be given. The sanction will divided in three types such as sanction according to the Civil Law, Criminal Law and Code of Ethics or Government Regulation about land deed officer.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arabiyani Arabiyani

Pasal 18B ayat (1) UUD Tahun 1945 memberikan legitimasi terhadap Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh yang merupakan hasil kesepakatan Pemerintah Indonesia dengan GAM. Hal ini kemudian dituangkan ke dalam Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh. Permasalahannya adalah materi qanun tersebut dianggap bertentangan dengan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 77 Tahun 2007. Pemerintah Pusat menghendaki perbaiki terhadap beberapa materi qanun, namun pihak Pemerintah Aceh dianggap menyalahi MoU Helsinki. Rumusan masalah kajian ini sebagai berikut: Pertama, apakah landasan pemikiran lahirnya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh? Kedua, apakah akibat hukum dari adanya Pasal 246 ayat (2), dan ayat (4) serta Pasal 247 Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh? Ketiga, apakah akibat hukum adanya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh? Hasil penelitian sebagai berikut: Pertama, menemukan landasan pemikiran lahirnya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh terdiri dari Pasal 18B UUD Tahun 1945 serta perumusan Pasal 246 dan Pasal 247 Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2006. Kedua, bahwa akibat hukum dari adanya Pasal 246 dan Pasal 247 berlaku dan sah untuk diterapkan melalui pembentukannya Qanun Aceh. Ketiga, konsekuensi yuridis adanya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 berlaku secara yuridis dan dapat ditindaklanjuti oleh Pemerintah Aceh karena sudah diundangkan dalam lembaran daerah. Tentu sudah berlaku secara otomatis karena pada saat disahkan oleh Gubernur Aceh selaku Kepala Pemerintah Aceh dan DPRA secara serta merta diundangkan dalam lembaran daerah Pemerintah Provinsi Aceh. Legal Certainty of Qanun Aceh Number 3 Year 2013 On Flag and Symbol of Aceh  The 1945 Constitution Article 18B paragraph (1) gives legitimacy to the Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the Flag and the Symbol of Aceh which is the result of the Government of Indonesia's agreement with GAM. This is then poured into Law Number 11 Year 2006 regarding Aceh Government. The problem is that the Qanun material is considered to be contradictory to Government Regulation Number 77 of 2007. The central government wants to improve on some of the Qanun material, but the Government of Aceh is considered to have violated the Helsinki MoU. The formulation of the problem as follows: First, what is the basis of thinking the formulation of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the flag and the symbol of Aceh? Second, what are the legal consequences of the existence of Article 246 paragraph (2), and paragraph (4) and Article 247, Law Number 11 Year 2006 regarding Aceh Government? Thirdly, what are the legal consequences of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the Flag and the Symbol of Aceh? The results of the research are as follows: First, find the foundation of the thought of the birth of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the Flag and the Symbol of Aceh consists of Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution and the formulation of Article 246 and Article 247 of Law Number 11 Year 2006. Second, the existence of Article 246 and Article 247 is valid and valid to be implemented through the establishment of Aceh Qanun. Thirdly, the juridical consequences of the Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 are valid in juridical manner and can be acted upon by the Government of Aceh as already enacted in the regional slabs. Of course already valid automatically because at the time passed by the Governor of Aceh as Head of the Government of Aceh and DPRA is immediately promulgated in the sheet area of Aceh Provincial Government.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Herlina Hanum Harahap ◽  
Danial Syah

The term of Building Use Rights on Management Rights was initially for 50 years in accordance with the provisions of Article 35 of Act No. 5 of 1960 but with the existence of Article 29 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 2014 to five 5 years. This clearly results in the issue of legal uncertainty for holders of Building Use Rights over Management Rights. The method used is normative juridical, the results of research obtained based on the analysis carried out can be seen that so far the arrangement for extension of Building Use Rights over Management Rights cannot be separated from the provisions of Article 35 of Act No. 5 of 1960, namely 30 years which can be extended with an approved for 20 years, with the provision of Article 29 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 2014 on Management of State and/or Regional Property, it has clearly changed the length of time granting Building Use Rights over Management Rights, namely for five years which can be extended with government approval. The provisions of Article 29 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 2014 on Management of State and/or Regional Property have resulted in legal certainty issues and can harm the holders of Building Use Rights above management rights so that it is clear that the provisions including Verordnung & Autonome Satzung have contradicted the provisions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Indrianti Azhar Firdausi ◽  
Fuqoha Fuqoha

The development of information technology should be maximized by the government in establishing communication and information about policies taken by the government. Thus, good communication will be held in order to achieve the goals of the State without the social upheaval that arises in the community due to policies set by the government. One of the failures of government public communication is the government's failure to explain and socialize the Presidential Regulation Number 20 of 2018 concerning the Use of Foreign Workers who get responses to the pros and cons of all parties, both from the general public and from government opposition. The communication failure gave birth to multi-interpretation from various circles of society and government. Every government regulation or legal policy has functions and objectives in order to achieve the goals of the State. Conception The rule of law guarantees legal certainty, legal benefits and legal justice. The regulation on the use of foreign workers is one form of legal certainty in order to protect opportunities and employment opportunities for citizens of their own country. However, communication failures built by the government resulted in multi-interpretation of policies that were considered to provide convenience for foreign workers and complicate Indonesian employment opportunities.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 340
Author(s):  
Ida Bagus Putra Pratama ◽  
I Made Dedy Priyanto

Research on legal certainty the amount of basic capital establishment of limited liability company based on the norms of conflict between article 32 paragraph (1) of the limted liability company law concerning "the limited liability company capital of at least Rp 50,000,000.00" with article 1 paragraph (3) of government regulations The limited liability of the company's capital of limited liability concerning "the founding capital of the company is determined by agreement”. 2 problem are formulated: (1) What is the form for deposit of stock capital on the provisions of article 33 of the limited liability company law, (2) How is the legal certainty of the number of basic capital of the limited liability After the validity of government regulation change of the limited liability company. This purpose research is finding form of the deposit of stock capital and the basic capital of the limited liability company before and after enforcement of government regulation of limited liability of the company. The legal research method used normative legal research method with statute approach and conceptual approach. Capital deposits of shares can be made in the form of money and other forms of immovable tangible objects such as land and intangible objects in the form of bill of Rights; and arrangements regarding the underlying capital applicable in the establishment of the limited liability company is Article 1 paragraph (3) of government regulation of the limited liability of the company.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document