scholarly journals ISLAH MENURUT HUKUM ISLAM RELEVANSINYA DENGAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DI TINGKAT PENYIDIKAN

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Waluyadi ,
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Matters ◽  
Case Based

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>The purpose of this reseach is to describe the reality of peace at investigation levels,  then compared to islah according to Islamic law as the reason of criminal removing, to find / to know the relevance. Based on the relevance, it possible become material for the legislators to formulate islah as a model of law enforcement at the level of investigation. This research is the normative research supported by empirical research. The data used was primary and secondary data. Data was collected by means of study documentation and interviews. Data were analyzed quatitatively dan and presented quatitatively. The research showed that the completion of criminal case based on the agreement between perpetrator and victim, along the case have not reached the judge. If the agreement is violated, they agreed to use the formal law. Criminal case which are resolved with peace/islah personalized and value of the loss is relatively small. Islam placing islah as an alternative the completion of criminal matters, along the case have not reached the judge. In the literature and practice, settling disputes with peace  known as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), which is based on Restorative Justice Theory. Al Qur’an has set peace/islah as a model the completion of criminal matters, long before these theories arises.  Peace/ islah in the completion of a criminal case at the level of investigation relevant to satisfy the principle of fast, simple, and inexpensive.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keyword : </em></strong><em>Islah, Islamic Law, Relevance and Investigation</em></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mendeskripsikan realitas perdamaian pada tingkat penyidikan, selanjutnya akan dibandingkan dengan islah menurut hukum Islam sebagai alasan penghapus pidana, untuk diketahui/ ditemukan relevansinya. Berdasarkan relevansi tersebut, dimungkinkan menjadi bahan bagi pembentuk undang-undang  untuk menformulasikan islah sebagai model penegakan hukum pidana pada  tingkat penyidikan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif  yang didukung dengan penelitian  empiris. Data yang digunakan mencakup data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data  dilakukan dengan cara studi dokumentasi dan wawancara. Data dianalisis secara kualitatif dan disajikan secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan penyelesaian perkara pidana dengan perdamaian pada tingkat penyidikan mendasarkan kesepakatan pelaku dan korban. Apabila kesepakatan itu dilanggar, mereka sepakat untuk menggunakan hukum formal. Perkara pidana yang diselesaikan dengan perdamaian/ islah, bersifat personal dan nilai kerugiannya relatif kecil. Islam menempatkan perdamaian/islah sebagai alternatif penyelesaian perkara pidana, sepanjang perkara tersebut belum sampai ke tangan hakim. Dalam literatur dan praktik,  penyelesaian perkara dengan perdamaian disebut <em>Alternative Disput Resolution </em>(ADR) yang mendasarkan pada teori <em>Restorative Justice. Al-Qur’an </em>telah menetapkan Perdamaian/ Islam sebagai model penyelesaian perkara pidana, jauh sebelum teori-teori itu muncul<em>. Perdamaian/ Islah  </em>dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana ditingkat penyidikan, relevan untuk pemenuhan asas cepat, sederhana dan biaya ringan.</p><p><strong>Kata Kunci: </strong>Islah, Hukum Islam, Relevansi dan Penyidikan</p>

Advancing of Restorative Justice in Criminal Law in India and Germany: A Comparative Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-112
Author(s):  
Mehak Bajpai
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Informal Settlement ◽  
Plea Bargaining ◽  
Guiding Principle ◽  
Primary Focus ◽  
Criminal Matters ◽  
New Discovery

The need for alternative dispute resolution and its importance is not a new discovery. Various kinds of informal agreements existed throughout the world when Alternative Dispute Resolution was not legally recognized as such. It first, however, was employed only in civil cases, and criminal justice system was exempted from it. The state undertook the responsibility to impose sanctions (which is very much the case even now) in criminal matters and the idea of informal settlement in these cases arrived much later globally. This article seeks to put some light on two systems, that is, India’s accusatorial system and Germany’s inquisitorial system of trial, and how both the countries have gradually come up with alternative dispute resolution techniques, with the primary focus being the victim–offender mediation programmes (VOMPs) and plea bargaining. The article shall give an overview of the guiding principle behind these programmes, that is, restorative justice and further trace the historical development and the present situation in both the countries. This is a comparative analysis which shall put forth the best out of both and give suggestions to improve the existing situation, while taking learning lessons from both the countries.

scholarly journals Restorative Justice in Settling Minor Criminal Disputes in Ponorogo, East Java: An Islamic Law Perspective

MAZAHIB ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hifdhotul Munawaroh
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Women And Children ◽  
Crimes Against Women ◽  
Level Of Understanding ◽  
The Village

This article aims at examining the viability of a village court as an alternative settlement of minor criminal disputes in the district of Mlarak, Ponorogo, East Java. Among the cases resolved through restorative justice are petty theft, juvenile delinquencies, crimes against women and children, and public order disruption. The village court has used mediation among the disputants in the search of a consensus without harming each party. The consensus achieved signifies the return of balance in the community which has been damaged by the offenses. This makes dispute resolution through mediation and customary justice in line with the concept of Restorative Justice. However, there are obstacles in the resolution of cases through mediation. This includes: first, there are no regulations governing village justice procedures so that the mediation and village justice procedures differ from one village to another. Second, the determination of sanctions for minor criminal offenses is perceived to have not deterred some of the perpetrators. This is evidenced by the repetition of criminal acts committed by the perpetrators which, thus, has created public unrest. Third, the level of understanding of community leaders towards the law is still lacking. This has resulted in discrepancies in settling the disputes. From the Islamic law perspective, the settlement of a dispute by means of the village justice is in accordance with the Sharia. It constitutes the implementation of al-shulh system and ta‘zīr concept in the provision of punishment for the perpetrators Keyword: Restorative Justice, al-Sulh, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Minor Criminal Disputes

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pengusaha Sewa Menyewa Kendaraan Bermotor yang Dirugikan oleh Konsumen pada Perusahaan Paulus Rental Bike Kabupaten Badung

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 234-238
Author(s):  
Philipus Dian Anjaraka ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Business Owners ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Inhibiting Factor ◽  
Litigation Process

The development of the motor vehicle industry sector is currently growing rapidly both domestically and imported from abroad so that in this business such as manufacturers, dealers and traders of vehicles competing with each other to provide facilities to consumers in order to increase turnover trading. In this research, it discusses efforts to resolve disputes between business owners who are harmed by consumers in the non-litigation process, and analyzes the obstacles that occur in the resolution of such disputes. The method used in this study is the empirical research method. The data used are primary and secondary data. The results showed that efforts to resolve disputes between business owners, especially motor vehicle leasing when harmed by consumers, were carried out by non-litigation, namely by using an alternative dispute resolution outside the court with mediation and negotiation mechanisms to the tenants who had apologized by returning the money agreed by both parties. In addition, the inhibiting factor in efforts to resolve disputes between business owners who are disadvantaged by consumers in the dispute resolution process is the rule of law factor. In this case because the loss is classified in the civil realm, it requires time to prove the loss that must get legality from the court. Not only the rule of law, but also law enforcement factors that process cases for so long and slow respond.

KONSEP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MELALUI MEDIASI PENAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA BERMOTIF RINGAN PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT KAMPUNG KUALA GASIB DI KECAMATAN KOTO GASIB KABUPATEN SIAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
ELMA YANTI
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Direct Participation ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Differences Of Opinion ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

The settlement of criminal offenses with mild motives can be carried out by reasoning penal mediation called the restorative justice approach, which focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and the community. The research that use in this study is sociological legal research (social legal research). The concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of a mildly criminal case for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak, was carried out with the intermediary of the headman. Headman as customary village heads and as government administrators have an important role in creating peace efforts in resolving disputes that occur in the community, one of which is through the settlement of criminal cases by reasoning penal mediation with the concept of restorative justice. The constraints of the concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of mildly criminal cases for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak are: a) The absence of a special law mediation of regulation, b) Lack of facilities and infrastructure in mediating, c) Lack of mediator skills for village head to reconcile the parties to the dispute, d) There are differences of opinion among law enforcement officials about the concept of restorative justice through penal mediation

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN MEDIASI PADA PENYELESAIAN PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KUNINGAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Fitri Purnamasari, Diding Rahmat Dan Gios Adhyaksa
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Negotiation Process ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Thesis Writing

AbstractThe author conducted this research with the background of the implementation of Mediation in Kuningan Religious Court in Kuningan. The purposes of writing this paper are to know how the Implementation on Divorce Settlement in Kuningan Religious Court and to know the factors that affect the success of mediation in the Kuningan Religious Court. The method used in this research is with empirical juridical approach using primary data and secondary data and data collection techniques are interviews, observation and literature study. The results of this research are the mediation arrangements set out in the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA ) Number 1 Year 2016 about Mediation Procedures in Courts and more specifically stipulated in the Decree of the Chief Justice Number 108 / KMA / AK / VI / 2016 on Mediation Governance at the Court. Mediation is the means of dispute resolution through the negotiation process to obtain agreement of the Parties with the assistance of the Mediator. Mediator is a Judge or any other party who has a Mediator Certificate as a neutral party assisting Parties in the negotiation process to see possible dispute resolution without resorting to the disconnection or enforcement of a settlement. Its implementation has been regulated in Law Number 1 Year 1974 about concerning Marriage, Compilation of Islamic Law, and Supreme Court RegulationNumber 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedure in Court. The conclusion of this thesis writing is Mediation which should be one of the alternative process of dispute settlement which can give greater access to justice to the parties in finding satisfactory dispute settlement and to fulfill the sense of justice, and become one of the effective instrument to overcome the problem of case buildup especially for the case Divorce, in the end has not been effectively implemented.Keywords: Mediation, Divorce, Marriage.�AbstrakPenulis melakukan penelitian ini dengan latar belakang yaitu bagaimana pelaksanaan Mediasi pada Pengadilan Agama Kuningan. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana Pelaksanaan pada Penyelesaian Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kuningan dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana faktor-faktor yang memepengaruhi keberhasilan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kuningan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris dengan menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder serta alat pengumpulan data yang digunakan melalui wawancara, observasi dan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pengaturan mediasi diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan dan lebih spesifik diatur dalam Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 108/KMA/AK/VI/2016 tentang Tata Kelola Mediasi di Pengadilan. Mediasi adalah cara penyelesaian sengketa melalui proses perundingan untuk memperoleh kesepakatan Para Pihak dengan dibantu oleh Mediator. Mediator adalah Hakim atau pihak lain yang memiliki Sertifikat Mediator sebagai pihak netral yang membantu Para Pihak dalam proses perundingan guna mencari berbagai kemungkinan penyelesaian sengketa tanpa menggunakan cara memutus atau memaksakan sebuah penyelesaian. Pelaksanaannya telah di atur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkwinan, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, dan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Kesimpulan dari penulisan skripsi ini adalah Mediasi yang seharusnya menjadi salah satu alternatif proses penyelesaian sengketa yang dapat memberikan akses keadilan yang lebbesar kepada para pihak dalam menemukan penyelesaian sengketa yang memuaskan dan mmemenuhi rasa keadilan, serta menjadi salah satu instrumen efektif mengatasi masalah penumpukan perkara khususnya untuk perkara perceraian, pada akhirnya belum efektif dilaksanakan.Kata Kunci : Mediasi, Perceraian, Perdata

scholarly journals PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATION OF RELIGIOUS COURT COMPETENCE TOWARDS ENCUMBRANCE RIGHT EXECUTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Abd. Shomad ◽  
Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Philosophical Foundation ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
Legal Relationship

Religious court as forefront in economic sharia dispute resolution in litigation has not ideal place to perform their duty since there are still regulation conflicts such as implementation of encumbrance right execution which still becomes a domain in district court. As explained, this article discusses phi-losophical foundation of Religious Court competence to resolve economic sharia issues. In regard to this, conceptual approach, law approach and historical approach are respectively used. Based on the analysis, basic competence of religious court is Islamic personality principle which carries the use of Islamic law elements (sharia principle) in its legal relationship. From the analysis the implication is drawn that as long as a dispute belongs to economic sharia, then it is Religious Court which is com-petent to handle including court decision.Keywords: law enforcement, economic sharia dispute, absolute competence, court decision implementation

SALAH SANGKA DAN PENIPUAN PADA PASAL 27 AYAT (2) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 JO. PASAL 72 AYAT (2) KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM TENTANG PERKAWINAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Muhammad Haka Rahman Hakim ' ◽  
Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni '
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Research ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Study Sites ◽  
Gt Element

<p>Abstract <br />This article aims to examine the correlation about the misunderstood and deception in the in Article 27 <br />paragraph (2) of Law No. 1 of 1974 Jo Article 72 paragraph (2) Compilation of Islamic Law on Marriage. <br />This research is descriptive with qualitative approach which is empirical research. The type of data used <br />is the primary data obtained directly from the study sites and secondary data obtained from the literature <br />materials. Technique of collecting data by interview and document study or library materials.Based on the <br />results of research and discussion, the scope of misclassified into two that is a mistake that there is no <br />element of deliberate and misconceived that there are elements of deliberate. Misunderstandings can be <br />interpreted with a misunderstanding between the bride, but for fraud can be interpreted because of the <br />falsification of identity between husband or wife. Fraud is part of a misunderstanding, but misunderstanding <br />does not necessarily include fraud.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji korelasi tentang ruang lingkup salah sangka dan penipuan pada <br />Pasal 27 ayat (2) Undang-undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 Jo Pasal 72 ayat (2) Kompilasi Hukum Islam <br />tentang Perkawinan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif dengan <br />pendekatan  kualitatif.  Jenis  data  yang  digunakan  adalah  data  primer  yang  diperoleh  langsung  dari <br />lokasi penelitian dan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari bahan pustaka. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian <br />dan pembahasan, ruang lingkup salah sangka digolongkan menjadi dua, yaitu salah sangka yang tidak <br />terdapat unsur kesengajaan dan salah sangka yang terdapat unsur kesengajaan. Salah sangka dapat <br />diartikan dengan kesalah pahaman antara kedua mempelai, namun untuk penipuan dapat diartikan <br />karena adanya pemalsuan identitas antara suami atau istri. Penipuan merupakan bagian dari salah <br />sangka, tetapi salah sangka belum tentu termasuk dari penipuan,perkawinan.<br /><br /></p>

scholarly journals Law enforcement against trade in counterfeit goods using well-known marks (a study in traditional markets in Medan)

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 00001
Author(s):  
Aflah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Counterfeit Goods ◽  
Trade Marks ◽  
Traditional Markets

The illegal use of well-known marks for counterfeit goods is qualified as a criminal act. The act may cause damages to the owner of a well-known mark. The protection of a registered mark and a well-known mark through Law Number 15 Year 2001 on Trade Marks should be able to address issues related to mark infringement. The number of cases of illegal use of well-known marks is high because, in a business, using a well-known mark is more profitable than using own mark. Other factor which influences trade in counterfeit goods using well-known marks is the lack of public legal awareness as consumers, producers and traders. An empirical research method was applied in the research, using primary and secondary data. Maximizing trade in local goods using registered marks is one of effective ways to minimize trade in counterfeit goods using well-known marks in traditional markets in Medan. There are two possible solutions to this problem. The first solution is socializing Law on Marks to local producers, consumers and traders. The second solution is implementing a supporting program to help local producers register their rights to a mark.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa antara Bank Sharî‘ah dengan Nasabah Bermasalah melalui Badan Arbitrase Sharî‘ah Nasional (BASYARNAS) menurut UU No. 30 tahun 1999

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Sulistyowati Sulistyowati
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Arbitration Board ◽  
Strong Emphasis ◽  
The Cost

<p>This study deals with dispute settlement between <em>Bank Syari’ah</em> and its customers through the National Shari’ah Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS). It focuses to elaborate the procedures of dispute settlement between <em>Bank Syari’ah</em> and its customers of financing from the perspective of Islamic law according to Bill No. 30/1999 above law No. 30 year 1999. Based on procedures as mentioned in the bill with regard to arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, Basyarnas, in proofing and resolving cases, has fulfilled the procedures and satisfied the conflicting parties with justice, so there is no need to appeal and reconsideration. This means that Basyarnas has conducted dispute resolution according to the existing procedures. The dispute settlement has also been in accordance with the Qur’ân and other Islamic legal rules which consist of the principles of power and mandate applied by the arbitrator in deciding and resolving the dispute. The board—as an independent institution—has setttled the disputes on the basis of justice for all parties, rejected the act of bribery since the cost is measurable. In addition, Basyarnas also gives strong emphasis on the principle of equality, friendship, consistence and response-bility in resolving disputes.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document